06.11.2013 Views

Habtom PhD Thesis Final.pdf - Silicon in Agriculture

Habtom PhD Thesis Final.pdf - Silicon in Agriculture

Habtom PhD Thesis Final.pdf - Silicon in Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STUDIES ON THE USE OF BIOCONTROL AGENTS<br />

AND SOLUBLE SILICON AGAINST<br />

POWDERY MILDEW OF ZUCCHINI AND ZINNIA<br />

By<br />

<strong>Habtom</strong> Butsuamlak Tesfagiorgis<br />

B.Sc. (Hons) Eritrea, M.Sc. (Natal)<br />

Submitted <strong>in</strong> partial fulfilment of the<br />

requirements for the degree of<br />

Doctor of Philosophy<br />

In the<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology<br />

School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Faculty of Science and <strong>Agriculture</strong><br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal<br />

Pietermaritzburg<br />

Republic of South Africa<br />

December 2008


ABSTRACT<br />

Powdery mildew (PM) is an important foliar disease of many crops, occurr<strong>in</strong>g under both<br />

greenhouse and field conditions. The application of biological control and soluble silicon (Si)<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st PM has received <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g acceptance as a result of <strong>in</strong>creased environmental and<br />

public concern over the use of fungicides for disease management, and because many key<br />

fungicides are no longer effective because of resistance problems. However, success with<br />

these control options depends on the development of effective antagonists and understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

how best to use Si <strong>in</strong> agriculture.<br />

Potential antagonists of PM were isolated from naturally <strong>in</strong>fected leaves of different plants. A<br />

total of 2000 isolates were tested <strong>in</strong> a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary screen<strong>in</strong>g on detached leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i.<br />

The best 30 isolates show<strong>in</strong>g consistent results were further tested under greenhouse<br />

conditions for their efficacy aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. In a greenhouse trial, 23 isolates provided<br />

disease control to levels of 30 to 77%. Application of 29 isolates resulted <strong>in</strong> significant<br />

reductions <strong>in</strong> values of area under disease progress curve (AUDPC). The best five isolates<br />

were identified as Clonostachys rosea (L<strong>in</strong>k) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & Gams (syn.<br />

Gliocladium roseum) (Isolate EH), Trichothecium roseum (Pers.) L<strong>in</strong>k (syn. Cephalothecium<br />

roseum) (Isolate H20) and Serratia marcescens (Bizio) (Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41).<br />

Three adjuvants (Break-Thru ® (BK), Partner ® (PR) and Tween-80 ® (T-80)) were compared<br />

for their ability to improve efficacy of spray application of silicon (Si) and biocontrol agents<br />

(BCAs) aga<strong>in</strong>st PM. Both BK and PR improved the efficacy of Si significantly (P < 0.05).<br />

Microscopic studies showed that BK affected PM fungi directly and enhanced the deposition<br />

of BCAs on the pathogen. Break-Thru ® was only toxic to the pathogen mycelia when used at<br />

> 0.25 ml l -1 , but phytotoxic to zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants when used at > 0.45ml l -1 . However, it did<br />

not affect the c.f.u. of bacterial BCAs. Use of BK at 0.2-0.4 ml l -1 can be recommended to<br />

assist spray application of Si (at 750 mg l -1 ) or BCAs for improved control of PM.<br />

i


The effect of concentration, frequency of application and runoff of Si sprays applied to the<br />

foliage was evaluated for control of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. <strong>Silicon</strong> (250-1000 mg l -1 ) + BK<br />

(0.25 ml l -1 ), was sprayed onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants at frequencies of 1-3 wk -1 . Spray<strong>in</strong>g Si<br />

reduced the severity of PM significantly (P < 0.05). Regardless of the concentration of Si, the<br />

best results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed when the frequency of the treatment was <strong>in</strong>creased, and when spray<br />

drift or spray runoff were allowed to reach the rhizosphere of the plants. When Si was applied<br />

onto leaves, direct contact between the spray and the pathogen resulted <strong>in</strong> mycelial death. Part<br />

of the spray (i.e., drift and runoff) was absorbed by plant roots, and subsequently played an<br />

important role <strong>in</strong> the health of the plants. If affordable, soluble Si should be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />

nutrient solutions of hydroponics or supplied with overhead irrigation schemes when PM<br />

susceptible crops are grown.<br />

Under greenhouse conditions, application of BCAs, with or without Si, reduced the severity<br />

and development of PM significantly (P < 0.001). Application of Si significantly reduced the<br />

severity and AUDPC values of PM (P < 0.05 for both parameters). <strong>Silicon</strong> alone reduced the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al disease level and AUDPC values of PM by 23-32%, and improved the efficacy of most<br />

BCAs. In the course of the <strong>in</strong>vestigation, antagonistic fungi consistently provided superior<br />

performances to bacterial isolates, provid<strong>in</strong>g disease control levels of up to 90%. Higher<br />

overall disease levels reduced the efficacy of Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, but did not affect the efficacy of<br />

BCAs.<br />

Under field conditions, Si alone reduced disease by 32-70%, Isolate B15 reduced disease by<br />

30-53% and Isolate B15 + Si reduced disease by 33-65%. Other BCAs applied alone or<br />

together with Si reduced the disease level by 9-68%. Most BCAs reduced AUDPC values of<br />

PM significantly. For most antagonists, better efficacy was obta<strong>in</strong>ed when Si was drenched<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the rhizosphere of the plant. However, efficacy of some of the BCAs and Si were affected<br />

by environmental conditions <strong>in</strong> the field. Repeated trials and better understand<strong>in</strong>g of how to<br />

use Si and the BCAs, <strong>in</strong> terms of their concentration and application frequency, and their<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions with the plant and the environment, are needed before they can be used for the<br />

commercial control of PM.<br />

ii


Elemental analysis was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the impact of differ<strong>in</strong>g application levels of<br />

silicon (Si) <strong>in</strong> a form of potassium silicate (KSi) <strong>in</strong> solution <strong>in</strong> terms of Si accumulation and<br />

selected elements <strong>in</strong> different tissues of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia and growth of these plants, and to<br />

study the effect of PM on the levels of selected elements <strong>in</strong> these two plant species. Plants<br />

were grown <strong>in</strong> re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g nutrient solutions supplied with Si at different concentrations and<br />

elemental composition <strong>in</strong> different parts were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g EDX and ICP-OES. Increased<br />

levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the solution <strong>in</strong>creased the levels of Si <strong>in</strong> leaves and roots of both plants without<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g its distribution to other plant parts. In zucch<strong>in</strong>i, the roots accumulated the highest<br />

levels of Si, substantially more than <strong>in</strong> the shoots. In contrast with z<strong>in</strong>nia, accumulation of Si<br />

was highest <strong>in</strong> the leaves. Accumulation of potassium (K) <strong>in</strong> shoots of both plants <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

with <strong>in</strong>creased levels of KSi <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution. However, K levels <strong>in</strong> flower of z<strong>in</strong>nia,<br />

fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and roots of both plants rema<strong>in</strong>ed unaffected. Increased level of Si reduced<br />

accumulation of calcium (Ca) <strong>in</strong> both plants.<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution at 50 mg l -1 resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased growth of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased uptake of P, Ca, and Mg by both plant species. However, application of higher<br />

levels of Si did not result <strong>in</strong> any further biomass <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> zucch<strong>in</strong>i. Levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the<br />

nutrient solution had no effects on elemental composition and characteristics of the fruits of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i. In both plant species, the presence of PM on the leaves of plants resulted <strong>in</strong> these<br />

leaves accumulat<strong>in</strong>g higher levels of Si and Ca, but less P, than leaves of un<strong>in</strong>fected plants<br />

exposed to the same levels of soluble Si. The highest concentrations of Si were observed <strong>in</strong><br />

leaf areas <strong>in</strong>fected with PM, and around the bases of trichomes. For optimum disease control<br />

and maximum accumulation of different elements <strong>in</strong> these two plants, hydroponic applications<br />

of Si at 50-150 mg l -1 is recommended.<br />

Five selected biocontrol agents and potassium silicate, used as source of soluble Si, were<br />

tested under hydroponic conditions at various concentrations aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

(Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum (DC) Gelyuta, V.P.). Application of BCAs resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

reductions <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al disease level and AUDPC values of PM by 38-68% and 30-65%,<br />

iii


espectively. Both severity and AUDPC values of PM were reduced by 87-95% when plants<br />

were supplied with Si (50-200 mg l -1 ). It is proposed that the provision of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

supply of Si and the ability of this plant species to accumulate high levels of Si <strong>in</strong> its leaves<br />

were the major reasons for the good response of z<strong>in</strong>nia to Si treatments aga<strong>in</strong>st PM. <strong>Silicon</strong><br />

played a protective role before <strong>in</strong>fection and suppressed development of PM after <strong>in</strong>fection.<br />

The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the best selected BCAs and Si can be used as an effective control option<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia when grown <strong>in</strong> hydroponic system.<br />

iv


DECLARATION<br />

I, <strong>Habtom</strong> Butsuamlak Tesfagiorgis, declare that<br />

i. The research reported <strong>in</strong> this thesis, except where otherwise <strong>in</strong>dicated, is my orig<strong>in</strong>al work.<br />

ii. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or exam<strong>in</strong>ation at any other university.<br />

iii. This thesis does not conta<strong>in</strong> other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

unless specifically acknowledged as be<strong>in</strong>g sourced from other persons.<br />

iv. This thesis does not conta<strong>in</strong> other persons’ writ<strong>in</strong>g, unless specifically acknowledged as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then:<br />

a) their words have been re-written but the general <strong>in</strong>formation attributed to them has been<br />

referenced;<br />

b) where their exact words have been used, their writ<strong>in</strong>g has been placed <strong>in</strong>side quotation<br />

marks, and referenced.<br />

v. Where I have reproduced a publication of which I am an author, co-author or editor, I have<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> detail which part of the publication was actually written by myself alone and<br />

have fully referenced such publications.<br />

vi. This thesis does not conta<strong>in</strong> text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet,<br />

unless specifically acknowledged, and the source be<strong>in</strong>g detailed <strong>in</strong> the thesis and <strong>in</strong> the<br />

References sections.<br />

Signed:…………………………….<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis (Candidate)<br />

Signed:…………………………….<br />

Prof. M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g (Supervisor)<br />

v


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

I wish to express my s<strong>in</strong>cere appreciation to my supervisor, Prof. M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g, for his<br />

guidance, <strong>in</strong>valuable advice, encouragement and assistance <strong>in</strong> review<strong>in</strong>g and edit<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

thesis.<br />

My thanks are extended to Dr M.J. Morris, for co-supervis<strong>in</strong>g the project and for his valuable<br />

<strong>in</strong>sights and <strong>in</strong>puts.<br />

I also wish to thank my friends, Dr H.H. K<strong>in</strong>fe, Dr M.G. Mengistu and Dr M.W. Bairu, for<br />

their support and encouragement at the crucial periods of this work.<br />

Further thanks go to:<br />

Proseed Pty Ltd, for provid<strong>in</strong>g the facilities to enable me to carry out the field <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

The Department of Chemistry and the Electron Microscopy Unit, UKZN, for provid<strong>in</strong>g me<br />

their facilities to carry out analysis of plant samples.<br />

Dr C. Southway, for his technical advice and guidance dur<strong>in</strong>g the elemental analysis.<br />

The staff and postgraduate students <strong>in</strong> the Discipl<strong>in</strong>es of Microbiology and Plant Pathology for<br />

their assistance, whenever it was needed.<br />

Dr K.S. Yobo and Ms M.P. Mchunu for their assistance and encouragement <strong>in</strong> different parts<br />

of this study.<br />

I am also grateful to PQ Silicas SA, Plant Health Products (Pty) Ltd and National Research<br />

Foundation of SA for their fund<strong>in</strong>g of this research.<br />

Special thanks go to my parents, brothers and sisters for their love, encouragement and for<br />

always be<strong>in</strong>g there and believ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> me.<br />

<strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, my s<strong>in</strong>cere gratitude and thanks to God who makes all th<strong>in</strong>gs possible.<br />

vi


DEDICATION<br />

To Bustuamlak Tesfagiorgis’s family for the support,<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g and spiritual encouragement<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g my studies.<br />

vii


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. i<br />

DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ v<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... vi<br />

DEDICATION .......................................................................................................................... vii<br />

LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. xii<br />

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... xiv<br />

TABLE OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................ xv<br />

INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1<br />

CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Literature Review ....................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Application of biocontrol agents and soluble silicon for the control of powdery mildew ..... 4<br />

1.1 General <strong>in</strong>troduction ......................................................................................... 4<br />

1.2 Powdery mildew ............................................................................................... 6<br />

1.2.1 Taxonomy of powdery mildew pathogens ........................................................ 6<br />

1.2.2 Epidemiology of powdery mildew .................................................................... 7<br />

1.2.3 Symptoms caused by powdery mildew ............................................................. 8<br />

1.2.4 Effects of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> the plant ............................................................ 8<br />

1.2.5 Control strategies .............................................................................................. 9<br />

1.3 Biological control ........................................................................................... 13<br />

1.3.1 Characteristics of a successful biological control agent ................................. 16<br />

1.3.2 Mechanisms of action of biocontrol agents .................................................... 16<br />

1.3.3 Challenges and opportunities <strong>in</strong> the development of biocontrol aga<strong>in</strong>st foliar<br />

diseases ........................................................................................................... 18<br />

1.3.4 Improvement of biocontrol efficacy ................................................................ 19<br />

1.4 Soluble silicon ................................................................................................. 20<br />

1.4.1 Effects of silicon on powdery mildew control ................................................ 20<br />

1.4.2 Effects of silicon on plant growth ................................................................... 21<br />

1.4.3 The role of silicon <strong>in</strong> amelioration of abiotic stresses ..................................... 21<br />

1.4.4 Possible mechanisms of action of silicon ........................................................ 21<br />

1.4.5 Methods of application of soluble silicon ....................................................... 22<br />

1.4.6 Challenges <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g silicon.............................................................................. 23<br />

1.5 Opportunities for the use of biocontrol agents and silicon <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

disease management programme .................................................................... 23<br />

1.6 References ....................................................................................................... 26<br />

CHAPTER TWO ...................................................................................................................... 36<br />

Isolation and <strong>in</strong> vitro screen<strong>in</strong>g of potential biocontrol agents aga<strong>in</strong>st powdery mildew .... 36<br />

Abstract ........................................................................................................... 36<br />

2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 36<br />

2.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................... 38<br />

2.2.1 Collection of samples ...................................................................................... 38<br />

2.2.2 Isolation and cultur<strong>in</strong>g of potential biocontrol agents..................................... 38<br />

viii


2.2.3 Preparation of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong>oculum ...................................................... 39<br />

2.2.4 Screen<strong>in</strong>g of isolates on detached leaves ........................................................ 39<br />

2.2.5 Screen<strong>in</strong>g of isolates on whole plants ............................................................. 40<br />

2.2.6 Data analysis ................................................................................................... 41<br />

2.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 41<br />

2.3.1 Isolation and screen<strong>in</strong>g on detached leaves .................................................... 41<br />

2.3.2 Screen<strong>in</strong>g on whole plants .............................................................................. 44<br />

2.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 48<br />

2.5 References ....................................................................................................... 51<br />

CHAPTER THREE .................................................................................................................. 54<br />

Effects of adjuvants on the control of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i when us<strong>in</strong>g foliar<br />

applications of soluble silicon and selected biocontrol agents ............................................. 54<br />

Abstract ........................................................................................................... 54<br />

3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 55<br />

3.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................... 56<br />

3.2.1 Effects of adjuvants and silicon on powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i .................. 56<br />

3.2.2 Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscop studies on the effects of Break-Thru ® on<br />

Podosphaera xanthii and biocontrol agents.................................................... 57<br />

3.2.3 Biocompatibility test of Break-Thru ® ............................................................. 57<br />

3.2.4 Phytotoxicity test of Break-Thru ® on zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants ..................................... 58<br />

3.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 58<br />

3.3.1 Effects of three adjuvants on powdery mildew control of with silicon .......... 58<br />

3.3.2 Visual and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopic observations on direct impact of<br />

Break-Thru ® on powdery mildew ................................................................... 60<br />

3.3.3 Biocompatibility of Break-Thru ® with biocontrol agents ............................... 63<br />

3.3.4 Phytotoxicity test of Break-Thru ® ................................................................... 66<br />

3.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 66<br />

3.5 References ....................................................................................................... 69<br />

CHAPTER FOUR ..................................................................................................................... 71<br />

Effects of concentration, frequency of application and runoff of foliar-applied silicon on<br />

powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i ................................................................................................. 71<br />

Abstract ........................................................................................................... 71<br />

4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 72<br />

4.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................... 73<br />

4.2.1 Preparation of plants ....................................................................................... 73<br />

4.2.2 Preparation of Podosphaera xanthii for <strong>in</strong>oculation ....................................... 73<br />

4.2.3 Application of soluble silicon ......................................................................... 73<br />

4.2.4 Disease assessment and statistical analysis ..................................................... 74<br />

4.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 74<br />

4.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 78<br />

4.5 References ....................................................................................................... 81<br />

ix


CHAPTER FIVE ...................................................................................................................... 84<br />

Studies on the effects of selected biocontrol agents and soluble silicon on the development<br />

of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i, under greenhouse conditions ............................................ 84<br />

Abstract ........................................................................................................... 84<br />

5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 85<br />

5.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................... 86<br />

5.2.1 Preparion of plants and <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii ...................... 86<br />

5.2.2 Application of biocontrol agents and silicon .................................................. 86<br />

5.2.3 Disease assessment .......................................................................................... 87<br />

5.2.4 Data analysis ................................................................................................... 87<br />

5.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 88<br />

5.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 92<br />

5.5 References ....................................................................................................... 95<br />

CHAPTER SIX ......................................................................................................................... 99<br />

Use of selected biocontrol agents and silicon for the management of powdery mildew of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i under field conditions ............................................................................................ 99<br />

Abstract ........................................................................................................... 99<br />

6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 100<br />

6.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................. 101<br />

6.2.1 Trial site, land preparation and transplant<strong>in</strong>g ................................................ 101<br />

6.2.2 Preparation of Podosphaera xanthii <strong>in</strong>oculum ............................................. 101<br />

6.2.3 Application of biocontrol agents and soluble silicon .................................... 102<br />

6.2.4 Disease assessment ........................................................................................ 102<br />

6.2.5 Statistical analysis ......................................................................................... 102<br />

6.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 103<br />

6.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 108<br />

6.5 References ..................................................................................................... 112<br />

CHAPTER SEVEN ................................................................................................................ 116<br />

Uptake and distribution of silicon <strong>in</strong> zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia, and its <strong>in</strong>teraction with the uptake<br />

of other elements ................................................................................................................. 116<br />

Abstract ......................................................................................................... 116<br />

7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 117<br />

7.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................. 118<br />

7.2.1 Preparation of plants ..................................................................................... 118<br />

7.2.2 Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDX) analysis ................................. 119<br />

7.2.3 Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometers (ICP-OES)<br />

analysis of plant tissues for elemental composisions .................................... 120<br />

7.2.4 Statistical analysis ......................................................................................... 122<br />

7.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 122<br />

7.3.1 Observations from EDX-ESEM analysis and elemental mapp<strong>in</strong>g ............... 122<br />

7.3.2 Results of ICP-OES analysis ......................................................................... 126<br />

7.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 132<br />

7.4 References ..................................................................................................... 139<br />

x


CHAPTER EIGHT ................................................................................................................. 142<br />

Effects of selected biocontrol agents and silicon on powdery mildew of z<strong>in</strong>nia plants grown<br />

hydroponically .................................................................................................................... 142<br />

Abstract ......................................................................................................... 142<br />

8.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 143<br />

8.2 Materials and methods .................................................................................. 144<br />

8.2.1 Preparation of plants ..................................................................................... 144<br />

8.2.2 Design of the hydroponic system .................................................................. 144<br />

8.2.3 Preparation of biocontrol agents ................................................................... 145<br />

8.2.4 Preparation of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong>oculum and <strong>in</strong>oculation technique .......... 145<br />

8.2.5 Disease assessment ........................................................................................ 146<br />

8.2.6 Statistical analysis ......................................................................................... 146<br />

8.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 147<br />

8.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 150<br />

8.5 References ..................................................................................................... 153<br />

CHAPTER NINE .................................................................................................................... 156<br />

General overview .................................................................................................................... 156<br />

9.1 References ....................................................................................................... 163<br />

xi


LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 2.1 Plates show<strong>in</strong>g prelim<strong>in</strong>ary screen<strong>in</strong>g of potential isolates us<strong>in</strong>g detached leaves <strong>in</strong>oculated with<br />

Podosphaera xanthii and treated with biocontrol agents ...............................…………….……………………...43<br />

Figure 2.2 Zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants grow<strong>in</strong>g under greenhouse....………..…………………………………..……………43<br />

Figure 2.3 Efficacy of potential BCAs <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of treatment<br />

under greenshouse conditions…………………...………………………………………………………………...46<br />

Figure 2.4 Effects of selected isolates <strong>in</strong> development of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i represented as area under<br />

disease progress curve (AUDPC) after five weeks of treatment under glasshouse conditions ..………………….47<br />

Figure 3.1 Relationships between adjuvants and Si applied at differ<strong>in</strong>g concentrations on severity (A) and<br />

AUDPC values (B) of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of <strong>in</strong>fection with Podosphaera xanthii …..61<br />

Figure 3.2 Effects of different adjuvants <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with foliarapplied<br />

Si at various concentrations. …………………………………………………………………...…………62<br />

Figure 3.3 Effects of different adjuvants <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g development of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i with foliar-applied Si at<br />

various concentrations after five weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation. AUDPC values are as a % of the untreated control<br />

AUDPC value……………………………………………………………………………………………………...62<br />

Figure 3.4 Plates of PDA show<strong>in</strong>g the effects of Break-Thru ® on mycelia of Isolates EH (A) and H20 (B)…….63<br />

Figure 3.5 In vitro bioassay on the effects of Break-Thru ® mixed with growth medium on growth of BCAs. A:<br />

colony form<strong>in</strong>g units of Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41 after two days of <strong>in</strong>cubation at 30 o C. C.F.U. of Isolates B15<br />

and Y15 were diluted by 10 10 and Isolate Y41 by 10 9 ; B: mycelial growth of Isolates EH and H20 after two<br />

weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation at 25 o C……….……………………………………………………………………………..64<br />

Figure 3.6 Environmental Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopic observations of the effects of Break-Thru® on<br />

Podosphaera xanthii and selected BCAs. A: Conidia and hyphae of the control; Plate 2: Collapsed and<br />

dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated hyphae and conidia of the fungus; C: Hyphae of the fungus stick<strong>in</strong>g to each other; D: Conidia bond<br />

each other and BCAs deposited on top of the fungal structures; E: Enhanced deposition of BCAs on the surface<br />

of the pathogen; F: Trichothecium roseum (Isolate H20) establish<strong>in</strong>g on the hyphae of the pathogen ………..…65<br />

Figure 4.1 Histograms show<strong>in</strong>g the effects of spray<strong>in</strong>g Si on the severity of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i, when<br />

applied at various concentration and frequencies on plants grown under greenhouse conditions <strong>in</strong> open or covered<br />

pots <strong>in</strong> two different trials………………………………………………………………………… ……………...76<br />

Figure 4.2 Relationship between Si concentrations and frequency of sprays applied <strong>in</strong> open or covered pots on<br />

PM control of zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants grown under glasshouse conditions <strong>in</strong> two different trials………………………..77<br />

xii


Figure 5.1 Percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al disease levels of powdery mildew of greenhouse-grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i by five<br />

biocontrol agents and soluble silicon compared to an Untreated Control treatment five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />

with Podosphaera xanthii ………………………………………………………………………………………...90<br />

Figure 5.2 Percentage reduction of the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values of powdery mildew of<br />

greenhouse-grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i by five biocontrol agents and soluble silicon compared to an Untreated Control<br />

treatment, five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii ……………………………………………….91<br />

Figure 6.1 Efficacy of five biocontrol agents and silicon <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the severity of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

after five weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii under field conditions …………..... ………. ……..106<br />

Figure 6.2 Efficacy of five biocontrol agents and silicon <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the AUDPC values of powdery mildew of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii under field conditions .……………………107<br />

Figure 7.1 Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrums of silicon and other elements on leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia plants that received Si treatments of 0 (control), 100 mg l -1 and 100 mg l -1 plus Podosphaera xanthii and<br />

Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum, respectively……………………….. …… ……………………………………...123<br />

Figure 7.2 EDX mapp<strong>in</strong>g of silicon deposition on leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants that received Si treatments<br />

of 0, 100 mg l -1 and 100 mg l -1 plus Podosphaera xanthii and Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum……….……. ….124<br />

Figure 7.3 Scan<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope and EDX mapp<strong>in</strong>g show<strong>in</strong>g silicon deposition of Si at the base of<br />

trichomes of non-<strong>in</strong>fected leaf of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and <strong>in</strong> the leaf conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g structures of the pathogen …………..…..125<br />

Figure 7.4 Effects of Si level <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution on the accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> different parts of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia plants after six weeks of growth <strong>in</strong> a nutrient recirculat<strong>in</strong>g system …..………………..………………...128<br />

Figure 7.5 Effects of concentrations of Si applied <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution on accumulations of K, P, Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong><br />

different parts of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after six weeks of growth <strong>in</strong> a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system……..………………....129<br />

Figure 7.6 Effects of concentration of Si applied <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution on accumulations of K, P, Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong><br />

different parts of z<strong>in</strong>nia after six weeks of growth <strong>in</strong> a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system…………………………..130<br />

Figure 7.7 Effects of <strong>in</strong>fection with powdery mildew fungi on the accumulation of Si, Ca and P <strong>in</strong> different parts<br />

of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants grown <strong>in</strong> a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system for six weeks and supplied with Si at<br />

150 mg l -1 …………………………………………………………………………...……………………………131<br />

Figure 8.1 Horizontal m<strong>in</strong>i troughs and their accessories used to supply nutrient solution to the plants <strong>in</strong> a recirculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system ……………….…………………………………………………………………………..…...145<br />

Figure 8.2 Percentage reductions <strong>in</strong> the disease severity and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) of<br />

powdery mildew of z<strong>in</strong>nia after five weeks of treatment with five biocontrol agents soluble silicon, compared to a<br />

control <strong>in</strong>oculated with Golov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum…………………..…………..………………………149<br />

xiii


LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table 1.1 Lists of some fungicides that have been commonly used for specific reference to target powdery<br />

mildew fungi. .................................................................................................................................................. 11<br />

Table 1.2 Lists of powdery mildew species that have developed resistance to target fungicides .................. 11<br />

Table 1.3 Lists of biocontrol agents that have been tested aga<strong>in</strong>st different species of powdery mildew of<br />

various crops. .................................................................................................................................................. 14<br />

Table 1.4 List of biocontrol products registered and commercially available (developed or be<strong>in</strong>g developed)<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st foliar pathogens. ................................................................................................................................. 15<br />

Table 1.5 Comparison of the benefits and limitations <strong>in</strong> terms of fungicides, silicon and biocontrol agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st plant diseases. ..................................................................................................................................... 25<br />

Table 2. 1 Sites where naturally <strong>in</strong>fected leaves of host plants were collected .............................................. 42<br />

Table 2.2 Effect of selected biocontrol agents on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and AUDPC of powdery mildew<br />

of zucch<strong>in</strong>i plans after 10 d and 5 wk of growth <strong>in</strong> a growth chamber and greenhouse, respectively. ........... 45<br />

Table 3.1 Effects of different adjuvants sprayed with soluble silicon (Si) at various concentrations on f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

disease level of powdery mildew of greenhouse grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of <strong>in</strong>fection with<br />

Podosphaera xanthii. ...................................................................................................................................... 59<br />

Table 3.2 Effects of different adjuvants and soluble silicon, sprayed at various concentrations, on AUDPC<br />

values of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i grown under glasshouse conditions after 5 weeks of <strong>in</strong>fection with<br />

Podosphaera xanthii ....................................................................................................................................... 60<br />

Table 4.1 Analysis of variance show<strong>in</strong>g factorial <strong>in</strong>teractions between concentration, frequency and runoff<br />

of foliar-applied silicon on severity of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. ............................................................ 78<br />

Table 5.1 Effects of selected biocontrol agents and soluble silicon (Si) on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and area<br />

under disease progress curve (AUDPC) of powdery mildew of greenhouse-grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i five weeks after<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii. ........................................................................................................... 89<br />

Table 6.1 Effects of biocontrol agents and silicon on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and AUDPC values of<br />

powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i under field conditions .................................................................................... 105<br />

Table 8.1 Effects of selected biocontrol agents and silicon on the f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and area under<br />

disease progress curve (AUDPC) of powdery mildew of z<strong>in</strong>nia, five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with<br />

Golov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum .................................................................................................................... 148<br />

xiv


TABLE OF ACRONYMS<br />

ANOVA = Analysis of variance<br />

ARC-PPRI = Agricultural Research Council - Plant Protection Research Institute<br />

AUDPC = Area under disease progress curve<br />

BCA(s) = Biological control agent<br />

BK = Break-Thru ®<br />

DDW = De-ionized distilled water<br />

EDX = Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence<br />

ESEM = Environmental scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy<br />

HDPE = High-density polyethylene () bottles<br />

ICP-OES = Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometers<br />

IPM = Integrated pest management<br />

ISR = Induced systemic resistance<br />

NA = Nutrient agar<br />

NB = Nutrient broth<br />

NDA = National Department of <strong>Agriculture</strong><br />

PDA = Potato dextrose agar<br />

PM = Powdery mildew<br />

PR = Partner ® 650<br />

RCBD = Randomized Block Design<br />

SAR = Systemic acquired resistance<br />

T-80 = Tween-80 ®<br />

xv


INTRODUCTION<br />

In the Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, at the University of KwaZulu-Natal is a research team,<br />

called Biocontrol for Africa, which has been develop<strong>in</strong>g research momentum for the last 15<br />

years. As a result, promis<strong>in</strong>g progress is be<strong>in</strong>g made <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g beneficial microorganisms<br />

for disease control and growth stimulation. The development and successful<br />

commercialization of Eco-T ® , a bio-fungicide product us<strong>in</strong>g a selected stra<strong>in</strong> of Trichoderma<br />

harzianum Rifai. reflects the efforts be<strong>in</strong>g undertaken to achieve team goals, to deliver<br />

effective biocontrol products to farmers. The use of soluble silicon aga<strong>in</strong>st biotic and abiotic<br />

stresses of plants has also shown promis<strong>in</strong>g results (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994, Bélanger et al., 1995).<br />

However, the relationships between Si and plants, Si and pathogens, and Si and the soil and<br />

other environmental factors, are not fully understood. In addition, Si is considered as safe and<br />

environmentally friendly. However, the option of us<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>tegrated with application of BCAs<br />

for improved disease control, especially aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, has not previously received much<br />

attention.<br />

As an alternative approach for susta<strong>in</strong>able disease management programme, the application of<br />

Si <strong>in</strong> agriculture is a fast grow<strong>in</strong>g area of <strong>in</strong>terest, and central to our research group. Several<br />

projects are <strong>in</strong> progress to uncover some of the myths of Si <strong>in</strong> agriculture <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

acceptable level of disease control and optimum plant growth, without compromis<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

quality of crop produce, or harm<strong>in</strong>g the environment. The research conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this thesis<br />

reflects part of the ongo<strong>in</strong>g research of the Biocontrol for Africa team.<br />

All the research was conducted at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South<br />

Africa. The ma<strong>in</strong> emphasis of the research was to screen potential biocontrol agents and<br />

evaluate the efficacy of BCAs and silicon aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia caused by<br />

Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) and Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum (DC) Gelyuta, V.P.,<br />

respectively.<br />

1


Research activities <strong>in</strong>cluded isolation of potential antagonists from various plant species that<br />

were naturally <strong>in</strong>fected with powdery mildew (PM), and <strong>in</strong> vitro screen<strong>in</strong>g of these isolates<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. Applications of Si as drenches, sprays and <strong>in</strong> hydroponic nutrient<br />

solution were <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> glasshouse conditions on the severity of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia. The efficacy of the best BCAs and Si applications, plus the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects of these<br />

two treatments aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, was further evaluated under glasshouse and field conditions.<br />

<strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, the impact of Si levels <strong>in</strong> a nutrient solution on elemental uptake by zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia, and the relationship between PM-<strong>in</strong>fection and elemental uptake by both plants was<br />

assessed us<strong>in</strong>g EDX and ICP-OES analysis.<br />

The objectives of this study were to:<br />

1. Review available literature on the use of biocontrol agents and silicon aga<strong>in</strong>st PM plant<br />

diseases;<br />

2. Isolate potential biocontrol agents aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, then evaluate their efficacy under<br />

greenhouse and field conditions;<br />

3. Study the effects of Si levels on PM control applied as drench, foliar treatment and <strong>in</strong><br />

nutrient solution;<br />

4. Understand the mode of action of foliar-applied silicon, and to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of<br />

dosage, frequency and runoff of the spray on PM control;<br />

5. Improve the spray efficiency of Si and BCAs by test<strong>in</strong>g various adjuvants;<br />

6. Evaluate the use of co-application of BCAs and silicon with Break-Thru ® for<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated disease management of PM;<br />

7. Evaluate the effects of Si levels <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution on PM control, plant growth,<br />

quality of produce and nutrient uptake and accumulation by zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia;<br />

8. Study the relationship between PM-<strong>in</strong>fection and elemental uptake by zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia; and<br />

9. Test the efficacy of the best BCAs plus Si on PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia grown hydroponically.<br />

The scope of this thesis is broad, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g n<strong>in</strong>e chapters, each chapter cover<strong>in</strong>g specific<br />

aspect of the research conducted on the use of biocontrol agents and silicon Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM.<br />

Each of these chapters is presented as discrete paper, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> repetition of some references<br />

2


etween chapters. This is the standard format for MSc and <strong>PhD</strong> theses adopted by the<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal. References have been formatted <strong>in</strong> the style of Crop Science.<br />

References<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant biology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the United States of America, 91: 11-17.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: Its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-336.<br />

3


CHAPTER ONE<br />

LITERATURE REVIEW<br />

APPLICATION OF BIOCONTROL AGENTS AND SOLUBLE SILICON FOR<br />

THE CONTROL OF POWDERY MILDEW<br />

1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION<br />

Production of enough palatable and safe food for the world's ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

presents a major challenge to the world’s farmers and agricultural experts. In the last few<br />

decades, agricultural production has <strong>in</strong>creased as a result of an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cultivated land and<br />

the use of agrochemicals for crop production and protection. However, the deterioration <strong>in</strong><br />

productivity of arable lands, coupled with climatic changes is a strong <strong>in</strong>dicator that such<br />

environmentally unfriendly and unsusta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural systems cannot solve the problem<br />

of food shortage <strong>in</strong> the long term. Food security and agricultural susta<strong>in</strong>ability require both<br />

development of new and appropriate technologies and an understand<strong>in</strong>g of the ecosystems <strong>in</strong><br />

which they are to be implemented. The need is for a new type of agriculture, based on<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able production without <strong>in</strong>tense use of fertilizers and pesticides. This would lead to the<br />

development of different production strategies (Campbell, 1989).<br />

In the last 50 years attitudes toward the use of agrochemicals have changed, partly as a result<br />

of pressure from conservationists and consumers, and more recently from organic growers<br />

(F<strong>in</strong>ch, 1992). Agricultural scientists are under pressure to f<strong>in</strong>d solutions for the needs<br />

presented by farmers who want to replace or reduce the use of agrochemicals for their organic<br />

production. Increased awareness of the impact of some agrochemicals to our health is also<br />

shift<strong>in</strong>g consumers to demand products grown with a m<strong>in</strong>imal use of chemicals. A demand for<br />

near zero residues <strong>in</strong> food crops is common <strong>in</strong> members of the Organizasion for Economic Cooperation<br />

and Develeopment (OECD).<br />

4


The use of biological control agents (BCAs) to control powdery mildew (PM) has been<br />

studied extensively. For many years, potential BCAs have been isolated from the phylloplane<br />

and tested for their ability to control PM. The most promis<strong>in</strong>g BCAs have been further<br />

developed and marketed as alternatives to the traditional chemical-based fungicides. Jutsum<br />

(1988) predicted that the global market value of biocontrol products should have a significant<br />

proportion of the market of the total expenditure on crop protection and public health remedies<br />

by 2000. However, the development <strong>in</strong> the use of BCAs has been slower than predicted,<br />

largely due to <strong>in</strong>consistent results <strong>in</strong> different grow<strong>in</strong>g environments, the challenge of mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

biological control of foliar pathogens competitive with agrochemicals (Schippers, 1988) and<br />

excessively difficult registration procedures <strong>in</strong> OECD countries. For example, it currently<br />

takes 5-10 years to get a BCA registered <strong>in</strong> the EU (M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g, 2008, pers. comm.). To<br />

improve this situation, more fundamental knowledge is needed on the biotic and abiotic<br />

factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the population dynamics, survival and antagonistic activity of BCAs <strong>in</strong> the<br />

phylloplane (Campbell, 1989). The successful development of BCAs is likely to depend on a<br />

thorough understand<strong>in</strong>g of the biology and ecology of each pathogen and its antagonists, and<br />

their <strong>in</strong>teractions with other phylloplane <strong>in</strong>habitants. Other biotic and abiotic factors such as<br />

the concentration of the antagonist applied, <strong>in</strong>oculum density of the pathogen, host genotype<br />

and conduciveness of the environment to the disease also affect the survival and activities of<br />

BCAs (Landa et al., 2001).<br />

<strong>Silicon</strong> (Si), be<strong>in</strong>g the second most abundant element on the earth’s crust, is present <strong>in</strong> plants<br />

at 0.1-10% of their dry weight (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994, 1999). Research over the last 40-50 years has<br />

demonstrated that this element can benefit plants by ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g biotic and abiotic stresses.<br />

Significant control of PM, and a consequent <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> plant development and yield, has been<br />

demonstrated by a variety of plants as a result of the application of soluble Si, <strong>in</strong> both<br />

greenhouse and field trials (Bélanger et al., 1995; Bowen et al., 1992; Menzies et al., 1991b;<br />

Remus-Borel et al., 2005; Samuels et al., 1991a & 1994). <strong>Silicon</strong> is safe and environmentally<br />

friendly. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce the level of disease control is related to the amount of Si absorbed by<br />

the plant, more research is needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the optimum concentraion and delivery<br />

methods that can provide acceptable levels of PM control, without compromis<strong>in</strong>g the quality<br />

and quantity of crop products.<br />

5


1.2 POWDERY MILDEW<br />

Powdery mildews are widespread plant diseases that are conspicuous by their superficial white<br />

mycelia and powder-like conidia (Kiss and Szentivanyi, 2001; Yarwood, 1957). They are<br />

mostly host-specific, rang<strong>in</strong>g from a s<strong>in</strong>gle species to a family of plants, and are obligate<br />

parasites that cannot survive without their host plant. Most PM fungi <strong>in</strong>fect only one family of<br />

plants. For <strong>in</strong>stance, the species Podosphaera xanthii, (syn. Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) that<br />

causes PM on the Cucurbitaceae, usually does not attack plants <strong>in</strong> any other family. There is,<br />

however, one report, where a PM of cucumber (P. xanthii) <strong>in</strong>fected a bean plant (Phaseolus<br />

vulgaris) (Kiss and Szentivanyi, 2001). As a group, PM fungi <strong>in</strong>fect many species of plants<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cereals and grasses, vegetables, ornamentals, weeds, shrubs and trees. It is a<br />

common disease of vegetables under both field and greenhouse conditions <strong>in</strong> most areas<br />

worldwide.<br />

1.2.1 Taxonomy of powdery mildew pathogens<br />

Powdery mildew fungi belong to the ascomycete fungi, <strong>in</strong> the order of Erysiphales with only<br />

one family, the Erysiphaceae (Huckelhoven, 2005). They are further subdivided <strong>in</strong>to five<br />

tribes (Erysipheae, Golov<strong>in</strong>omycet<strong>in</strong>ae, Cystotheceae, Phyllact<strong>in</strong>ieae, Blumerieae) and further<br />

sub-tribes, mak<strong>in</strong>g more than 10 genera <strong>in</strong> total (Braun et al., 2002; McGrath, 1996).<br />

Classification of PM fungi is based on: the type of conidiophore, presence or absence of welldeveloped<br />

fibris<strong>in</strong> bodies and mode of conidial germ<strong>in</strong>ation (Sitterly, 1978). For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to these criteria, this author classified major species of PM of Cucurbitaceae <strong>in</strong>to<br />

three genera and six species. These <strong>in</strong>clude: E. cichoracearum (DC ex Mecat); E. polyphaga<br />

Hammarlund; Leveillula taurica (Lev) Arnaud; and S. fulig<strong>in</strong>ea (Schlecht. ex Fr.) Poll. The<br />

genus Leveillula is considered as a synonym for Erysiphe. Among these, E. cichoracearum<br />

and S. fulig<strong>in</strong>ea are the most common and important PM species on cucurbits. On the<br />

ornamental, z<strong>in</strong>nia, E. cichoracearum is the most common pathogen (Boyle and Wick, 1996;<br />

Kamp, 1985). Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea (syn. Podosphaera fusca) has been renamed recently as<br />

Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) (Perez-Garcia et al., 2006; Shishkoff and McGrath, 2002),<br />

6


and E. cichoracearum renamed as Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum (DC) Gelyuta, V.P. (Ke<strong>in</strong>ath<br />

and DuBose, 2004; Kobori et al., 2004)<br />

1.2.2 Epidemiology of powdery mildew<br />

The PM fungi overw<strong>in</strong>ter on plant debris as colonies of mycelium or <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ute brown to black<br />

sexual reproductive structure (cleistothecia) (McGrath and Thomas, 1996; Yarwood, 1957 &<br />

1978). In the spr<strong>in</strong>g, the cleistothecia produce ascospores that can be transported onto<br />

susceptible host tissues by w<strong>in</strong>d or ra<strong>in</strong> splash (Iannotte, 2004). Once a spore (ascospore or<br />

conidium) lands on the host surface, it germ<strong>in</strong>ates with<strong>in</strong> 2-3d and penetrates the host cell wall<br />

with its appressorium. Direct penetration of the host cell by PM fungi <strong>in</strong>volves both enzymatic<br />

and mechanical power (Green et al., 2002 cited by Huckelhoven, 2005). Follow<strong>in</strong>g penetration<br />

of the cell wall barrier, the fungus develops a haustorium (root-like structures) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

epidermal cells of the plant, from which it extracts nutrients through the plasma membrane of<br />

the host (Huckelhoven, 2005).<br />

Severity of PM depends on: the genotype, age and condition of the host plant and prevalent<br />

weather conditions of the grow<strong>in</strong>g season. The most favourable environmental conditions for<br />

PM are dry atmospheric and soil conditions, moderate temperatures, reduced light <strong>in</strong>tensity,<br />

fertile soil and succulent plant growth (Yarwood, 1957). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to McGrath (1996) and<br />

Yarwood (1978), importance of PM <strong>in</strong> different regions varies, based on the above-mentioned<br />

conditions. Generally, <strong>in</strong>cidence of PM <strong>in</strong>creases as ra<strong>in</strong>fall decreases. Unlike most other<br />

fungi, conidia of PM can germ<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> the absence of water at relative humidity below 20%<br />

(McGrath and Thomas, 1996). This is because conidia of PM fungi have high water content<br />

with an extremely efficient water conservation system. In contrast, ra<strong>in</strong> and availability of free<br />

moisture on the surface of the leave are unfavourable conditions for the development of the<br />

disease because they favour the survival and establishment of other microbes that are<br />

antagonists to the pathogen (McGrath, 1996). Increased relative humidity of the air is also<br />

reported to enhance germ<strong>in</strong>ation of PM conidia (Sitterly, 1978). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the same author,<br />

optimum temperature for germ<strong>in</strong>ation of conidia is 23-31 o C, with a peak at 28 o C. The fungus<br />

dies <strong>in</strong> few hours if the temperature rises above 27 o C or drops below 1.1 o C.<br />

7


Powdery mildew is usually more severe under glasshouse than under field conditions. This is<br />

because glasshouses provide reduced air circulation and light <strong>in</strong>tensities as well as higher<br />

temperature and cont<strong>in</strong>uous cropp<strong>in</strong>g, the comb<strong>in</strong>ation that often results <strong>in</strong> severe PM<br />

epidemics (Howard et al., 1994). Incidence of PM <strong>in</strong>creases as relative humidity (RH) rises to<br />

90 %, but it does not occur when leaf surfaces are wet (e.g., <strong>in</strong> a ra<strong>in</strong> shower). This makes the<br />

disease common <strong>in</strong> crowded plant<strong>in</strong>gs, where air circulation is poor, and <strong>in</strong> damp, shaded<br />

areas. Howard et al. (1994) showed that young, succulent growth is usually more susceptible<br />

than older plant tissues. When the optimum environmental conditions are present, the disease<br />

spreads fast, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> production of large numbers of conidia for further cycles of <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

(McGrath, 1996).<br />

1.2.3 Symptoms caused by powdery mildew<br />

The disease is noted with appearance of small, round, whitish, powder-like spots on leaf<br />

surfaces, petioles and stems (McGrath and Thomas, 1996). Symptoms appear first on crown<br />

leaves, on shaded lower leaves and on leaf undersurfaces. These white, powdery colonies<br />

grow <strong>in</strong> size and cover both sides of the leaf, petioles and young stems (Howard et al., 1994).<br />

Older leaves <strong>in</strong>fected with P. xanthii turn a dirty-white with age; while those <strong>in</strong>fected with<br />

G. cichoracearum rema<strong>in</strong> white (Howard et al., 1994). Severely <strong>in</strong>fected leaves become<br />

yellow, turn brown, and fall prematurely (Howard et al., 1994). Fruits rarely show visible<br />

symptoms of PM even <strong>in</strong> the presence of heavy <strong>in</strong>fection.<br />

1.2.4 Effects of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> the plant<br />

Although PM is rarely lethal, it is a major production problem, especially when the prevalent<br />

environmental conditions are ideal for its development (Choi et al., 2004). Severe <strong>in</strong>fection of<br />

plants with PM can causes premature leaf senescence, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> reduced photosynthesis and<br />

transpiration efficiencies by the plant, lead<strong>in</strong>g to stunted and weakened plants (McGrath and<br />

Thomas, 1996). Loss of leaves and vigour <strong>in</strong> ornamental plants, as a consequence of severe<br />

PM <strong>in</strong>fection, make the <strong>in</strong>fected plants unsightly and of little commercial value as ornamentals<br />

(Gombert et al., 2001). The impact of PM on fruit is usually <strong>in</strong>direct because PM hardly ever<br />

<strong>in</strong>fects fruit. However, it reduces the quality and quality of fruit by impair<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

8


photosynthetic rate of the plant. This often results <strong>in</strong> sunburned or prematurely-ripen fruits that<br />

have a low market value (Bélanger et al., 1997). Fruits produced from severely <strong>in</strong>fected plants<br />

are known to have a poor appearance, <strong>in</strong>ferior storage quality and dim<strong>in</strong>ished flavor due to<br />

reduced levels of soluble solids (Ke<strong>in</strong>ath et al., 2000; McGrath and Thomas, 1996). In South<br />

Africa, annual economic loss of R7-8milions was estimated on cucurbits as a result of<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection by PM (Haupt, 2007), and the value of fungicides used to control the disease on<br />

various PM-susceptible crops is estimated to be more than R40million per annum (M.D.<br />

La<strong>in</strong>g, 2004, pers. comm.).<br />

1.2.5 Control strategies<br />

(a) Cultural practices<br />

Any activity that alters the environmental conditions that favour germ<strong>in</strong>ation of the conidia<br />

and survival of the PM fungi can reduce or prevent the disease. Howard et al. (1994)<br />

recommended that lower<strong>in</strong>g plant populations <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>crease air circulation,reduce<br />

relative humidity and m<strong>in</strong>imize shad<strong>in</strong>g. Avoid<strong>in</strong>g excessive nitrogen fertilization can also<br />

reduce disease severity by avoid<strong>in</strong>g succulent growth. In addition, remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fected leaves<br />

and destroy<strong>in</strong>g them, followed by clean<strong>in</strong>g the greenhouse thoroughly after each successive<br />

crop, can m<strong>in</strong>imize spread of the disease and reduce survival of the fungus dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter and<br />

prevent a carry-over of PM from an <strong>in</strong>fected crop to a new crop. Furthermore, s<strong>in</strong>ce the fungus<br />

does not like high leaf wetness for its germ<strong>in</strong>ation, spray<strong>in</strong>g water onto <strong>in</strong>fected leaves every<br />

2-3d can reduce its establishment. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce leaf wetness can cause <strong>in</strong>fection of the plant<br />

by other foliar pathogens, spray<strong>in</strong>g should be commenced early <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

allow the leaf to be dry with<strong>in</strong> 2-3hr (Howard et al., 1994).<br />

(b) Chemical control<br />

If cultural practices fail to prevent or control the disease, application of contact or systemic<br />

fungicides is the most widely used option (McGrath, 1996). Some of the commonly used<br />

fungicides aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of various crops are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 1.1. Some of these fungicides<br />

provide effective control of PM when applied properly. McGrath and Shishkoff (1999)<br />

recommended that once the disease is detected, fungicides should be applied every 7-10d.<br />

9


Fungicide applications made to control PM should be effective aga<strong>in</strong>st more than one disease<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce most crops suffer from several foliar diseases that are caused by more than one fungus<br />

(Ke<strong>in</strong>ath and Du Bose, 2004).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce PM develops on the upper and lower surfaces of the leaf, the spray must cover both<br />

sides for effective control (McGrath, 2001, McGrath et al., 1996). However, these authors<br />

believe that even with modern techniques of spray, it is difficult to directly deliver fungicide to<br />

the lower surface. Hence, the use of translam<strong>in</strong>ar or systemic fungicides is the ultimate choice<br />

for fungicide spray programmes. Unfortunately, because of their s<strong>in</strong>gle-site modes of action,<br />

these types of fungicides have been prone to the development of resistance by the pathogen<br />

(McGrath, 2005).<br />

In spite of some success <strong>in</strong> the use of fungicides for PM management, several researchers have<br />

reported on the development of resistance by PM fungi on multiple crops <strong>in</strong> different parts of<br />

the world (McGrath, 2001; McGrath et al., 1996). In addition, phytoxicity caused by<br />

fungicides may be a problem on some plants. For <strong>in</strong>stance, dur<strong>in</strong>g periods of <strong>in</strong>tense solar<br />

radiation or high temperatures, application of chlorothalonil has been reported to <strong>in</strong>jure mature<br />

watermelon fruit (Holmes et al., 2002). Similarly, Pas<strong>in</strong>i et al. (1997) reported that repeated<br />

use of dodemorph resulted <strong>in</strong> the shorten<strong>in</strong>g of stems of roses and <strong>in</strong>creased selection of<br />

resistant populations of PM. The rate at which populations of PM fungi became resistant to<br />

fungicides has been l<strong>in</strong>ked to repeated use of fungicides with one specific mode of action<br />

(Engels et al., 1996; O’Hara et al., 2000). Some of the PM species that have developed<br />

resistance to fungicides are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1.2.<br />

10


Table 1.1 Lists of some fungicides that have been commonly used for specific reference to target powdery mildew fungi.<br />

Fungicide (active <strong>in</strong>gredient) Crop Target Pathogen Reference(s)<br />

azoxystrob<strong>in</strong> melon Podosphaera xanthii Romero et al., 2007<br />

azoxystrob<strong>in</strong>, benomyl, chlorothalonil, mancozeb, watermelon P. xanthii Ke<strong>in</strong>ath and DuBose, 2004<br />

myclobutanil, pyraclostrob<strong>in</strong><br />

benomyl, bitertanol apple P. leucotrica NDA, 1999<br />

benomyl, bitertanol, bupirimate, carbendazim, fenarimol, tomato Oidium neolycopersici Jones et al., 2001<br />

pyrazophos, thiabendazole, trifor<strong>in</strong>e<br />

benomyl, fenarimol zucch<strong>in</strong>i P. xanthii Bettiol, 1999<br />

benomyl, carbendazim, tebuconazole, triticonazole wheat Blumeria gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici NDA, 1999<br />

dodemorph rose Sphaerotheca pannosa var. Pas<strong>in</strong>i et al., 1997<br />

rosae<br />

epoxiconazole barley B. gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. hordei Barber et al., 2003<br />

fenarimol, polyox<strong>in</strong> cucumber P. xanthii Choi et al., 2004.<br />

mancozeb, proqu<strong>in</strong>azid, penconazole, grape Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator Oliva et al., 199; Pianella et al., 2006<br />

pyrazophos, triadimefon, tridemorph, trifor<strong>in</strong>e long melon P. xanthii Jiskani et al., 2000<br />

sulphur papaya Ovulariopsis papayae NDA, 1999<br />

triadimefon pumpk<strong>in</strong> P. xanthii McGrath, 1996<br />

NB: Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea and P. fusca are referred as P. xanthii (Perez-Garcia et al., 2006)<br />

Table 1.2 Lists of powdery mildew species that have developed resistance to target fungicides<br />

PM fungi Fungicides Host Reference(s)<br />

B. gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici fenpropimorph, propiconazole, qu<strong>in</strong>oxyfen wheat Bernhard et al., 2002; Engels et al., 1996<br />

B. gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. hordei fenpropimorph barley O’Hara et al., 2000<br />

P. xanthii azoxystrob<strong>in</strong>, benomyl, kresoxim-methyl,<br />

mycobutanil, propiconazole, triadimefon<br />

cucurbit Ishii et al., 2001; McGrath, 2001; McGrath and Shishkoff,<br />

2001; McGrath et al., 1996<br />

U. necator azoxystrob<strong>in</strong>, myclobutanil grape Northover and Homeyer, 2001; Wong and Wilcox, 2002<br />

11


(c) Other control options<br />

Pas<strong>in</strong>i et al. (1997) showed that the use of several antifungal compounds such as salts, oils and<br />

plant extracts aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of rose were as efficient as spray<strong>in</strong>g the fungicide dodemorph. They<br />

also noted that spray applications of KH 2 P0 4 and NaHC0 3 at 0.5-1% offered good control of<br />

PM. W<strong>in</strong>e v<strong>in</strong>egar, JMS Stylet Oil ® , canola oil, synertrol and neem extract also provided<br />

satisfactory disease control. In addition, fatty acids formulated as potassium salts reduced the<br />

severity of the disease significantly. Partial control of PM was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Milsana ® , a<br />

concentrated extract from leaves of Reynoutriu sachul<strong>in</strong>ensis (F. Schmidt) Nakai (Pas<strong>in</strong>i et al.,<br />

1997). Bettiol et al. (1999) showed that foliar application of a mixture of cow’s milk and water<br />

was effective <strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection of caused by P. xanthii. Similarly, spray<strong>in</strong>g milk-based<br />

products onto pumpk<strong>in</strong> reduced PM and other foliar symptoms by 50-70% and post harvest<br />

fruit rot by 40-50% compared to the chemical control (Ferrand<strong>in</strong>o and Smith, 2007). Bélanger<br />

et al. (1997) have reviewed a range of plant extracts and biocompatible products that have<br />

been used aga<strong>in</strong>st PM.<br />

(d) Integrated control<br />

Integrated disease management is the practice of us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of control measures to<br />

prevent and manage diseases <strong>in</strong> crops. Strategies that <strong>in</strong>tegrate BCAs and chemical fungicides<br />

can overcome the lower efficacy of antagonists, while reduc<strong>in</strong>g the residues of chemical<br />

fungicides on the f<strong>in</strong>al products and the environment. The idea of IPM is based on good<br />

agricultural practices needed to produce profitable and productive crops <strong>in</strong> a susta<strong>in</strong>able way.<br />

Once the symptom is observed or a potential for <strong>in</strong>fection is identified, different techniques<br />

can be used as preventative or curative measures to m<strong>in</strong>imize the risk of disease <strong>in</strong>fection and<br />

spread.<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong>ations of different control strategies have provided promis<strong>in</strong>g disease control when<br />

tested aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of various crops. For <strong>in</strong>stance, application of Ampelomyces quisqualis Ces<br />

ex Schlect, Trichoderma harzianum Rifai and Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn, with lower<br />

rates of fungicides provided the same level of control of PM of strawberry as fungicides<br />

applied at full rates (Pertot et al., 2008). Similarly, a mixture of BCAs (B. subtilis, Tilletiopsis<br />

m<strong>in</strong>or Nyland and Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimm.) Viégas), m<strong>in</strong>eral salts (KH 2 PO 4 ), an<br />

12


antitranspirant (kaol<strong>in</strong>) and an antioxidant (ascorbic acid) controlled PM of mango effectively<br />

(Nofal and Haggag, 2006). A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of BCAs and chemicals can give better results than<br />

when they are applied separately. Comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these approaches can control the pathogen<br />

<strong>in</strong> climatic conditions beyond the effective range of the bio-protectant, m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

environmental pollution and the likelihood of the pathogen develop<strong>in</strong>g resistance, while<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g localized and persistent control (Tronsmo and Hjeljord, 1998).<br />

1.3 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL<br />

Biological control, as a crop protection strategy system, emerged as a response to the search<br />

for a safe, effective and environmentally friendly approach to replace or supplement the use of<br />

chemical pesticides. Biological control of plant diseases <strong>in</strong>volves the use of antagonistic<br />

microorganisms to control a pathogen. One form of biological control occurs if the activity of<br />

a microorganism, e.g., a plant pathogen, is controlled by another member of the community<br />

(Campbell, 1989).<br />

Over the past three decades, research has repeatedly demonstrated that many microorganisms<br />

can act as natural antagonists to plant pathogens (Cook, 2000). Powdery mildew fungi are<br />

prime targets for biocontrol agents because of their superficial growth (Bélanger et al., 1997).<br />

This has attracted many researchers to conduct <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong> order to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

antagonists that can provide acceptable levels of disease control. The mostly studied<br />

microorganisms aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of different species are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 1.3. Although consistency<br />

has been the major challenge <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM with these antagonists, most of these BCAs<br />

have produced promis<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g PM. The success and failure of biological<br />

control depends amongst other th<strong>in</strong>gs, on the production and application of effective BCAs.<br />

Through research, some of the most successful BCAs have been processed <strong>in</strong>to commercial<br />

products that are approved for the market. Table 1.4 is a summary of some of the promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

biological products aga<strong>in</strong>st foliar diseases that have been commercialized. However, it should<br />

be noted that there are many more which are not listed on Table 1.4.<br />

13


Table 1.3 Lists of biocontrol agents that have been tested aga<strong>in</strong>st different species of powdery mildew of various crops.<br />

BCA Target Pathogen Crop Reference(s)<br />

Ampelomyces quisqualis E. cichoracearum cucumber Sundheim, 1982<br />

P. aphanis strawberry Pertot et al., 2008<br />

P. leucotricha apple Ozentivanyi and Kiss, 2003<br />

P. xanthii cucumber, melon,<br />

pumpk<strong>in</strong>, squash, w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

squash<br />

P. xanthii cucumber Elad, 2000; Elad et al., 1998<br />

NB: Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea and P. fusca are referred as P. xanthii (Perez-Garcia et al., 2006); P. flocculosa as S. flocculosa and P. rugulosa as<br />

S. rugulosa (Eken, 2005) and Verticillium lecanii as Lecanicillium lecanii (Verhaar et al., 1998).<br />

14<br />

Abo-Foul et al., 1996; Dik et al., 1998; Elad et al., 1998;<br />

McGrath and Shishkoff, 1999; Romero et al., 2003;<br />

Shishkoff and McGrath, 2002; Sundheim, 1982<br />

S. pannosa var. rosae rose Pas<strong>in</strong>i et al., 1997<br />

U. necator grape Falk et al., 1995<br />

Various spp. various crops Sztejnberg et al., 1989<br />

Acremonium alternatum P. xanthii melon Romero et al., 2003<br />

Bacillus sp. P. xanthii cucurbits Romero et al., 2004<br />

B. subtilis P. xanthii squash zucch<strong>in</strong>i Bettiol, 1999<br />

P. aphanis strawberry Pertol et al., 2008<br />

Lecanicillium lecanii P. xanthii cucumber, melon Askary et al., 1998; Dik et al., 1998; Romero et al., 2003;<br />

Verhaar et al., 1996<br />

S. macularies f.sp. fragariae strawberry Miller et al., 2004<br />

Meira geulakonigii P. xanthii cucumber Sztejnberg et al., 2004<br />

Sporothrix flocculosa P. xanthii cucumber Dik et al., 1998<br />

S. pannosa var. rosae rose Bélanger et al., 1994<br />

Several spp. several plants Neveu et al., 2007<br />

Sporothrix rugulosa P. xanthii cucumber Verhaar et al., 1996, 1998<br />

Stephanoascus flocculosus P. xanthii cucumber Jarvis et al., 1989<br />

S. pannosa var. rosae rose Hajlaoui and Bélanger, 1991<br />

Stephanoascus rugulosus P. xanthii cucumber Jarvis et al., 1989<br />

S. pannosa var. rosae rose Hajlaoui and Bélanger, 1991<br />

Tilletiopsis albescens P. xanthii cucumber Knudsen and Skou, 1993<br />

E. gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. hordei barley Knudsen and Skou, 1993<br />

T. m<strong>in</strong>or P. xanthii cucumber Hijwegen, 1992<br />

T. wash<strong>in</strong>gtonensis S. pannosa var. rosae rose Hajlaoui and Bélanger, 1991; Sztejnberg et al., 1989<br />

Trichoderma harzianum S. mors-uvae gooseberry Picton and Hummer, 2003<br />

P. aphanis strawberry Pertot et al., 2008


Table 1.4 List of biocontrol products registered and commercially available (developed or be<strong>in</strong>g developed) aga<strong>in</strong>st foliar pathogens.<br />

Product Name BCA (s) Target Pathogen Producer Reference(s)<br />

AQ10 Biofungicide Ampelomyces quisqualis Powdery mildews Ecogen Inc, USA Hofste<strong>in</strong> and Chapple, 1998;<br />

McGrath and Shishkoff, 1999;<br />

Shishkoff and McGrath, 2002<br />

Aspire Candida oleophila Botrytis and Penicillium spp. Ecogen Inc, USA Droby et al., 1998<br />

BINAB-T ® T. harzianum + T.<br />

polysporum<br />

Various fungal diseases Bio-Innovation EFTR<br />

AB, Sweden<br />

Moller et al., 2003; Mommaerts et<br />

al., 2008<br />

Eco-77 ® T. harzianum Botrytis c<strong>in</strong>erea, Eutypa lata, Plant Health Products, Plant-Health, 2008<br />

E. leptoplaca<br />

South Africa<br />

QST 713,<br />

AgraQuest, Inc., USA EPA, 2005; Marrone, 2002<br />

Serenade TM downy mildew, early blight,<br />

late blight, bacterial spot,<br />

walnut blight<br />

Sporodox ® P. flocculosa Powdery mildew Plant Products Co. Ltd,<br />

Canada<br />

Konstant<strong>in</strong>idou-Dolts<strong>in</strong>is et al.,<br />

2007<br />

Trichodex T. harzianum Various fungal diseases Makteshim Chemical Dik et al., 1999; Elad et al., 1998;<br />

Works Ltd, Israel. Etebarian et al., 2000; Hofste<strong>in</strong> and<br />

Chapple, 1998<br />

Trichodowels T. harzianum + T. viride Various fungal disease Agrimm Technologies Monte, 2001<br />

Ltd, New Zealand<br />

TrichoFlow WP TM T. harzianum Various fungal diseases Agrimm Technologies Bal and Alt<strong>in</strong>tas, 2006; Fourie and<br />

Ltd, New Zealand<br />

Trichopel ® T. harzianum Wide range of fungal diseases Agrimm Technologies<br />

Ltd, New Zealand<br />

Halleen, 2006<br />

Bhuiyan et al., 2003<br />

Trichoseal T. viride Trunk and foliar pathogens Agrimm Technologies<br />

Ltd, New Zealand<br />

YieldPlus Cryptococcus albidus Botrytis and Penicillium spp. Anchor Yeast, South<br />

Africa<br />

http://www.tricho.com/trichotech<br />

Droby et al., 2002<br />

15


1.3.1 Characteristics of a successful biological control agent<br />

A BCA must firstly be safe to humans, animals and the environment. It should have the<br />

ability to grow and colonize the phylloplane fast, produce large number of spores and<br />

survive with a m<strong>in</strong>imal requirement for nutrients and favourable environmental conditions<br />

(Blakeman and Fokkema, 1982; Chao et al., 1986). Ideally, a BCA should also have some<br />

means by which it can survive under unfavourable environmental conditions. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

Bacillus species produce spores which are resistant to UV light and desiccation and can be<br />

formulated easily (Raaijmakers et al., 2002).<br />

Active colonization of available substrates by BCAs can greatly reduce the success of<br />

pathogen <strong>in</strong>ocula attempt<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>fect host plants. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong>fection of host plants by<br />

PM usually occurs with<strong>in</strong> 72h after the conidia of the pathogen land on a susceptible leaf<br />

(Huckelhoven, 2005). Therefore PM can only be controlled if there is active and rapid<br />

colonization of the phylloplane by the BCA after it is sprayed onto the leaves of the target<br />

crop. In addition, an ideal BCA should be competitive with agrochemicals <strong>in</strong> terms of cost<br />

and efficacy.<br />

1.3.2 Mechanisms of action of biocontrol agents<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the development of beneficial microbes for the control of plant diseases, scientists<br />

recognized that an effective delivery system requires a thorough understand<strong>in</strong>g of its<br />

biological relationship with its target (Bateman and Chapple, 2001). There are at least four<br />

mechanisms by which BCAs act aga<strong>in</strong>st a target PM pathogen: competition for resources,<br />

antibiosis, mycoparasitism and <strong>in</strong>duction of host resistance (Whipps, 1992).<br />

Competition for soluble substrates occurs when two (or more) organisms require the same<br />

resource (Tronsmo and Hjeljord, 1998), and the use by one reduces the amount available to<br />

the other (Campbell, 1989). In such cases, one organism uses most of the nutrients and<br />

grows, while the other has <strong>in</strong>sufficient nutrients for its growth and dies. This is typical for a<br />

fungus or bacterium that grows very fast and overwhelms the target organism. However,<br />

the use of competition for nutrients on the phylloplane as a biocontrol strategy seems<br />

unlikely aga<strong>in</strong>st PM because they can germ<strong>in</strong>ate without exogenous nutrients and cover<br />

16


elatively large areas of leaves with<strong>in</strong> 1-2wk after <strong>in</strong>fection (McGrath and Thomas, 1996).<br />

However, Elad et al. (1998) showed that competition is one of the mechanisms that is used<br />

by T. harzianum T39 dur<strong>in</strong>g its establishment on the phylloplane.<br />

Antibiosis occurs when the production of toxic metabolites or antibiotics of one organism<br />

has a direct negative effect on another organism. In pure culture, antibiotic production is<br />

common by many potential BCAs (Tronsmo and Hjeljord, 1998). It appears to be important<br />

to the survival of microorganisms through elim<strong>in</strong>ation of microbial competition for food<br />

sources, which are usually very limited <strong>in</strong> the phylloplane. Several species of Bacillus<br />

(Romero et al., 2004 & 2007) and yeast (Hajlaoui and Bélanger, 1991 & 1993; Urquhart<br />

and Punja, 2002) are known to use antibiotic production as their primary mode of action <strong>in</strong><br />

suppress<strong>in</strong>g PM. Production of ß-1,3-exo and endo-glucanase, chit<strong>in</strong>ase and antifungal<br />

compounds by these antagonists was reported to <strong>in</strong>hibit germ tube development of P.<br />

xanthii and plasmolyse its spores (Urquhart and Punja, 2002). Many Trichoderma spp. are<br />

known to produce antibiotics that are is effective aga<strong>in</strong>st a wide range of pathogens (Elad et<br />

al., 1998).<br />

Another mechanism utilized by BCAs is mycoparasitism. This is a parasitism of PM fungus<br />

by the antagonist fungus. It <strong>in</strong>volves direct contact between the fungi result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> death of<br />

the host (PM pathogen), and nutrient absorption by the parasite (antagonist) (Whipps et al.,<br />

1988). To break down the walls of their host, mycoparasites possess various enzymes such<br />

as: cellulases, chit<strong>in</strong>ases, β-1,3-glucanases and proteases (Elad, 1996 & 2000; Hijwegen,<br />

1992; Patil et al., 2000; Urquhart and Punja, 2002). The <strong>in</strong>teraction between mycoparasites<br />

and their target fungi occurs <strong>in</strong> four sequential, but overlapp<strong>in</strong>g phases: target location,<br />

recognition, contact and penetration (Whipps et al., 1988). In the first stage, a chemical<br />

stimulus from the pathogenic fungus attracts the parasite (the antagonist). The second step<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves attack of the target pathogen by the mycoparasite with the help of enzymes. In the<br />

third step, the mycoparasitic antagonist attaches to the host (pathogenic fungi) either by<br />

coil<strong>in</strong>g around or grow<strong>in</strong>g alongside it. In the f<strong>in</strong>al step, the mycoparasitic fungus degrades<br />

the pathogenic cell wall by produc<strong>in</strong>g various enzymes (Tronsmo and Hjeljord, 1998).<br />

17


Some researchers have shown that BCAs may act aga<strong>in</strong>st the pathogen by trigger<strong>in</strong>g host<br />

defense mechanisms. In <strong>in</strong>duced systemic resistance (ISR), the BCA is not directly<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved with the pathogen; <strong>in</strong>stead, it activates the defense mechanisms of the host (Wei et<br />

al., 1996). Once ISR is expressed, it activates multiple potential defense mechanisms<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased production of antifungal compounds by the host (Elad, 2000; Wei et al.,<br />

1996). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these authors, ISR has a wide range spectrum, protect<strong>in</strong>g the plant<br />

from variety of pathogens. Trichoderma harzianum T39 (Elad, 2000; Elad et al., 1998) and<br />

some growth promot<strong>in</strong>g bacteria such as B. pumulus Meyer and Gottheil, Pseudomonas<br />

putida (Trevisan) and Serratia marcescens (Bizio) (Wei et al., 1996) have been reported as<br />

BCAs that <strong>in</strong>duced systemic resistance.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g screen<strong>in</strong>g, it is important to consider the different mechanisms of action, because<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibition of the pathogen by an <strong>in</strong>troduced antagonist may <strong>in</strong>volve different <strong>in</strong>teractions. In<br />

addition, s<strong>in</strong>ce the control system <strong>in</strong>volves BCAs, pathogen, host and the environmental<br />

conditions, it is important to <strong>in</strong>corporate these components dur<strong>in</strong>g the screen<strong>in</strong>g. Screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

techniques often focus on detect<strong>in</strong>g one or two modes of action and therefore fail to detect<br />

BCAs us<strong>in</strong>g other modes of action.<br />

1.3.3 Challenges and opportunities <strong>in</strong> the development of biocontrol aga<strong>in</strong>st foliar<br />

diseases<br />

Biological control has been less successful <strong>in</strong> the phyllosphere than the rhizosphere<br />

(Andrews, 1992). This is partly due to extreme fluctuations <strong>in</strong> environmental conditions <strong>in</strong><br />

the aerial part of the plant compared to the soil parts. Blakeman and Fokkema (1982) noted<br />

that the survival and activities of both saprophytes and pathogens on leaves is dependent on<br />

the microclimatological conditions and chemical properties of the leaf surface. Because of<br />

their requirements for specific environmental conditions, BCAs are usually effective with<strong>in</strong><br />

a limited range of temperature and RH. For <strong>in</strong>stance, most antagonists of PM are more<br />

efficient when RH is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed above 80% (Bélanger et al., 1994 & 1997; Hijwegen,<br />

1992; Jarvis and Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, 1977; Jarvis et al., 1989), which can be achieved by<br />

manipulat<strong>in</strong>g the greenhouse environment. However, this is not possible under field<br />

conditions. Hence, efficacy of most BCAs aga<strong>in</strong>st PM and other foliar diseases has been<br />

<strong>in</strong>consistent, especially under field conditions. In addition, BCAs rely on the availability of<br />

nutrients for their survival and production of antibiotics and siderophores. Unfortunately,<br />

18


the amount of nutrients on the phylloplane is often limited and may be leached as a result of<br />

irrigation, ra<strong>in</strong>, dew and fog (Andrews, 1992).<br />

The rate of establishment and biocontrol activities of <strong>in</strong>troduced antagonists is often slower<br />

than that of the pathogen. For <strong>in</strong>stance, conidia of PM require 3-5d to germ<strong>in</strong>ate and <strong>in</strong>fect<br />

the plant (Huckelhoven, 2005; McGrath and Thomas 1996). In contrast, except for a few<br />

antagonists such as A. quisqualis (Sundheim and Krekl<strong>in</strong>g, 1982), establishment of BCAs<br />

on the phylloplane may take 10-14d, by which time the disease is at a high level. Once the<br />

disease pressure is very high, efficacy of BCAs is limited (Elad et al., 1998; Pertot et al.,<br />

2008). Moreover, some <strong>in</strong>troduced BCAs need the presence of their host on the phylloplane<br />

<strong>in</strong> order to establish themselves. For example, T. m<strong>in</strong>or was more effective when applied 2d<br />

after the plant was <strong>in</strong>fected with PM (Hijwegen, 1986).<br />

In spite of these challenges, use of BCAs on the phylloplane does provide some<br />

opportunities. The method of application of BCAs is simple, and it is easy to see the effects<br />

of treatments because the disease is visible. Once applied and established, BCAs can move<br />

onto different parts of the foliage, and may provide long-term control without the risk of<br />

resistance.<br />

1.3.4 Improvement of biocontrol efficacy<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce biological control is holistic <strong>in</strong> its approach, it is important to comb<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

manipulation of different aspects that are necessary to favour the antagonist and<br />

disadvantage the pathogen (Andrews, 1992). For <strong>in</strong>stance, growth of <strong>in</strong>troduced BCAs can<br />

be assisted by manipulation of the microclimate of greenhouses (Blakeman and Fokkema,<br />

1982). Adjust<strong>in</strong>g the RH to the level required by the antagonist or provid<strong>in</strong>g free water on<br />

the leaf surface can improve the efficacy of biological control. However, cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g is needed because <strong>in</strong>creased leaf wetness can result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection of the plant by<br />

other pathogens. In addition, the chemical properties of the leaf surface can also be<br />

modified to suit the demand of the antagonist by apply<strong>in</strong>g the right chemical. Grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BCAs <strong>in</strong> suitable media, apply<strong>in</strong>g correct dosage of BCA <strong>in</strong>oculum, us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate<br />

formulations and storage and plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>oculum <strong>in</strong> favourable positions can facilitate active<br />

colonization of the phylloplane by the antagonist. Application of BCAs before the disease<br />

reaches a certa<strong>in</strong> level, and use of selected adjuvants and oils can improve efficacy of<br />

19


iological control. Elad et al. (1996) noted that the efficacy of Tilletiopsis spp. was best<br />

when applied few days before or immediately after <strong>in</strong>fection of the plant with PM.<br />

Furthermore, use of additives, such as sucrose, can <strong>in</strong>crease the population of the antagonist<br />

on the phylloplane (Blakeman and Fokkema, 1982). However, growth of other pathogens<br />

must be managed carefully.<br />

1.4 SOLUBLE SILICON<br />

<strong>Silicon</strong> (Si) is the second most abundant element <strong>in</strong> the surface of the earth and can present<br />

<strong>in</strong> plants <strong>in</strong> amounts equivalent to those of macronutrients such as calcium, magnesium and<br />

phosphorus (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994). Although the level of Si <strong>in</strong> plant tissues ranges between 0.1-<br />

10%, sometimes exceed<strong>in</strong>g that of nitrogen and potassium, its importance to agriculture has<br />

been underrated with the perception that most plants can grow <strong>in</strong> a nutrient solution without<br />

Si <strong>in</strong> their formulation (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1999). However, when Si is readily available to plants, it<br />

plays a major role <strong>in</strong> their survival and growth. Some of the beneficial effects of Si to plants<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>creased growth and decreased susceptibility towards pathogens and <strong>in</strong>sects, and<br />

amelioration of abiotic stresses (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999).<br />

1.4.1 Effects of silicon on powdery mildew control<br />

The effects of Si on <strong>in</strong>cidence and severity of PM on a range of crops has been studied by<br />

several researchers (Bélanger et al., 1995; Menzies et al., 1991b; Samuels et al., 1991a &<br />

1994). Bélanger et al. (1995) noted that add<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong>to nutrient solutions reduced <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

of PM <strong>in</strong> cucumber and delayed its rate of development. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Menzies et al.<br />

(1991a), the reduction <strong>in</strong> the severity of PM was due to <strong>in</strong>hibition of germ<strong>in</strong>ation of PM<br />

conidia by Si. Similarly, treatment with Si reduced PM of barley (Wiese et al., 2005), grape<br />

(Bowen et al., 1992; Reynolds et al., 1996), muskmelon (Menzies et al., 1992), wheat<br />

(Bélanger et al., 2003; Remus-Borel et al., 2005) and zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Menzies et al., 1992).<br />

Whilst the use of Si for disease management is safe and effective, <strong>in</strong> most reports complete<br />

control of the disease was not obta<strong>in</strong>ed, with results differ<strong>in</strong>g among cultivars (Liang et al.,<br />

2005; Palmer et al., 2006), cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons and temperature (Schuerger and Hammer,<br />

2003).<br />

20


1.4.2 Effects of silicon on plant growth<br />

Bélanger et al. (1997) noted that, <strong>in</strong> Europe, 60% of cucumber and 30% of rose growers<br />

were us<strong>in</strong>g soluble Si on a regular basis. Most of those users believed that they had<br />

benefited by reduc<strong>in</strong>g fungicide application and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g yields. Even <strong>in</strong> the absence of<br />

disease, application of Si has been observed to <strong>in</strong>crease yields of cucumber. However, it is<br />

not clear if this <strong>in</strong>crease was as a result of disease control or the management of several<br />

biotic and abiotic stresses of the plants.<br />

1.4.3 The role of silicon <strong>in</strong> amelioration of abiotic stresses<br />

<strong>Silicon</strong> has been reported to ameliorate m<strong>in</strong>eral toxicity effects <strong>in</strong> plants (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994;<br />

Marschner, 1995). For <strong>in</strong>stance, Si can reduce or prevent toxicity effects caused by<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>um (Al), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) (Marschner, 1995; Tisdale et al., 1993).<br />

Equally, it can reduce the impact of nutrient deficiencies of phosphorus (P) and z<strong>in</strong>c (Zn)<br />

(Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994; Marschner, 1995). In addition, it reduces stress of plants caused by soil<br />

sal<strong>in</strong>ity and excessive transpiration (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994; Marschner, 1995; Tisdale et al., 1993).<br />

Moreover, <strong>in</strong> sugar cane, Si protected leaves from ultraviolet radiation damage by filter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

out harmful ultraviolet rays (Tisdale et al., 1993).<br />

1.4.4 Possible mechanisms of action of silicon<br />

Although consistent results have been reported on the positive effects of Si <strong>in</strong> disease<br />

management, the mechanisms by which Si reduces severity of diseases are the subject of<br />

ongo<strong>in</strong>g debate (Ghanmi et al., 2004). While several researchers believe that the possible<br />

mechanism of action of Si is purely mechanical, others claim that it is entirely based on the<br />

catalysis of <strong>in</strong>duction of systemically acquired resistance (SAR) by the host plants.<br />

Zeyen et al. (1992) associated reduction of PM to be a result of <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> silification of<br />

the epidermal cells, which would impede the penetration by the pathogen germ tubes.<br />

Supportive reports by Carver et al. (1998) and W<strong>in</strong>slow (1992) showed that <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st fungal pathogens <strong>in</strong> cereal species was correlated with the accumulation<br />

of Si <strong>in</strong> these plants. However, further <strong>in</strong>vestigations revealed that silification takes place at<br />

the trichome bases on the epidermis (Bélanger et al., 1995, Samuels et al., 1994), and<br />

around the fungal hyphae and <strong>in</strong>fection pegs <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected cells of the host plant (Bélanger et<br />

21


al., 1995; Datnoff et al., 1997). Microscopic studies by Menzies et al. (1991b) showed<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of phenolic compounds with<strong>in</strong> cells of cucumber plants treated with<br />

Si. Similarly, Fawe et al. (1998) discovered that treatment with Si <strong>in</strong>duced defense<br />

reactions <strong>in</strong> cucumber plants towards PM by promot<strong>in</strong>g accumulation of antifungal<br />

flavonoids. Moreover, Bélanger et al. (2003) reported that treatment with Si <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

defense mechanisms <strong>in</strong> wheat aga<strong>in</strong>st B. gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici by promot<strong>in</strong>g accumulation of<br />

electron-dense, phenolic compounds surround<strong>in</strong>g fungal haustoria with<strong>in</strong> the epidermal<br />

cells of these plants. Us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray microanalysis and microscopic <strong>in</strong>vestigations, Ghanmi et<br />

al. (2004) found that treat<strong>in</strong>g Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh with Si <strong>in</strong>duced the<br />

production of electron-dense, fungitoxic substance that accumulated with<strong>in</strong> and around the<br />

collapsed haustoria of epidermal cells with<strong>in</strong> the leaves of the disease-resistant plants.<br />

Furthermore, Si was shown to <strong>in</strong>crease resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st blast disease on rice caused by<br />

Magnaporthe grisea (T.T. Hebert) M.E. Barr. by catalys<strong>in</strong>g the accelerated production of<br />

phenolic like compounds and antifungal momilactone phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s (Rodrigues et al.,<br />

2004). Most of these conclusions were made based on apply<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution.<br />

However, foliar application of Si has also provided effective control of PM <strong>in</strong> several crops<br />

(Bowen et al., 1992; Guével et al., 2007; Liang et al., 2005; Menzies et al., 1992; Palmer et<br />

al., 2006; Reynolds et al., 1996). What is not clear is whether similar mechanisms of action<br />

are <strong>in</strong>volved when Si is used as a foliar treatment as when it is applied to plant roots as a<br />

fertilizer.<br />

1.4.5 Methods of application of soluble silicon<br />

Usually Si has been applied to plants by add<strong>in</strong>g soluble forms of the element <strong>in</strong>to a nutrient<br />

solution of a hydroponics system. This system ensures a cont<strong>in</strong>uity of supply of Si to the<br />

plants while the pH and concentration of each element <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution can be<br />

balanced accord<strong>in</strong>g to the requirements of the plants. With drip irrigation, Si may be added<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the irrigation stream at the required level, <strong>in</strong> order to supply plants through the<br />

irrigation system. Under field conditions, Si is normally applied as drench or through the<br />

irrigation system (i.e. spr<strong>in</strong>kler or other techniques). <strong>Silicon</strong> can also be applied to plants as<br />

a foliar spray. Foliar application is commonly used to control foliar diseases directly rather<br />

than through amelioration of abiotic stresses of the plant related to the soil.<br />

22


1.4.6 Challenges <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g silicon<br />

Although many studies have been made on Si <strong>in</strong> agriculture <strong>in</strong> the last 50 years <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

understand the role of Si <strong>in</strong> agriculture, its exploitation has been limited. This is partly due<br />

to <strong>in</strong>consistency of the results under different conditions on different species. Susceptibility<br />

of plants to stress, and weather conditions and the characteristics of the soils such as soil<br />

physical properties, soil organic matter and soil chemistry have direct effects on the role of<br />

Si to plants. Bélanger (2008) noted that beneficial effects of Si are noticeable only when the<br />

plant is under stress. Unlike curative fungicides that can eradicate the disease completely,<br />

Si is more effective when applied as a protective treatment (Liang et al., 2005; Samuels et<br />

al., 1991b), and it is less effective under situations of high disease pressure (Kanto et al.,<br />

2007). S<strong>in</strong>ce Si is <strong>in</strong>teractive with other elements, such as Ca, Al and Mn, its availability to<br />

plants is dependent on presence of other elements and the soil pH (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999).<br />

A lack of knowledge on optimum concentrations and application frequencies is another<br />

reason for <strong>in</strong>complete control of diseases. For <strong>in</strong>stance, application of high concentrations<br />

of Si to cucumber may provide effective control of PM, but may result <strong>in</strong> reduced quality of<br />

the fruit (Bélanger et al., 1997). Many researchers believe that disease resistance is l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

with the amount of Si accumulated by the plant (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994; Jansen, 2004). However the<br />

level of Si that should be applied <strong>in</strong> order to give optimum disease control without<br />

compromis<strong>in</strong>g growth and quality of the produce is an issue of cont<strong>in</strong>uous research<br />

(Bélanger et al., 1995). A further challenge is that uptake of Si varies not only between<br />

crops (Mitani and Ma, 2005), but may also vary between cultivars with<strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle crop<br />

(Ago et al., 2008).<br />

1.5 OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE USE OF BIOCONTROL AGENTS AND<br />

SILICON IN AN INTEGRATED DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME<br />

Each control option has its unique strengths and weaknesses relative to the other. Individual<br />

disease management options often result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete disease control. This raises a<br />

question whether the use of biocontrol agents and Si can supplement each other for better<br />

disease control <strong>in</strong> a susta<strong>in</strong>able way.<br />

23


An IPM programme may <strong>in</strong>volves the comb<strong>in</strong>ed use of chemical, biological, physical,<br />

biotechnical, genetic and agricultural techniques of disease control that offers the<br />

opportunity to growers to choose the most appropriate <strong>in</strong>tervention once a threshold disease<br />

level is reached (Oliva et al., 1999). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these researchers, unlike chemical<br />

control, where the ma<strong>in</strong> objective is to eradicate the disease, the aim of IPM is to keep the<br />

disease level below the tolerance threshold by <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g only when the severity of the<br />

pathogen exceeds a certa<strong>in</strong> level.<br />

The challenge to control PM with BCAs and Si is the extremely rapid development of the<br />

disease. Therefore, there is a need to f<strong>in</strong>d a means by which the rate of disease progress can<br />

be reduced so that the use of BCAs and Si can be more effective. If this challenge rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

unsolved, farmers will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to depend on us<strong>in</strong>g fungicides as their only effective tool to<br />

control PM. In South Africa, the proposed approach of us<strong>in</strong>g biological control and Si for<br />

disease management and plant growth promotion is gett<strong>in</strong>g encourag<strong>in</strong>g acceptance by the<br />

farmers. Most soils <strong>in</strong> Africa are acidic and deficient <strong>in</strong> plant-available Si due to leach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Therefore, application of Si fertilizer to crops should benefit most crops <strong>in</strong> most situations.<br />

Use of Si, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with BCAs, by commercial farmers could replace the <strong>in</strong>tensive use of<br />

agrochemicals <strong>in</strong> Africa.<br />

24


Table 1.5 Comparison of the benefits and limitations <strong>in</strong> terms of fungicides, silicon and biocontrol<br />

agents aga<strong>in</strong>st plant diseases.<br />

Criteria Fungicides <strong>Silicon</strong> BCAs<br />

Efficacy<br />

• Short term 3 2 1<br />

• Long term 1 2 3<br />

• Rapidity of effect 3 2 1<br />

• Effect under high disease pressure 3 1 1<br />

• Curative control 3 1 1<br />

• Preventative control 3 3 3<br />

Reliability<br />

• Environmental <strong>in</strong>fluences 3 2 1<br />

• Influence of plant and soil 2 1 1<br />

• Shelf life 2 3 1<br />

Reduction <strong>in</strong> risks<br />

• Risk of resistance 1 3 3<br />

• Side effects to humans and animals 1 3 3<br />

• Residues <strong>in</strong> food 1 3 3<br />

• Persistence <strong>in</strong> the environment 1 3 3<br />

Public acceptance 1 2 3<br />

Profitability to producer 2 3 2<br />

Cost effectiveness 1 2 3<br />

Long-term benefit for society 1 3 3<br />

1 (least), 2 (<strong>in</strong>termediate) and 3 (most) relative advantage of the control method. The table<br />

and criteria for comparison was adopted and modified from Yobo (2005).<br />

25


1.6 REFERENCES<br />

Abo-Foul, S., Rask<strong>in</strong>, V.I., Sztejnberg, A., Marde, J.B. 1996. Disruption of chlorophyll organization<br />

and function <strong>in</strong> powdery mildew-diseased cucumber leaves and its control by the<br />

hyperparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Phytopathology, 86: 195-199.<br />

Ago, Y., Mitani, N. Yamaji, N. Iwasaki, K., Ma, J.F. 2008. Differential uptake of silicon <strong>in</strong> two<br />

cultivars of pumpk<strong>in</strong> (Abstract). 4 th International Conference on <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>,<br />

Port, Edward, South Africa.<br />

Andrews, J.H. 1992. Biological control <strong>in</strong> the phyllosphere. Annual Reviews of Phytopathology, 30:<br />

603-635.<br />

Askary, H., Carrirre, Y., Bélanger, R.R., Brodeur, J. 1998. Pathogenicity of the fungus Verticillium<br />

lecanii to aphids and powdery mildew. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8: 23-32.<br />

Bal, U., Alt<strong>in</strong>tas, S. 2006. Effects of Trichoderma harzianum on the yield and fruit quality of<br />

tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) grown <strong>in</strong> an unheated greenhouse. Australian<br />

Journal of Experimental <strong>Agriculture</strong>, 46: 131-136.<br />

Barber, J.A.S., Park<strong>in</strong>, C.S., Chowdhury, A.B.M.N.U. 2003. Effect of application method on the<br />

control of powdery mildew (Blumeria gram<strong>in</strong>is) on spr<strong>in</strong>g barley. Crop Protection, 22: 949-<br />

957.<br />

Bateman, R., Chapple, A. 2001. The spray application of mycopesticide formulations. In: T.M.<br />

Butt, C.W. Jackson and N. Megan (Eds.). Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress, Problems<br />

and Potential. CABI, Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, UK. Pp. 289-309.<br />

Bélanger, R.B., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.M. 1997. Powdery mildew: Recent advances toward<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control. In: G.J. Boland and L.D. Kuykendall (Eds.) Plant-microbe Interactions<br />

and Biological Control. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Pp. 89-109.<br />

Bélanger, R.R. 2008. Understand<strong>in</strong>g the benefits of silicon <strong>in</strong> plants through transcriptomic<br />

analysis. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the IV <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong> Conference, Port Edward, South<br />

Africa 2008.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G. 2003. Cytological evidence of an active role of silicon<br />

<strong>in</strong> wheat resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici). Phytopathology,<br />

93: 402-411.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: Its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-336.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Labbé, C., Jarvis, W.R. 1994. Commercial-scale control of rose powdery mildew<br />

with a fungal antagonist. Plant Disease, 78: 420-424.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., N. Benhamou, and J.G. Menzies. 2003. Cytological evidence of an active role of<br />

silicon <strong>in</strong> wheat resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici).<br />

Phytopathology, 93: 402-412.<br />

26


Bernhard, U., Leader, A., Longhurst, C., Felsenste<strong>in</strong>, F.G. 2002. Qu<strong>in</strong>oxyfen - resistance<br />

management and sensitivity monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> wheat: 1995-2000. Pest Management Science,<br />

58: 972-974.<br />

Bettiol, W. 1999. Effectiveness of cow's milk aga<strong>in</strong>st zucch<strong>in</strong>i squash powdery mildew<br />

(Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> greenhouse conditions. Crop Protection, 18: 489-492.<br />

Bhuiyan, S.A., Ryley, M.J., Galea, V.J., Tay, D. 2003. Evaluation of potential biocontrol agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st Claviceps africana <strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo. Plant Pathology, 52: 60-67.<br />

Blakeman, J.P., Fokkema, N.J. 1982. Potential for biological control of plant diseases on the<br />

phylloplane. Annual Reviews <strong>in</strong> Phytopathology, 20: 167-190.<br />

Bowen, P., Menzies, J., Ehret, D., Samuels, L., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Soluble silicon sprays <strong>in</strong>hibit<br />

powdery mildew development on grape leaves. Journal of the American Society for<br />

Horticultural Science, 117: 906-912.<br />

Boyle, T.H., Wick, R.I. 1996. Responses of Z<strong>in</strong>nia angustifolia x Z. violacea backcross hybrids to<br />

three pathogens. HortScience, 31: 851-854<br />

Braun, U., Cook, R.T.A., Inman, A.J., Sh<strong>in</strong>, H-D. 2002. The taxonomy of the powdery mildew<br />

fungi. In: Bélanger, R.R., Bushnell, W.R., Dik, A.J., Carver, T.L.W. (Eds.). The Powdery<br />

Mildews. APS Press, St. Paul, M<strong>in</strong>nesota, U.S.A., Pp. 13-55.<br />

Campbell, R. 1989. Biological Control of Microbial Plant Pathogens. Cambridge University Press,<br />

Cambridge, UK.<br />

Carver, T.L.W., Thomas, B.J., Robb<strong>in</strong>s, M.P., Zeyen, R.J. 1998. Phenylalan<strong>in</strong>e ammonia-lyase<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibition, autofluorescence, and localized accumulation of silicon, calcium and manganese<br />

<strong>in</strong> oat epidermis attacked by the powdery mildew fungus Blumeria gram<strong>in</strong>is (DC) Speer.<br />

Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 52: 223-243.<br />

Chao, W.L., Nelson, E.B., Harman, G.E., Hoch, H.C. 1986. Colonization of the rhizosphere by<br />

biological control agents applied to seeds. Phytopathology, 76: 60-65.<br />

Choi, G.J., Lee, S.W., Jang, K.S., Kim, J.S, Cho, K.Y., Kim, J.C. 2004. Effects of chrysophanol,<br />

pariet<strong>in</strong>, and nepod<strong>in</strong> of Rumex crispus on barley and cucumber powdery mildews. Crop<br />

Protection, 23: 1215-1221.<br />

Cook, R.J. 2000. Advances <strong>in</strong> plant health management <strong>in</strong> the 20 th century. Annual Review of<br />

Phytopathology, 38: 95-116.<br />

Datnoff, L.E., Deren, C.W., Snyder, G.H. 1997. <strong>Silicon</strong> fertilization for disease management of rice<br />

<strong>in</strong> Florida. Crop Protection, 16: 525-531.<br />

Dik, A.J., Kon<strong>in</strong>g, G., Köhl, J. 1999. Evaluation of microbial antagonists for biological control of<br />

Botrytis c<strong>in</strong>erea stem <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> cucumber and tomato. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 105: 115-122.<br />

27


Dik, A.J., Verhaar, M.A., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. Comparison of three biological control agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> semi-commercial-scale<br />

glasshouse trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104: 413-423.<br />

Droby, S., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Weiss, B., Horev, B., Chalutz, E., Katz, H., Keren-Tzur, M.,<br />

Shachnai, A. 1998. Commercial test<strong>in</strong>g of Aspire: a yeast preparation for the biological<br />

control of postharvest decay of citrus. Biological Control, 12: 97-101.<br />

Droby, S., V<strong>in</strong>okur, V., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Goldschmidt, E.E., Porat, R. 2002.<br />

Induction of resistance to Penicillium digitatum <strong>in</strong> grapefruit by the yeast biocontrol agent<br />

Candida oleophila. Phytopathology, 92: 393-399.<br />

Eken, E. 2005. A review of biological control of rose powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var.<br />

rosae) by fungal antagonists. Acta Horticulturae, 690: 93-96.<br />

Elad, Y. 1996. Mechanisms <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the biological control of Botrytis c<strong>in</strong>erea <strong>in</strong>cited diseases.<br />

European Journal of Plant Pathology, 102: 719-732.<br />

Elad, Y., Kirshner, B., Yehuda, N., Sztejnberg, A. 1998. Management of powdery mildew and gray<br />

mould of cucumber by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and Ampelomyces quisqualis AQ10.<br />

BioControl, 43: 241-251.<br />

Elad, Y., Malathrakis, N.E., Dik, A.J. 1996. Biological control of Botrytis <strong>in</strong>cited diseases and<br />

powdery mildews <strong>in</strong> greenhouse crops. Crop Protection, 15: 229-240.<br />

Elad,Y. 2000. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and<br />

potential modes of action. Crop Protection, 19: 709-714.<br />

Engels, A.J.G., Mantel, B.C., De Waard, M.A. 1996. Effect of split applications of fenpropimorphconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

fungicides on sensitivity of Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici. Plant Pathology,<br />

45: 636.<br />

EPA, 2005 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2005. Bacillus subtilis stra<strong>in</strong> QST 713.<br />

Biopesticide Registration Action Document 006479.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant biology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the United States of America, 91: 11-17.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1999. <strong>Silicon</strong>. Annual Reviews <strong>in</strong> Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50:<br />

641-664.<br />

Etebarian, H.R., Scott, E.S., Wicks, T.J. 2000. Trichoderma harzianum T39 and T. virens DAR<br />

74290 as potential biological control agents for Phytophthora erythroseptica. European<br />

Journal of Plant Pathology, 106: 329-337.<br />

Falk, S.P., Gadoury, D.M., Pearson, R.C., Seem, R.C. 1995. Partial control of grape powdery<br />

mildew by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease, 79: 483-490.<br />

Fawe, A., Abou-Zaid, M., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. <strong>Silicon</strong>-mediated accumulation of<br />

flavonoid phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> cucumber. Phytopathology 88: 396-401.<br />

28


Ferrand<strong>in</strong>o, F.J., Smith, V.L. 2007. The effect of milk-based foliar sprays on yield components of<br />

field pumpk<strong>in</strong>s with powdery mildew. Crop Protection, 26: 657-663.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ch, S. 1992. Appraisal of <strong>in</strong>tegrated pest management systems for controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sects of<br />

vegetable crops. In: J.C. van Lateren, A.K. M<strong>in</strong>ks and O.M.B. de Ponti (Eds.). Biological<br />

control and <strong>in</strong>tegrated crop protection: towards environmentally safer agriculture. Podac<br />

Scientific, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands. Pp. 49-60.<br />

Fourie, P.H., Halleen, F. 2006. Chemical and biological protection of grapev<strong>in</strong>e propagation<br />

material from trunk disease pathogens. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 116: 255-265.<br />

Ghanmi, D., McNally, D.J., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G. Bélanger, R.R. 2004. Powdery mildew of<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana: a pathosystem for explor<strong>in</strong>g the role of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant–microbe<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 64: 189-199.<br />

Gombert, L., W<strong>in</strong>dham, M., Hamilton, S. 2001. Evaluation of disease resistance among 57 cultivars<br />

of z<strong>in</strong>nia. HortTechnology-Alexandria VA, 11:71-74.<br />

Guével, M.H., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. Effect of root and foliar applications of soluble<br />

silicon on powdery mildew control and growth of wheat plants. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 119: 429-436.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Bélanger, R.R. 1991. Comparative effects of temperature and humidity on the<br />

activity of three potential antagonists of rose powdery mildew. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 97: 203-208.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Bélanger, R.R. 1993. Antagonism of the yeast-like phylloplane fungus Sporothrix<br />

flocculosa aga<strong>in</strong>st Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is var. tritici. Biocontrol Science and Technology,<br />

3: 427-427.<br />

Haupt, M.R. 2007. An <strong>in</strong>vestigation on the use of biological agents as a susta<strong>in</strong>able alternative to<br />

synthetic fungicides <strong>in</strong> treat<strong>in</strong>g powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> tunnel cucumbers. (M.Tech. <strong>Thesis</strong>).<br />

University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.<br />

Hijwegen, T. 1986. Biological control of cucumber powdery mildew by Tilletiopsis m<strong>in</strong>or.<br />

Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 92: 93-95.<br />

Hijwegen, T. 1992. Glycolytic activities <strong>in</strong> some fungicolous fungi. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 98: 77-80.<br />

Hofste<strong>in</strong>, R., Chapple, A. 1998. Commercial development of biofungicides. In: F.R. Hall, and J.J.<br />

Menn (Eds.). Biopesticides: Use and Delivery. Hamana Press Inc., New Jersey, Pp. 77-102.<br />

Holmes, G.J., Adams, M.L., Thornton, A.C., 2002. Evaluation of fungicides for control of gummy<br />

stem blight and powdery mildew of watermelon. Fungicide and Nematicide Tests (onl<strong>in</strong>e),<br />

Report 57:V131, DOI: 10.1094/FN57.<br />

Howard, R.J., Garland, J.A., Seaman, W.L. 1994. Diseases and pests of vegetable crops <strong>in</strong> Canada:<br />

an illustrated compendium. The Canadian Phytopathological Society, Ottawa, Canada.<br />

http://www.tricho.com/trichotech.html captured 15/12/2008.<br />

29


Huckelhoven, R. 2005. M<strong>in</strong>i Review: powdery mildew susceptibility and biotrophic <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

strategies. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 245: 9 - 17.<br />

Iannotte, M. 2004. Powdery Mildew: Controll<strong>in</strong>g and Prevent<strong>in</strong>g Powdery Mildew on Plants.<br />

http://garden<strong>in</strong>g.about.com/od/gardenproblems/a/PowderyMildew.htm. Captured on<br />

15/10/2004.<br />

Ishii, H., Fraaije, B.A., Sugiyama, T., Noguchi, K., Nishimura, K., Takeda, T., Amano, T.,<br />

Hollomon, D.W. 2001. Occurrence and molecular characterization of strobilur<strong>in</strong> resistance<br />

<strong>in</strong> cucumber powdery mildew and downy mildew. Phytopathology, 91: 1166-1171.<br />

Jansen, M. 2004. Role of silicon <strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses.<br />

Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 50: 11-18.<br />

Jarvis, W.R., Shaw, L.A., Traquair, J.A. 1989. Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g antagonism of cucumber powdery<br />

mildew by Stephanoascus flocculosus and S. rugulosus. Mycological Research, 92: 162-<br />

165.<br />

Jarvis, W.R., Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, K. 1977. The control of powdery mildew of greenhouse cucumber by water<br />

sprays and Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease Reporter, 61: 728-730.<br />

Jones, H., Whipps, J.M., Gurr, S.J. 2001. Pathogen profile: the tomato powdery mildew fungus<br />

Oidium neolycopersici. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2: 303-309.<br />

Jutsum, A.R. 1988. Commercial application of biological control: status and prospects. In: R.K.S.<br />

Wood and M.J. Way (Eds.). Biological Control of Pests, Pathogens and Weeds:<br />

Developments and Prospects. Royal Society of London, London, U.K. Pp. 357-370.<br />

Kamp, M. 1985. Control of Erysiphe cichoracearum on Z<strong>in</strong>nia elegans, with a polymer-based<br />

antitranspirant. HortScience, 20: 879-881.<br />

Kanto, T., Maekawa, K., A<strong>in</strong>o, M. 2007. Suppression of conidial germ<strong>in</strong>ation and appressorial<br />

formation by silicate treatment <strong>in</strong> powdery mildew of strawberry. Journal of General Plant<br />

Pathology, 73: 1-7.<br />

Ke<strong>in</strong>ath, A.P., DuBose, V.B. 2004. Evaluation of fungicides for prevention and management of<br />

powdery mildew on watermelon. Crop Protection, 23: 35-42.<br />

Ke<strong>in</strong>ath, A.P., May, W.H., III, DuBose, V.B., 2000. Effect of sequential or alternat<strong>in</strong>g applications<br />

of Quadris and companion fungicides on watermelon foliar diseases. Fungicide and<br />

Nematicide Tests, 55: 290.<br />

Kiss, L., Szentiványi, O. 2001. Infection of bean with cucumber powdery mildew, Podosphaera<br />

fusca. New Disease Report, 50: 411.<br />

Knudsen, I.B., Skou, J.P. 1993. The affectivity of Tilletiopsis <strong>in</strong> biocontrol of powdery mildew.<br />

Annual Review of Applied Biology, 123: 173-185.<br />

Kobori, R.F., Suzuki, O., Wierzbicki, R., Della Vecchia, P.T., Camargo, L.E.A. 2004. Occurrence<br />

of Podosphaera xanthii Race 2 on Cucumis melo <strong>in</strong> Brazil. Plant Disease, 88: 1161-1161.<br />

30


Konstant<strong>in</strong>idou-Dolts<strong>in</strong>is, S., E. Markellou, A.M. Kasselaki, E. Siranidou, A. Kalamarakis, K.<br />

Tzembelikou, A. Schmitt, C. Koumakiss, and N. Malathrakis. 2007. Control of powdery<br />

mildew of grape <strong>in</strong> Greece us<strong>in</strong>g Sporodex(R) L and Milsana(R). Journal of Plant Diseases<br />

and Protection, 114: 256-262.<br />

Landa, B.B., Navas-Cortes, J. A., Hervas, A., Jimenez-Diazet, R.M. 2001. Influence of temperature<br />

and <strong>in</strong>oculum density of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris on suppression of Fusarium wilt<br />

of chickpea by rhizosphere bacteria. Phytopathology, 91: 807-816.<br />

Liang, Y.C., Sun, W.C., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the<br />

enhancement of <strong>in</strong>duced resistance to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> Cucumis sativus. Plant<br />

Pathology, 54: 678-685.<br />

Marrone, P.G. 2002. An effective biofungicide with novel modes of action. Pesticide Outlook,<br />

13: 193-194.<br />

Marschner, H. 1995. M<strong>in</strong>eral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, UK.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 1996. Successful management of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> pumpk<strong>in</strong> with disease<br />

threshold-based fungicide programs. Plant Disease, 80: 910-916.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 2001. Fungicide resistance <strong>in</strong> cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences and<br />

challenges. Plant Disease, 85: 236-245.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 2005. Occurrence of resistance to QoI, DMI and MBC fungicides <strong>in</strong> Podosphaera<br />

xanthii <strong>in</strong> 2004 and implication for controll<strong>in</strong>g cucurbit powdery mildew. Resistant Pest<br />

Management Newsletter, 14: 36-40.<br />

McGrath, M.T., Shishkoff, N. 1999. Evaluation of biocompatible products for manag<strong>in</strong>g cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew. Crop Protection, 18: 471-478.<br />

McGrath, M.T., Shishkoff, N. 2001. Resistance to triadimefon and benomyl: dynamics and impact<br />

on manag<strong>in</strong>g cucurbit powdery mildew. Plant Disease, 85: 147-154.<br />

McGrath, M.T., Staniszewska, H., Shishkoff, N., Casella, G. 1996. Fungicide sensitivity of<br />

Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea populations <strong>in</strong> the United States. Plant Disease, 80: 697-703.<br />

McGrath, M.T., Thomas, C.E., 1996. Powdery mildew. In: T.H. Zitter, D.I. Hopk<strong>in</strong>s, and C.E.<br />

Thomas. Compendium of Cucurbit Diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, M<strong>in</strong>nesota, USA. Pp. 28-<br />

30.<br />

Menzies, J., Bowen, P., Ehret, D., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Foliar applications of potassium silicate<br />

reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucch<strong>in</strong>i squash. Journal<br />

of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 117: 902-905.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Helmer, T., Koch, C., Seywerd, F. 1991a. Effects of<br />

soluble silicon on the parasitic fitness of Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea on Cucumis sativus.<br />

Phytopathology, 81: 84-88.<br />

31


Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Samuels, A.L. 1991b. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of silicon on<br />

cytological <strong>in</strong>teractions between Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea and Cucumis sativus. Physiology<br />

and Molecular Plant Pathology, 39: 403-414.<br />

Miller, T.C., Gubler, W.D., Laemmlen, F.F., Geng, S., Rizzo, D.M. 2004. Potential for us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Lecanicillium lecanii for suppression of strawberry powdery mildew. Biocontrol Science<br />

and Technology, 14: 215-220.<br />

Mitani, N., Ma, J.F. 2005. Uptake system of silicon <strong>in</strong> different plant species. Journal of<br />

Experimental Botany, 56: 1255–1261.<br />

Moller, K., Jensen, B., Andersen, H.P., Stryhn, H., Hockenhull, J. 2003. Biocontrol of Pythium<br />

tracheiphilum <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cabbage by Clonostachys rosea under field conditions. Biocontrol<br />

Science and Technology, 13: 171-182.<br />

Mommaerts, V., Platteau, G., Boulet, J., Sterk, G., Smagghe, G. 2008. Trichoderma-based<br />

biological control agents are compatible with the poll<strong>in</strong>ator Bombus terrestris: a laboratory<br />

study. Biological Control, 46: 463-466.<br />

Monte, E. 2001. Understand<strong>in</strong>g Trichoderma: between biotechnology and microbial ecology.<br />

International Microbiology, 4: 1-4.<br />

NDA - National Department of <strong>Agriculture</strong>. 1999. A guide for the Control of Plant Diseases.<br />

National Department of <strong>Agriculture</strong>, Pretoria, South Africa.<br />

Neveu, B., Labbé, C., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. GFP technology for the study of biocontrol agents <strong>in</strong><br />

tritrophic <strong>in</strong>teractions: A case study with Pseudozyma flocculosa. Journal of<br />

Microbiological Methods, 68: 275-281.<br />

Nofal, M.A., Haggag, W.M. 2006. Integrated management of powdery mildew of mango <strong>in</strong> Egypt.<br />

Crop Protection, 23: 480-486.<br />

Northover, J., Homeyer, C.A. 2001.Detection and management of myclobutanil-resistant grapev<strong>in</strong>e<br />

powdery mildew (Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator) <strong>in</strong> Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,<br />

23: 337-345.<br />

O’Hara, R.B, Nielsen, B.J., Ostergard, H. 2000. The effect of fungicide dose on the composition of<br />

laboratory populations of barley powdery mildew. Plant Pathology, 49: 558-566.<br />

Oliva, J., Navarro, S., Navarro, G., Camara, M.A., Barba, A. 1999. Integrated control of grape berry<br />

moth (Lobesia botrana), powdery mildew (Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator), downy mildew (Plasmopara<br />

viticola) and grapev<strong>in</strong>e sour rot (Acetobacter spp.) Crop Protection, 18: 581-587.<br />

Ozentivanyi, S., Kiss, L. 2003. Overw<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g of Ampelomyces mycoparasite on apple trees and<br />

other plants <strong>in</strong>fected with powdery mildew. Plant Pathology, 52: 737-746.<br />

Palmer, S., Scott, E., Stangoulis, J., Able, A.J. 2006. The effect of foliar-applied Ca and Si on the<br />

severity of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> two strawberry cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 708: 135-139.<br />

32


Pas<strong>in</strong>i, C., D’Aquila, F., Curir, P., Guli<strong>in</strong>o, M.L. 1997. Effectiveness of antifungal compounds<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st rose powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae) <strong>in</strong> glasshouses. Crop<br />

Protection, 16: 251-256.<br />

Patil, R., Ghormade, V., Deshpande, M. 2000. Chit<strong>in</strong>olytic enzymes: an exploration. Enzyme and<br />

Microbial Technology, 26: 473-83.<br />

Perez-Garcia, A., M<strong>in</strong>gorance, E., Rivera, M.E., P<strong>in</strong>o, D., Romero, D., Tores, J.A., Vicente, A.<br />

2006. Long-term preservation of Podosphaera fusca us<strong>in</strong>g silica gel. Journal of<br />

Phytopathology, 154: 190-192.<br />

Pertot, I., Zasso, R., Amsalem, L., Baldessari, M., Angeli, G., Elad, Y. 2008. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol<br />

agents <strong>in</strong> strawberry powdery mildew control strategies <strong>in</strong> high tunnel grow<strong>in</strong>g systems.<br />

Crop Protection, 27: 622-631.<br />

Picton, D.D., Hummer, K.E. 2003. Control of powdery mildew on leaves and stems of gooseberry.<br />

HortTechnology, 13: 365-367.<br />

Plant-Health, 2008. http://www.plant-health.co.za/articles/work<strong>in</strong>g_with_nature1.2.<strong>pdf</strong> captured on<br />

15/12/2008<br />

Raaijmakers, J.M., Vlami, M., Desouza J.T. 2002. Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol<br />

agents. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 81: 537-547.<br />

Remus-Borle, W., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2005. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong>duces antifungal compounds <strong>in</strong><br />

powdery mildew-<strong>in</strong>fected wheat. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 66: 108-<br />

115.<br />

Reynolds, A.G., Veto, L.J., Sholberg, P.L., Wardle, D.A., Haag, P. 1996. Use of potassium silicate<br />

for the control of powdery mildew [Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator (Schwe<strong>in</strong>) Burrill] <strong>in</strong> Vitis v<strong>in</strong>ifera L.<br />

cultivar Bacchus. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 47: 421-428.<br />

Rodrigues, F.A., McNally, D.J., Datnoff, L.E., Jones, J.B., Labbé, C., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G.,<br />

Bélanger, R.R. 2004. <strong>Silicon</strong> enhances the accumulation of diterpenoid phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> rice:<br />

a biochemical mechanism for blast resistance. Phytopathology 94: 177-183.<br />

Romero, D., de Vicente, A., Zeriouh, H., Cazorla, F.M., Fernández-Ortuño, D., Torés, J.A.,. Pérez-<br />

García, A. 2007. Evaluation of biological control agents for manag<strong>in</strong>g cucurbit powdery<br />

mildew on greenhouse-grown melon. Plant Pathology, 56: 976-986.<br />

Romero, D., Perez-Garcia, A. Rivera, M.E., Cazorla, F.M., de Vicente, A., 2004. Isolation and<br />

evaluation of antagonistic bacteria towards the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus<br />

Podosphaera fusca. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 64: 263-269.<br />

Romero, D., Rivera, M.E., Cazorla, F.M., de Vicente, A., Perez-Garcia, A. 2003. Effects of<br />

mycoparasitic fungi on the development of Sphaerotheca fusca <strong>in</strong> melon leaves.<br />

Mycological Researches, 107: 64-67.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991a. Mobility and deposition of silicon<br />

<strong>in</strong> cucumber plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 485-492.<br />

33


Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991b. Distribution of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea).<br />

Canadian Journal of Botany, 69: 140-146.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1993. The effects of silicon<br />

supplementation on cucumber fruit: changes <strong>in</strong> surface characteristics. Annals of Botany,<br />

72: 433-440.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L. 1994. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> cell walls and papillae of<br />

Cucumis sativus dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea. Physiology and Molecular<br />

Plant Pathology, 44: 237-242.<br />

Schippers, B. 1988. Biological control of pathogens with rhizobacteria. In: R.K.S. Wood and M.J.<br />

Way (Eds.). Biological Control of Pests, Pathogens and Weeds: Developments and<br />

Prospects. Royal Society, London, UK. Pp. 283-290.<br />

Schuerger, A.C., Hammer, W. 2003. Suppression of powdery mildew on greenhouse-grown<br />

cucumber by addition of silicon to hydroponic nutrient solution is <strong>in</strong>hibited at high<br />

temperature. Plant Disease, 87: 177-185.<br />

Shishkoff, N., McGrath, M.T. 2002. AQ10 biofungicide comb<strong>in</strong>ed with chemical fungicides or<br />

addQ spray adjuvant for control of cucurbit powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> detached leave culture.<br />

Plant Disease, 86: 915-918.<br />

Sitterly, W.R. 1978. Powdery mildew of cucurbits. In: D.M. Spencer (Ed.). The Powdery Mildews.<br />

Academic Press, London. Pp. 359-379<br />

Sundheim, L. 1982. Control of cucumber powdery mildew by the hyperparasite Ampelomyces<br />

quisqualis and fungicides. Plant Pathology, 31: 209-214.<br />

Sundheim, L., Krekl<strong>in</strong>g, T. 1982. Host-parasite relationships of the hyperparasite Ampelomyces<br />

quisqualis and its powdery mildew host Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea: Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron<br />

microscopy. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, 104: 202-210.<br />

Sztejnberg, A., Galper, S., Mazar, S., Lisker, N. 1989. Ampelomyces quisqualis for biological and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control of powdery mildews <strong>in</strong> Israel. Journal of Phytopathology, 124: 285-295.<br />

Sztejnberg, A., Paz, Z., Boekhout, T., Gafni, A., Gerson, U. 2004. A new fungus with dual<br />

biocontrol capabilities: reduc<strong>in</strong>g the numbers of phytophagous mites and powdery mildew<br />

disease damage. Crop Protection, 23: 1125-1129.<br />

Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.J., Beaton, J.D. 1993. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. MacMillan Publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Company, New York.<br />

Tronsmo, A. and Hjeljord, L.G. 1998. Biological control with Trichoderma species. In: G.S. Boland<br />

and L.D. Kuykendall (Eds.). Plant-Microbe Interactions and Biological Control. Marcel<br />

Dekker, New York, USA. Pp. 111-126.<br />

34


Urquhart, E.J., Punja, Z.K. 2002. Hydrolytic enzymes and antifungal compounds produced by<br />

Tilletiopsis species, phyllosphere yeasts that are antagonists of powdery mildew fungi.<br />

Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 48: 219-229.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C 1996. Glasshouse experiments on biocontrol of cucumber<br />

powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by the mycoparasites Verticillium lecanii and<br />

Sporothrix rugulosa. Biological Control, 6: 353-360.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1998. Selection of Verticillium lecanii isolates with high<br />

potential for biocontrol of cucumber powdery mildew by means of components analysis at<br />

different humidity regimes. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8: 465-477.<br />

Wei, G., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun, S. 1996. Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased plant growth by plant growth-promot<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria under field conditions.<br />

Phytopathology, 86: 221-224.<br />

Whipps, J.M. 1992. Status of biological disease control <strong>in</strong> horticulture. Biocontrol Science and<br />

Technology, 2: 3-24.<br />

Whipps, J.M., Lewis, K., Cook, R.C. 1988. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control. In: M.N.<br />

Burge (Ed.). Fungi <strong>in</strong> Biological Control Systems. Manchester University Press,<br />

Manchester, UK. Pp. 161-187.<br />

Wiese, J., Wiese, H., Schwartz, J., Schubert, S. 2005. Osmotic stress and silicon act additively <strong>in</strong><br />

enhanc<strong>in</strong>g pathogen resistance <strong>in</strong> barley aga<strong>in</strong>st barley powdery mildew. Journal of Plant<br />

Nutrition and Soil Science, 168: 269-274.<br />

W<strong>in</strong>slow, M.D. 1992. <strong>Silicon</strong>, disease resistance, and yield of rice genotypes under upland cultural<br />

conditions. Crop Science, 32: 1208-1213.<br />

Wong, F.P., Wilcox, W.F. 2002. Sensitivity to azoxystrob<strong>in</strong> among isolates of Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator:<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e distribution and relationship to myclobutanil sensitivity. Plant Disease, 86: 394-<br />

404.<br />

Yarwood, C.E. 1957. Powdery mildews. The Botanical Review, 23: 235-301.<br />

Yarwood, C.E. 1978. History and taxonomy of powdery mildews. In: D.M. Spencer (Ed.). The<br />

Powdery Mildews. Academic Press, London. Pp. 1-32.<br />

Yobo, K.S. 2005. Biological control and plant growth promotion by selected Trichoderma and<br />

Bacillus species. <strong>PhD</strong> <strong>Thesis</strong>, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South<br />

Africa.<br />

Zeyen, R.J., Ahlstrand, G.G., Carver, T.L.W. 1993. X-ray microanalysis of frozen-hydrated, freezedried,<br />

and critical po<strong>in</strong>t dried leaf specimens: determ<strong>in</strong>ation of soluble and <strong>in</strong>soluble<br />

chemical elements at Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is epidermal cell papilla sites <strong>in</strong> barley isol<strong>in</strong>es<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Ml-o and ml-o alleles. Canadian Journal of Botany, 71: 284-296.<br />

35


CHAPTER TWO<br />

ISOLATION AND IN VITRO SCREENING OF POTENTIAL BIOCONTROL<br />

AGENTS AGAINST POWDERY MILDEW<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a , M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a and M.J. Morris b<br />

a Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

b Plant Health Products, P.O. Box 207, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham Road, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

Powdery mildew (PM) is an important disease of many plants worldwide. Potential<br />

antagonists of powdery mildew were isolated from naturally <strong>in</strong>fected leaves of different<br />

plants. A total of 2000 isolates of bacteria, fungi and yeasts were tested <strong>in</strong> a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g on detached leaves. The best 30 isolates show<strong>in</strong>g consistent results were further<br />

tested under glasshouse conditions for their efficacy aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. In a<br />

glasshouse trial, disease control of 30-77% was provided by 23 isolates, and significant<br />

reductions <strong>in</strong> AUDPC values were recorded as a result of 29 isolates be<strong>in</strong>g applied. The<br />

best five isolates, identified as Gliocladium roseum (syn. Clonostachys rosea) (Isolate EH),<br />

Trichothecium roseum (syn. Cephalothecium roseum) (Isolate H20) and Serratia<br />

marcescens (i.e., Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41), were selected for further studies.<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Powdery mildew (PM) is one of the most important foliar diseases of many plants<br />

worldwide, occurr<strong>in</strong>g both under greenhouse and field conditions (Kiss et al., 2004).<br />

Application of systemic fungicides has been the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal control option (McGrath, 1996;<br />

2001). However, effective control of this disease with fungicides is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

difficult due to concerns about health and environmental hazards, as well as the rapid<br />

development of fungicide resistance by these pathogenic fungi, render<strong>in</strong>g most fungicides<br />

<strong>in</strong>effective aga<strong>in</strong>st PM (McGrath, 2001). The possibility of us<strong>in</strong>g resistant cultivars towards<br />

this disease is also limited, especially <strong>in</strong> fruit and vegetable crops (Bélanger and<br />

36


Benyagoub, 1997). Therefore, there is great research <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g effective<br />

antagonists aga<strong>in</strong>st PM that can supplement or replace conventional agrochemical<br />

fungicides.<br />

Biocontrol of PM by various antagonists may <strong>in</strong>volve competition for natural resources<br />

(Nofal and Haggag, 2006), antibiosis (Hajlaoui et al., 1992; 1994), mycoparasitism (Askary<br />

et al., 1997; Falk et al., 1995a; Kiss, 1998; Romero et al., 2003; Sundheim, 1982;<br />

Sztenjberg et al., 1989; 1995b; Verhaar et al., 1997) or <strong>in</strong>duction of systemic resistance <strong>in</strong><br />

plants aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogens (Elad et al., 1998; Silva et al., 2004; Vogt and Buchenauer, 1997).<br />

The superficial growth of PM on leaves makes it an easy target for many antagonists that<br />

can be isolated and screened for their biocontrol efficacy.<br />

The success of biological control depends on the <strong>in</strong>itial screen<strong>in</strong>g because subsequent<br />

results depend on identify<strong>in</strong>g the best isolates dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial process (Chiou and Wu,<br />

2003). Isolat<strong>in</strong>g potential antagonists from their natural hosts can make screen<strong>in</strong>g easier and<br />

more effective because they will be applied <strong>in</strong> the same environment, to which they should<br />

be well adapted.<br />

There are several techniques of prelim<strong>in</strong>ary screen<strong>in</strong>g isolates for biological control agents,<br />

with the dual culture method be<strong>in</strong>g preferred by many researchers (Landa et al., 1997;<br />

Morton and Stroube, 1955; Paulitz et al., 1992). This technique <strong>in</strong>volves cultur<strong>in</strong>g the target<br />

pathogen and the potential antagonist(s) together on the same artificial medium. Its<br />

simplicity and rapid results, with some level of reliability, makes it a good primary<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g method when the antagonists and the target pathogens can be grown<br />

saprophytically. However, obligate pathogens such as PM cannot be cultured on artificial<br />

media, limit<strong>in</strong>g the application of this approach. Moreover, some of the modes of action<br />

cannot be observed by dual culture, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the loss of some effective isolates if their<br />

modes of action are not detected us<strong>in</strong>g this technique. Therefore, an alternative approach is<br />

needed for obligate parasites that require the screen<strong>in</strong>g of isolates <strong>in</strong> a natural way. The<br />

objectives of this study were to isolate and screen various potential antagonists of PM from<br />

naturally <strong>in</strong>fected leaves of susceptible plants.<br />

37


2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

2.2.1 Collection of samples<br />

Samples of leaves of 16 plant species, naturally <strong>in</strong>fected with PM, were collected from 8<br />

sites <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce of KwaZulu-Natal (Table 2.1). Two leaf samples (one young and one<br />

old <strong>in</strong>fected leaf) were taken from each plant species that were grow<strong>in</strong>g at least 1km apart,<br />

or after an <strong>in</strong>terval of 10 d, if taken from the same plant.<br />

2.2.2 Isolation and cultur<strong>in</strong>g of potential biocontrol agents<br />

(a) Fungi<br />

Mycelia of PM, and hence any associated fungi, were scratched from the plant with a<br />

sterilized scalpel, plated onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and <strong>in</strong>cubated at 25 o C. Plates<br />

were monitored for 1 wk, while develop<strong>in</strong>g colonies of fungi were sub-cultured. Each<br />

isolate was <strong>in</strong>cubated for 1-2 wk depend<strong>in</strong>g on its growth and sporulation rates. Mycelia<br />

and spores were harvested by pour<strong>in</strong>g 5ml of sterilized distilled water onto the plates of<br />

PDA for 5m<strong>in</strong> and scratch<strong>in</strong>g the mycelial mat with a sterilized scalpel. The mycelial<br />

suspension was transferred <strong>in</strong>to sterile bottles, shaken vigorously and spores were filtered<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g four layers of cheesecloth.<br />

(b) Bacillus<br />

Samples of <strong>in</strong>fected leaves were placed <strong>in</strong>to conical flasks conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sterilized distilled<br />

water and shaken vigorously. After remov<strong>in</strong>g the leaf materials from the flask, the<br />

suspension was serially diluted, then heated to 80 o C for 15 m<strong>in</strong>. Aliquots of 0.1 ml were<br />

plated on Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) and <strong>in</strong>cubated at 30 o C overnight. Individual bacterial<br />

colonies were transferred onto clean PDA plates and <strong>in</strong>cubated for 24 h at 30 o C. For mass<br />

production, isolates were <strong>in</strong>oculated onto 100 ml flasks conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 50 ml of Tryptone Soya<br />

Broth (TSB) and <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> a water bath operat<strong>in</strong>g at 30 o C and 200-250 revolutions per<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ute (rpm). After an <strong>in</strong>cubation period of 72 h, cultures were centrifuged at 9000 rpm for<br />

15 m<strong>in</strong>. The suspension was removed gently and the pellet was transferred <strong>in</strong>to bottles<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sterilized distilled water.<br />

38


(c) Yeasts<br />

The same technique that was used for Bacillus isolates was adopted with slight<br />

modifications. Mycelial and spore suspensions of PM were prepared by putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

leaves <strong>in</strong>to conical flasks conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 100 ml of sterilized distilled water and shaken<br />

vigorously for few m<strong>in</strong>utes. The suspensions were serially diluted <strong>in</strong> sterile distilled water<br />

and an aliquot of 0.1 ml of each dilution was plated onto a semi-selective media, prepared<br />

by add<strong>in</strong>g Rose Bengal to PDA, with the objective of <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g bacterial growth. All<br />

colonies of yeast were re-streaked on Malt Extract Agar (MEA) to obta<strong>in</strong> pure cultures and<br />

<strong>in</strong>cubated at 25 o C. After 48 h of <strong>in</strong>cubation, isolates were transferred <strong>in</strong>to 100 ml flasks<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Malt Extract Broth (MEB) and fermented <strong>in</strong> a water bath for 72 h at 25 o C with<br />

rotary agitation at 200-250 rpm.<br />

2.2.3 Preparation of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />

Inoculum of PM was collected from naturally <strong>in</strong>fected leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Cucurbita pepo,<br />

F1-Hybrid Partenon) obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Starke Ayres 1 , and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g conidia<br />

onto disease-free plants and keep<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> a separate glasshouse. Conidia of PM were<br />

harvested us<strong>in</strong>g the method of Askary et al. (1998) and Dik et al. (1998). To ensure a high<br />

level of conidial viability and to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the same age of conidia, dead conidia were<br />

removed by shak<strong>in</strong>g the source leaves 24 h before <strong>in</strong>oculation. Infected leaves were then<br />

immersed <strong>in</strong> sterilized distilled water and shaken to remove PM conidia. Conidia were<br />

counted us<strong>in</strong>g a haemocytometer and the concentration was adjusted to 10 3 conidia ml -1 .<br />

Inoculation was by spray<strong>in</strong>g the conidial suspension onto leaves with<strong>in</strong> two hours of<br />

count<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

2.2.4 Screen<strong>in</strong>g of isolates on detached leaves<br />

Seeds of zucch<strong>in</strong>i were planted <strong>in</strong> trays filled with a composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark, and kept <strong>in</strong> a<br />

glasshouse (26-28 o C, 75-85% RH). After 2 wk, fully developed leaves were cut off with<br />

their petioles and transferred <strong>in</strong>to pairs of 90 mm diameter Petri dishes, as described by<br />

Shishkoff and McGrath (2002). Each leaf petiole was <strong>in</strong>serted through a hole that connected<br />

the bottom of the top Petri dish to the lid of the bottom Petri dish that conta<strong>in</strong>ed a nutrient<br />

solution (Figure 2.1). Petri dishes were transferred <strong>in</strong>to growth chambers set at a<br />

1 Starke Ayres Seeds (Pty) Ltd., P. O. Box 304, Epp<strong>in</strong>dust 7475, South Africa.<br />

39


temperature of 25 o C and 18 o C (day and night), with a photoperiod of 16 h and an RH of 65-<br />

80%. The lid of the top Petri dish was removed to avoid fluctuations of humidity that might<br />

have affected antagonistic activity of potential antagonists. Potential antagonists were<br />

applied by putt<strong>in</strong>g 10-15 droplets of the microbial suspension onto the leaves us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sterilized Pasteur pipettes. In order to give the antagonists a competitive advantage, they<br />

were applied 2 d before <strong>in</strong>oculation of the leaves with PM, and reapplied 4 d after<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

Ten days after <strong>in</strong>oculation, the percentage of leaf area covered with PM was recorded and<br />

transferred <strong>in</strong>to a scale of 1-5 where: 1 = 0-20%, 2 = 20-40%, 3 = 40-60%, 4 = 60-80%, 5 =<br />

80-100% of leaf area covered by PM. This was done <strong>in</strong> order to separate the most effective<br />

ones from the least based on a range.To avoid any possibility of cross contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

between treatments, each isolate was tested <strong>in</strong> two replicates, placed 150-200 mm from<br />

other isolates. Isolates that showed superior performance aga<strong>in</strong>st PM were selected for<br />

further screen<strong>in</strong>gs that cont<strong>in</strong>ued until the number of isolates was reduced to the best 30.<br />

2.2.5 Screen<strong>in</strong>g of isolates on whole plants<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of zucch<strong>in</strong>i were raised <strong>in</strong> the same way as described above and kept <strong>in</strong> the<br />

glasshouse until they produced two fully developed leaves. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were then<br />

transplanted <strong>in</strong>to pots (180mm diameter) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark medium and<br />

transferred <strong>in</strong>to another glasshouse (24-30 o C and 65-85% RH). The plants were supplied<br />

with a complete fertilizer [3:1:3 (38) from Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> 2 at 0.5g l -1 ] + [Ca(NO 3 ) 2 at<br />

0.5 g l -1 ] by means of drip irrigation. Plant distance was 400mm with<strong>in</strong> rows and 1.5-2m<br />

between rows (Figure 2.1). Once seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were well established, they were <strong>in</strong>oculated with<br />

approximately 3-5 ml of a conidial suspension of P. xanthii (10 3 conidia ml -1 ) us<strong>in</strong>g a hand<br />

sprayer. Inoculation took place <strong>in</strong> the late afternoon to ensure sufficiently high relative<br />

humidity for germ<strong>in</strong>ation of the conidia.<br />

All BCAs were applied us<strong>in</strong>g hand sprayers 2d before <strong>in</strong>oculation of P. xanthii and<br />

reapplied 4 d later, when symptoms started to appear, and cont<strong>in</strong>ued every week for 4 wk.<br />

The concentrations of propagules of BCAs applied were 10 6 ml -1 for fungi and 10 8 ml -1 for<br />

bacteria and yeasts, respectively. All BCAs were applied <strong>in</strong> the even<strong>in</strong>gs to ensure<br />

2 Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> (Pty) Ltd., P.O. Box 742, Muldersdrift, 1747, South Africa.<br />

40


sufficient relative humidity for establishment of the antagonists. The best five isolates that<br />

controlled PM consistently were selected for further evaluations and sent for identification<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g DNA sequence. The bacterial and fungal BCAs were identified by Inqaba<br />

Biotechnical Industries (Pty) Ltd 3 and Agricultural Research Council (ARC-PPRI) 4 ,<br />

respectively.<br />

Disease assessments were made weekly by estimat<strong>in</strong>g the percentage of leaf area <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

for each treatment, immediately before the next spray application of the BCA. Values of<br />

area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) were calculated from the disease severity<br />

values us<strong>in</strong>g an AUDPC program (Shaner and F<strong>in</strong>ney, 1977).<br />

2.2.6 Data analysis<br />

The experiment was arranged <strong>in</strong> a randomized complete block design with each treatment<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g three replications. Data was analysed us<strong>in</strong>g GenStat ® Statistical Analysis Software<br />

(GenStat, 2006). Where the CV % was > 20%, the orig<strong>in</strong>al data was transformed us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

square root transformation and means of treatments were separated us<strong>in</strong>g Duncan's New<br />

Multiple Range Test. Effect of <strong>in</strong>dividual treatment (i.e. BCA) <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM was<br />

assessed by calculat<strong>in</strong>g the percentages of f<strong>in</strong>al disease level and AUDPC value of the<br />

Untreated Control reduced by the biocontrol treatment.<br />

2.3 RESULTS<br />

2.3.1 Isolation and screen<strong>in</strong>g on detached leaves<br />

When PDA was used as a growth media, many types of microbes grew from the scrap<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of PM mycelium that were plated onto it. However, only fungal colonies were picked up<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a sterilized scalpel. Rate of germ<strong>in</strong>ation of germ-tubes as well as shape, size and<br />

colour of mycelia of these fungi were variable when observed with the naked eye.<br />

Microscopic exam<strong>in</strong>ations showed that the isolates differed widely <strong>in</strong> their spore structures<br />

and hyphae. When Rose Bengal was added to the PDA, growth of bacterial species was<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited and yeasts, together with some fungi, grew on the medium. However, there were a<br />

3 Inqaba Biotechnical Industries (Pty) Ltd., P.O. Box 14356, Hatfield 0028, South Africa.<br />

4 Agricultural Research Council (ARC-PPRI), P. Bag X134, Queenswood 0121, South Africa.<br />

41


few Gram negative bacteria that grew on PDA conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Rose Bengal. The isolation<br />

technique used for Bacillus species provided many isolates, mostly Gram positive bacteria.<br />

Only colonies that showed some morphological resemblance to typical Bacillus colonies<br />

were chosen as potential isolates.<br />

The isolation techniques were applied to leaves of 16 plant species <strong>in</strong>fected with P. xanthii<br />

PM, collected from different sites. A total of 2,000 candidate microbes were selected for<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g on detached leaves. Detached leaves started to show PM symptoms 3-4 d after<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation and the disease could cover an entire leaf with<strong>in</strong> 10 d because the<br />

environmental conditions were favourable for PM. Adventitious roots developed from the<br />

bottom of the petiole after 6-7 d. As long as the nutrient solution was available, the leaves<br />

could stay alive, <strong>in</strong> most cases, for more than one month.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the evaluation, some leaves died due to high levels of PM and were considered as<br />

100% diseased (i.e., 0% control). More than half of the potential BCA isolates reduced PM<br />

disease levels compared to the untreated control. From all the isolates tested, the best 100<br />

isolates were selected for a second phase of screen<strong>in</strong>g, from which 70% of them were<br />

discarded, before a third phase of selection was conducted, because the efficacy of some of<br />

these isolates was less consistent than others. Some isolates were observed to produce an<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibition zone around them, restrict<strong>in</strong>g the expansion of the PM colony, while other<br />

isolates <strong>in</strong>hibited the establishment of the disease. After a series of screen<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

detached leaves, a total of 30 isolates (11 bacteria, 12 fungi and 7 yeasts) were selected that<br />

reduced PM disease levels by more than 60%.<br />

Table 2. 6 Sites where naturally <strong>in</strong>fected leaves of host plants were collected<br />

Site<br />

Host plants<br />

Albert Falls weed 1<br />

Durban, KwaMashu<br />

cucumber, grape, pumpk<strong>in</strong><br />

Pietermaritzburg, <strong>Agriculture</strong> Campus cabbage, cucumber, papaya, pepper, pumpk<strong>in</strong>, rose, tomato,<br />

weed 2, strawberry, z<strong>in</strong>nia, zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Pietermaritzburg, Cedara<br />

cucumber, pumpk<strong>in</strong><br />

Pietermaritzburg, Scottsville<br />

grape, mulberry, pumpk<strong>in</strong>, weed 3, zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Pietermaritzburg, Ukul<strong>in</strong>ga Farm beans, pepper, tomato, weed 4, zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Tala Valley<br />

pumpk<strong>in</strong><br />

Tongaat<br />

pumpk<strong>in</strong><br />

42


A<br />

B<br />

Figure 2.1 Plates show<strong>in</strong>g prelim<strong>in</strong>ary screen<strong>in</strong>g of potential isolates us<strong>in</strong>g detached leaves<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculated with Podosphaera xanthii and treated with biocontrol agents (A). Note the formation of<br />

adventitious roots from the petioles, and the development of powdery mildew (B).<br />

Figure 2.2 Zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> greenhouse.<br />

43


2.3.2 Screen<strong>in</strong>g on whole plants<br />

BCA<br />

Control<br />

Under glasshouse condition, plants started to show symptoms of PM 4d after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />

and the disease level could reach up to > 80% with<strong>in</strong> 2 wk, if not treated. Application of<br />

BCAs had a significant effect on the severity of PM (P < 0.001). Compared to the treatment<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only water, 23 isolates significantly reduced the f<strong>in</strong>al disease level by 30-77%.<br />

Some isolates that showed promis<strong>in</strong>g results on detached leaves (e.g., Isolates CR, CK,<br />

CFC, CE, C, B14, E-77) were less efficient <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g the disease when tested under<br />

glasshouse condition, although they caused significant control (Table 2.2).<br />

The AUDPC value of the Untreated Control, was significantly reduced (P < 0.001) by 29<br />

isolates (Figure 2.3). There was a direct relationship between f<strong>in</strong>al disease level and<br />

AUDPC values. Whenever the f<strong>in</strong>al disease was high, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g value of AUDPC<br />

was high.<br />

The best five biocontrol isolates were identified as Clonostachys rosea (L<strong>in</strong>k) Schroers,<br />

Samuels, Seifert & Gams (syn. Gliocladium roseum, Isolate EH), Trichothecium roseum<br />

(Pers.) L<strong>in</strong>k (syn. Cephalothecium roseum, Isolate H20) and 3 isolates Serratia marcescens<br />

(Bizio) (i.e., Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41).<br />

44


Table 2.7 Effect of selected biocontrol agents on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and AUDPC of powdery<br />

mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i plans after 10 d and 5 wk of growth <strong>in</strong> a growth chamber and greenhouse,<br />

respectively.<br />

Isolates (BCAs)<br />

Type Disease rat<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

F= fungus, B= bacterium, Y= yeast<br />

Values with<strong>in</strong> column followed by a common letter were not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Duncan's<br />

New Multiple Range Test at α = 0.05.<br />

detached leaves<br />

FDL<br />

Greenhouse assessment<br />

Values <strong>in</strong> brackets are means of data transformed us<strong>in</strong>g square root transformations.<br />

Rat<strong>in</strong>gs: 1 disease < 20%; 2 = < 40%, 3 = < 60%; 4 =


CFC<br />

CK<br />

B-14<br />

E-77<br />

C<br />

CR<br />

B-29<br />

DY<br />

B-21<br />

B-1272<br />

DS<br />

Y18<br />

Y38<br />

Y20<br />

B-52<br />

Y30<br />

Y27<br />

ML<br />

Y26<br />

C12<br />

BK<br />

Y31<br />

C218<br />

Y15<br />

Y9<br />

Y41<br />

EH<br />

H20<br />

B-15<br />

BCAs<br />

CE<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Disease control (%)<br />

Figure 2.3 Efficacy of potential BCAs <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of<br />

treatment under greenhouse conditions.<br />

46


BCAs<br />

CK<br />

B-29<br />

E-77<br />

CFC<br />

C<br />

B-21<br />

CE<br />

DY<br />

CR<br />

DS<br />

B-14<br />

B-1272<br />

B-52<br />

Y18<br />

Y38<br />

Y20<br />

BK<br />

Y30<br />

ML<br />

Y27<br />

Y26<br />

C12<br />

B-15<br />

Y31<br />

C218<br />

EH<br />

Y41<br />

Y9<br />

Y15<br />

H20<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

Reduction <strong>in</strong> AUDPC (%)<br />

Figure 2.4 Effects of selected isolates <strong>in</strong> development of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

represented as area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) after five weeks of treatment under<br />

greenhouse conditions.<br />

47


2.4 DISCUSSION<br />

The development of a proper isolation and <strong>in</strong> vitro screen<strong>in</strong>g protocol that provides rapid,<br />

repeatable and reliable results is an important <strong>in</strong>itial step <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g efficient antagonists<br />

for biocontrol of plant diseases. This is because the success of all subsequent stages<br />

depends on the ability of the <strong>in</strong>itial screen<strong>in</strong>g procedure to identify appropriate candidates<br />

(Whipps et al., 1988). Biological control of plant diseases typically <strong>in</strong>volves three<br />

components: the biocontrol agent (BCA), the pathogen and the plant itself (Nevew et al.,<br />

2007). If one of these components is miss<strong>in</strong>g, the screen<strong>in</strong>g process will be <strong>in</strong>complete.<br />

In order to be an appropriate candidate, an isolate should consistently produce a promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

result under various environmental conditions. It is a common challenge dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g process that some potential candidates show good efficacy <strong>in</strong>itially, but fail to<br />

perform at later stages, or when they are tested <strong>in</strong> different environments.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the screen<strong>in</strong>g process, BCAs were applied before and after <strong>in</strong>oculation of the<br />

pathogen. Application before <strong>in</strong>fection was aimed at <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g competition as a possible<br />

mechanism of action <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g the disease by allow<strong>in</strong>g the antagonists to establish<br />

themselves before the disease. When spores or conidia of a pathogen require exogenous<br />

nutrients for germ<strong>in</strong>ation and germ tube elongation, they are subjected to competition for<br />

these nutrients with the <strong>in</strong>digenous saprophytic microbial community (Brodie and<br />

Blackeman, 1975). However, Wilson (1997) determ<strong>in</strong>ed that conidia of PM fungi do not<br />

require exogenous nutrients dur<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation, and host penetration occurs with<strong>in</strong> a short<br />

period follow<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation, limit<strong>in</strong>g the value of competition as biocontrol strategy. He<br />

concluded that suppress<strong>in</strong>g the sporulation and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of the pathogen us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mycoparasites is the only viable approach to control PM fungi. However, other mechanisms<br />

of action such as antibiosis and <strong>in</strong>duction of host resistance are important mechanisms for<br />

many antagonists. Hence, <strong>in</strong>itial screen<strong>in</strong>g should m<strong>in</strong>imize loss of potential antagonists by<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g every possible opportunity for all antagonists to display their potential biocontrol<br />

activity.<br />

In most cases, the performance of biocontrol isolates on agar has less predictive value than<br />

<strong>in</strong> vivo tests (Verhaar et al., 1998). This is because biocontrol activity of all antagonists is<br />

dependant on several factors that determ<strong>in</strong>e the survival of the <strong>in</strong>troduced microbe. For<br />

48


their survival and establishment, BCAs may require the presence of their host on the<br />

phylloplane. For <strong>in</strong>stance, growth of Pseudozyma flocculosa (Traquair, Shaw and Jarvis)<br />

Boekhout and Traquair is dependent on the presence of PM (Nevew et al., 2007). This may<br />

be related to availability of nutrients from the target pathogen.<br />

Many isolates of yeasts suppressed PM development. Often there was a clear zone around<br />

the antagonists. Yeasts are known to produce several <strong>in</strong>hibitory products (Hajilaoui et al.,<br />

1994, Benyagoub et al., 1996a; Urquhart and Punja, 2002). For <strong>in</strong>stance, several species of<br />

Tilletiopsis produce ß-1,3 exo- and endo-glucanase, chit<strong>in</strong>ase and antifungal compounds<br />

(Urquhart and Punja, 2002). An active fraction of ester fatty acids produced by species of<br />

this genus was reported to <strong>in</strong>hibit germ tube development of P. xanthii and plasmolyse its<br />

spores (Urquhart and Punja, 2002). Pseudozyma flocculosa secretes modified long-cha<strong>in</strong><br />

fatty acids that caused cytoplasmic granulation and collapse of PM hyphae (Hajilaoui et al.,<br />

1994, Benyagoub et al., 1996a). This might be the reason for the clear zone around many of<br />

the yeast isolates tested.<br />

The formation of an <strong>in</strong>hibition zone by bacterial isolates species is believed to be the result<br />

of antibiosis or competition, through which the antagonists control the disease. A report by<br />

Romero et al. (2004) <strong>in</strong>dicated that these two mechanisms of action are common <strong>in</strong><br />

bacteria. Further work by these researchers showed that production of lipopeptide<br />

antibiotics such as surfact<strong>in</strong>, fengyc<strong>in</strong>, and itur<strong>in</strong> A or bacillomyc<strong>in</strong>, and butanolic by<br />

Bacillis subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn showed that antibiosis is the ma<strong>in</strong> factor <strong>in</strong> PM<br />

suppression by Bacillus (Romero et al., 2007). Few candidates of fungal isolates showed<br />

hyperparasitism <strong>in</strong> addition to the modes of actions demonstrated by yeasts and bacterial<br />

isolates.<br />

The screen<strong>in</strong>g was performed us<strong>in</strong>g one species of plant, zucch<strong>in</strong>i (F1 hybrid), <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

with a s<strong>in</strong>gle PM fungus (P. xanthii). The hybrid used for this experiment is very<br />

susceptible to PM and grows upward, mak<strong>in</strong>g it an ideal choice for this research. Although<br />

all cucurbit plants are known to be susceptible to PM (McGrath and Thomas, 1996), most<br />

of them grow horizontally which requires large grow<strong>in</strong>g areas and it also <strong>in</strong>creases the<br />

possibility of <strong>in</strong>ter-plot <strong>in</strong>terference between treatments.<br />

49


The approach adopted was based on the hypothesis that if an isolate can antagonize PM of<br />

this plant (i.e. zucch<strong>in</strong>i), then it will probably be effective aga<strong>in</strong>st other PM species of<br />

different plants. This approach has been used by several authors (Sztejnburg et al., 1989;<br />

Szentivanyi and Kiss, 2003). These groups of authors showed that Ampelomyces quisqualis<br />

Cesati ex Schlechtendahl isolated from a specific PM provided effective control aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

other PM species on different crops.<br />

The efficacy of some of the potential antagonists used was reduced when they were tested<br />

under greenhouse conditions. This could be due to greater fluctuations of the environmental<br />

conditions of the glasshouse compared to the growth chamber, where temperature, light<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity and relative humidity were all stable. However, these factors are more variable<br />

under glasshouse conditions subjected to fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g daily weather conditions. In spite of<br />

such fluctuations, some isolates gave consistent results, probably due to their adaptability to<br />

environmental fluctuations.<br />

Under both grow<strong>in</strong>g conditions, PM covered the whole leaf with<strong>in</strong> 2wk after <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />

This demonstrated the potential for the disease to destroy the whole plant if the<br />

environmental conditions were favourable for its development, and there were no effective<br />

control measures.<br />

The screen<strong>in</strong>g procedure followed <strong>in</strong> this experiment yielded potential antagonists that can<br />

be used under glasshouse conditions where PM is prevalent, with environmental conditions<br />

that favour both the antagonists and the pathogen. Paulitz and Bélanger (2001) described<br />

glasshouses as provid<strong>in</strong>g conducive environmental conditions under which BCAs can<br />

operate at their best. However, to be effective, the potential BCAs must be able to establish<br />

themselves soon after their application because the development of PM is so fast <strong>in</strong> such<br />

environments. The control efficacy of these potential isolates is promis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

disease. However, the level of control provided by all BCAs tested was not complete.<br />

Therefore, there is a need to enhance their efficacy with a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of these<br />

BCAs, the pathogen and the host plant. The efficacy of these antagonists can also be<br />

enhanced by co-application of compatible products or adjuvants. There is also a need to test<br />

these selected isolates under field conditions, where environmental conditions are not<br />

controlled, <strong>in</strong> order to develop biofungicides that can be used for <strong>in</strong>tegrated disease<br />

management purposes for field crops.<br />

50


2.5 REFERENCES<br />

Askary, H., Benhamou, N., Brodeur, J. 1997. Ultrastructural and cytochemical <strong>in</strong>vestigations of the<br />

antagonistic effect of Verticillium lecanii on cucumber powdery mildew. Phytopathology,<br />

87: 359-368.<br />

Askary, H., Carrirre, Y., Bélanger, R. R., Brodeur, J. 1998. Pathogenicity of the fungus Verticillium<br />

lecanii to aphids and powdery mildew. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8: 23-32.<br />

Bélanger, R.R, Benyagoub, M. 1997. Challenges and prospects for <strong>in</strong>tegrated control of powdery<br />

mildew <strong>in</strong> greenhouse. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 19: 310-314.<br />

Brodie, I.D.S., Blakeman, J.P. 1975. Competition for carbon compounds by leaf surface bacterium<br />

and conidia of Botrytis c<strong>in</strong>erea. Physiological Plant Pathology, 6: 125-135.<br />

Chiou, A.L., Wu, W.S. 2003. Formulation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B190 for control of lily<br />

grey mould (Botrytis elliptica). Journal of Phytopathology, 151: 13-18.<br />

Dik, A.J., Verhaar, M.A., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. Comparison of three biological control agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> semi-commercial-scale<br />

glasshouse trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104: 413-423.<br />

Elad, Y., Kirshner, B., Nitzani, Y., Sztejnberg, A. 1998. Management of powdery mildew and gray<br />

mold of cucumber by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and Ampelomyces quisqualis AQ10.<br />

BioControl, 43: 241-251.<br />

Falk, S.P., Gadoury D.M., Cortesi P., Pearson, R.C., Seem, R.C. 1995a. Parasitism of Unc<strong>in</strong>ula<br />

necator cleistothecia by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Phytopathology, 85:<br />

794-800.<br />

Falk, S.P., Gadoury, D.M., Pearson, R.C., Seem, R.C. 1995b. Partial control of grape powdery<br />

mildew by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease, 79: 483-490.<br />

GenStat. 2006. GenStat Statistical Analysis Software 9 th ed. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Oxford, UK.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Benhamou, N., Bélanger, R.R. 1992. Cytochemical study of the antagonistic<br />

activity of Sporothrix flocculosa on rose powdery mildew, Sphaerotheca pannosa var.<br />

rosae. Phytopathology, 82: 583-589.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Traquair, J. A., Jarvis, W.R., Bélanger, R. R. 1994. Antifungal activity of<br />

extracellular metabolites produced by Sporothrix flocculosa. Biocontrol Science and<br />

Technology, 4: 229-237.<br />

Kiss, L. 1998. Natural occurrence of Ampelomyces <strong>in</strong>tracellular mycoparasites <strong>in</strong> mycelia of<br />

powdery mildew fungi. New Phytologist, 140: 709-714.<br />

Kiss, l., Russel, J.C., Szentivanyi, O., Xu, X., Jeffries, P. 2004. Review: Biology and biocontrol<br />

potential of Ampelomyces mycoparasites, natural antagonists of powdery mildew.<br />

Biocontrol Science and Technology, 14: 635-651.<br />

51


Landa, B.B., Navas-Cortes, J.A., Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 2004. Influence of temperature on plantrhizobacteria<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions related to biocontrol potential for suppression of fusarium wilt of<br />

chickpea. Plant Pathology, 53: 341-352.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 2001. Fungicide resistance <strong>in</strong> cucurbit powdery mildew: Experiences and<br />

challenges. Plant Disease, 85: 236-245.<br />

McGrath, M.T., Thomas, C.E., 1996. Powdery mildew. In: T.H. Zitter, D.I. Hopk<strong>in</strong>s, and C.E.<br />

Thomas. Compendium of Cucurbit Disease. APS Press, St. Paul, M<strong>in</strong>nesota, USA. Pp. 28-<br />

30.<br />

Morton, D.T., Stroube, N.H., 1955. Antagonistic and stimulatory effects of microorganisms upon<br />

Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology, 45: 419-420.<br />

Neveu, B., Labbé, C., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. GFP technology for the study of biocontrol agents <strong>in</strong><br />

tritrophic <strong>in</strong>teractions: a case study with Pseudozyma flocculosa. Journal of Microbiological<br />

Methods, 68: 275-281.<br />

Nofal, M.A., Haggag, W.M. 2006. Integrated management of powdery mildew of mango <strong>in</strong> Egypt.<br />

Crop Protection, 25: 480-486.<br />

Paulitz, T.C., Zhou, T., Rank<strong>in</strong>, L. 1992. Selection of rhizosphere bacteria for biological control of<br />

Pythium aphanidermatum on hydroponically grown cucumber. Biological Control, 3: 226-<br />

237.<br />

Romero, D., Perez-Garrcia, A., Rivera, M.E, Cazorla, F.M., De Vicente, A. 2004. Isolation and<br />

evaluation of antagonistic bacteria towards the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus<br />

Podosphaera fusca. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 64: 263-269.<br />

Romero, D., Rivera, M.E, Cazorla, F.M., De Vicente, A., Perez-Garrcia, A. 2003. Effect of<br />

mycoparasitic fungi on the development of Sphaerotheca fusca <strong>in</strong> melon leaves.<br />

Mycological Research, 107: 64-71.<br />

Romero, D., Vicente, A. de Olmos, J.L., Davila, J. C., Perez-García, A. 2007. Effect of lipopeptides<br />

of antagonistic stra<strong>in</strong>s of Bacillus subtilis on the morphology and ultrastructure of the<br />

cucurbit fungal pathogen Podosphaera fusca. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103: 969-<br />

976.<br />

Shaner, G., F<strong>in</strong>ney, R.E., 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slowmildew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> Knox wheat. Phytopathology, 67: 1051-1056.<br />

Shishkoff, N., McGrath, M.T. 2002. AQ10 biofungicide comb<strong>in</strong>ed with chemical fungicides or<br />

AddQ spray adjuvant for control of cucurbit powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> detached leaf culture. Plant<br />

Disease, 86: 915-918.<br />

Silva, H.S.A., Romeiro, R.S., Macagnan, D., Halfeld-Vieira, B.A., Pereira, M.C.B., Mounteer, A.<br />

2004. Rhizobacterial <strong>in</strong>duction of systemic resistance <strong>in</strong> tomato plants: non-specific<br />

protection and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> enzyme activities. Biological Control, 29: 288-295.<br />

52


Sundheim, L. 1982. Control of cucumber powdery mildew by the hyperparasite Ampelomyces<br />

quisqualis and fungicides. Plant Pathology, 31: 209-214.<br />

Szentivny, O., Kiss, L. 2003. Overw<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g of Ampelomyces mycoparasites on apple trees and<br />

other plants <strong>in</strong>fected with powdery mildew. Plant Pathology, 52: 737-746.<br />

Sztejnberg, A., Galper, S., Mazar, S., Lisker, N. 1989. Ampelomyces quisqualis for biological and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control of powdery mildews <strong>in</strong> Israel. Journal of Phytopathology, 124: 285-295.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C 1996. Glasshouse experiments on biocontrol of cucumber<br />

powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by the mycoparasites Verticillium lecanii and<br />

Sporothrix rugulosa. Biological Control, 6: 353-360.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1998. Selection of Verticillium lecanii isolates with high<br />

potential for biocontrol of cucumber powdery mildew by means of components analysis at<br />

different humidity regimes. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8: 465-477.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Ostergaard, K.K., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C 1997. Preventative and curative<br />

applications of Verticillium lecanii for biological control of cucumber powdery mildew.<br />

Biocontrol Science and Technology, 7: 543-551.<br />

Vogt, W., Buchenauer, H. 1997. Enhancement of biological control by comb<strong>in</strong>ation of antagonistic<br />

fluorescent Pseudomonas stra<strong>in</strong>s and resistance <strong>in</strong>ducers aga<strong>in</strong>st damp<strong>in</strong>g off and powdery<br />

mildew <strong>in</strong> cucumber. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 104: 272-280.<br />

Whipps, J.M., Lewis, K., Cook, R.C. 1988. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control. In: M.N.<br />

Burge (Ed.). Fungi <strong>in</strong> Biological Control System. Manchester University Press, Manchester,<br />

UK.<br />

Wilson, M. 1997. Biocontrol of aerial plant diseases <strong>in</strong> agriculture and horticulture: current<br />

approaches and future perspective. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology,<br />

19: 188-191.<br />

53


CHAPTER THREE<br />

EFFECTS OF ADJUVANTS ON THE CONTROL OF POWDERY MILDEW<br />

OF ZUCCHINI WHEN USING FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF SOLUBLE<br />

SILICON AND SELECTED BIOCONTROL AGENTS<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a , M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a and M.J. Morris b<br />

a<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

b Plant Health Products, P.O. Box 207, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham Road, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

Three adjuvants (Break-Thru® (BK), Partner® (PR) and Tween-80® (T-80)) were<br />

compared for their ability to improve the efficacy of soluble silicon (Si) applied as a foliar<br />

spray aga<strong>in</strong>st powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (PM). The best adjuvant was applied alone to<br />

evaluate its direct effect on the pathogen. Among the adjuvants tested, BK followed by<br />

PR, improved efficacy of Si significantly (P < 0.05). However, T-80 did not affect the<br />

efficacy of Si. Microscopic studies showed that BK <strong>in</strong>hibited germ<strong>in</strong>ation of conidia, and<br />

caused collapse and dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of both conidia and mycelia of the pathogen. It also<br />

enhanced the deposition of BCAs on the pathogen.<br />

The compatibility of BK was tested with selected biocontrol agents (BCAs) and zucch<strong>in</strong>i at<br />

various concentrations. Biocompatibility tests showed that mix<strong>in</strong>g BK (0.2-1 ml l -1 ) to<br />

nutrient broth improved the c.f.u. of Isolates Y15 and Y41 while not affect<strong>in</strong>g that of<br />

Isolate B15. However, mycelial growth of fungal Isolates EH and H20 was <strong>in</strong>hibited when<br />

BK was mixed <strong>in</strong>to PDA agar at concentrations of more than 0.2 ml l -1 . Spray<strong>in</strong>g BK at<br />

0.25 ml l -1 was compatible with zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants, but showed phytotoxic effect at more<br />

than 0.5 ml l -1 . In the presence of BK, the efficacy of foliar spray of Si was improved by<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the Si concentration to an optimum concentration of 750 mg l -1 . Break-Thru ® at<br />

concentraions of 0.2-0.4 ml l -1 enhanced the activity of Si sprays and three BCAs <strong>in</strong><br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g PM.<br />

54


3.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Adjuvants are widely used with agrochemicals, with the objective of enhanc<strong>in</strong>g spray<br />

performance by improv<strong>in</strong>g the coverage, absorption and efficacy of the spray treatment<br />

(Gent et al., 2003). Amer et al. (1993) reported a 30% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> control of powdery<br />

mildew (PM) of wheat (Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici Marchal) when adjuvants were<br />

mixed with fungicides. Several reports have <strong>in</strong>dicated that adjuvants may have beneficial<br />

effects when applied with some BCAs (Bélanger et al., 1997; Phillip et al., 1990; Picton<br />

and Hummer, 2003). Enhanced survival as a result of homogenous distribution of BCAs on<br />

leaves was reported when Sigma Oil, Aqua Aid and Tween-80 were mixed with a<br />

suspension of BCAs for control of PM of cucumber (Dik et al., 1998). Efficacy of<br />

Sporothrix flocculosa Traquir, Shaw and Jarvis aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of rose was also improved<br />

when surfactants were added <strong>in</strong>to the spray mix (Bélanger et al., 1994). Moreover, the<br />

biocontrol activity of several yeasts aga<strong>in</strong>st postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables<br />

was improved by add<strong>in</strong>g various adjuvants <strong>in</strong>to the spray suspension (Lima et al., 2005)<br />

Foliar applications of silicon (Si) to control PM have been moderately successful on a few<br />

crops (Bowen et al., 1992; Guével et al., 2007; Liang et al., 2006; Menzies et al., 1992;<br />

Palmer et al., 2006; Reynolds et al., 1996). However, there is little <strong>in</strong>formation about the<br />

optimum concentration of Si that can provide acceptable levels of control, or on efforts to<br />

improve its efficacy. As with agrochemicals, the efficacy of foliar sprays of Si may be<br />

improved by add<strong>in</strong>g adjuvants to enhance their coverage, and retention of Si on the<br />

phylloplane, and therefore reduc<strong>in</strong>g the concentrations of Si required for good control of<br />

PM. Similarly, adjuvants may enhance the even distribution of BCAs on leaves, and<br />

therefore improve the level of PM control that they can provide.<br />

Before any adjuvant may be recommended for large-scale usage, a thorough assessment on<br />

its potential risks is essential. Assessment of its direct impact on the plant, the BCA and the<br />

pathogen are needed. The use of adjuvants alone can limit development of PM by<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation of conidia and/or <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g its mycelial growth. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral oil, Tween-80 and some surfactants were reported to have <strong>in</strong>hibitory effects on PM<br />

of cucumber (Dik et al., 1998), rose (Bélanger et al., 1994) and wheat (Ziv and<br />

Frederiksen, 1987). Therefore, apply<strong>in</strong>g such adjuvants with BCAs can <strong>in</strong>flate the<br />

perceived activity of the antagonists (Bélanger et al., 1997).<br />

55


The objectives of this study were to compare three adjuvants for their capacity to improve<br />

foliar-applied soluble Si; to study the direct effect of the best adjuvant on the pathogen; to<br />

test its compatibility with the plant and selected BCAs; and to determ<strong>in</strong>e the optimum<br />

concentration of Si that can give acceptable level of control, when comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the best<br />

adjuvant.<br />

3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

3.2.1 Effects of adjuvants and silicon on powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of zucch<strong>in</strong>i were grown and <strong>in</strong>oculated with PM as described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2.<br />

Three adjuvants were tested: Break-Thru ® (polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer),<br />

Partner 650 ® (alkoxylated fatty alkylam<strong>in</strong>e polymer/ethoxylated sorbitane ester) and<br />

Tween-80 ® (polyoxyethylene 20 sorbitan monooleate). These were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

Universal Crop Protection 1 , Degussa Africa 2 and Merck Chemicals 3 , respectively.<br />

As a source of soluble silicon (Si), potassium silicate (K 2 SiO 3 ) (a product K2550 conta<strong>in</strong>ig<br />

20.5-20.9% SiO 2 and 8.0-8.15% K 2 O) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from PQ Silicas SA 4 and<br />

concentrations of Si was calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the product’s <strong>in</strong>formation. Break-Thru ® ,<br />

Partner, and Tween-80 at a rate of 0.5, 0.5, and 0.2 ml l -1 , respectively, were mixed with<br />

Si (at 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg l -1 ) and sprayed onto leaves of <strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants<br />

until runoff. Water was used as a control. Treatments were applied once a week <strong>in</strong> the late<br />

afternoon to avoid the hottest period of the day. Percentage of leaf area covered by PM was<br />

recorded weekly for five weeks and the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) was<br />

calculated from the disease data us<strong>in</strong>g an AUDPC Program (Shaner et al., 1977). Analysis<br />

of variance (ANOVA) analysis was performed with GenStat ® Statistical Analysis Software<br />

(GenStat, 2006). Comparisons between means of treatments was made us<strong>in</strong>g Fisher’s<br />

protected least significant difference (FLSD) and effect of adjuvants on percentage<br />

reductions of f<strong>in</strong>al diseae level and AUDPC values were calculated by compar<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

values of each treatment aga<strong>in</strong>st that of the Untreated Control (only water). Polynomial<br />

1 Universal Crop Protection (Pty) Ltd., P.O. Box 801, Kempton Park 1620, South Africa.<br />

2<br />

Degussa Africa (Pty) Ltd., P.O. Box 261, Somerset West 7129, South Africa.<br />

3<br />

Merck Chemicals (Pty) Ltd., 259 Davidson Rd. Wadeville 1422, Gauteng, South Africa.<br />

4 PQ Silicas South Africa (Pty) Ltd, 169 Tedstone Rd, P.O. Box 14016 ,Wadeville 1422, Gauteng, South<br />

Africa.<br />

56


egression analysis was also performed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of concentration of Si<br />

applied with different adjuvants at various rates on open or covered pots. The adjuvant that<br />

provided best result <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g PM with Si was selected for further <strong>in</strong>vestigations.<br />

3.2.2 Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscop studies on the effects of Break-Thru ® on<br />

Podosphaera xanthii and biocontrol agents<br />

Two fungal (Clonostachys rosea (L<strong>in</strong>k) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & Gams, Isolate EH)<br />

and Trichothecium roseum (Pers.) L<strong>in</strong>k, Isolate H20) and 3 isolates of Serratia marcescens<br />

(Bizio) (i.e., Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41) were prepared, as described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2, and BK<br />

was added <strong>in</strong>to the microbial suspension at a rate of 0.25 ml l -1 . All treatments were<br />

sprayed onto diseased plants that were grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse, with the environmental<br />

conditions set at 25 o C and 18 o C (day and night), a photoperiod of 16 h and an RH of 65-<br />

80%. Treatments were applied weekly dur<strong>in</strong>g the late afternoon to ensure enough humidity<br />

and a favourable temperature for the establishment of the BCAs. After 5 wk, samples were<br />

taken from the <strong>in</strong>fected leaves to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the direct impact of BK on the pathogen and<br />

BCAs us<strong>in</strong>g scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy.<br />

Samples of the <strong>in</strong>fected leaves were cut <strong>in</strong>to circles of approximately 10mm diameter and<br />

fixed overnight <strong>in</strong> 3% glutaraldehyde <strong>in</strong> cacodylate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7.0), and then<br />

dehydrated <strong>in</strong> a graded alcohol series. Specimens were critical po<strong>in</strong>t dried <strong>in</strong> a Hitachi<br />

HCP-2 us<strong>in</strong>g CO 2 as a transfusion fluid. Dried specimens were mounted on copper stubs<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g double-sided carbon tape. All stubs were then coated with gold-palladium <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Polaron E500 Sputter Coater and viewed with a Philips XL30 environmental scann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

electron microscope (ESEM) operat<strong>in</strong>g at 12 KV.<br />

3.2.3 Biocompatibility test of Break-Thru ®<br />

Microbial media conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g BK were prepared for fungal and bacterial BCAs. A solution<br />

of BK was prepared by mix<strong>in</strong>g 10 ml l -1 of the adjuvant with 90ml of sterilized distilled<br />

water and filtered through a filter paper. Full strength Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) was<br />

autoclaved for 15m<strong>in</strong> at 121 o C and left at room temperature to cool down. When the<br />

temperature of the flask was approximately 40 o C, the solution of BK was added to the<br />

57


medium at concentrations of 0.02-1 ml l -1 . The PDA-BK medium was mixed thoroughly<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a magnetic stirrer, poured to Petri dishes and kept <strong>in</strong> a lam<strong>in</strong>ar flow for 24 h.<br />

Approximately 3-5 mm-diameter agar plugs of Isolates EH and H20, taken from the<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g edge of 2wk old cultures, were plated on the medium and <strong>in</strong>cubated at 25 o C. After<br />

2 wk mycelial growth of Isolate EH was measured us<strong>in</strong>g a ruler. However, growth of<br />

Isolate H20 was patchy when BK was added to the agar and mycelial growth was<br />

measured by estimat<strong>in</strong>g the percentage of the plate covered by the fungus and convert<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the value <strong>in</strong>to a diameter. Nutrient Broth (NB) was prepared <strong>in</strong> 100 ml conical flasks and<br />

autoclaved at 121 o C for 15 m<strong>in</strong>. After the broth was cold, BK was added <strong>in</strong>to the flasks at<br />

concentrations of 0.01-0.1 ml l -1 . The three isolates of S. marcescens (i.e., Isolates B15,<br />

Y15 and Y41) were <strong>in</strong>oculated <strong>in</strong>to the broth us<strong>in</strong>g a sterile loop and fermented <strong>in</strong> a<br />

shaker, set at 150 rpm at 28 o C. After 48 h of <strong>in</strong>cubation, cultures were serial-diluted <strong>in</strong><br />

McCarthy bottles conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sterile distilled water and plated onto PDA. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, plates<br />

were <strong>in</strong>cubated for 24 h at 30 o C and colony-form<strong>in</strong>g units (c.f.u.) were counted. Data of<br />

each BCA was analysed as Randomized Block Design us<strong>in</strong>g GenStat ® Statistical Analysis<br />

Software separately (GenStat, 2006) and relationships between concentrations of BK and<br />

microbial growth were confirmed us<strong>in</strong>g polynomial regression analysis.<br />

3.2.4 Phytotoxicity test of Break-Thru ® on zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants<br />

Break-Thru ® (0.25-2 ml l -1 ) was sprayed onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants <strong>in</strong>fected with PM once a<br />

week until runoff. After 3wk, visual assessments were made of the toxicity of BK to the<br />

plants.<br />

3.3 RESULTS<br />

3.3.1 Effects of three adjuvants on powdery mildew control of with silicon<br />

All adjuvants used <strong>in</strong> this study improved spray coverage and retention of Si on zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

leaves. When leaves were sprayed with Si that conta<strong>in</strong>ed any of these three adjuvants, they<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed wet for longer periods than leaves sprayed with Si without an adjuvant. Add<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BK and PR to Si sprays gave better results, reduc<strong>in</strong>g disease levels by an average of 18-<br />

20%. However, T-80 did not improve the efficacy of Si sprays significantly. Application of<br />

BK and PR alone significantly reduced disease severity levels by 20% and 18%,<br />

respectively. However, spray<strong>in</strong>g T-80 alone exacerbated the disease level (Table 3.1).<br />

58


The concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the spray solution had a significant impact on PM control<br />

(P < 0.001). Regardless of the adjuvant used, the efficacy of Si was improved as the spray<br />

concentration was <strong>in</strong>creased, with 750 mg l -1 be<strong>in</strong>g the optimum dosage. The effect of<br />

adjuvants and Si applied at various concentrations on severity of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after 5 wk<br />

of <strong>in</strong>fection and the level of disease control obta<strong>in</strong>ed by these treatments are presented <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1, respectively.<br />

The effects of adjuvants on AUDPC values were highly significant (P < 0.001). Without<br />

Si, BK and PR reduced the AUDPC values significantly (Table 3.2). AUDPC values of Si<br />

plus BK or PR were also significantly low. Spray<strong>in</strong>g Si conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g BK and PR reduced the<br />

AUDPC value by 26 and 23%, respectively. Even without Si, these two adjuvants reduced<br />

AUDPC values by 20-25%. However, application of T-80 did not affect the AUDPC value<br />

significantly and the efficacy of Si was unaffected by the presence of T-80. When<br />

comparisons were made among concentrations, the lowest AUDPC values were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

when Si was applied at 750 mg l -1 . The AUDPC values of PM as affected by three<br />

adjuvants, applied with Si at various concentrations, are presented <strong>in</strong> Figures 3.1 & 3.2.<br />

Table 8.1 Effects of different adjuvants sprayed with soluble silicon (Si) at various concentrations<br />

on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level of powdery mildew of greenhouse grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection with Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

Si concentration (mg l -1 )<br />

Adjuvants<br />

0 250 500 750 1000<br />

Break-Thru ® 73.3 b 66.7 ab 63.7 ab 60.0 a 61.7 ab<br />

Partner ® 75.0 b 65.0 ab 70.0 ab 58.3 a 60.0 a<br />

Tween-80 92.3 c 79.0 b 73.3 b 63.3 ab 75.0 b<br />

Water 91.7 c 78.3 b 76.7 b 76.7 b 75.0 b<br />

Effects<br />

P-Values<br />

Adjuvants < 0.001<br />

Concentration < 0.001<br />

Adjuvants*Concentration 0.704<br />

FLSD<br />

11.686<br />

CV (%)<br />

9.9<br />

Means followed by a common letter were not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fisher’s protected least<br />

significant difference (P < 0.05).<br />

59


Table 9.2 Effects of different adjuvants and soluble silicon, sprayed at various concentrations, on<br />

AUDPC values of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i grown under glasshouse conditions after 5 weeks<br />

of <strong>in</strong>fection with Podosphaera xanthii<br />

Si concentration (mg l -1 )<br />

Adjuvants<br />

0 250 500 750 1000<br />

Break-Thru ® 1724 b 1392 ab 1416 ab 1031 a 1169 ab<br />

Partner ® 1636 b 1524 b 1456 b 1229 ab 1180 ab<br />

Tween-80 2164 c 1871 bc 1787 bc 1289 ab 1599 b<br />

Water 2168 c 1851 bc 1735 bc 1649 b 1712 b<br />

Effects<br />

P-Values<br />

Adjuvants < 0.001<br />

Concentration < 0.001<br />

Adjuvants*Concentration 0.955<br />

FLSD 420.9<br />

CV (%) 16.2<br />

Means followed by a common letter were not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fisher’s protected least<br />

significant difference (P


A<br />

× Break-Thru: y= 1.142x 2 - 9.851x + 82.06<br />

R² = 0.983<br />

●Partner: y = 0.476x 2 - 6.525x + 80.00<br />

R² = 0.715<br />

▲ Tween: y = 3.262x 2 - 24.60x + 114.5<br />

R² = 0.909<br />

■ Water: y= 1.785x 2 - 14.21x + 102.6<br />

R² = 0.900<br />

B<br />

× Break-Thru: = 37.92x 2 - 374.6x + 2053<br />

R² = 0.843<br />

●Partner: y = -2.357x 2 - 106.5x + 1750<br />

R² = 0.960<br />

▲ Tween: y = 56.57x 2 - 510.6x + 2651<br />

R² = 0.799<br />

■ Water: Water: y = 56.42x 2 - 449.9x + 255.<br />

R² = 0.991<br />

Figure 3.1 Relationships between adjuvants and Si applied at differ<strong>in</strong>g concentrations on<br />

severity (A) and AUDPC values (B) of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five weeks of<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection with Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

61


× Break-Thru: y = 9.308ln(x) + 20.48<br />

R² = 0.913<br />

● Partner: y = 10.09ln(x) + 18.53<br />

R² = 0.766<br />

▲Tween 80: y = 15.54ln(x) + 1.519<br />

R² = 0.726<br />

■ Water: y = 10.45ln(x) + 2.990<br />

R² = 0.817<br />

Figure 3.2 Effects of different adjuvants <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

with foliar-applied Si at various concentrations.<br />

× Break-Thru: y = 17.55ln(x) + 21.09<br />

R² = 0.833<br />

● Partner: y = 13.35ln(x) + 22.41<br />

R² = 0.892<br />

▲Tween 80: y = 20.53ln(x) - 0.014<br />

R² = 0.758<br />

■ Water: y = 14.19ln(x) + 2.322<br />

R² = 0.899<br />

Figure 3.3 Effects of different adjuvants <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g development of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i with foliarapplied<br />

Si at various concentrations after five weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation. AUDPC values are as a % of<br />

the untreated control AUDPC value.<br />

62


3.3.3 Biocompatibility of Break-Thru ® with biocontrol agents<br />

Analysis of ANOVA on the effects of BK on colony form<strong>in</strong>g units of Isolates B15, Y15<br />

and Y41 were not significant at P < 0.05. However, regression analysis showed that there<br />

was relationship between concentrations of BK <strong>in</strong> the medium and c.f.u. of Isolate B15,<br />

with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g levels of BK <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g the c.f.u. of this isolate slightly. Add<strong>in</strong>g BK at a<br />

concentration of 0.4 ml l -1 was optimum for growth of Isolates Y15 and Y41. The effect<br />

of BK on mycelial growth of Isolates EH and H20 was significant (P < 0.001) (Figure 3.4<br />

B). Growth of these two fungal BCAs was significantly <strong>in</strong>hibited when BK was added <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the medium at a concentration of 0.4 ml l -1 . Mycelial growth of Isolates EH and H20 were<br />

reduced by 19 and 49%, respectively, when BK was mixed to PDA at 1 ml l -l (Figures 3.4<br />

and 3.5). Result of an <strong>in</strong> vitro bioassay on the effects of BK on growth of all BCAs is<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.5.<br />

Control BK at 1ml l -1<br />

A<br />

Control BK at 1ml l -1<br />

B<br />

Figure 3.4 Plates of PDA show<strong>in</strong>g the effects of Break-Thru ® on mycelial growth of Isolates<br />

EH (A) and H20 (B).<br />

63


A<br />

× Y15: y = 1.551x 2 - 5.862x + 15.45<br />

R² = 0.355; P = 0.070<br />

■ B15: y = 1.037x 2 - 7.482x + 27.97<br />

R² = 0.757; P = 0.835<br />

▲ Y41: y = 0.845x + 2.24<br />

R² = 0.240; P = 0.291<br />

B<br />

× H20: y = 1.575x 2 - 21.07x + 112.8<br />

R² = 0.902; P < 0.001<br />

▲ EH: y = 0.216x 2 - 3.881x + 58.89<br />

R² = 0.800; P < 0.001<br />

Figure 3.5 In vitro bioassay on the effects of Break-Thru ® mixed with growth medium on growth of<br />

BCAs. A: colony form<strong>in</strong>g units of Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41 after two days of <strong>in</strong>cubation at 30 o C.<br />

C.F.U. of Isolates B15 and Y15 were diluted by 10 10 and Isolate Y41 by 10 9 ; B: mycelial growth of<br />

Isolates EH and H20 after two weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation at 25 o C.<br />

64


A<br />

.<br />

B<br />

1<br />

C<br />

D<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Figure 3.6 Environmental Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopic observations of the effects of Break-<br />

Thru® on Podosphaera xanthii and selected BCAs. A: Conidia and hyphae of the control; Plate 2:<br />

Collapsed and dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated hyphae and conidia of the fungus; C: Hyphae of the fungus stick<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

each other; D: Conidia bond each other and BCAs deposited on top of the fungal structures; E:<br />

Enhanced deposition of BCAs on the surface of the pathogen; F: Trichothecium roseum (Isolate H20)<br />

establish<strong>in</strong>g on the hyphae of the pathogen.<br />

65


3.3.4 Phytotoxicity test of Break-Thru ®<br />

Application of BK at 0.25 ml l -1 provided moderate disease control with no phytotoxic<br />

effects to the plant. When BK was applied at 0.5 ml l -1 , PM was reduced by more than<br />

60%. At 1 ml l -1 , BK provided complete control of PM. However, leaves of the plants<br />

showed symptoms of shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g followed by burn<strong>in</strong>g when BK was applied at higher levels.<br />

Repeated application of BK, even at 0.5 ml l -1 , caused stunt<strong>in</strong>g of the plant, with young<br />

leaves be<strong>in</strong>g malformed and reduced <strong>in</strong> size.<br />

3.4 DISCUSSION<br />

Selection of an effective adjuvant for an <strong>in</strong>tegrated disease management programme can<br />

reduce the impact of agrochemicals on the environment by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the quantity of active<br />

<strong>in</strong>gredient required to deliver disease control without compromis<strong>in</strong>g yield or quality<br />

(Kirkwood, 1993). When used properly, adjuvants are expected to have no toxic effect to<br />

the plants or the environment. However, recent studies have <strong>in</strong>dicated that some adjuvants,<br />

primarily surfactants, can have direct impact on the BCAs and the target pest (Dr A.<br />

Charudattan, 2007 5 , personal communication).<br />

Although many available adjuvants provide application <strong>in</strong>formation on the label, each<br />

plant management project is unique and requires an assessment before the appropriate<br />

adjuvant can be selected and utilized. Adjuvants can <strong>in</strong>crease the efficacy of foliar<br />

treatments by alter<strong>in</strong>g spray droplet sizes, distribution of sprays on the plant, viscosity<br />

(stick<strong>in</strong>ess) of the sprays, their evaporation rate, the rate of uptake of agrochemicals by the<br />

target plant, and the solubility of agrochemicals <strong>in</strong> solution (Young, 2004).<br />

In this study, some of the above properties were shown by all adjuvants used. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

better coverage of zucch<strong>in</strong>i leaves was achieved with the same amount of Si solution or<br />

BCA suspension when BK, PR and T-80 were added <strong>in</strong>to the spray mixture. Prokop and<br />

Kejklícek (2002) noted that most water soluble adjuvants improve spray coverage by<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g the percentage of small droplets (i.e., < 75 µm) which are the major contributors<br />

to off-target drift. Longer retention of the spray on the surface of the leaves was assumed<br />

5<br />

Dr R. Charudattan, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida<br />

66


to be the result of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> viscosity of the spray solution by these adjuvants. When any<br />

of these three adjuvants were mixed <strong>in</strong> the spray solution, they formed foam. Formation of<br />

foam is reported to control drifts, mak<strong>in</strong>g the spray application more effective and<br />

economical (Young, 2004).<br />

At higher dosages (> 0.5 ml l -1 ), BK was shown to control PM effectively on its own, but<br />

it had phytotoxic effects on zucch<strong>in</strong>i. Plants that were sprayed with BK at higher levels<br />

frequently showed stunted growth with malformed leaves. Young leaves were more<br />

sensitive to this adjuvant. Spray<strong>in</strong>g BK at a concentration of 0.25 ml l -1 provided moderate<br />

disease control without affect<strong>in</strong>g the plant negatively. Both BK and PR showed promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

results <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i when they were sprayed alone or together with Si.<br />

Addition of BK and PR improved the efficacy of Si by improv<strong>in</strong>g distribution of the Si<br />

sprays, and by suppress<strong>in</strong>g the pathogen directly. Foliar application of Si without adjuvants<br />

also resulted <strong>in</strong> significantly lower disease values, especially when used at higher<br />

concentrations. Regardless of the adjuvant used, the efficacy of Si was <strong>in</strong>creased as<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong>creased up to 750 mg l -1 .<br />

The addition of T-80 <strong>in</strong>to spray mixtures was reported to have an <strong>in</strong>hibitory effect on PM<br />

fungi (Bélanger et al., 1994; Dik et al., 1998; Ziv and Frederiksen, 1987) and to have<br />

enhanced the efficacy of B. amyloliquefaciens Ribonuclease (Barnase) as a BCA by<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g the distribution of the antagonist on the surface of the plant (Chiou and Wu,<br />

2003). Dik et al. (1998) also reported <strong>in</strong>creased control of PM by A. quisqualis Ces ex<br />

Schlect when T-80 was mixed <strong>in</strong> the spray suspension. In this study, T-80 improved spray<br />

efficiency, but did not affect the disease directly. The size and shape of the PM colonies<br />

were not apparently affected when sprayed with T-80. Even when applied together with Si,<br />

the colonies of PM were large and fluffy, similar to colonies of the control treatment. In<br />

some cases, the disease severity and AUDPC value of treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g T-80 were<br />

even higher than treatments without any adjuvant. The reason for the failure of T-80 to<br />

have any impact on the disease is not known. Although each adjuvant was applied based<br />

on recommendations from previous studies and their registration labels, the concentration<br />

of T-80 was much less than that of both BK and PR. Therefore, the concentration of T-80<br />

67


used might not have been strong enough to affect the disease or the pathogen might have<br />

been resistant towards this adjuvant.<br />

Colonies of PM treated with BK were small, flat and dry. Further <strong>in</strong>vestigations with<br />

ESEM revealed that the disease suppression shown by BK resulted from the direct impact<br />

of the adjuvant on the pathogen. Conidia of PM were less <strong>in</strong> number and mycelial growth<br />

of the PM fungus was limited after treatment with BK. In addition, conidia and hyphae of<br />

the pathogen collapsed and dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated as a result of direct contact with BK. It is<br />

probable that this impact is related to the chemical properties of the adjuvant. The adhesive<br />

properties of BK also forced conidia and hyphae of the PM fungus to stick to each other,<br />

restrict<strong>in</strong>g spread of conidia and expansion of its colonies Moreover, mix<strong>in</strong>g BK with<br />

suspensions of BCAs resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased deposition of these antagonists on the pathogen,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> improved control of PM. When used at an appropriate rate, BK has the<br />

potential to improve the efficacy of BCA antagonists significantly.<br />

A major limitation to the effective use of BCAs and Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM has been due to the rate<br />

of disease development and spread. The direct impact of BK on the pathogen therefore<br />

gives a novel opportunity to enhance the management of PM with BCAs and Si. It is<br />

conceivable that BK would provide a short-term control function, followed by the<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed effects of Si and a BCA to provide medium to long-term disease control.<br />

Growth of Isolate EH and Isolate H20 was <strong>in</strong>hibited when BK was added to PDA at<br />

concentration of 0.4 ml l -1 . In contrast, add<strong>in</strong>g BK <strong>in</strong>to NB at 0.2-1 ml l -1 had little effect<br />

on the c.f.u. of isolates of S. marcescens. Based on the biocompatibility and phyto-toxicity<br />

tests, it is recommended that for effective control of PM comb<strong>in</strong>ed with BCAs or Si, BK<br />

must be used at a concentration range of 0.2-0.4 ml l -1 , depend<strong>in</strong>g on the sensitivity of the<br />

plant towards the adjuvant. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of disease control, repeated application may<br />

result <strong>in</strong> an accumulation of BK on the phylloplane, which may have adverse effect on the<br />

plant or the BCAs. To avoid such risks, further <strong>in</strong>vestigations on the impacts of BK<br />

deposition on the plant and antagonists is needed before the recommended rate is adopted<br />

for implementation. In addition, direct contact between the adjuvant and the BCA <strong>in</strong> target<br />

may affect the antagonistic properties of the BCAs. Therefore, more <strong>in</strong> vitro research is<br />

68


needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e effects of BK on the metabolic properties of the BCA isolates.<br />

Moreover, although most adjuvants are considered to have no pesticidal properties and are<br />

exempted from regulations of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Hock, 1998),<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation is needed on the hazards that BK may pose to consumers and beneficial<br />

microbial <strong>in</strong>habitants of the phylloplane.<br />

3.5 REFERENCES<br />

Amer, M.A., Hoorne, D., Poppe, J. 1993. In-vivo evaluation of adjuvants for more effective control<br />

of celery leaf-spot (Septoria apiicola) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is) of wheat<br />

with fungicides. Pesticide Science, 37: 113-120.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.G. 1997. Powdery mildews: Recent advances toward<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control. In: G.J Boland and L.D Kuykendall (Eds.). Plant-Microbe Interactions<br />

and Biological Control. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Labbé, C., Jarvis, W.R. 1994. Commercial-scale control of rose powdery mildew<br />

with a fungal antagonist. Plant Disease, 78: 420-424.<br />

Bowen, P., Menzies, J., Ehret, D., Samuels, L., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Soluble silicon sprays <strong>in</strong>hibit<br />

powdery mildew development on grape leaves. Journal of the American Society for<br />

Horticultural Science, 117: 906-912.<br />

Chiou, A.L., Wu, W.S. 2003. Formulation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B190 for control of lily<br />

grey mould (Botrytis elliptica). Journal of Phytopathology, 15: 13-18.<br />

Dik, A.J., Verhaar, M.A., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. Comparison of three biological control agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> semi-commercial-scale<br />

glasshouse trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104: 413-423.<br />

GenStat, 2006. GenStat Statistical Analysis Software 9 th ed. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Oxford, UK.<br />

Gent, D.H., Schwartz, H.F., Nissen, S.J. 2003. Effect of commercial adjuvants on vegetable crop<br />

fungicide coverage, absorption and efficacy. Plant Disease, 87: 591-597.<br />

Guével, M.-H., Menzies J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. Effect of root and foliar applications of soluble<br />

silicon on powdery mildew control and growth of wheat plants. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 119: 429-436.<br />

Hock, W.K. 1998. Horticultural spray adjuvants. Agrochemical Fact Sheet, The Pennsylvania State<br />

University. http://pubs.cas.psu.edu/FreePubs/<strong>pdf</strong>s/uo202.<strong>pdf</strong> Captured on 15/08/2008.<br />

Liang, Y.C., Sun, W.C., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the<br />

enhancement of <strong>in</strong>duced resistance to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> Cucumis sativus. Plant<br />

Pathology, 54: 678-685.<br />

69


Lima, G., Castoria, R., Sp<strong>in</strong>a, A.M., de Curis, F. 2005. Improvement of biocontrol activity of yeast<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st post harvest pathogens: recent experiences. Acta Horticulturae, 682: 2035-2040.<br />

Menzies, J., Bowen, P., Ehret, D., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Soluble silicon sprays <strong>in</strong>hibit powdery<br />

mildew development on grape leaves. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural<br />

Science, 117: 902-905.<br />

Palmer, S., Scott, E., Stangoulis, J., Able, A.J. 2006. The effect of foliar-applied Ca and Si on the<br />

severity of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> two strawberry cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 708: 135-139.<br />

Philipp, W.-D., Beuther, E., Hermann, D., Kl<strong>in</strong>kert, F., Oberwalder, C., Schmiditke, M., Straub, B.<br />

1990. Zur formulieurung des Mehltauhyperparasiten Ampelomyces quisqualis Ces,<br />

Zeitschrift fur Planzenkrankeheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 97: 120-132.<br />

Picton, D.D., Hummer, K.E. 2003. Oil application reduces white p<strong>in</strong>e blister rust severity <strong>in</strong> black<br />

currants. HortTechnology, 13: 365-367.<br />

Prokop, M., Kejklícek, R. 2002. Effect of adjuvants on spray droplet size of water. Research <strong>in</strong><br />

Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 48:144-148.<br />

Shaner, G., F<strong>in</strong>ney, R.E., 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slowmildew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> Knox wheat. Phytopathology, 67: 1051-1056.<br />

70


CHAPTER FOUR<br />

EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATION, FREQUENCY OF APPLICATION AND<br />

RUNOFF OF FOLIAR-APPLIED SILICON ON POWDERY MILDEW OF<br />

ZUCCHINI<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a , M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a and M.J. Morris b<br />

a<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

b Plant Health Products, P.O. Box 207, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham Road, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

The effect of concentration, frequency of application and runoff of foliar-applied soluble<br />

silicon (Si) on the severity of powdery mildew (PM) (Podosphaera xanthii (syn.<br />

Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Cucurbita pepo L.) was evaluated. Soluble Si (250-<br />

1000 mg l -1 ), together with Break-Thru ® (0.25 ml l -1 ), was sprayed onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants at<br />

frequencies of 1-3 wk -1 . The leaves of all plants were <strong>in</strong>oculated with a known<br />

concentration of conidia of P. xanthii 2 d after the sprays were applied. The effect of runoff<br />

was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by cover<strong>in</strong>g some of the pots with polyethylene sheets, while others were<br />

left open.<br />

Spray<strong>in</strong>g Si onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i crops reduced the severity of PM significantly. The efficacy of<br />

Si was improved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the spray frequency. However, concentration of Si did not<br />

have a major impact on the efficacy of Si. Regardless of the concentration of Si, the best<br />

results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed when the frequency of the treatment was <strong>in</strong>creased, and when Si was<br />

allowed to reach the root zone of the plants.<br />

When Si was applied onto leaves, direct contact between the spray and the pathogen<br />

seemed to be the ma<strong>in</strong> mechanism of action <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> disease control, and part of the<br />

spray (i.e., the runoff) was absorbed by the plant roots, and subsequently played an<br />

important role <strong>in</strong> the health of the plants. If affordable, soluble Si should be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />

nutrient solutions of hydroponic crops or supplied from overhead irrigation schemes.<br />

71


4.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Powdery mildew (PM) of many crops causes significant losses <strong>in</strong> yield if not managed<br />

properly (Romero et al., 2003 & 2004). Soluble silicon (Si) has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated by many<br />

authors (Bélanger et al., 1995 & 1997; Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999; Liang et al., 2005) as an<br />

environmentally safe option for the management of this disease. These researchers have<br />

demonstrated that effective control of PM can be achieved by the application of soluble Si<br />

at appropriate dosages and frequencies.<br />

Foliar applications of Si have shown promis<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of several crops<br />

(Bowen et al., 1992; Guével et al., 2007; Liang et al., 2005; Menzies et al., 1992; Palmer<br />

et al., 2006; Reynolds et al., 1996). These authors have showed that it is possible to replace<br />

or supplement the fungicides be<strong>in</strong>g used aga<strong>in</strong>st PM with soluble Si sprays. The level of<br />

disease control that can be achieved us<strong>in</strong>g this approach is, however, limited due to a lack<br />

of <strong>in</strong>formation on the optimum concentration. Efficacy of Si can also be improved by<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the frequency of application as this <strong>in</strong>creases the deposition of the element on<br />

the phylloplane.<br />

Furthermore, when a foliar spray is used, there is always runoff which is <strong>in</strong>tercepted by the<br />

soil. If the Si treatment is absorbed by the roots, as a quasi-essential element, it may play a<br />

role <strong>in</strong> the health of the plant. Therefore, to assess the direct effect of foliar application of<br />

Si on PM, it is important to differentiate the impact of runoff from the total effect of the<br />

treatment. Understand<strong>in</strong>g the effect of such components can determ<strong>in</strong>e whether foliar<br />

applications of Si should be more or less effective than root drenches.<br />

The objectives of this study were to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of foliar applied Si on the<br />

severity of PM, determ<strong>in</strong>e the optimum concentration and application frequencies of Si on<br />

PM, and study the impact of runoff on the efficacy of foliar sprays of soluble Si.<br />

72


4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

4.2.1 Preparation of plants<br />

Seeds of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Cucurbita pepo, F1-Hybrid Partenon) were planted <strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>g trays<br />

and kept <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse at a temperature of 26-28 o C and relative humidity of 75-85%.<br />

Trays were irrigated with a complete fertilizer [Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> 1 3:1:3 (38) at 0.5 g l -1 ]<br />

+ [Ca(NO 3 ) 2 at 0.5 g l -1 ] for 2 wk us<strong>in</strong>g overhead irrigation. Once the germ<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs had fully developed a second leaf, they were transplanted <strong>in</strong>to pots filled with<br />

composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark and transferred to another glasshouse set at 26-28 o C, 75-85% RH.<br />

The plants were irrigated with the same nutrient solution us<strong>in</strong>g drip irrigation until the end<br />

of the experiment.<br />

4.2.2 Preparation of Podosphaera xanthii for <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />

Inoculum of PM was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from plants that were <strong>in</strong>oculated with previously collected<br />

samples of natural <strong>in</strong>oculum. Conidia of PM were harvested us<strong>in</strong>g the same technique, as<br />

described <strong>in</strong> Chapters 2-3, and counted us<strong>in</strong>g a haemocytometer. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculated by spray<strong>in</strong>g 3-5 ml of conidial suspensions of PM (10 3 conidia ml -1 ) onto the<br />

leaves of each seedl<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g a hand sprayer with<strong>in</strong> two hours of count<strong>in</strong>g. Inoculation was<br />

done 2 d after Si was sprayed onto plants.<br />

4.2.3 Application of soluble silicon<br />

Soluble Si was sprayed onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants <strong>in</strong> the form of KSi at four different<br />

concentrations (250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg l -1 ) until runoff. Treatments were applied at a<br />

frequency of 1-3 wk -1 . Impact of Si spray that is absorbed by the roots on disease level was<br />

assessed by controll<strong>in</strong>g movement of Si onto the roots. The lower part of the plants and<br />

their pots were sealed with polyethylene sheets cut and taped <strong>in</strong>to place to provide a<br />

waterproof barrier to stop any Si spray from reach<strong>in</strong>g the root zone of the plants, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

form of runoff and drift,. The aerial parts of the plants were left open for spray. Other pots<br />

were left uncovered, allow<strong>in</strong>g the drift and runoff of spray applications to reach to the<br />

rhizosphere and to be taken up by the roots.<br />

1 Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> (Pty) Ltd., P. O. Box 742, Muldersdrift, 1747, South Africa.<br />

73


For all treatments, Break-Thru ® (BK) was used as a wetter at concentration of 0.25 ml l -1 .<br />

Distilled water conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only BK was sprayed at the same frequencies as the control<br />

treatment. All the treatments were applied <strong>in</strong> the late afternoon <strong>in</strong> order to m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

dryness of the leaves due to heat. Disease levels, as percentage of leaf area <strong>in</strong>fected, were<br />

evaluated 3 wk after <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />

4.2.4 Disease assessment and statistical analysis<br />

The experiment was conducted twice, with each treatment hav<strong>in</strong>g three replications. The<br />

treatments were arranged <strong>in</strong> a factorial randomized complete block design. Analysis of<br />

Variance (ANOVA) were performed us<strong>in</strong>g a factorial treatment structure. Where the CV %<br />

was > 20%, the orig<strong>in</strong>al data was transformed us<strong>in</strong>g a square root transformation.<br />

Interactive effects of application concentration, frequency and runoff of Si on the severity<br />

of PM was analysed us<strong>in</strong>g GenStat ® Statistical Analysis Software (GenStat, 2006).<br />

Treatment means were separated us<strong>in</strong>g Fisher’s protected least significant difference<br />

(LSD). The percentage of disease reduction by each treatment was calculated by tak<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al disease of the Untreated Contarol as a reference. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, polynomial regression<br />

analysis was performed on the percentage of disease reduced by different levels of Si<br />

applied on open or covered pots at 3 different frequencies.<br />

4.3 RESULTS<br />

In both experiments, application of Si reduced the disease severity significantly. The effect<br />

of concentration on the efficacy of soluble Si sprays was not significant (Table 4.1 and<br />

4.2). After spray<strong>in</strong>g the plants with Si at various concentrations (250-1000 mg l -1 ) for<br />

3 wk, disease severity of the control treatment was reduced by 42-61% and 75-79% <strong>in</strong> the<br />

first and second trials, respectively. In both experiment, extra Si had little or no added<br />

effect on the efficacy of the spray. When the effect of Si at different concentrations on<br />

severity of PM was compared, there was no significant difference between the values.<br />

In both trials, spray frequency had a significant effect on the efficacy of Si <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

PM. Us<strong>in</strong>g the same concentration of Si, efficacy of the treatment was <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>itially<br />

by 30% and almost doubled <strong>in</strong> the subsequent experiment when the spray frequency was<br />

74


tripled. Even <strong>in</strong> the control treatment which conta<strong>in</strong>ed only BK, the disease level was<br />

reduced when the treatment was sprayed at higher frequency (Figures 4.1 & 4.2).<br />

A comparison of PM severity between open and covered pots showed that drift and runoff<br />

of foliar-applied Si had a significant impact on disease control (Tables 4.1). In both trials,<br />

efficacy was improved significantly when Si was sprayed onto plants <strong>in</strong> open pots. An<br />

overall <strong>in</strong>crease of 17% (Trial 2) and 18% (Trial 1) <strong>in</strong> disease reduction occurred on plants<br />

<strong>in</strong> open pots, where Si was allowed to reach the rhizosphere, compared to the sealed pots<br />

where the spray was restricted to the phylloplane (Figure 4.2).<br />

In both trials, the <strong>in</strong>teraction of Si concentration and frequency was significant. Interactive<br />

effects of concentration and frequency on the efficacy of Si was significant <strong>in</strong> the second<br />

experiment but not <strong>in</strong> the first experiment. However, trends of these two experiments<br />

showed that the best results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed when Si was used at higher concentrations with<br />

higher frequencies (i.e., 3 times per week). For <strong>in</strong>stance, when Si was applied 3 times a<br />

week at 1000 mg l -1 , then its efficacy was <strong>in</strong>creased by more than two - three times<br />

(Figures 4.1 & 4.2).<br />

Interactive effects of Si concentration and application method were not significant on the<br />

efficacy of Si. However, improved efficacy was obta<strong>in</strong>ed when treatments with higher<br />

levels of Si were sprayed on plants <strong>in</strong> open pots. Interaction of frequency and runoff on the<br />

efficacy of Si was not significant. In both trials, efficacy of Si was improved when sprayed<br />

onto plants <strong>in</strong> open pots at higher frequencies. Increas<strong>in</strong>g the frequency from 1 to 3 times<br />

per week <strong>in</strong>creased the efficacy of the treatment by a mean of 35% <strong>in</strong> the first experiment<br />

and nearly 100% <strong>in</strong> the second experiment. Trends of the two trials also showed that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> efficacy was slightly higher when sprays were applied to plants <strong>in</strong> the open<br />

pots.<br />

Interaction of concentration, frequencies and application method was only significant on<br />

the second experiment. However, <strong>in</strong>dividual observations showed that the best results were<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed when Si was sprayed at higher frequencies to plants <strong>in</strong> open pots. Effects of Si at<br />

various concentrations sprayed onto plants <strong>in</strong> open and sealed pots, at different<br />

frequencies, <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM are presented on Figures 4.1 & 4.2.<br />

75


Trial 1<br />

Trial 2<br />

Figure 4.1 Histograms show<strong>in</strong>g the effects of spray<strong>in</strong>g Si on the severity of powdery mildew of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i, when applied at various concentration and frequencies on plants grown under greenhouse<br />

conditions <strong>in</strong> open or covered pots <strong>in</strong> two different trials.<br />

76


Covered pots<br />

Open pots<br />

Trial 1<br />

Spray frequencies<br />

3 / wk (▲): y = 2.199x 2 - 8.252x + 61.77<br />

R² = 0.815<br />

2/wk (×): y = 0.844x 2 - 1.176x + 41.17<br />

R² = 0.972<br />

1 / wk (■): y = -2.488x 2 + 6.896x + 43.01<br />

R² = 0.707<br />

Spray frequencies<br />

3 / wk (▲): y = 3.497x 2 - 14.22x + 75.78<br />

R² = 0.745<br />

2 / wk (×): y = 2.536x 2 - 12.34x + 65.82<br />

R² = 0.999<br />

1 / wk (■): y = -3.320x 2 + 16.88x + 34.82<br />

R² = 0.999<br />

Trial 2<br />

Spray frequencies<br />

3 / wk (▲): y = 4.092x 2 - 16.25x + 89.46<br />

R² = 0.998<br />

2 / wk (×): y = 1.691x 2 - 7.780x + 87.88<br />

R² = 0.696<br />

1 / wk (■): y = -7.689x 2 + 30.20x + 48.92<br />

R² = 0.989<br />

Spray frequencies<br />

3 / wk (▲): y = 3.508x 2 - 16.26x + 100.3<br />

R² = 0.945<br />

2 / wk (×): y = 2.867x 2 - 15.06x + 98.96<br />

R² = 0.718<br />

1 / wk (■): y = 0.823x 2 - 2.583x + 71.45<br />

R² = 0.235<br />

Figure 4.2 Relationship between Si concentrations and frequency of sprays applied <strong>in</strong> open or covered pots on PM control of zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

plants grown under glasshouse conditions <strong>in</strong> two different trials.<br />

77


Table 10.1 Analysis of variance show<strong>in</strong>g factorial <strong>in</strong>teractions between concentration,<br />

frequency and runoff of foliar-applied silicon on severity of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i.<br />

Source of variation<br />

Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

F-value P-value F-value P-value<br />

Concentration 1.03 0.389 0.84 0.481<br />

Frequency 32.56 < 0.001*** 25.89 < 0.001***<br />

Runoff 21.86 < 0.001*** 5.19 0.027*<br />

Concentration*Frequency 2.26 0.053 3.54 0.006**<br />

Concentration * Runoff 0.33 0.805 1.84 0.153<br />

Frequency*Runoff 0.13 0.877 0.48 0.621<br />

Concentration * Frequency * Runoff 0.90 0.503 3.06 0.013*<br />

CV (%) 18.4 24.42<br />

Values with *= significant at P < 0.05; **= significant at P < 0.01; *** = significant at P < 0.001<br />

4.4 DISCUSSION<br />

In this study, spray<strong>in</strong>g soluble Si onto the leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i reduced the severity of PM<br />

significantly. This confirmed the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of previous research on the use of Si sprays for<br />

the control of PM of cucumber (Menzies et al., 1992; Liang et al., 2005), grape (Bowen et<br />

al., 1992; Reynolds et al., 1996), muskmelon (Menzies et al., 1992), strawberry (Kanto et<br />

al., 2004; Palmer et al., 2006), wheat (Guével et al., 2007) and zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Menzies et al.,<br />

1992).<br />

In most cases, foliar applications of Si provides less disease control compared to when the<br />

element is fed to the plant <strong>in</strong> a nutrient solution or as a soil amendment (Guével et al.,<br />

2007; Liang et al., 2005). However, <strong>in</strong> some plants foliar application provides better<br />

efficacy than supply<strong>in</strong>g the element to the roots. For <strong>in</strong>stance, Bowen et al. (1992) found<br />

that spray<strong>in</strong>g Si at 1000mg l -1 onto grape leaves reduced the severity of PM significantly;<br />

whereas treat<strong>in</strong>g the plant with a Si-amended solution did not. This was considered to be<br />

because foliar application allows Si to be applied to non-hydroponic crops or crops that are<br />

unable to transport Si from their root to shoots through their vascular system, (Bélanger et<br />

al., 1995).<br />

78


When Si is applied as a foliar treatment, its mode of action <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g severity of PM may<br />

be different from when it is fed through the roots (Wang and Galletta, 1998). Spray<strong>in</strong>g Si<br />

on cucumber can result <strong>in</strong> the formation of a coat<strong>in</strong>g (film) on the leaves (Menzies et al.,<br />

1992), which would act as a physical barrier, prevent<strong>in</strong>g the penetration of fungal hyphae<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the host (Bowen et al., 1992). Guével et al. (2007) showed that foliar application of Si<br />

has a direct effect on PM over and above any effects mediated by the plant, as results from<br />

root amendments which may lead to <strong>in</strong>duced resistance. A direct action by Si spays on PM<br />

was confirmed by our results when Si was sprayed onto plants where the element was<br />

restricted from reach<strong>in</strong>g the roots of the plants. When KSi is used aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, the active<br />

<strong>in</strong>gredient of the spray appears to be Si (Menzies et al., 1992).<br />

Results of this study showed that <strong>in</strong> the range of 250-1000 mg l -1 , the level of Si <strong>in</strong> the<br />

spray solution had little impact on the efficacy of Si <strong>in</strong> PM control. Severity of PM was<br />

significantly reduced by all treatments, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that application of Si at lower<br />

concentrations could provide the optimum disease control while m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the cost of<br />

control. Observations by Menzies et al. (1992) on the use of Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of different<br />

hosts showed that the efficacy of a foliar spray of Si at 1000 mg l -1 was equivalent to a<br />

solution of 100 mg l -1 applied as a soil amendment.<br />

In this study, the efficacy of Si was improved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the spray frequency. When the<br />

application frequency was <strong>in</strong>creased from 1 to 3 times per week, efficacy of Si was<br />

doubled. This agrees with a report of Reynolds et al. (1996), who <strong>in</strong>creased the efficacy of<br />

Si sprays aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of grape (Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator (Schwe<strong>in</strong>.) Burrill) by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g spray<br />

frequency. Increas<strong>in</strong>g application frequencies could <strong>in</strong>crease the total amount of Si<br />

deposited on the surface of the leaf, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> better efficacy. Spray<strong>in</strong>g Si at a<br />

concentration of 250 mg l -1 with a frequency of 3 times per week could be expected to<br />

result <strong>in</strong> a lower amount of Si be<strong>in</strong>g deposited on the leaf than if it was applied once a<br />

week at a concentration of 1000 mg l -1 . However, this study showed that spray<strong>in</strong>g Si at<br />

250 mg l -1 x 3 x wk -1 was more effective than spray<strong>in</strong>g 1000 mg l -1 x 1 x wk -1 . Even for<br />

the adjacent treatment, which did not conta<strong>in</strong> Si, disease severity was reduced by<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the frequency of spray treatment. Therefore, when spray frequency is <strong>in</strong>creased,<br />

there must be other factors that are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the efficacy of Si other than the<br />

total amount of the element deposited on the phylloplane. The wett<strong>in</strong>g agent (BK) and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased leaf wetness could have their own impact on the pathogen. Break-Thru ® was<br />

79


shown to have a direct effect on PM restrict<strong>in</strong>g expansion of its colonies and collaps<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conidia and hyphae of the pathogen (Chapter 3). Although extended periods of leaf<br />

wetness can favour <strong>in</strong>fection of zucch<strong>in</strong>i by several foliar pathogens, it has a negative<br />

effect on the development of PM by <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation of the conidia (Bushnell and<br />

Rowell, 1967; Qu<strong>in</strong>n and Powell, 1982; Sakurai and Hirata, 1959). Most importantly,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the frequency of applications could improve the cont<strong>in</strong>uity of Si supply to plants<br />

roots through runoff. Even though the major factors rema<strong>in</strong> unknown, this study<br />

demonstrated that better disease control could be achieved by spray<strong>in</strong>g Si at lower<br />

concentrations with <strong>in</strong>creased spray frequencies <strong>in</strong>stead of apply<strong>in</strong>g higher concentrations<br />

of Si at lower frequencies.<br />

When the same concentration of Si was sprayed at the same frequencies per week, the<br />

severity of PM recorded from plants grown <strong>in</strong> uncovered pots was less than that of plants<br />

grown <strong>in</strong> covered pots. This was because, <strong>in</strong> open pots, part of the spray solution was<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercepted by the soil as a result of drift and runoff. Once the Si solution was <strong>in</strong> the<br />

rhizosphere of the plant, it could be absorbed by the roots and translocated to different<br />

parts of the plant. Reviews by Epste<strong>in</strong> (1994, 1995 & 2001) showed that add<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

nutrient solution or add<strong>in</strong>g it to the soil benefits plants by provid<strong>in</strong>g protection aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

pathogens through physical barriers and trigger<strong>in</strong>g plant resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogens, and<br />

ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g other biotic and abiotic stresses of the plant. However, when KSi is sprayed<br />

onto the leaf, it may be deposited on the surface of the leaf without penetrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

plant (Buck et al., 2008). Therefore, the possible mechanisms of protection it provides<br />

might have been through direct contact with the pathogen and alteration of the chemical<br />

properties of the leaf such as pH, which could lead to changes <strong>in</strong> osmotic properties of the<br />

leaf surface (Liang et al., 2005). Us<strong>in</strong>g scann<strong>in</strong>g electron micrographs, Bowen et al. (1992)<br />

observed an active accumulation of Si around the appressoria of the PM fungi when Si was<br />

sprayed onto leaves of cucumber plants. However, Reynolds et al. (1996) suggested that<br />

exogenously applied silicates act to augment the activity of their endogenous counterparts,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the accumulation of the element around the pathogen.<br />

80


In most research conducted on the management of PM us<strong>in</strong>g foliar-applied Si, the effects<br />

of the drift or runoff of soluble Si on the disease has not been considered. However, as<br />

seen <strong>in</strong> this study, such drift and runoff can have a significant impact on the health of the<br />

plant and give a confounded conclusion because different modes of action can be <strong>in</strong>volved,<br />

once the element is absorbed by the plant via its roots. For <strong>in</strong>stance, foliar application of Si<br />

did not reduce severity of PM of strawberry (Palmer et al., 2006), but enhanced growth of<br />

the plant by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g its chlorophyll content (Wang and Galletta, 1998). Therefore, such<br />

metabolic changes of the plant might be related to the absorption of Si through the roots as<br />

a result of drift and runoff of foliar-applied Si.<br />

In this study, the plants were irrigated us<strong>in</strong>g drip irrigation, avoid<strong>in</strong>g any wash-off of Si<br />

from leaves to the soil. However, due to size of the grow<strong>in</strong>g area and other technical<br />

limitations, most growers prefer overhead irrigation than drip irrigation. In such cases, Si<br />

can be mixed with the nutrient solution and supplied to the plant as part of the irrigation.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g that technique could improve the efficacy and m<strong>in</strong>imize/avoid the costs of labour<br />

that would be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> spray<strong>in</strong>g of the element three times a week to control the disease.<br />

This technique may improve the efficacy of the treatment by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the spray coverage,<br />

and ensur<strong>in</strong>g a better contact between the spray and the pathogen. If proven economical,<br />

the foliar use of Si at appropriate application <strong>in</strong>tervals and concentrations could replace<br />

fungicides for the management of PM on zucch<strong>in</strong>i, a welcome development for organic<br />

farmers.<br />

4.5 REFERENCES<br />

Bélanger, R.R, Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-36.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.G. 1997. Powdery mildew: recent advances toward <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

control. In: G.S. Boland and L.D. Kuykendall (Eds.). Plant-microbe <strong>in</strong>teractions and biological<br />

control. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA. Pp. 89-109.<br />

Bowen, P., Menzies, J., Ehret, D., Samuels, L., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Soluble silicon sprays <strong>in</strong>hibit<br />

powdery mildew development on grape leaves. Journal of the American Society for<br />

Horticultural Science, 117: 906-912.<br />

Buck, G.B., Korndorfer, G.H., Nolla, A., Coelho, L. 2008. Potassium silicate as foliar spray and<br />

rice blast control. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31: 23-237.<br />

81


Bushnell, W.R, Rowell, J.B. 1967. Fluorochemical liquid as a carrier for spores of Erysiphe<br />

gram<strong>in</strong>is and Pucc<strong>in</strong>ia gram<strong>in</strong>is. Plant Disease Report, 51: 447-448.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant biology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the United States of America, 91: 11-17.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1999. <strong>Silicon</strong>. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,<br />

50: 641-64.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 2001. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> plants: Facts vs. concepts. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>. In: L.E. Datnoff,<br />

G.H. Snyder, and G.H. Korndörfer (Eds.). Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, Pp. 1-15.<br />

Genstat. 2006. GenStat Statistical Analysis Software. 8 th ed. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Oxford,<br />

UK.<br />

Guével, M.H., Menzies J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. Effect of root and foliar applications of soluble<br />

silicon on powdery mildew control and growth of wheat plants. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 119: 429-436.<br />

Kanto, T., Miyoshi, A., Ogawa, T., Maekawa, K., A<strong>in</strong>o, M. 2004. Suppressive effect of potassium<br />

silicate on powdery mildew of strawberry <strong>in</strong> hydroponics. Journal of General Plant<br />

Pathology, 70: 207-211.<br />

Liang, Y.C., Sun, W.C., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the<br />

enhancement of <strong>in</strong>duced resistance to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> Cucumis sativus. Plant<br />

Pathology, 54: 678-685.<br />

Menzies, J., Bowen, P., Ehret, D., Glass, A.D. M. 1992. Foliar applications of potassium silicate<br />

reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucch<strong>in</strong>i squash.<br />

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 117: 902-905.<br />

Palmer, S., Scott, E., Stangoulis, J., Able, A.A. 2006. The effect of foliar-applied Ca and Si on the<br />

severity of powdery mildew of strawberry cultivars. 2006. Acta Horticulturae, No. 708:<br />

135-139.<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>n, JA, Powell, CC Jr. 1982. Effects of temperature, light, and relative humidity on powdery<br />

mildew of begonia. Phytopathology, 72: 480-484.<br />

Reynolds, A.G., Veto, L.J., Sholberg, P.L., Wardle, D.A., Haag, P. 1996. Use of potassium silicate<br />

for the control of powdery mildew [Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator (Schwe<strong>in</strong>) Burrill] <strong>in</strong> Vitis v<strong>in</strong>ifera L.<br />

cultivar Bacchus. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 47: 42-428.<br />

Romero, D., Perez-Garcia, A. Rivera, M.E., Cazorla, F.M., de Vicente, A., 2004. Isolation and<br />

evaluation of antagonistic bacteria towards the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus<br />

Podosphaera fusca. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 64: 263-269.<br />

Romero, D., Rivera, M.E., Cazorla, F.M., de Vicente, A., Perez-Garcia, A. 2003. Effects of<br />

mycoparasitic fungi on the development of Sphaerotheca fusca <strong>in</strong> melon leaves.<br />

Mycological Researches, 107: 64-67.<br />

82


Sakurai, H., Hirata, K. 1959. Some observations on the relation between the penetration hypha and<br />

haustorium of the barley powdery mildew and the host cell. V. Influence of water spray on<br />

the pathogen and the host tissue. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 4: 239-<br />

245.<br />

Wang, S.Y. and Galletta, G.J. 1998. Foliar application of potassium silicate <strong>in</strong>duces metabolic<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> strawberry plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21: 157-167.<br />

83


CHAPTER FIVE<br />

STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF SELECTED BIOCONTROL AGENTS<br />

AND SOLUBLE SILICON ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF POWDERY<br />

MILDEW OF ZUCCHINI, UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a , M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a and M.J. Morris b<br />

a<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

b Plant Health Products, P. O. Box 207, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham Road, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

Duplicate trials were conducted under greenhouse conditions to evaluate the effects of five<br />

potential biocontrol agents and soluble silicon (Si) for the control of powdery mildew of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i caused by Podosphaera xanthii. Biocontrol agents were sprayed onto leaves with<br />

a wetter (Break-Thru ® ), and Si was drenched onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i roots (250ml of K 2 SiO 3 at<br />

100mg l -1 , applied weekly). All five BCAs provided significant control of PM, whether Si<br />

was drenched to the roots or not. The effects of Si applied alone on disease severity and<br />

AUDPC were significant, reduc<strong>in</strong>g them by 23% and 32%, respectively. Application of Si<br />

improved the efficacy of most BCAs significantly. Of the five BCAs, the fungi provided<br />

better control of PM than the bacterial isolates, reduc<strong>in</strong>g disease levels by up to 90%.<br />

Higher disease pressure reduced the efficacy of Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM but, did not affect the<br />

performance of BCAs.<br />

84


5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Powdery mildews (PM) are prime targets for biocontrol agents (BCAs) because they are<br />

superficial pathogens, and are therefore accessible to external agencies. As a result, several<br />

biocontrol studies have been conducted to control PM under greenhouse conditions (Dik et<br />

al., 1998; Elad et al., 1998; Hijwegen, 1992; Verhaar et al., 1993, 1996). Controlled<br />

environmental variables of greenhouses provide optimum environmental conditions for the<br />

establishment and survival of antagonists. Most antagonists of PM require high humidity,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g greenhouses an ideal environment for implementation of biocontrol.<br />

Ampelomyces quisqualis Ces. (Pertot et al., 2008; Sundheim, 1982), Bacillus subtilis<br />

(Ehrenberg) Cohn (Ke<strong>in</strong>ath and DuBose, 2004), Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimm.) Zare & W.<br />

Gams (syn. Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Viegas) (Askary et al., 1997; Miller et al., 2004;<br />

Verhaar et al., 1993; 1996), Sporothrix flocculosa Traquir, Shaw & Jarvis (syn.<br />

Pseudozyma flocculosa) (Bélanger et al., 1994; Jarvis et al., 1989; Hajlaoui and Bélanger,<br />

1991), Tilletiopsis spp. (Urquhart et al., 1994; Hijwegen, 1992), and Trichoderma<br />

harzianum Rifai (Elad, 2000; Elad et al., 1998; Pertot et al., 2008) have all shown<br />

moderate to good disease control of PM when tested <strong>in</strong> greenhouses. Some of these<br />

antagonists have been commercialized. For <strong>in</strong>stance, A. quisqualis stra<strong>in</strong> AQ10 was<br />

marketed as AQBiofungicide (Elad et al., 1998), B. subtilis Stra<strong>in</strong> QST 713 as Serenade TM<br />

(Ngugi et al., 2005) and T. harzianum stra<strong>in</strong> T39 as TRIXODEX TM (Elad et al., 1998).<br />

Low humidity levels have been the major factor <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g the use of BCAs aga<strong>in</strong>st PM on<br />

field crops. As a result, biocontrol of this disease has been limited to greenhouse<br />

conditions, where humidity is not a limit<strong>in</strong>g factor. To overcome this limit under field<br />

conditions, scientists have tried amend<strong>in</strong>g the BCAs with adjuvants or oils (Bélanger et al.,<br />

1994; Philipp et al., 1990).<br />

The efficacy of BCAs depends on the climatic conditions of the crop. Powdery mildew can<br />

thrive under dry conditions, whereas most BCAs need relative humidity above 70%<br />

(Hajlaoui and Bélanger, 1991). Furthermore, the rate of development of PM may <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

the level of control of PM by BCAs, especially <strong>in</strong> the case of hyperparasites. This means<br />

that the efficacy of BCAs may differ from season to season, from cultivar to cultivar, and<br />

may be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by other control measures such as fungicides.<br />

85


Use of soluble silicon (Si) <strong>in</strong> PM management has been studied under controlled<br />

conditions with some degree of success (Bélanger et al., 1995; Menzies et al., 1991b;<br />

Samuels et al., 1991a & 1994). Both BCAs and Si have drawn considerable attention<br />

because they are considered as environmentally friendly. However, the level of disease<br />

control obta<strong>in</strong>ed from each control options is often <strong>in</strong>complete, rais<strong>in</strong>g the possibility of<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g them together <strong>in</strong> order to supplement each other.<br />

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of five selected BCAs aga<strong>in</strong>st PM<br />

of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (caused by Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne)), to determ<strong>in</strong>e the efficacy of Si <strong>in</strong><br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g PM and improv<strong>in</strong>g efficacy of BCAs by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g them with this element.<br />

5.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

5.2.1 Preparion of plants and <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Cucurbita pepo L., F1-Hybrid Partenon), were raised <strong>in</strong> a<br />

greenhouse operat<strong>in</strong>g at a temperature of 26-28 o C and relative humidity (RH) of 75-85%.<br />

After produc<strong>in</strong>g two fully developed leaves, they were transplanted <strong>in</strong>to pots (180 mm <strong>in</strong><br />

diameter) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark and transferred <strong>in</strong>to another greenhouse (24-<br />

30 o C and 65-85% RH) permanently. The plants were irrigated with complete fertilizer<br />

[Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> 1 3:1:3(38) at 0.5 g l -1 ] + [Ca(NO 3 ) 2 at 0.5 g l -1 ] by means of drip<br />

irrigation. Pots were kept at a distance of 40 cm with<strong>in</strong> rows and 150-200 cm between<br />

rows. After 3 d of transplant<strong>in</strong>g, seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>in</strong>oculated by spray<strong>in</strong>g 3-5 ml of conidial<br />

suspensions of P. xanthii (10 3 conidia ml -1 ) onto the leaves of each seedl<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g a hand<br />

sprayer. First, the source plants that were grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a separated greenhouse were shaken<br />

24 h before spores harvested for <strong>in</strong>oculation. This was done to ensure that all conidia <strong>in</strong> the<br />

suspension were fresh and of the same age. Once the conidia had been counted, <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />

commenced immediately, with<strong>in</strong> 2 h dur<strong>in</strong>g late afternoon to ensure a sufficiently high<br />

temperature and relative humidity for <strong>in</strong>fection.<br />

5.2.2 Application of biocontrol agents and silicon<br />

Clonostachys rosea (L<strong>in</strong>k) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & Gams (Isolate EH), Trichothecium<br />

roseum (Pers.) L<strong>in</strong>k (Isolate H20) and 3 isolates of Serratia marcescens (Bizio) (i.e.,<br />

1 Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> (Pty) Ltd., P. O. Box 742, Muldersdrift, 1747, South Africa.<br />

86


Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41) were used as biocontrol agents aga<strong>in</strong>st PM. All BCAs were<br />

produced accord<strong>in</strong>g to their requirements as described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2 and applied until runoff<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a hand sprayer 2d before <strong>in</strong>oculation of the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs with PM and repeated after 4d<br />

when PM symptom started to appear and then cont<strong>in</strong>ued weekly for 5 wk. The<br />

concentration of propagules per ml of each BCA was 10 6 for Isolates EH and H20 and 10 8<br />

for isolates of S. marcescens. As a wetter, Break-Thru ® (at 0.25 ml l -1 ) was added to each<br />

microbial suspension and mixed thoroughly. All BCAs were applied <strong>in</strong> the even<strong>in</strong>gs to<br />

improve establishment of the antagonists by provid<strong>in</strong>g sufficient relative humidity. Si, <strong>in</strong><br />

the form of KSi, was drenched onto the roots of each plant 3 d before <strong>in</strong>oculation and<br />

weekly thereafter (250 ml at 100 mg l -1 ).<br />

5.2.3 Disease assessment<br />

Assessment of the percentage of leaf area <strong>in</strong>fected was recorded for each treatment weekly<br />

before the next application. Rat<strong>in</strong>gs on percentage of the leaf covered by PM was recorded<br />

for 3 leaves every week to represent disease severity and averaged to give the percentage<br />

of disease. The development of disease was very high, especially for the Untreated<br />

Control. This created a problem because the rated leaves soon developed 100% disease.<br />

To deal with this problem, rat<strong>in</strong>gs of the severity level of PM of the control plants were<br />

made on new leaves that were not fully covered by the PM colonies. Then the leaves that<br />

corresponded to the leaves rated for the Untreated Control plants were assessed to get a<br />

severity rat<strong>in</strong>g for the treatments. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, AUDPC was calculated from PM levels us<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

AUDPC Program (Shaner and F<strong>in</strong>ney, 1977).<br />

5.2.4 Data analysis<br />

Two trials were conducted, with each treatment hav<strong>in</strong>g three replications, arranged <strong>in</strong> a<br />

randomized complete block design. Analysis of variance and contrast analysis between<br />

treatments that conta<strong>in</strong>ed Si and without Si were performed us<strong>in</strong>g GenStat ® Statistical<br />

Analysis Software (GenStat, 2006). Comparison between means of treatments was<br />

performed us<strong>in</strong>g Fisher’s Protected LSD and efficacy of each treatment on percentage<br />

reductions of FDL and AUDPC values were calculated by compar<strong>in</strong>g the values of each<br />

treatment with that of the Untreated Control.<br />

87


5.3 RESULTS<br />

One week after <strong>in</strong>oculation, the mean leaf area <strong>in</strong>fected of 3% was recorded on the first<br />

three leaves of the Untreated Control. The level of disease <strong>in</strong>creased exponentially and at<br />

the end of the second week, these leaves were 100% diseased, and the newly emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

leaves were <strong>in</strong>fected. In the second trial, the mean disease level after one week was 18%<br />

and subsequently followed a similar pattern. At the end of the month, the level of leaf area<br />

<strong>in</strong>fected of of plants from the Untreated Control was 61% and 89% for the first and second<br />

trials, respectively. In both trials, the effects of treatments on the severity and AUDPC<br />

values were highly significant (F < 0.001).<br />

In the first week of the first trial, the severity levels of PM recorded for all treatments were<br />

similar, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0-5%. However, severity levels of PM started to differ after the<br />

second week of treatments. In the second trial, the severity levels of PM were obvious after<br />

only one week of <strong>in</strong>fection, with the antagonistic fungi Isolates EH and H20, with and<br />

without Si, reduc<strong>in</strong>g disease severity to a level of < 3% versus a level of 18% recorded for<br />

the Untreated Control. The levels of PM of plants treated by bacterial BCAs alone, or with<br />

Si, were with<strong>in</strong> the range of 2-7%; while plants treated with Si alone developed an <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection level of 10%. In both trials, all BCAs reduced PM level significantly (P < 0.001).<br />

The rank<strong>in</strong>g order of treatments and the percentage of reduction obta<strong>in</strong>ed by all treatments<br />

are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5.1 and Figures 5.1 and 5.2, respectively.<br />

Application of Si had a significant effect on the severity of PM (P < 0.05), and the contrast<br />

<strong>in</strong> severity levels of PM between plants treated with Si and those that were not treated with<br />

Si was highly significant (P < 0.05). Furthermore, most BCAs provided improved control<br />

of PM when they were applied to plants that were be<strong>in</strong>g treated with Si.<br />

The effects of treatments on AUDPC were significant (P < 0.001) for both trials. All BCAs<br />

reduced PM development, as reflected by significantly lower AUDPC values. Similarly,<br />

application of Si had a significant impact on AUDPC values of the second trial, but not <strong>in</strong><br />

the first trial. In both trials, Si alone significantly reduced the AUDPC values. Integrated<br />

applications of Si and BCAs resulted <strong>in</strong> significantly lower AUDPC values, with most<br />

BCAs treatments show<strong>in</strong>g an improved efficacy, compared to their respective values<br />

without Si (Table 5.1). Overall, application of Si provided a mean reduction of 13 % <strong>in</strong><br />

disease severity and AUDPC values.<br />

88


Table 11.1 Effects of selected biocontrol agents and soluble silicon (Si) on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and area under disease progress curve<br />

(AUDPC) of powdery mildew of greenhouse-grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

Treatments<br />

FDL AUDPC FDL AUDPC<br />

-Si +Si -Si +Si -Si +Si -Si +Si<br />

Control 61.3 c 41.7 b 688.8 c 470.2 b 89.3 e 68.7 d 965.0 e 758.2 d<br />

B15 43.3 b 37.7 b 448.2 bc 396.7 b 39.0 c 35.0 bc 379.2 c 221.8 b<br />

EH 32.0 ab 30.0 ab 361.7 ab 331.3 ab 11.0 a 6.3 a 145.8 ab 126.0 a<br />

H20 36.0 b 30.0 ab 374.5 ab 309.2 ab 5.3 a 9.0 a 71.2 a 128.3 a<br />

Y15 25.3 a 34.0 ab 249.7 a 361.7 ab 28.0 b 26.3 b 275.3 b 271.8 b<br />

Y41 36.0 b 30.3 ab 399.0 b 337.2 ab 29.0 b 31.3 bc 255.5 b 292.8 bc<br />

Average 39.0 33.9 420.3 367.7 33.6 29.4 348.7 299.8<br />

Effects F-values F-values F-values F-values<br />

- Si = treatments without Si, + Si= treatments with Si<br />

Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

BCAs < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0 .001<br />

Si 0.020 0.052 0.045 0.009<br />

BCAs * Si 0.020 0.041 0.022 < 0.001<br />

FLSD 10.25 130.14 9.95 87.08<br />

CV (%) 16.6 19.5 18.6 15.9<br />

Means with<strong>in</strong> column followed by a common letter were not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fisher’s protected least significant difference (P


Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

BCAs<br />

PM control (%)<br />

Figure 5.1 Percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al disease levels of powdery mildew of greenhouse-grown zucch<strong>in</strong>i by five biocontrol agents<br />

and soluble silicon compared to an Untreated Control treatment five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

90


Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

BCAs<br />

Reduction <strong>in</strong> AUDPC (%)<br />

Figure 5.2 Percentage reduction of the Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values of powdery mildew of greenhouse-grown<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i by five biocontrol agents and soluble silicon compared to an Untreated Control treatment, five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with<br />

Podosphaera xanthii.<br />

91


5.4 DISCUSSION<br />

Infection by PM and consequently, development of PM, was very rapid <strong>in</strong> both trials,<br />

partly due to the environmental conditions of the greenhouse that favoured PM. Powdery<br />

mildew progress on the Untreated Control plants demonstrated the ideal conductions of the<br />

greenhouse to the development of PM. Powdery mildew is a very common disease of crops<br />

that are grown under such conditions. This is because its high RH, high temperature and<br />

restricted air circulation provide an ideal environment for germ<strong>in</strong>ation of conidia of PM<br />

fungi and their establishment (Howard et al., 1994). Once <strong>in</strong>fection starts <strong>in</strong> such<br />

environment, the disease spreads throughout the greenhouse at a fast rate and causes a<br />

massive impact on the yield and quality of the fruit, if not managed properly (Dik et al.,<br />

1998).<br />

Restrictions on the use of fungicides have <strong>in</strong>tensified the use of biological control as an<br />

alternative approach <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM. As a result, some promis<strong>in</strong>g results have been<br />

reported by several researchers (Dik et al., 1998; Elad et al., 1998; Hijwegen, 1992; Miller<br />

et al., 2004; Verhaar et al., 1993 & 1996). This is because PM grows superficially on the<br />

leaf and its exposure to the external environment makes it vulnerable to attack by many<br />

microbes (Bélanger et al., 1998). However, due to the dependency of antagonists on<br />

specific environmental conditions for establishment and survival, most of them operate<br />

more effectively with<strong>in</strong> a limited range of temperature and RH (Bélanger et al., 1998;<br />

Jarvis and Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, 1977; Jarvis et al., 1989). When BCAs are tested aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, the most<br />

limit<strong>in</strong>g factor has been their requirements for a high RH. In this regard, greenhouses are<br />

ideal sites for exploitation of biological control because they provide the best<br />

environmental conditions for the development and activity of BCAs. This was<br />

demonstrated <strong>in</strong> our trials where the severity levels of PM were very high <strong>in</strong> the Untreated<br />

Control.<br />

In both trials, all BCAs reduced disease severity by suppress<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>fection rate and<br />

development of PM. After 4wk of treatments with these BCAs, promis<strong>in</strong>g levels of disease<br />

reduction (40-90%) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Reductions <strong>in</strong> the levels of PM can <strong>in</strong>crease the amount<br />

and quality of yields by zucch<strong>in</strong>i. We did not f<strong>in</strong>d a publication on the impact of PM on<br />

yields of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. However, <strong>in</strong> cucumber, a level of <strong>in</strong>fection as little as 5% for 60d will<br />

translate <strong>in</strong>to a yield loss of 6% (Bélanger et al., 1998) and severe <strong>in</strong>fection can reduce the<br />

92


yield by more than 50% (Sundheim, 1982). Therefore, the ability of our isolates to<br />

suppress PM level by 40-90% shows their potential to be used aga<strong>in</strong>st PM under<br />

greenhouse conditions, giv<strong>in</strong>g the growers an alternative option to manag<strong>in</strong>g PM<br />

effectively.<br />

Most of our isolates controlled PM better when they were applied to plants treated with Si.<br />

Drench<strong>in</strong>g the pots of zucch<strong>in</strong>i weekly with 250 ml of a Si solution at a concentration of<br />

100 mg l -1 reduced PM by an average of 12-14% over all treatments. Such additive effects<br />

were likely due to a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of mechanisms that are <strong>in</strong>volved by the mixed treatment<br />

<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM as opposed to the modes of action provided by Si or <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

antagonist, applied alone. Although the mechanism by which Si exerts its protective effects<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st plant diseases is the subject of debate and controversy (Ghanmi et al., 2004),<br />

prevention of penetration of PM fungi as a result of physical barrier (Bowen et al., 1992;<br />

Samuels et al, 1991a & b), prim<strong>in</strong>g the resistance of the host (Cherif et al, 1994; Fawe et<br />

al., 1998; Menzies, et al., 1991b) and ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g the biotic and abiotic stresses of the<br />

plant (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994, 1999, 2001) are currently considered to be the ma<strong>in</strong> modes of action<br />

of the element. In case of biological control, the known mechanisms of action employed by<br />

different antagonists <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g PM <strong>in</strong>clude: antibiosis (Dik et al., 1998; Hajlaoui et<br />

al., 1992 & 1994; Urquart et al., 1994 ), competition (Nofal and Haggag, 2006),<br />

mycoparasitism (Askary et al., 1997; Falk et al., 1995a & b; Kiss 1998; Romero et al.,<br />

2003; Sundheim, 1982; Sztenjberg et al., 1989; Verhaar et al., 1997) and <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g host<br />

resistance (Elad et al., 1998; Silva et al., 2004; Vogt and Buchenauer, 1997). Therefore,<br />

when some of these mechanisms of action are used <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM, better disease<br />

control could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Sometimes, co-application of BCAs together or with Si might<br />

not give an improved efficacy aga<strong>in</strong>st the target disease, PM. However, it might still<br />

benefit the plant because one of the treatments <strong>in</strong> the comb<strong>in</strong>ation could provide protection<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st non-target pathogens. For <strong>in</strong>stance, co-application of AQ10 and Trichodex did<br />

not improve efficacy of the application <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of cucumber but gave better<br />

control of grey mold (Elad et al., 1998).<br />

The level of control obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Si alone, or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with the BCAs, was<br />

promis<strong>in</strong>g. However, there is still a possibility that such level of control can be improved<br />

by manipulat<strong>in</strong>g the environment of the greenhouse further. For <strong>in</strong>stance, sett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g temperature at 20-25 o C can give better results (Schuerger and Hammer, 2003).<br />

93


Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these authors, suppression of PM of cucumber by Si was <strong>in</strong>dependent of light<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity, but was significantly <strong>in</strong>hibited when the temperature was higher than 24 o C.<br />

Co-application of BCAs with other control options has also given an improved success <strong>in</strong><br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of different crops <strong>in</strong> similar environment (Dik et al., 1998; Elad et al.,<br />

1998; Sundheim, 1982). This is because when some BCAs are used alone, they cannot<br />

offer protection for the entire season so that they can be viable alternatives to chemicals<br />

(Pertot et al., 2008). This is common especially when mycoparasites are used as BCAs,<br />

which need a certa<strong>in</strong> level of disease s<strong>in</strong>ce they can only attack established <strong>in</strong>fections (e.g.,<br />

A. quisqualis) (Fokkema, 1993). In contrast, epidemics of PM develop very fast and can<br />

overtake the mycoparasite. For this reason, repeated applications of BCAs may <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the likelihood of their controll<strong>in</strong>g PM. However, if the mode of action of the BCA is<br />

antibiosis, the antagonist does not have to be <strong>in</strong> direct contact with the pathogenic fungi<br />

because the molecules will diffuse over the leaf surface (Dik et al., 1998). In this study the<br />

use of Break-Thru ® has improved efficacy of BCAs by enhanc<strong>in</strong>g their deposition on the<br />

leaf and the pathogen and directly affect<strong>in</strong>g the PM fungi.<br />

In most reports where Si produced promis<strong>in</strong>g results, the research has been conducted<br />

under controlled environments by grow<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>in</strong> hydroponics (Kanto et al., 2004;<br />

Schuerger and Hammer, 2003) or recycl<strong>in</strong>g-nutrient solutions (Adatia and Besford, 1986).<br />

In both systems, there is cont<strong>in</strong>uous supply of Si to the plant, giv<strong>in</strong>g an improved efficacy<br />

compared to the technique used <strong>in</strong> this study. In our case, Si was supplied to the<br />

rhizosphere once a week, from which some of the solution was dra<strong>in</strong>ed out of the pots due<br />

to gravity, or leached as a result of irrigation, leav<strong>in</strong>g little opportunity for the plant to<br />

utilize the supply. This means that the amount of Si that could be absorbed by the plant<br />

was lower than when the element is supplied cont<strong>in</strong>uously to the roots. When Si is used to<br />

provide control of diseases, the availability of Si over time is more important than its<br />

amount. This is because if the supply is <strong>in</strong>terrupted, even for one day, the plant may be<br />

<strong>in</strong>fected by the pathogen (Samuels et al., 1991b). Once <strong>in</strong>fection occurs, protective<br />

measures have little impact on PM. Samuels et al. (1991b) have described the type<br />

protection offered by Si aga<strong>in</strong>st diseases as “non-systemic resistance”. Therefore, we<br />

believe that improved efficacy can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the frequency of supply of Si<br />

to plant roots. Alternatively, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the loss of Si by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the dra<strong>in</strong>age can play a<br />

significant role <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the availability of Si to the plant.<br />

94


The overall disease levels were high <strong>in</strong> Trial 2, which made most BCAs perform better.<br />

However, Si performed worse under the high disease pressure of Trial 2. In Trial 2, the<br />

disease severity level <strong>in</strong>creased by 31%, reflect<strong>in</strong>g a 28% reduction <strong>in</strong> the efficacy of Si.<br />

This was assumed to be a direct response to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> disease pressure compared to<br />

the first trial. High levels of <strong>in</strong>fection at the start of Trial 2 might have played a role <strong>in</strong><br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g the efficacy of the Si treatment by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the development of PM, which<br />

ultimately resulted <strong>in</strong> a high f<strong>in</strong>al disease level. Kanto et al. (2007) demonstrated that the<br />

impact of Si applications is reduced when the plants are already <strong>in</strong>fected with PM.<br />

Therefore, for best control of PM, Si must be applied prior to <strong>in</strong>fection, by rely<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

previous history of the grow<strong>in</strong>g environment or disease forecasts. If Si fails to provide<br />

protection aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>fection by the pathogen or if the pressure of PM is too high, the use of<br />

other control options, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fungicides, may be needed as emergency measures so that<br />

Si can function at a manageable level of PM. In spite of the reduced efficacy of Si <strong>in</strong><br />

Trial 2, the fact that both control options provided promis<strong>in</strong>g results gives hope that they<br />

can provide economic control under natural levels of <strong>in</strong>fection, where PM levels are<br />

usually much lower than the levels tested here.<br />

5.5 REFERENCES<br />

Adatia, M.H., Besford, R.T. 1986. The effects of silicon on cucumber plants grown <strong>in</strong> recirculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nutrient solution. Annals of Botany, 58: 343-51.<br />

Askary, H., Benhamou, N., Brodeur, J. 1997. Ultrastructural and cytochemical <strong>in</strong>vestigations of the<br />

antagonistic effect of Verticillium lecanii on cucumber powdery mildew. Phytopathology,<br />

87: 359-368.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: Its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-336.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.G. 1997. Powdery mildews: Recent advances toward<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control. In: G.J. Boland and L.D. Kuykendall (Eds.). Plant-microbe <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

and biological control. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, Pp 89-109.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Labbé, C., Jarvis, W.R. 1994. Commercial-scale control of rose powdery mildew<br />

with a fungal antagonist. Plant Disease, 78: 420-424.<br />

Cherif, M., Assel<strong>in</strong>, A., Bélanger, R.R. 1994. Defence response <strong>in</strong>duced by soluble silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber roots <strong>in</strong>fected by Pythium spp. Phytopathology, 84: 236-242.<br />

95


Dik, A.J., Verhaar M.A., Bélanger R.R. 1998. Comparison of three biological control agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> semi-commercial-scale<br />

greenhouse trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104: 413-423.<br />

Elad, Y. 2000. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and<br />

potential modes of action. Crop Protection, 19: 709-714.<br />

Elad, Y., Kirshner, B., Yehuda, N., Sztjenberg, A., 1998. Management of powdery mildew and<br />

gray mold of cucumber by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and Ampelomyces quisqualis<br />

AQ10. Biocontrol, 43: 241-251.<br />

Falk S.P., Gadoury, D.M., Pearson, R.C., Seem, R.C. 1995b. Partial control of grape powdery<br />

mildew by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease, 79: 483-490.<br />

Falk, S.P., Gadoury, D.M., Cortesi, P., Pearson R.C., Seem, R.C. 1995a. Parasitism of Unc<strong>in</strong>ula<br />

necator cleistothecia by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Phytopathology,<br />

85: 794-800.<br />

Fawe, A., Abou-Zaid M., Menzies, J.G., Jeblick, W., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. <strong>Silicon</strong>-mediated<br />

accumulation of flavonoid phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> cucumber. Phytopathology, 88: 396-401.<br />

Fokkema, N.J. 1993. Opportunities and problems of control of foliar diseases with<br />

microorganisms. Pesticide Science, 31: 411-416.<br />

GenStat. 2006 GenStat Statistical Analysis Software 9 th ed. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Oxford, UK.<br />

Ghanmi, D., McNally, D.J., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger R.R. 2004. Powdery mildew<br />

of Arabidopsis thaliana: a pathosystem for explor<strong>in</strong>g the role of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant-microbe<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 64: 189-199.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R. and Bélanger, R.R. 1991. Comparative effects of temperature and humidity on the<br />

activity of three potential antagonists of rose powdery mildew. Netherlands Journal of<br />

Plant Pathology, 97: 203-208.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Benhamou, N., Bélanger, R.R. 1992. Cytochemical study of the antagonistic<br />

activity of Sporothrix flocculosa on rose powdery mildew, Sphaerotheca pannosa var.<br />

rosae. Phytopathology, 82: 583-589.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Traquair, J. A., Jarvis, W.R., Bélanger, R. R. 1994. Antifungal activity of<br />

extracellular metabolites produced by Sporothrix flocculosa. Biocontrol Science and<br />

Technology, 4: 229-237.<br />

Hijwegen, T. 1992. Biological control of cucumber powdery mildew with Tilletiopsis m<strong>in</strong>or under<br />

greenhouse conditions. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 98: 221-225.<br />

Howard, R.J., Garland, J.A., Seaman, W.L. 1994. Diseases and pests of vegetable crops <strong>in</strong> Canada:<br />

an illustrated compendium. The Canadian Phytopathological Society, Ottawa, Canada.<br />

Jarvis, W.R. and Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, K. 1977. The control of powdery mildew of greenhouse cucumber by<br />

water sprays and Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease Reporter, 61: 728-30.<br />

96


Jarvis, W.R., Shaw, L.A. Traquir, J.A. 1989. Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g antagonism of cucumber powdery<br />

mildew by Stepahanoascus flocculosus and S. rugulosus. Mycological Research, 92: 102-<br />

106.<br />

Kanto, T., Maekawa, K., A<strong>in</strong>o, M. 2007. Suppression of conidial germ<strong>in</strong>ation and appressorial<br />

formation by silicate treatment <strong>in</strong> powdery mildew of strawberry. Journal of General Plant<br />

Pathology, 73: 1-7.<br />

Kanto, T., Miyoshi, A., Ogawa, T., Maekawa, K., A<strong>in</strong>o, M. 2004. Suppressive effect of potassium<br />

silicate on powdery mildew of strawberry <strong>in</strong> hydroponics. Journal of General Plant<br />

Pathology, 70: 207-211.<br />

Ke<strong>in</strong>ath, A.P. and DuBose, V.B. 2004. Evaluation of fungicides for prevention and management of<br />

powdery mildew on watermelon, Crop Protection, 23: 35-42.<br />

Kiss, L. 1998. Natural occurrence of Ampelomyces <strong>in</strong>tracellular mycoparasites <strong>in</strong> mycelia of<br />

powdery mildew fungi. New Phytologist, 140: 709-714.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Samuels, A.L. 1991. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of silicon on<br />

cytological <strong>in</strong>teractions between Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea and Cucumis sativus. Physiology<br />

and Molecular Plant Pathology, 39: 403-414.<br />

Miller, T.C., Gubler, W.D., Laemmlen, F.F., Geng, S., Rizzo, D.M. 2004. Potential for<br />

Lecanicillium lecanii for suppression of strawberry powdery mildew. Biocontrol Science<br />

and Technology, 14: 215-220.<br />

Ngugi, H. K., Dedej, S., Delaplane, K. S., Savelle, A.T., Scherm, H. 2005. Effect of flower-applied<br />

Serenade biofungicide (Bacillus subtilis) on poll<strong>in</strong>ation-related variables <strong>in</strong> rabbiteye<br />

blueberry. Biological Control, 33: 32-38.<br />

Nofal, M.A., Haggag, W.M. 2006. Integrated management of powdery mildew of mango <strong>in</strong> Egypt.<br />

Crop Protection, 25: 480-486.<br />

Pertot, I., Zasso, R., Amsalem, L., Baldessari, M., Angeli, G., Elad, Y. 2008. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol<br />

agents <strong>in</strong> strawberry powdery mildew control strategies <strong>in</strong> high tunnel grow<strong>in</strong>g systems.<br />

Crop Protection, 27: 622-631.<br />

Philipp, W.D., Beuther, E., Hermann, D., Kl<strong>in</strong>kert, F., Oberwalder, C., Schmiditke, M., Straub, B.<br />

1990. Zur formulieurung des Mehltauhyperparasiten Ampelomyces quisqualis Ces,<br />

Zeitschrift fur Planzenkrankeheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 97: 120-132.<br />

Romero, D; Rivera, M.E, Cazorla, F.M., De Vicente, A. and Perez-Garrcia A. 2003. Effect of<br />

mycoparasitic fungi on the development of Sphaerotheca fusca <strong>in</strong> melon leaves.<br />

Mycological Research, 107: 64-71.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991a. Distribution of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea).<br />

Canadian Journal of Botany, 69: 140-146.<br />

97


Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991b. Mobility and deposition of<br />

silicon <strong>in</strong> cucumber plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 485-492.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L. 1994. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> cell walls and papillae<br />

of Cucumis sativus dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea. Physiology and Molecular<br />

Plant Pathology, 44: 237-242.<br />

Schuerger, A.C., and Hammer, W. 2003. Suppression of powdery mildew on greenhouse-grown<br />

cucumber by addition of silicon to hydroponic nutrient solution is <strong>in</strong>hibited at high<br />

temperature. Plant Disease, 87: 177-185.<br />

Shaner, G., F<strong>in</strong>ney, R.E., 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slowmildew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> Knox wheat. Phytopathology, 67: 1051-1056.<br />

Silva, H.S.A., Romeiro, R. da S., Macagnan, D., Halfeld-Vieira, B.de A., Pereira, M.C.B.,<br />

Mounteer, A. 2004. Rhizobacterial <strong>in</strong>duction of systemic resistance <strong>in</strong> tomato plants: nonspecific<br />

protection and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> enzyme activities. Biological Control, 29: 288-295.<br />

Sundheim, L. 1982. Control of cucumber powdery mildew by hyperparasite Ampelomyces<br />

quisqualis and fungicides. Plant Pathology, 31: 209-214.<br />

Sztejnberg, A., Galper, S., Mazar, S. and Lisker, N. 1989. Ampelomyces quisqualis for biological<br />

and <strong>in</strong>tegrated control of powdery mildews <strong>in</strong> Israel. Journal of Phytopathology, 124: 285-<br />

295.<br />

Urquhart, E. J., Menzies, J. G., Punja, Z. K. 1994. Growth and biological control activity of<br />

Tilletiopsis species aga<strong>in</strong>st powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) on greenhouse<br />

cucumber. Phytopathology, 84: 341-351.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1996. Greenhouse experiments on biocontrol of<br />

cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by the mycoparasites Verticillium<br />

lecanii and Sporothrix rugulosa. Biological Control, 6: 353-360.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., van Strien, P.A.C., Hijwegen, T. 1993. Biological control of cucumber powdery<br />

mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by Verticillium lecanii and Sporothrix cf. flocculosa.<br />

IOBC/WPRS Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 16: 79-81.<br />

Vogt, W., Buchenauer, H. 1997. Enhancement of biological control by comb<strong>in</strong>ation of antagonistic<br />

fluorescent Pseudomonas stra<strong>in</strong>s and resistance <strong>in</strong>ducers aga<strong>in</strong>st damp<strong>in</strong>g off and powdery<br />

mildew <strong>in</strong> cucumber. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 104: 272-<br />

280.<br />

98


CHAPTER SIX<br />

USE OF SELECTED BIOCONTROL AGENTS AND SILICON FOR THE<br />

MANAGEMENT OF POWDERY MILDEW OF ZUCCHINI<br />

UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a , M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a and M.J. Morris b<br />

a<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

b Plant Health Products, P. O .Box 207, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham Road, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

Two field trials were conducted at the Ukul<strong>in</strong>ga Research Farm to evaluate the efficacy of<br />

five selected biocontrol agents and soluble silicon (Si) <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g powdery mildew of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i caused by Podosphaera xanthii. Biocontrol agents were applied as foliar sprays at a<br />

concentration of 10 8 propagules ml -1 . One litre of Si at 100 mg l -1 was drenched weekly<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the rhizosphere of treated plants. Although statistically not significant, disease<br />

reductions of 32-70% by Si alone, 30-53% by Isolate B15, and 33-65% by Isolate B15 + Si<br />

were achieved. Other BCAs applied alone or together with Si also reduced disease levels<br />

by 9-68%. Plants treated with most of the BCAs showed significantly lower AUDPC<br />

values. For most antagonists, better efficacy was obta<strong>in</strong>ed when Si was drenched weekly<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the rhizosphere of the plants. Efficacy of some of the BCAs and Si were affected by<br />

the environmental conditions of the field. A low temperature with a high humidity<br />

enhanced the performances of Isolate B15 plus Si whereas these conditions suppressed the<br />

fungal BCAs. However, at a high temperature and a low relative humidity, the efficacy of<br />

the fungal antagonists was superior, and the rest of the treatments provided reduced disease<br />

control. Although promis<strong>in</strong>g results were achieved by all treatments, repeated trials and<br />

better understand<strong>in</strong>g of the use of Si and the BCAs <strong>in</strong> their dosage and application<br />

frequency, as well as <strong>in</strong>teractions with the host plant and the environment, are needed<br />

before they can be implemented on a commercial scale for susta<strong>in</strong>able control of the<br />

powdery mildew.<br />

99


6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The development of fungicide resistant fungal mutants comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>in</strong>creased concerns<br />

over health and environmental hazards caused by fungicides have <strong>in</strong>tensified the <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g biocompatible products that can supplement or replace conventional fungicides,<br />

especially to control diseases such as powdery mildew (PM) (Shishkoff and McGrath,<br />

2002).<br />

Effective control of PM with several biocontrol agents has been achieved under<br />

greenhouse conditions (Bélanger et al., 1997; Elad et al., 1996 & 1998; Falk et al., 1995;<br />

Jarvis and Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, 1977; Verhaar et al., 1996). This has resulted <strong>in</strong> the development of<br />

some promis<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol products on the market. However, efficacy of many of these<br />

products has been <strong>in</strong>consistent when tested under field conditions, partly due to the<br />

variability of the many factors that govern the establishment of BCAs (Bélanger et al.,<br />

1994; Schuerger and Hammer, 2003). Unlike greenhouse conditions, where humidity,<br />

temperature and other growth factors are relatively stable, field conditions are variable and<br />

unpredictable. Humidity, temperature, light <strong>in</strong>tensity and ra<strong>in</strong>fall are some of the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

factors that determ<strong>in</strong>e the success of a BCA. These factors have a direct impact on disease<br />

development, and the survival and antagonistic activities of BCAs on the phylloplane.<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g silicon (Si) <strong>in</strong>to nutrient solutions has reduced PM of cucurbits grown <strong>in</strong><br />

hydroponics (Bélanger et al., 1995; Menzies et al., 1991a & b; Samuels et al., 1991a;<br />

Schuerger and Hammer, 2003). As a foliar spray, Si has also been reported to effectively<br />

control PM on cucumber, muskmelon and zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Menzies et al., 1992), and on grape<br />

(Bowen et al., 1992).<br />

However, under both greenhouse and field conditions, the level of control achieved with<br />

BCAs and Si is often <strong>in</strong>complete. This is as a result of the slow establishment of BCAs as<br />

opposed to the fast development of the disease. One of the limitations of Si has been the<br />

failure to provide curative protection once the plant is <strong>in</strong>fected by the pathogen (Kanto et<br />

al., 2007). Co-application of BCAs and Si may complement each other to give a better<br />

disease control.<br />

100


To date, we have found no publications <strong>in</strong> which Si was directly supplied to the roots of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants grow<strong>in</strong>g under field conditions. Objectives of this study were to evaluate<br />

the efficacy of five selected isolates and Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i caused by Podosphaera<br />

xanthii (Castagne) under field conditions, and to study the possibility of us<strong>in</strong>g these two<br />

control options <strong>in</strong> the development of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated field management strategy aga<strong>in</strong>st this<br />

disease.<br />

6.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

6.2.1 Trial site, land preparation and transplant<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The field trials were conducted at Ukul<strong>in</strong>ga Research Farm located at E 29 o 40E and 30 o 24’<br />

S, 715 m above sea level, <strong>in</strong> the Southern Tall Grassveld of South Africa (Morris, 2002) on<br />

heavy, deep soil of Bonheimer clays (Dr R. Melis 1 , 2002, pers. comm.).<br />

The field was thoroughly plowed twice with a tractor and all the exist<strong>in</strong>g weeds were<br />

removed by hand. To moisten the field and enhance survival of the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, irrigation<br />

was commenced one day before transplantation. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of zucch<strong>in</strong>i, raised as described<br />

<strong>in</strong> previous sections, were transplanted <strong>in</strong>to the field once they had a fully developed<br />

second leaf. Plant<strong>in</strong>g distance was 1.25m between plants and 1.5m between rows. Dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the experimental periods, moisture level of the field was monitored daily. The field was<br />

irrigated with overhead irrigation and kept free of weeds with herbicides, as needed.<br />

6.2.2 Preparation of Podosphaera xanthii <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />

Collection, storage and preparation of P. xanthii were the same as described <strong>in</strong> the previous<br />

Chapters except that <strong>in</strong>oculations were performed by spray<strong>in</strong>g the conidia onto the<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i crop with a CP3 knapsack sprayer <strong>in</strong>stead of a hand sprayer.<br />

1 Dr. R. Melis, Pro-Seed C.C., P.O. Box 101477, Scottsville 3209, South Africa .<br />

101


6.2.3 Application of biocontrol agents and soluble silicon<br />

Microbial suspensions of three Serratia marcescens (Bizio) isolates (i.e., Isolates B15, Y15<br />

and Y41) and two fungi (Clonostachys rosea (L<strong>in</strong>k) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & Gams<br />

(syn. Gliocladium roseum) (Isolate EH) and Trichothecium roseum (Pers.) L<strong>in</strong>k (syn.<br />

Cephalothecium roseum) (Isolate H20) ) were prepared as described <strong>in</strong> the previous<br />

sections and were applied onto plant leaves at a concentration of 10 8 propagules ml -1 ,<br />

together with a wetter (Break-Thru ® , 0.25 ml l -1 ) 3 d before <strong>in</strong>oculation and cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

weekly 4 d after <strong>in</strong>oculation. All BCAs were applied us<strong>in</strong>g a CP3 Knapsack sprayer until<br />

runoff.<br />

One litre of Si at 100 mg l -1 , <strong>in</strong> the form of KSi, was drenched onto the roots of each plant<br />

3 d before <strong>in</strong>oculation and weekly thereafter. Where Si was not used as a treatment, the<br />

same volume of clean water was drenched onto the rhizosphere. All treatments were made<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the late afternoon or early even<strong>in</strong>g to provide favourable conditions for the<br />

establishment of BCAs and to <strong>in</strong>crease the availability of Si to the plant roots by reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

evaporation.<br />

6.2.4 Disease assessment<br />

The first disease rat<strong>in</strong>g was performed 10 d after <strong>in</strong>oculation with conidia of P. xanthii and<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued weekly for 4 wk. Percentage of the area of leaves covered by PM was recorded<br />

weekly as the disease severity and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) was<br />

calculated from the disease percentage dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of the trial us<strong>in</strong>g an AUDPC<br />

Program (Shaner and F<strong>in</strong>ney, 1977).<br />

6.2.5 Statistical analysis<br />

Two trials were conducted, with each treatment hav<strong>in</strong>g three replications, arranged <strong>in</strong> a<br />

randomized complete blocks design. Each replication was represented by a plot of 12<br />

plants. To reduce <strong>in</strong>ter-plot <strong>in</strong>terference, data was collected from the central row of each<br />

plot. Data was analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g Genstat (R) Statistical Analysis Software (Genstat, 2006).<br />

Comparison between treatments with Si and without Si was performed us<strong>in</strong>g contrast<br />

analysis. Where the CV (%) was > 20%, data was transformed us<strong>in</strong>g a square root<br />

102


transformation. Means of treatments were compared us<strong>in</strong>g Fisher’s Protected Least<br />

Significant Difference (FLSD) and efficacy of each treatment on percentage reductions of<br />

FDL and AUDPC values were calculated by compar<strong>in</strong>g the values of each treatment with<br />

that of the Untreated Control.<br />

6.3 RESULTS<br />

Symptoms of PM started to appear one week after <strong>in</strong>oculation and developed slowly. In all<br />

plots, the disease was ma<strong>in</strong>ly concentrated on the older leaves, which senesced with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g PM severity. Late-emerg<strong>in</strong>g leaves were susceptible to <strong>in</strong>fection, but severity of<br />

the disease was relatively low on them. To assess levels of <strong>in</strong>fection, disease progress<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the same period was analysed for each plot.<br />

The impact of the selected BCAs and Si on the severity levels of PM after 5 wk of<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculation are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 6.1. Some of the treatments significantly reduced the<br />

severity of the disease <strong>in</strong> the first trial (P < 0.05), but not <strong>in</strong> the second trial (Table 6.1). In<br />

contrast, the effects of treatments on disease progress, represented by AUDPC values, were<br />

not significant for the first trial. However, they were significant for the second trial<br />

conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g January - March, 2007. In both experiments, the effects of Si on<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual treatments were not significant, as shown by contrast analysis. However, most<br />

BCAs provided improved control when applied to plants treated with Si (Figures 6.1 &<br />

6.2).<br />

In the first trial (March - May, 2006), Si alone and Isolate B15 with/without Si controlled<br />

the disease significantly. Disease reduction of 73, 53 and 65% was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by treat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

plant with Si, Isolate B15 and Isolate B15 + Si, respectively. The levels of disease after<br />

treatment by the rest of the <strong>in</strong>dividual treatments were not statistically lower than that of<br />

the control. However, they reduced the disease severity by 9 - 51%. In this trial, the<br />

bacterial isolates showed better antagonistic activity than the two fungal isolates (Figure<br />

6.1). Similarly, significant reductions <strong>in</strong> AUDPC values of 67 and 60% was recorded when<br />

plants were treated with Si and B15 + Si, respectively. In contrast, application of Isolate<br />

EH + Si resulted <strong>in</strong> an AUDPC value similar to that of the Untreated Control. In most<br />

cases, treatments that showed high level of disease had high AUDPC values (Table 6.1).<br />

103


However, if the disease levels recorded throughout the trial rema<strong>in</strong>ed almost constant, it<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> low or high AUDPC values depend<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>in</strong>itial disease level.<br />

In the second trial, which was conducted between January - March, 2007, the effects of<br />

treatments on the severity of PM were not significant at P < 0.05. However, Isolates H20<br />

and EH, without Si, reduced disease severity by 68 and 61%, respectively. Although not<br />

significant, application of the rest of BCAs, with or without Si, reduced PM by 22-41%<br />

and Si alone reduced disease severity by 32% (Figure 6.1). The effect of treatments on the<br />

development of disease, as represented by AUDPC, was significant at P < 0.05 when the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al data was used, but none were significant when transformed data was analysed. In<br />

spite of these statistical differences, all BCAs, with or without Si, reduced the AUDPC<br />

values by 44-77%, <strong>in</strong> parallel with reductions <strong>in</strong> disease severity.<br />

In both trials, the effect of Si on <strong>in</strong>dividual treatments was not significant when contrasts<br />

were made between treatments that conta<strong>in</strong>ed Si aga<strong>in</strong>st those without Si. In spite of<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> disease levels between treatments, there were no obvious differences <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of time to flower<strong>in</strong>g and fruit sett<strong>in</strong>g among plots.<br />

104


Table 12.1 Effects of biocontrol agents and silicon on f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and AUDPC values<br />

of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i under field conditions<br />

Treatment <strong>Silicon</strong> Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

FDL AUDPC FDL AUDPC<br />

Water - 25.7 (4.91) b 233.3 (14.87) b 29.0(5.34) b 532.3(22.99) b<br />

Water + 7.0 (2.59) a 77 (8.59) a 19.7(4.16) ab 306.0(16.26) b<br />

B15 - 12.0 (3.45) ab 126.0 (11.17) ab 20.3(4.27) ab 266.3(16.13) ab<br />

B15 + 9.0 (2.98) a 92.2 (9.5)ª 19.3(4.29) ab 229.0(14.86) ab<br />

EH - 17.0 (4.1) b 129.5 (11.37) ab 11.3(3.35) a 168.0(12.71) ab<br />

EH + 23.3 (4.79) b 190.2 (13.68) b 20.0(4.47) ab 266.7(16.31) ab<br />

H20 - 20.7 (4.51 b 165.7 (12.75) ab 9.3(2.90) a 127.7(11.16) a<br />

H20 + 16.0 (3.97) ab 141.2 (11.67) ab 17.0(4.08) ab 201.0(14.02) ab<br />

Y15 - 16.0 (3.9) ab 136.5 (11.37) ab 22.0(4.67) ab 217.3(14.73) ab<br />

Y15 + 16.3 (4.03) b 151.7 (12.12) ab 22.7(4.72) ab 304.0(17.35) b<br />

Y41 - 14.3 (3.75) ab 143.5 (11.89) ab 20.0(4.28) ab 220.7(14.57) ab<br />

Y41 + 12.7 (3.55) ab 124.8 (11.14) ab 20.0(4.4) ab 283.7(16.64) ab<br />

Effects P-value P-value P-value P-value<br />

Treatment 0.030 0.200 0.587 0.068<br />

-Si vs. +Si 0.084 0.168 0.576 0.655<br />

F.LS.D. 1.266 3.992 1.98 5.891<br />

CV (%) 19.4 20.3 27.6 22.2<br />

- = no Si, += Si present<br />

Means with<strong>in</strong> column followed by a common letter were not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fisher’s<br />

protected least significant difference (P < 0.05).<br />

Values <strong>in</strong> brackets are means of data transformed us<strong>in</strong>g square root transformations<br />

105


Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

BCAs<br />

PM control (%)<br />

Figure 6.1 Efficacy of five biocontrol agents and silicon <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the severity of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i under<br />

field conditions five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii <strong>in</strong> two trials.<br />

106


Trial 1 Trial 2<br />

BCAs<br />

Reduction <strong>in</strong> AUDPC (%)<br />

Figure 6.2 Efficacy of five biocontrol agents and silicon <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the AUDPC values of powdery mildew of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after five<br />

weeks of <strong>in</strong>oculation with Podosphaera xanthii under field conditions.<br />

107


6.4 DISCUSSION<br />

The BCAs tested and a Si drench demonstrated the potential to reduce the f<strong>in</strong>al disease<br />

levels of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i effectively. Isolate B15 alone, or together with Si, provided<br />

significant disease control. Compared to the rest of the isolates tested, Isolate B15 showed<br />

superior biocontrol activity, although its efficacy was lower <strong>in</strong> the second trial. However,<br />

the efficacies of most treatments were reduced <strong>in</strong> the second trial, with the exceptions of<br />

Isolates EH and H20 without Si. Five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with P. xanthii, the epidemic<br />

of the disease, as represented by AUDPC values, was significantly reduced by all<br />

treatments.<br />

These two trials showed that, <strong>in</strong> spite of their potential to control the disease, <strong>in</strong>consistency<br />

was observed with some of the isolates tested. For example, Isolate B15 was the best <strong>in</strong> the<br />

first trial, but performed poorly <strong>in</strong> the second trial. In contrast, Isolates EH and H20 were<br />

<strong>in</strong>ferior at the first trial and were the best <strong>in</strong> the second trial. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the performance<br />

of Isolates Y15 and Y41 were relatively stable <strong>in</strong> both trials. For most treatments, the<br />

disease level of the second trial was slightly lower than the first one. Cook and Baker<br />

(1983) suggested that effective biocontrol activity can only be obta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> a specific<br />

level of disease. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these authors, if the disease level caused by a target<br />

pathogen is m<strong>in</strong>imal compared to the Un<strong>in</strong>fected Control, then the efficiencies of various<br />

treatments <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g the disease appear to be negligible, mask<strong>in</strong>g the efficacy of some<br />

genu<strong>in</strong>ely effective isolates. In contrast, if the disease level is higher than certa<strong>in</strong> level,<br />

especially for fast develop<strong>in</strong>g diseases such as PM, then the contribution of each control<br />

measure becomes m<strong>in</strong>imal, and comparison between treatments usually results <strong>in</strong> nonsignificant<br />

differences.<br />

Significant control of diseases and subsequent <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> yield has been obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

number of field studies of biological control. The major problem, however, is the failure to<br />

repeat these results consistently <strong>in</strong> different soils or <strong>in</strong> different years <strong>in</strong> naturally <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

fields and to make biological control of plant diseases competitive with chemical control<br />

(Schippers, 1988). Unlike greenhouse trials, where most environmental conditions are<br />

controlled, field trials results are affected by several environmental factors operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependently or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with each other. Reports of previous studies on biocontrol<br />

of several diseases <strong>in</strong>dicated that fluctuations <strong>in</strong> environmental conditions <strong>in</strong> the field have<br />

been the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for the failure or <strong>in</strong>consistent performance of biocontrol agents<br />

108


(Paulitz and Bélanger, 2001). Because of their requirements for specific environmental<br />

conditions, BCAs are usually effective with<strong>in</strong> a limited range of temperature and RH<br />

(Blakeman and Fokkema, 1982). For <strong>in</strong>stance, most antagonists of PM operate more<br />

efficiently when RH is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed above 80% (Bélanger et al., 1997; Jarvis and Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby,<br />

1977), which can be achieved by manipulat<strong>in</strong>g the greenhouse environment, but this is not<br />

possible under field conditions. The requirement of many BCAs for a high RH has been<br />

confirmed by Jarvis et al. (1989) and Bélanger et al. (1994), who showed that the efficacy<br />

of Stephanoascus flocculosus Traquair , L.A. Shaw and Jarvis, Sporothrix flocculosa<br />

Traquair, Shaw & Jarvis and S. rugulosus Traquair, Shaw & Jarvis aga<strong>in</strong>st PM was<br />

reduced when RH levels dropped below 60%. Hijwegen (1992) also showed that survival<br />

and antagonistic activities of Tilletiopsis m<strong>in</strong>or Nyland aga<strong>in</strong>st P. xanthii was reduced<br />

significantly when RH levels were reduced below 70-75%. Relative humidity is often the<br />

primary limit<strong>in</strong>g factor under field conditions, when it drops below a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

requirement of the BCAs.<br />

Climatic data secured for the two periods of the trials showed that dur<strong>in</strong>g the first trial, the<br />

mean temperature was < 15 o C and the mean RH was > 70%. Although the prevalent RH<br />

was ideal for germ<strong>in</strong>ation of PM spores and <strong>in</strong>fection of the plant by the pathogen,<br />

development of the disease was retarded because of the low temperature, which was less<br />

than optimum for the fungus (Cheah and Falloon, 2001). Most BCAs prefer warmer<br />

environmental conditions for their establishment and best biocontrol activities. In spite of<br />

that, the performances of the bacterial isolates were favoured by high RH of the field,<br />

which was with<strong>in</strong> the range of their requirement for their survival and biocontrol activities.<br />

In the second trial, where day time temperatures <strong>in</strong> the field were high (i.e. 27-29 o C) and<br />

RH was lower than < 54%, the efficacy of antagonistic fungi was better than that of<br />

bacterial isolates. This might have been related to the sensitivity/tolerance of these BCAs<br />

towards RH. Based on the results of these two trials, it was concluded that the fungal<br />

BCAs were relatively tolerant to low RH but were sensitive to low temperature;<br />

specifically, Isolate B15 was more sensitive to a low RH; and Isolates Y15 and Y41 were<br />

less sensitive to fluctuations <strong>in</strong> temperature and RH.<br />

Although the contrast analysis between treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Si aga<strong>in</strong>st treatments without<br />

Si showed no significant effect, application of Si reduced the disease severity consistently<br />

and improved the efficacy of most of the BCAs, especially <strong>in</strong> the first trial. Reduced<br />

109


performances of Si <strong>in</strong> the second trial might have been related to the high temperatures <strong>in</strong><br />

the field. Schuerger and Hammer (2003) reported similar results, where the efficacy of Si<br />

<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of glasshouse-grown cucumber crop was reduced at higher temperatures<br />

(24-32 o C). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these researchers, the optimum temperature for best control of the<br />

disease us<strong>in</strong>g Si was <strong>in</strong> the range of 20 o C, which supports the results of our first trial.<br />

Despite its potential, this study showed that the potential role of Si <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i under field condition may be limited, especially when compared to previous<br />

reports that were conducted under greenhouse conditions (Bélanger et al., 1995; Guevel et<br />

al., 2007; Menzies et al., 1991a & b; Schuerger and Hammer, 2003). Some of the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons might have contributed for this shortcom<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

For effective control or disease prevention, Si must be supplied to the plant cont<strong>in</strong>uously.<br />

Interruption of the supply, even for one day, can result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection of the plant by the<br />

pathogen. Samuels et al. (1991b) reported that enhanced resistance of cucumber aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

PM lasted only 24 h after Si was removed from the nutrient solution. Firstly, <strong>in</strong> this field<br />

study, one litre of Si was applied to the rhizosphere at a frequency of once per week. Most<br />

of the water content of the solution can be lost soon to evaporation, leav<strong>in</strong>g dry Si <strong>in</strong> the<br />

rhizosphere. In this form, Si cannot be absorbed by plant roots because the element is not<br />

<strong>in</strong> the form of a solution. Secondly, some of the applied Si may have become permanently<br />

unavailable to the plant roots if it bounds to Al 3+ or Mn 2+ ions <strong>in</strong> the soil (M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

2008, pers. comm.). Therefore, if the applied Si is not be<strong>in</strong>g taken up by the plant due to<br />

unavailability, the plant could be <strong>in</strong>fected easily by the pathogen after 1-2 d of treatment.<br />

Once the symptoms appear on the susceptible plant, apply<strong>in</strong>g Si as curative measure has<br />

little impact because the disease can cover the whole plant with<strong>in</strong> few days. Kanto et al.<br />

(2006) and Liang et al. (2005) noted that Si is more effective when used preventively than<br />

curatively. Therefore, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the application frequency or switch<strong>in</strong>g to us<strong>in</strong>g slow<br />

release formulations of Si could be used to improve the availability of Si to plants over an<br />

extended period of time.<br />

In greenhouse trials, Kanto et al. (2006) showed that the efficacy of Si <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of<br />

strawberry was affected by the susceptibility of the plants to the disease. These researchers<br />

showed that the less susceptible cultivar responded better to Si treatment than more<br />

susceptible cultivar.<br />

110


In both trials, there was little variation <strong>in</strong> terms of time of flower<strong>in</strong>g and production of fruit<br />

among the treatments. From the lack of correlation between the treatments, and time of<br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g and fruit sett<strong>in</strong>g, it would appear that the l<strong>in</strong>kage between PM <strong>in</strong>fection and the<br />

development of zucch<strong>in</strong>i under field conditions is weak. Severe <strong>in</strong>fection of PM causes<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct effects on the quality and yield of fruit by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the photosynthetic area of the<br />

plant through premature senescence of leaves (Cheah and Falloon, 2001; Ke<strong>in</strong>ath et al.,<br />

2000). Fruit set is <strong>in</strong>directly affected as a result of the reduced photosynthetic activities of<br />

the plant. Therefore, one explanation for our observation would be that the cultivar used <strong>in</strong><br />

these studies may be highly susceptible, but has a relatively high level of tolerance to the<br />

disease, cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to yield well despite high disease levels.<br />

The efficacy of the tested antagonistic fungi was generally superior <strong>in</strong> the second trial<br />

compared to the first one. In the first trial conducted from March to May 2006, the relative<br />

humidity was <strong>in</strong> the range of 70-75%, with a temperature of 4-12 o C. In the second trial, the<br />

mean temperature and RH dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g period of January to February 2007 was 27-<br />

29 o C and 54-59%, respectively. From this <strong>in</strong>formation, it was concluded that Isolates B15,<br />

Y15 and Y41 have the potential to perform well at lower temperatures, provided that there<br />

are high RH levels.<br />

Some of the tested isolates provide some degree of control, especially when they were used<br />

together with Si. This is an encourag<strong>in</strong>g result because it provides the growers with an<br />

option to <strong>in</strong>clude this comb<strong>in</strong>ation as an alternative <strong>in</strong> PM control. Farmers who do not<br />

want to use conventional fungicides can use this option. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce there were<br />

<strong>in</strong>consistent performances by some of the BCAs tested, there is a need for repeated<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation under various environmental conditions. Repeated application of Si may give<br />

a better control as compared to the frequency used <strong>in</strong> this study. Hence, further research on<br />

the dosage/frequency of Si applications is needed before its use is adopted widely as a<br />

control strategy aga<strong>in</strong>st this disease. In addition, the cultivar used <strong>in</strong> this study was very<br />

susceptible to the disease and the potential of the treatments might have been h<strong>in</strong>dered due<br />

to the extremely fast development of the disease. It is possible that the efficacy of BCAs<br />

and Si treatments would have been improved if the cultivar used was less susceptible to the<br />

disease. In studies conducted by Bélanger et al. (1994) and Dik et al. (1998), it was<br />

observed that the degree of control provided by BCAs was better when resistant cultivars<br />

were used compared to susceptible ones. Similarly, the efficacy of sprays of <strong>in</strong>organic salts<br />

111


such as potassium bicarbonate was affected by disease pressure (McGrath and Shishkoff,<br />

1999; Muza and Travis, 1995). Other reports also showed that efficacies of Ampelomyces<br />

quisqualis Ces ex Schlect, Trichoderma harzianum Rifai and Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg)<br />

Cohn were dependant on environmental conditions and disease pressure (Elad et al., 1998;<br />

Pertot et al., 2008).<br />

Moreover, co-application of some of the antagonists tested <strong>in</strong> this study might have<br />

provided enhanced efficacy <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g the disease. In a number of studies, synergistic<br />

effects have been observed by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g antagonists. For <strong>in</strong>stance, the use of<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula and a mixture of Trichoderma spp. provided effective<br />

control of PM and downy mildew (Abd-El-Moity et al., 2003). They also reported that<br />

when B. subtilis was added to that comb<strong>in</strong>ation and applied at an early age (i.e. 4wk old),<br />

the crop gave its highest yields. The additive effects were probably due to a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

multiple mechanisms that affect the pathogens, as opposed to the fewer control<br />

mechanisms provided by a s<strong>in</strong>gle antagonist.<br />

There is also a need to understand more about the epidemiology of the disease, the<br />

resistance level of the plant and to identify the optimal environmental requirements of the<br />

BCAs <strong>in</strong> order to improve their efficacy by manipulat<strong>in</strong>g some of these variables.<br />

Moreover, s<strong>in</strong>ce disease suppression by an <strong>in</strong>troduced beneficial organism depends on the<br />

amount of <strong>in</strong>oculum applied onto the phylloplane, it may be necessary to alter the<br />

application protocol us<strong>in</strong>g higher rates, shorter spray <strong>in</strong>tervals or apply<strong>in</strong>g chemical<br />

fungicides when the disease pressure is too high.<br />

6.5 REFERENCES<br />

Abd-El-Moity, T.H., Abed-El-Moneim, M.L., Tia, M.M.M., Aly, A.Z.,Tohamy, M.R.A. 2003.<br />

Biological control of some cucumber diseases under organic agriculture. Acta<br />

Horticulturae, 608: 227-236.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: Its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-336.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.G. 1997. Powdery mildews: Recent advances toward<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control. In: G.J Boland and L.D Kuykendall (Eds.). Plant-Microbe Interactions<br />

and Biological Control. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York. Pp 89-109.<br />

112


Bélanger, R.R., Labbe, C., Jarvis, W.R. 1994. Commercial-scale control of rose powdery mildew<br />

with a fungal antagonist. Plant Disease, 78: 420-424.<br />

Blakeman, J.P., Fokkema, N.J. 1982. Potential for biocontrol of plant diseases on the phylloplane.<br />

Annual Review of Phytopathology, 20: 167-192.<br />

Bowen, P., Menzies, J., Ehret, D. 1992. Soluble silicon sprays <strong>in</strong>hibit powdery mildew<br />

development on grape leaves. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,<br />

117: 906-1012.<br />

Cheah, L.H., Falloon, R. 2001. Powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> squash. Crop and Food Research (BROAD<br />

sheet). Number 133. New Zealand Institute for Crop and Food Research.<br />

http://www.crop.cri.nz Captured on 04/07/08<br />

Cook, R.J., Baker, K.F. 1983. The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens.<br />

APS Press, St Paul, M<strong>in</strong>nesota, USA.<br />

Dik, A.J., Verhaar, M.A., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. Comparison of three biological control agents<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> semi-commercial-scale<br />

glasshouse trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104: 413-423.<br />

Elad, Y., Kirshner, B., Yehuda, N., Sztejnberg, A. 1998. Management of powdery mildew and<br />

gray mould of cucumber by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and Ampelomyces quisqualis<br />

AQ10. BioControl, 43: 241-251.<br />

Elad, Y., Malathrakis, N.E., Dik, A.J. 1996. Biological control of Botrytis-<strong>in</strong>cited diseases and<br />

powdery mildews <strong>in</strong> greenhouse crops. Crop Protection, 15: 229-240.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant biology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the USA, 91: 11-17.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1999. <strong>Silicon</strong>. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50:<br />

641-64.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 2001. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> plants: Facts vs. concepts. In L.E. Datnoff, G.H. Snyder & Korndorfer,<br />

G.H. (Eds.). <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Pp. 1-15.<br />

Falk, S.P., Gadoury, D.M., Pearson, R.C., Seem, R.C. 1995. Partial control of grape powdery<br />

mildew by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease, 79: 483-490.<br />

GenStat. 2006. GenStat Statistical Analysis Software 9 th ed. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Oxford, UK.<br />

Guevel, M.-H., Menzies J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. Effect of root and foliar applications of soluble<br />

silicon on powdery mildew control and growth of wheat plants. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 119: 429-436.<br />

Hijwegen, T. 1992. Biological control of cucumber powdery mildew with Tilletiopsis m<strong>in</strong>or under<br />

glasshouse conditions. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 98: 221-225.<br />

Jarvis, W.R., Shaw, L.A., Traquir, J.A. 1989. Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g antagonism of cucumber powdery<br />

mildew by Stepahanoascus flocculosus and S. rugulosus. Mycological Research, 92: 102-<br />

106.<br />

113


Jarvis, W.R., Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, K. 1977. The control of powdery mildew of greenhouse cucumber by water<br />

sprays and Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease Reporter, 61: 728-730.<br />

Kanto, T., Maekawa, K., A<strong>in</strong>o, M. 2007. Suppression of conidial germ<strong>in</strong>ation and appressorial<br />

formation by silicate treatment <strong>in</strong> powdery mildew of strawberry. Journal of General Plant<br />

Pathology, 73: 1-7.<br />

Kanto, T., Miyoshi, A., Ogawa, T., Maekawa, K., A<strong>in</strong>o, M. 2006. Suppressive effect of liquid<br />

potassium silicate on powdery mildew of strawberry <strong>in</strong> soil. Journal of General Plant<br />

Pathology, 72: 137-142.<br />

Ke<strong>in</strong>ath, A.P., May, W.H., III, DuBose, V.B., 2000. Effect of sequential or alternat<strong>in</strong>g applications<br />

of Quadris and companion fungicides on watermelon foliar diseases. Fungicide and<br />

Nematicide Tests, 55: 290.<br />

Liang, Y.C, Sun, W.C., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the<br />

enhancement of <strong>in</strong>duced resistance to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> Cucumis sativus. Plant<br />

Pathology, 54: 678-685.<br />

McGrath, M. and Shishkoff, N. 1999. Evaluation of biocompatible products for manag<strong>in</strong>g cucurbit<br />

powdery mildew. Crop Protection, 18: 471-478.<br />

Menzies, J., Bowen, P., Ehret, D., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Foliar applications of potassium silicate<br />

reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucch<strong>in</strong>i squash.<br />

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 112: 902-905.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Helmer, T., Koch, C., Seywerd, F. 1991a. Effects of<br />

soluble silicon on the parasitic fitness of Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea on Cucumis sativus.<br />

Phytopathology, 81: 84-88.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Samuels, A.L. 1991b. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of silicon on<br />

cytological <strong>in</strong>teractions between Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea and Cucumis sativus. Physiol.<br />

Mol. Plant Physiology, 39: 403-414.<br />

Morris, C.D. 2002. Patch graz<strong>in</strong>g of tall grassveld by cattle after spr<strong>in</strong>g burn. African Journal of<br />

Range and Forage Science, 19: 188-194.<br />

Muza, A.J., Travis, J.W. 1995. Evaluation of fungicides for control of powdery mildew on grapes.<br />

Fungicide Nematicide Tests, 50: 52.<br />

Paulitz, T., Bélanger, R.R. 2001. Biological control <strong>in</strong> greenhouse systems. Annual Review of<br />

Phytopathology, 39: 103-133.<br />

Pertot, I., Zasso, R., Amsalem, L., Baldessari, M., Angeli, G., Elad, Y. 2008. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol<br />

agents <strong>in</strong> strawberry powdery mildew control strategies <strong>in</strong> high tunnel grow<strong>in</strong>g systems.<br />

Crop Protection, 27: 622-631.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991a. Distribution of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea).<br />

Canadian Journal of Botany, 69: 140-146.<br />

114


Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991b. Mobility and deposition of<br />

silicon <strong>in</strong> cucumber plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 485-492.<br />

Schippers, B. 1988. Biological control of pathogens with rhizobacteria. In: R.K.S. Wood and M.J.<br />

Way (Eds.). Biological Control of Pests, Pathogens and Weeds: Developments and<br />

Prospects. Royal Society, London, UK. Pp. 283-290.<br />

Schuerger, A.C., Hammer, W. 2003. Suppression of powdery mildew on greenhouse-grown<br />

cucumber by addition of silicon to hydroponic nutrient solution is <strong>in</strong>hibited at high<br />

temperature. Plant Disease, 87: 177-185.<br />

Shaner, G., F<strong>in</strong>ney, R.E., 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slowmildew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> Knox wheat. Phytopathology, 67, 1051–1056.<br />

Shishkoff, N., McGrath, M.T. 2002. AQ10 biofungicide comb<strong>in</strong>ed with chemical fungicides or<br />

AddQ spray adjuvant for control of cucurbit powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> detached leaf culture.<br />

Plant Disease, 86: 915-918.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1996. Glasshouse experiments on biocontrol of<br />

cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by the mycoparasites Verticillium<br />

lecanii and Sporothrix rugulosa. Biological Control, 6: 353-360.<br />

115


CHAPTER SEVEN<br />

UPTAKE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SILICON IN ZUCCHINI AND ZINNIA,<br />

AND ITS INTERACTION WITH THE UPTAKE OF OTHER ELEMENTS<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a and M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

a<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

Elemental analysis was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the impact of differ<strong>in</strong>g application levels of<br />

silicon (Si) <strong>in</strong> nutrient solutions on: (1) the uptake and distribution of Si <strong>in</strong>to different<br />

organs (tissues) of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia; (2) its impact on the uptake and accumulation of<br />

other elements; (3) the effect of powdery mildew on the levels of selected elements on<br />

these two plant species; and (4) the effects of Si uptake on the growth of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia plants. Plants were grown <strong>in</strong> re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g nutrient solutions, supplied with Si at<br />

different concentrations. Samples were taken from different organs of each plant and<br />

analysed us<strong>in</strong>g energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy (EDX)<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometers (ICP-OES). Increased<br />

levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the solution <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> leaves and roots of both plants<br />

without affect<strong>in</strong>g its distribution <strong>in</strong> other parts. In zucch<strong>in</strong>i, roots accumulated higher levels<br />

of Si g dw -1 than leaves. With z<strong>in</strong>nia, accumulation of Si g dw- 1 was highest <strong>in</strong> leaves.<br />

Accumulation of K <strong>in</strong> shoots of both plants <strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>creased levels of KSi <strong>in</strong> the<br />

nutrient solution. However, K levels <strong>in</strong> flower of z<strong>in</strong>nia, fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and roots of both<br />

plants rema<strong>in</strong>ed unaffected. Increased level of Si reduced accumulation of Ca <strong>in</strong> both<br />

plants.<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution at a lower level (i.e., 50 mg l -1 ) <strong>in</strong>creased the growth<br />

of zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants and resulted <strong>in</strong> a maximal uptake of P, Ca, and Mg <strong>in</strong> both plants.<br />

However, application of higher levels of Si did not provide further growth enhancement.<br />

Levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution had no effects on elemental composition and<br />

characteristics of the fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. However, when Si was applied at > 50 mg l -1 , then<br />

116


the P level of the fruit was reduced by 50%. In both plants, <strong>in</strong>fected leaves accumulated<br />

higher levels of Si and Ca, but less P, than leaves of un<strong>in</strong>fected plants exposed to the same<br />

levels of soluble Si. The highest concentrations of Si were observed <strong>in</strong> leaf areas <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

with PM, and around the bases of trichomes of both plants. For optimum disease control<br />

and maximum accumulation of different elements <strong>in</strong> these two plants, application of Si at<br />

50-150 mg l -1 is recommended.<br />

7.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Silicon</strong> (Si) is the second most abundant element <strong>in</strong> the earth’s crust. It has been considered<br />

as not essential to the growth of plants (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994). This is because of a perception that<br />

many plants can grow normally <strong>in</strong> its absence (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1999) and symptoms for its<br />

deficiency and toxicity are not apparent (Ma and Yamaji, 2006). Even today, some<br />

scientists do not consider Si as an essential element for plant growth, although its beneficial<br />

roles on plant growth and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses have received<br />

considerable attention (Datnoff et al., 1997; Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994, 1999 & 2001; Ma, 2004; Ma<br />

and Yamaji, 2006; Meyer and Keep<strong>in</strong>g, 2005). However, these researchers have shown that<br />

when crops with a high Si demand are repeatedly grown <strong>in</strong> soils with low levels of plantavailable<br />

Si, then symptoms of Si deficiency are be<strong>in</strong>g manifested by low productivity, and<br />

susceptibility of the crops to biotic and abiotic stresses.<br />

The mechanisms of uptake, translocation and accumulation of Si on different plants have<br />

been <strong>in</strong>vestigated by several researchers (Liang et al., 2005; Ma and Yamaji, 2006; Ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

et al., 2006; Raven, 2001; Tamai and Ma, 2003). In some plants, the uptake of Si can be<br />

equal or even greater than Ca, Mg, S and P (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999; Ma and Yamaji, 2006),<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g 0.1-10 % (Tamai and Ma, 2003), with the cell walls of epidermal layers be<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> site of Si deposition (Adatia and Besford, 1986). The level and mechanisms of uptake<br />

varies among plants species (Adatia and Besford, 1986; Ma and Yamaji, 2006). Beneficial<br />

effects of the element on growth and yield of several crops have been l<strong>in</strong>early related to the<br />

level of Si supplied to the plants (Bélanger et al., 1997; Ma, 2004; Ma and Takahashi,<br />

2002). However, an excessive supply of Si to cucumber (Bélanger et al., 1997; Samuels et<br />

al., 1993) and strawberry plants (Lieten et al., 2002) may result <strong>in</strong> poor fruit quality.<br />

117


Therefore, there is a need to determ<strong>in</strong>e the optimum level of Si supply <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

maximum benefits without compromis<strong>in</strong>g the quantity and quality of yield, or the cost of<br />

apply<strong>in</strong>g Si to plants. With the <strong>in</strong>creased application of Si to soil-less media <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

enhance plant growth and disease protection, careful <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the uptake and<br />

distribution of this element <strong>in</strong> different part of the plants is needed.<br />

Increased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> trichomes, around pathogen sites of <strong>in</strong>fection and at<br />

different parts of the cell has been reported on powdery mildew (PM) <strong>in</strong>fected plants<br />

(Cherif et al., 1992a; Menzies et al., 1991; Samuels et al., 1991a, 1991b & 1993). The<br />

presence of Si may result <strong>in</strong> different levels of activation, or speed of activation, of defence<br />

reactions <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected and un<strong>in</strong>fected plants (Cherif et al., 1992b). Where a plant is <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

by P. xanthii, its uptake of Si <strong>in</strong>creases, and then resistance to the disease is enhanced<br />

(Cherif et al., 1994; Rodrigues et al., 2005). To date, there is little <strong>in</strong>formation available<br />

that maps out the distribution of Si to different parts of different plant species.<br />

Understand<strong>in</strong>g the level of uptake and accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong>to different organs of plants,<br />

and its effects on the total elemental uptake of plants can lead to the better use of this<br />

element <strong>in</strong> crop production. The objectives of this research were (1) to assess uptake and<br />

distribution of Si to different parts of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia, <strong>in</strong> relation to Si supply and its<br />

impact on the uptake and accumulation of other elements by these plants; (2) to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the relationship between <strong>in</strong>fection of these plants by P. xanthii and accumulation of Si and<br />

selected elements by each plant; and (3) to study the effects of Si supply on characteristics<br />

of fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and flowers of z<strong>in</strong>nia and accumulation of other elements <strong>in</strong> these<br />

organs.<br />

7.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

7.2.1 Preparation of plants<br />

Seeds of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (Cucurbita pepo, F1-Hybrid Partenon) and z<strong>in</strong>nia (Z<strong>in</strong>nia elegans cv.<br />

Jakobrekop Sunbow), obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Starke Ayres 1 and McDonald Seeds 2 , respectively,<br />

were used for this study. Seeds of both plants were planted <strong>in</strong> Speedl<strong>in</strong>g® trays conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

1 Starke Ayres, P. O. Box 304, Epp<strong>in</strong>dust 7475, South Africa.<br />

2 McDonald Seeds (Pty) Ltd, P. O. Box 238, Pietermaritzburg, 3200, South Africa.<br />

118


composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark. These were transferred <strong>in</strong>to a tunnel operat<strong>in</strong>g at 26-28 o C and 75-<br />

85%. Trays were irrigated with a balanced fertilizer [3:1:3 (38) from Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> 3 ,<br />

at 0.5 g l -1 ] + [Ca(NO 3 ) 2 at 0.5 g l -1 ] until seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were transplanted <strong>in</strong>to pots filled with<br />

composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark. Transplant<strong>in</strong>g was commenced after seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of zucch<strong>in</strong>i developed<br />

their first leaf, and when z<strong>in</strong>nias reached a height of 50-70 mm. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, pots were<br />

transferred <strong>in</strong>to a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system that is <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse (24-30 o C and RH of<br />

60-70%) and supplied with a complete hydroponics nutrient solution. Soluble Si was added<br />

<strong>in</strong> the form of KSi , at 11 different concentrations (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500,<br />

750 and 1000 mg l -1 ). To see the effect of <strong>in</strong>fection with P. xanthii on elemental uptake by<br />

these two plant species, both plants were <strong>in</strong>oculated with the pathogen and grown on<br />

separate benches while be<strong>in</strong>g supplied with Si (150 mg l -1 ). Inoculations were made by<br />

dust<strong>in</strong>g conidia of the pathogen from <strong>in</strong>fected leaves onto healthy z<strong>in</strong>nia leaves, or<br />

spray<strong>in</strong>g a conidial suspension onto zucch<strong>in</strong>i leaves us<strong>in</strong>g a hand sprayer. The levels of Si<br />

used were based on previous results for both plants. Plants of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia were<br />

kept <strong>in</strong> the system for 6 wk, by which time all the plants had produced well-developed<br />

fruits and flowers.<br />

7.2.2 Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDX) analysis<br />

Leaf samples were taken from different positions of each plant and washed thoroughly<br />

with distilled water to remove superficial dust, cut <strong>in</strong>to pieces of approximately 10 mm<br />

diameter, and fixed overnight <strong>in</strong> 3% glutaraldehyde <strong>in</strong> cacodylate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7).<br />

Samples were then dehydrated <strong>in</strong> a graded alcohol series. Specimens were critical po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

dried <strong>in</strong> a Hitachi HCP-2 us<strong>in</strong>g carbon dioxide as the transfusion fluid. Dried specimens<br />

were mounted onto copper stubs us<strong>in</strong>g double-sided carbon tape. All stubs were then<br />

coated with gold-palladium <strong>in</strong> a Polaron E500 Sputter Coater and the accumulation of Si<br />

and other elements <strong>in</strong> the samples was assayed us<strong>in</strong>g an environmental scann<strong>in</strong>g electron<br />

microscope with an energy dispersive X-ray analysis system (ESEM-EDX). Analysis was<br />

performed on leaves of un<strong>in</strong>fected plants and areas of <strong>in</strong>fected leaves that were covered or<br />

uncovered with colonies of the pathogen.<br />

3 Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> (Pty) Ltd., P. O. Box 742, Muldersdrift, 1747, South Africa.<br />

119


Quantitative calculations were made us<strong>in</strong>g the fundamental parameter method of the EDX<br />

program as used by Marguí et al. (2005). Elements that were considered for analysis and<br />

quantification <strong>in</strong>cluded: carbon (C), nitrogen (N), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg),<br />

potassium (K), oxygen (O), phosphorus (P) and silicon (Si).<br />

To further study the effects of <strong>in</strong>fection and presence of the pathogen on Si accumulation<br />

<strong>in</strong> leaves, elemental mapp<strong>in</strong>g was performed on (1) entirely disease-free leaves, (2)<br />

disease-free areas of <strong>in</strong>fected plants, and (3) <strong>in</strong>fected areas of <strong>in</strong>fected plants covered by<br />

PM colony. Elemental mapp<strong>in</strong>g was also performed to exam<strong>in</strong>e the distribution of Si to<br />

different parts of the leaf.<br />

7.2.3 Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometers (ICP-OES)<br />

analysis of plant tissues for elemental composisions<br />

(a) Preparation of samples<br />

Plants of z<strong>in</strong>nia and zucch<strong>in</strong>i were removed from their grow<strong>in</strong>g medium and washed<br />

thoroughly us<strong>in</strong>g tap water and f<strong>in</strong>ally r<strong>in</strong>sed <strong>in</strong> distilled water, to remove superficial dust.<br />

The plant materials were cut <strong>in</strong>to four parts: leaves, roots, flower/fruits, and<br />

stem + petioles. Samples were then oven-dried at 70 o C for 72 h, ground <strong>in</strong>to particles less<br />

than 1.0 mm <strong>in</strong> diameter, us<strong>in</strong>g a blender and then thoroughly homogenized. A sample of<br />

0.5 g of each plant material was put <strong>in</strong>to a crucible and kept overnight <strong>in</strong> a furnace set at<br />

650 o C. Ashes of the samples were processed us<strong>in</strong>g microwave digestion.<br />

(b) Microwave digestion<br />

All sample digestions were carried with the CEM Microwave Digester (CEM MARS5 <br />

Microwave) us<strong>in</strong>g tarred 100 ml Teflon ® PFA digestion vessels. The vessels were<br />

thoroughly washed us<strong>in</strong>g acid and r<strong>in</strong>sed with distilled water to free them from any<br />

particulate matter and then dried. Ash was transferred <strong>in</strong>to the vessels and 5 ml of 65%<br />

HNO 3 and 0.1 ml HF were added to each sample and the vessels were thereafter sealed<br />

with their lids. Thirteen vessels, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a reagent blank vessel, were arranged <strong>in</strong> a<br />

scrubber and digestion was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g procedures. The temperature<br />

was ramped to 165 o C with<strong>in</strong> 10 m<strong>in</strong> with the application of 1200W power, followed by a<br />

120


dwell time of 20 m<strong>in</strong> at 165 o C. The temperature and pressure limits were set to 175 o C and<br />

15.2 bar (220 psi), respectively. Follow<strong>in</strong>g completion of the digestion program, the<br />

vessels were allowed to rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the microwave cavity until the <strong>in</strong>ternal temperature<br />

cooled to < 65 o C. Then the scrubber was removed from the microwave, placed <strong>in</strong> a fume<br />

exhaust system and then the vessels were vented slowly to release the residual pressure.<br />

Roots and leaves of z<strong>in</strong>nia and zucch<strong>in</strong>i produced a small quantity of precipitate at the end<br />

of the cycle, so the procedure was repeated after add<strong>in</strong>g 0.9 ml HF to the digest. Once the<br />

samples were fully digested, they were diluted to 100ml with de-ionized distilled water<br />

(DDW) to make a dilution factor of 100 (v/v) and transferred <strong>in</strong>to high-density<br />

polyethylene (HDPE) bottles. After every cycle, the vessels were washed with tap water<br />

and r<strong>in</strong>sed with DDW.<br />

(c) Preparation of standards<br />

A 100 ml reagent blank was prepared by mix<strong>in</strong>g DDW with 5 ml of HNO 3 and 0.1 or<br />

1 ml of HF, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the volume of HF used for the digest. Two sets of five standard<br />

solutions (i.e., 2, 15, 50, 100 and 200 mg l -1 ) were prepared to avoid formation of Si<br />

precipitates, with the first set conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only Si and the second set <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ca, K, Mg<br />

and P.<br />

(d) ICP-OES system<br />

All measurements were made us<strong>in</strong>g an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission<br />

Spectrometer (ICP-OES) (Varian Model 720-ES). To avoid <strong>in</strong>strument damage and<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation from the free HF of the solution, a V-groove nebulizer, a Sturman-Masters<br />

Spray Chamber, and a Radial Torch were used <strong>in</strong>stead of the glassy materials of the<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e. The system components used were recommended by the supplier as be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suitable for solutions conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g up to 30% HF. Samples were taken automatically at a rate<br />

of 1 ml m<strong>in</strong>-1 us<strong>in</strong>g an SPS3 AutoSampler. The plasma forward power was 1000W with<br />

plasma and auxiliary gas flow rates of 15 and 1.5 l m<strong>in</strong>-1, and a pump rate of 15 rpm was<br />

used to aspire the sample solutions. The ICP system was calibrated us<strong>in</strong>g ICP Expert II<br />

software, with each calibration curve be<strong>in</strong>g constructed l<strong>in</strong>early through zero after<br />

subtraction of the reagent blank, as used by Feng et al. (1999).<br />

121


7.2.4 Statistical analysis<br />

Data collected from the ICP-OES was analysed us<strong>in</strong>g polynomial regression to study the<br />

relationships of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution with elemental compositions of different tissues<br />

of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants.<br />

7.3 RESULTS<br />

7.3.1 Observations from EDX-ESEM analysis and elemental mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Results of the EDX analysis and elemental mapp<strong>in</strong>g showed that leaves of both plants<br />

accumulated high levels of Si. Even <strong>in</strong> the control, where Si was not added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient<br />

solution, leaves of both plants accumulated some levels of Si (Figures 7.1 & 7.2). As the<br />

concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution was <strong>in</strong>creased, the level of Si <strong>in</strong> the leaves of<br />

both plants <strong>in</strong>creased. In some cases, the level of Si was even higher than that of C and O.<br />

In both plants, <strong>in</strong>fected leaves accumulated more Si than the un<strong>in</strong>fected leaves, with Si<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly concentrated around the <strong>in</strong>fected areas. Further <strong>in</strong>vestigations of these areas<br />

showed that Si was accumulated <strong>in</strong> the plant and not <strong>in</strong> the hyphae of the PM fungus<br />

(Figure 7.3B). Regardless of Si concentration <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution, Si was always highly<br />

concentrated at the base of trichomes (Figure 7.3A).<br />

122


0 mg l -1<br />

150 mg l -1 150 mg l -1 + PM<br />

150 mg l -1 + PM<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

0 mg l -1 150 mg l -1<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

Figure 7.1 Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrums of silicon and other elements on leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants that<br />

received Si treatments of 0 (control), 100 mg l -1 and 100 mg l -1 plus Podosphaera xanthii and Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum, respectively.<br />

123


0 mg l -1 150 mg l -1 150 mg l -1 + PM<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

Figure 7.2 EDX mapp<strong>in</strong>g of silicon deposition on leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants that received Si treatments of 0<br />

(control), 100 mg l -1 and 100 mg l -1 plus Podosphaera xanthii and Glov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum, respectively.<br />

124


A<br />

B<br />

Figure 7.3 Scan<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope and EDX mapp<strong>in</strong>g show<strong>in</strong>g silicon deposition of Si at the<br />

base of trichomes of non-<strong>in</strong>fected leaf of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (A) and <strong>in</strong> the leaf conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g structures of the<br />

pathogen (B).<br />

125


7.3.2 Results of ICP-OES analysis<br />

When samples were completely digested through a microwave treatment, the digest<br />

became colourless. An amount of 5 ml HNO3 and 0.1 ml HF were sufficient to yield full<br />

digests of samples of flowers of z<strong>in</strong>nia and fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and the stem and petioles of<br />

these two plants. However, leaf and root samples required an extra 0.9 ml of HF for a<br />

complete digestion.<br />

As with the EDX analysis, both plants accumulated considerable amounts of Si <strong>in</strong> their<br />

tissue, even if the element was not added to the nutrient solution. The source of this<br />

element <strong>in</strong> the control was probably from the composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark that was used as the<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g medium, plus the Si <strong>in</strong> the irrigation water. Accumulation of Si by both plants<br />

was directly related to the level of the element <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution. With zucch<strong>in</strong>i,<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g as little Si as 50 mg l-1 <strong>in</strong>creased growth of the plant. However, extra applications<br />

of Si did not result <strong>in</strong> further <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> plant growth. Add<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution<br />

at 50 mg l-1 doubled the total amount of Si accumulated <strong>in</strong> different tissues of the plant,<br />

with leaves accumulat<strong>in</strong>g more than six times as much. As the levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient<br />

solution was <strong>in</strong>creased up to 400 mg l-1, the level of Si accumulated by leaves was<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased by 8-9 times, reach<strong>in</strong>g its maximum level of 68.8 mg g-1 dry weight (dw).<br />

However, the extra accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> the leaves obta<strong>in</strong>ed by supply<strong>in</strong>g Si at 150-<br />

400 mg l-1 was negligible, and extra applications had little impact. Similarly,<br />

accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> roots was almost doubled when the concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the<br />

solution was kept between 50-200 mg l-1. However, application of Si at higher rates (i.e.,<br />

> 200 mg l-1) had little impact on the level of Si accumulated by roots. In addition, the<br />

level of Si accumulated <strong>in</strong> stems and petioles of zucch<strong>in</strong>i rema<strong>in</strong>ed constant when Si was<br />

supplied at 0-200 mg l-1. However, at 250-500 mg l-1, that amount <strong>in</strong>creased by 35-65%.<br />

The amount of Si <strong>in</strong> the fruit of zucch<strong>in</strong>i was not affected by nutrient concentrations of Si<br />

(Figure 7.4).<br />

The effect of Si levels <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solutions on the accumulation of Si by z<strong>in</strong>nia was<br />

similar. As the level of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution <strong>in</strong>creased, leaves of z<strong>in</strong>nia accumulated<br />

as high as 92.6 mg g-1 dw, which was more than double the value obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the control<br />

treatment. Optimum concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution was considered to be<br />

126


250 mg l-1 because <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the Si level further had a negligible impact on<br />

accumulation of the element. Roots of this plant also accumulated high amount of Si (24.2<br />

mg g-1 dw) as the level of Si <strong>in</strong> the solution was set at 150 mg l-1. Flowers of z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

doubled their Si content when the plant was supplied with 50 mg l-1. However,<br />

subsequent <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> Si supply did not result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased Si levels <strong>in</strong> z<strong>in</strong>nia flowers.<br />

Chang<strong>in</strong>g Si level <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution did not affect the Si content of the stems and<br />

petioles of z<strong>in</strong>nia (Figure 7.4).<br />

Both plant species responded positively to the levels of KSi <strong>in</strong> the solution by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the total amount of K obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> their tissues. With zucch<strong>in</strong>i, add<strong>in</strong>g Si at 100 mg l-1 to<br />

the solution <strong>in</strong>creased the amount of K found <strong>in</strong> the leaves by 44%. However, apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

more Si did not <strong>in</strong>crease accumulation of K further. In contrast, leaves of z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

accumulated higher levels of K when the plant was supplied with higher levels of Si. In<br />

addition, the K content of the stems and petioles of both plants was <strong>in</strong>creased as the<br />

concentration of the Si supply was <strong>in</strong>creased. When KSi was added to the nutrient solution<br />

at the maximum concentration (i.e., 1000 mg l-1), the amount of K accumulated by stem<br />

and petioles of both plants almost doubled. In contrast, the levels of K <strong>in</strong> the roots and<br />

fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i, and flowers of z<strong>in</strong>nia were not affected by Si levels of nutrient solutions<br />

(Figures 7.5 & 7.6).<br />

The levels of Mg <strong>in</strong> leaves of both plants were <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> both plants as a result of<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Si level <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution. At a Si level of 50 mg l -1 , the level of Ca <strong>in</strong><br />

different parts of both plants was <strong>in</strong>creased. However, extra levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the solution did<br />

not <strong>in</strong>crease their Ca contents. Instead, reduced accumulation of Ca was observed,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> roots, flowers and fruits. Level of P <strong>in</strong> fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and flowers of z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

were <strong>in</strong>creased slightly with <strong>in</strong>creased levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution. In addition, the<br />

Mg content <strong>in</strong> leaves of both plants <strong>in</strong>creased as the level of Si of the nutrient solutions<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased. Measurement of levels of Ca, Mg and P <strong>in</strong> both plants showed that the highest<br />

levels of these elements were obta<strong>in</strong>ed when Si was added to the nutrient solution at<br />

50 mg l -1 (Figures 7.5 & 7.6).<br />

127


Si <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

A<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.898x 2 + 6.866x + 6.275<br />

R² = 0.58<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.192x2 + 2.596x + 12.70<br />

R² = 0.215<br />

▲ Fruits: y = -0.014x2 + 0.138x + 4.958<br />

R² = 0.225<br />

× Stem+ petioles: y = -0.056x2 + 0.794x + 2.334<br />

R² = 0.437<br />

Si <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

B<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.532x 2 + 10.476x + 28.94<br />

R² = 0.728<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.354x 2 + 4.726x + 24.52<br />

R² = 0.290<br />

▲ Flowers: y = -0.036x 2 + 0.678x + 9.780<br />

R² = 0.384<br />

× Stem+ petioles: y = 0.046x 2 - 0.936x + 11.662<br />

R² = 0.676<br />

Figure 7.4 Effects of Si level <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution on the accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> different parts of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i (A) and z<strong>in</strong>nia (B) plants after six weeks of growth <strong>in</strong> a nutrient recirculat<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

128


K <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = 0.044x 2 - 0.082x + 4.496<br />

R² = 0.713<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.016x 2 + 0.308x + 3.96<br />

R² = 0.168<br />

■ Roots: y = 0.024x 2 - 0.214x + 2.456<br />

R² = 0.169<br />

▲ Fruits: y = 0.014x 2 - 0.224x + 3.438<br />

R² = 0.075<br />

Mg <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

● Leaves: y = 0.002x 2 + 0.154x + 5.95<br />

R² = 0.204<br />

■ Roots: y = 0.002x 2 - 0.10x + 2.288<br />

R² = 0.358<br />

▲ Fruits: y = -0.012x 2 + 0.106x + 2.486<br />

R² = 0.033<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = -0.022x 2 + 0.062x + 4.402<br />

R² = 0.643<br />

Ca <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.200x 2 + 2.844x + 20.90<br />

R² = 0.188<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.002x 2 - 0.182x + 7.934<br />

R² = 0.268<br />

▲Fruits: y = -0.030x 2 + 0.318x + 1.378<br />

R² = 0.080<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = -0.078x 2 + 0.88x + 5.012<br />

R² = 0.505<br />

P <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.128x 2 + 1.78x + 3.778<br />

R² = 0.108<br />

■ Roots: y = 0.070x 2 - 0.766x + 9.362<br />

R² = 0.14<br />

▲ Fruits: y = 0.018x 2 - 0.328x + 7.392<br />

R² = 0.144<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = 0.002x 2 + 0.174x + 5.868<br />

R² = 0.161<br />

Figure 7.5 Effects of concentrations of Si applied <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution on accumulations of K, P, Ca, and Mg <strong>in</strong> different parts of zucch<strong>in</strong>i after six weeks of<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

129


K <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

● Leaves: y = 0.01x 2 - 0.038x + 5.264<br />

R² = 0.435<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.002x 2 + 0.088x + 2.316<br />

R² = 0.209<br />

▲ Flowers: y = -0.002x 2 + 0.158x + 1.852<br />

R² = 0.585<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = 0.004x 2 + 0.156x + 4.108<br />

R² = 0.426<br />

P <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

▲ Flowers: y = 0.088x 2 - 1.352x + 11.554<br />

R² = 0.41<br />

● Leaves: y = 0.028x 2 - 0.352x + 6.276<br />

R² = 0.302<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = 0.014x 2 - 0.092x + 4.344<br />

R² = 0.112<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.002x 2 - 0.034x + 4.016<br />

R² = 0.093<br />

Ca <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.056x 2 + 0.112x +10.926<br />

R² = 0.840<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.026x 2 + 0.254x + 4.144<br />

R² = 0.121<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = -0.022x 2 + 0.142x + 3.952<br />

R² = 0.444<br />

▲ Flowers: y = -0.086x 2 + 0.794x + 3.34<br />

R² = 0.585<br />

Mg <strong>in</strong> plant tissue<br />

(mg g -1 dw)<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

▲ Flowers: y = -0.064x 2 + 0.994x + 2.574<br />

R² = 0.577<br />

● Leaves: y = -0.014x 2 + 0.002x + 6.764<br />

R² = 0.578<br />

× Stem + petioles: y = 0.01x 2 - 0.104x + 1.668<br />

R² = 0.201<br />

■ Roots: y = -0.006x 2 + 0.092x + 0.402<br />

R² = 0.101<br />

Figure 7.6 Effects of concentration of Si applied <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution on accumulations of K, P, Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> different parts of z<strong>in</strong>nia after six weeks of growth<br />

<strong>in</strong> a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

130


Zucch<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia<br />

Figure 7.7 Effects of <strong>in</strong>fection with powdery mildew fungi on the accumulation of Si, Ca and P <strong>in</strong><br />

different parts of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants grown <strong>in</strong> a nutrient re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system for six weeks<br />

and supplied with Si at 150 mg l -1 .<br />

131


Effects of powdery mildew on accumulation of selected elements<br />

Infected plants of zucch<strong>in</strong>i accumulated higher levels of Si <strong>in</strong> their leaves and roots than<br />

disease-free plants. However, the amount of Si <strong>in</strong> other parts of <strong>in</strong>fected plants was almost<br />

unaffected. The total amount of K found <strong>in</strong> different parts of <strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants was not<br />

significantly affected as a result of <strong>in</strong>fection with the pathogen. The total amount of P<br />

accumulated by all parts of <strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants decl<strong>in</strong>ed by 30%, with leaves of <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants accumulat<strong>in</strong>g 56% less than un<strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants. In addition, the P level<br />

<strong>in</strong> stems and petioles of <strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants was reduced by 29%. However, the level of<br />

Ca accumulated <strong>in</strong> different parts of <strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants was <strong>in</strong>creased by 81%. Infection<br />

doubled the amount of Ca <strong>in</strong> leaves and <strong>in</strong>creased that <strong>in</strong> roots by 26%. However, fruit of<br />

<strong>in</strong>fected zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants accumulated less Ca. Infection resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased levels of Mg <strong>in</strong><br />

leaves (+45%), while reduc<strong>in</strong>g that of roots and fruits (-62% and -34%, respectively) (Figure<br />

7.7).<br />

Plants of z<strong>in</strong>nia <strong>in</strong>fected with G. cichoracearum accumulated higher levels of Si <strong>in</strong> their roots<br />

and leaves than similar tissues of disease-free plants. However, other parts of <strong>in</strong>fected and<br />

non-<strong>in</strong>fected plants accumulated similar levels of Si. Similarly, <strong>in</strong>fected plants showed<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased levels of Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> their different parts than the un<strong>in</strong>fected plants. Infection with<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia with G. cichoracearum did not have a major impact on the total amount of K and P<br />

accumulated by this plant, although the level of P <strong>in</strong> leaves was reduced slightly. The effect of<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection on accumulation of different elements by zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants are presented on<br />

Figures 7.7.<br />

7.4 DISCUSSION<br />

To our knowledge, this is the first <strong>in</strong>vestigation to determ<strong>in</strong>e the uptake and distribution of Si,<br />

K, Ca, P and Mg to different parts of z<strong>in</strong>nia and zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants. The analytical techniques<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> this study provided unbiased and reliable <strong>in</strong>formation on the concentration of<br />

different elements <strong>in</strong> different tissues of both plants. EDX analysis was faster and required<br />

lesser chemicals <strong>in</strong> comparison to the ICP-OES. However, ICP-OES has a higher precision<br />

and lower detection limit than EDX (E<strong>in</strong>häuser, 1997). This is because the sample size taken<br />

by EDX is often small and superficial. For <strong>in</strong>stance, if the read<strong>in</strong>g is taken from the surface of<br />

132


a leaf, the value may vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on the presence of the pathogen on the leaf. In some<br />

cases, where the leaf was covered by the pathogen, the Si values were much higher than that<br />

of a disease-free leaf. In addition, the data obta<strong>in</strong>ed from EDX was relative (i.e. the graph<br />

represents a percentage of each element from the total <strong>in</strong> consideration). Moreover, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the age of the plant, distribution of Si on both sides of the leaf can differ (Hodson and<br />

Sangster, 1988), with older tissues accumulat<strong>in</strong>g more Si than the young tissues (Ma and<br />

Yamaji, 2006). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these authors, the <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> specific tissues<br />

is related to immobility of Si <strong>in</strong> older tissues. Therefore, it is not possible to make firm<br />

conclusions on the exact amount of a specific element based on EDX assessment alone.<br />

Despite these limitations, the EDX can give useful <strong>in</strong>formation about a sample’s composition<br />

and its elemental distribution (E<strong>in</strong>häuser, 1997). Furthermore, it provides an opportunity to<br />

observe the effect of Si treatments on the morphology of the pathogen and the plant, as well<br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g the distribution of the element <strong>in</strong> specific plant tissues. The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage of ICP<br />

over EDX was that it provided accurate results by tak<strong>in</strong>g representative samples, while<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the level of sampl<strong>in</strong>g error. Hence, only the results of the ICP analyses were<br />

considered for <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />

Although the mechanism of uptake and distribution of Si <strong>in</strong> different plants rema<strong>in</strong>s poorly<br />

understood, Epste<strong>in</strong> (1999) suggests that Si is absorbed by plant roots <strong>in</strong> the form of<br />

monosilicic acid [Si(OH) 4 ] and translocated to different parts of the plant through the xylem<br />

(Hodson & Sangster, 1989), mak<strong>in</strong>g for uneven distribution with<strong>in</strong> shoots (Ma and Takahashi,<br />

2002; Ma and Yamaji, 2006). In monocots, once silicic acid is translocated from roots to<br />

shoots, it becomes more concentrated as a result of loss of water through transpiration and<br />

polymerizes to form silica gel (SiO 2 .nH 2 O). In most monocots, polymerization starts once the<br />

concentration of Si(OH) 4 <strong>in</strong> the xylem exceeds 2 mM, although higher concentrations are<br />

needed <strong>in</strong> some plants such as rice and wheat (Ma and Yamaji, 2006). If Si is deposited <strong>in</strong> a<br />

polymerized form, it is not available for redistribution or for physiological activity (Ma and<br />

Yamaji, 2006). However, these studies were conducted <strong>in</strong> monocots, which rout<strong>in</strong>ely deposit<br />

Si as phytoliths <strong>in</strong> their leaves. In contrast, most dicots do not deposit phytoliths (some<br />

cucurbits are the exceptions), and it is therefore unlikely that the same process applies to<br />

dicots.<br />

133


Leaves have been the ma<strong>in</strong> organ selected for analysis when determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g uptake and<br />

accumulation of elements by plants (Adatia and Besford, 1986; Ranganathan et al., 2006;<br />

Samuels et al., 1991b). However, such observations may lead to biased and <strong>in</strong>conclusive<br />

results because elements are distributed to different organs of plants at different levels. Even<br />

when samples are be<strong>in</strong>g taken only from leaves, their orientation can affect the outcome.<br />

Adatia and Besford (1986) discovered that leaves of cucumber positioned at the bottom of<br />

shoots had a higher Si content than the top leaves. Such differences might be related to<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> the age of the leaves, or to their proximity to the source of Si (Ma and Yamaji,<br />

2006). In young leaves of wheat, Si is ma<strong>in</strong>ly concentrated <strong>in</strong> the abaxial (lower) epidermal<br />

cells, whereas <strong>in</strong> old leaves both abaxial and adaxial (upper) epidermal cells have the same<br />

levels of Si (Hodson, and Sangster, 1988). Moreover, Epste<strong>in</strong> (1994) noted that distribution of<br />

this Si <strong>in</strong> different parts of the roots and reproductive parts is often variable. In this study such<br />

variables were avoided by tak<strong>in</strong>g representative samples of each organ from the entire plant<br />

and blend<strong>in</strong>g it thoroughly after dry<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Accumulation of Si by some plant species may reach levels, or higher, than recognized plant<br />

macronutrients such as P, K, Mg, Ca and S (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999). Our <strong>in</strong>vestigation showed<br />

that there was accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> both plants. Even <strong>in</strong> the control, where no Si was added<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution, the levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the roots and leaves of z<strong>in</strong>nia and zucch<strong>in</strong>i plants<br />

were higher than that of Ca, P, K and Mg. We believe that these plants obta<strong>in</strong>ed the element<br />

from the composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark and water, which were used <strong>in</strong> the grow<strong>in</strong>g system. This is <strong>in</strong><br />

agreement with the observation that Si is ubiquitous <strong>in</strong> nature (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999).<br />

Regardless of the level of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution, the daily uptake of the element by both<br />

plants was related to their water consumption. However, the fact that both plants reached<br />

saturation at a certa<strong>in</strong> level of Si <strong>in</strong> the solution demonstrates that they absorb the element<br />

actively rather than passively. The difference <strong>in</strong> accumulation of Si by different species of<br />

plants has been attributed to differences <strong>in</strong> the ability of the roots to take up this element (Ma<br />

and Takahashi, 2002). The uptake, translocation and polymerization of Si <strong>in</strong> rice is affected by<br />

the transpiration rate and other metabolic activities of the plant (Ma and Yamaji, 2006; Ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

et al., 2006). However, Ma and Yamaji (2006) have identified a Si transporter gene <strong>in</strong> rice<br />

that is believed to be responsible for <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> this plant.<br />

134


In zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants, Si was ma<strong>in</strong>ly accumulated <strong>in</strong> roots and leaves. In contrast, the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g parts of these two plant species accumulated relatively little Si. High levels of Si <strong>in</strong><br />

the root were assumed to be as a result of a slow rate of translocation of the element from the<br />

roots to shoots, or that the amount of Si required by other organs of the plant had reached its<br />

saturation stage. A high level of Si <strong>in</strong> leaves might be because of high transpiration rate of this<br />

organ (Raven, 2001), coupled with other metabolic activities that take place <strong>in</strong> this part of the<br />

plant (Liang et al., 2005; Ra<strong>in</strong>s et al., 2006).<br />

Although both plants accumulated more Si as the levels of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution were<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased, zucch<strong>in</strong>i atta<strong>in</strong>ed its optimal level of Si with a lower level of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient<br />

solution than z<strong>in</strong>nia. Supply<strong>in</strong>g Si at levels as low as 50 mg l -1 <strong>in</strong>creased the growth of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i because the uptake of most of the elements studied was maximal at that level of Si.<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g Si at > 50 mg l -1 did not result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased growth because the levels of most of the<br />

other macronutrient elements <strong>in</strong> the plant rema<strong>in</strong>ed almost constant. With cucumber,<br />

application of Si <strong>in</strong>creased the weight of leaves of the plant without affect<strong>in</strong>g their size (Adatia<br />

and Besford, 1986). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these authors, leaves of Si- fed plants were stronger than the<br />

control because they had higher chlorophyll contents. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, the effect of Si on the<br />

growth of z<strong>in</strong>nia was not noticeable. It is possible that the difference could not be detected<br />

easily because the plant does not produce a big crown. Accumulation of Si and K <strong>in</strong> the petiole<br />

and stems of Si supplemented plants was not different compared to the control. In addition,<br />

there was no apparent difference <strong>in</strong> the morphology of the z<strong>in</strong>nia flowers as a response to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased supply of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solutions. Plant size also appeared similar. However,<br />

this may have been because the beneficial effects of Si treatment of plants are usually<br />

expressed when the plants are subjected to various stress conditions (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994). However,<br />

<strong>in</strong> this study, plants were not stressed because they were raised under optimum growth<br />

conditions and kept free of diseases, except PM.<br />

In addition to protection aga<strong>in</strong>st biotic and abiotic stresses, Si has also been shown to<br />

strengthen the plant by thicken<strong>in</strong>g its stem and stiffen<strong>in</strong>g the leaves (Takahashi, 1995). This<br />

role can be of great importance especially for z<strong>in</strong>nia and other ornamental plants, and<br />

vegetables, where their ornamental value or their fruit quality are affected by the ability of the<br />

135


plant to stand erect and support its organs properly. Application of Si can also improve the<br />

yield of zucch<strong>in</strong>i, as well as <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the quantity, as has been mentioned for other crops<br />

(Datnoff et al., 1997; Ma, 2004; Ma and Takahashi, 2002; Samuels et al., 1993).<br />

Although the mode of action by which Si exerts its protective effects aga<strong>in</strong>st diseases and<br />

pests are complex and rema<strong>in</strong> controversial (Fawe et al., 1998; Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994; Ghanmi et al.,<br />

2004), the relationship between the accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> specific areas of the plant and<br />

consequent disease protection rema<strong>in</strong>s of great importance. Therefore, accumulation of a high<br />

level of Si <strong>in</strong> leaves of both plants may protect these plants aga<strong>in</strong>st PM and other foliar<br />

diseases.<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g Si <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution did not affect the elemental composition of fruits of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i. With the exception of P, accumulation of all other elements (i.e. Ca, Mg, K and Si)<br />

was slightly <strong>in</strong>creased by supply<strong>in</strong>g the plant with low levels of Si (i.e. 50 mg l -1 ). As the<br />

concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution was raised beyond 50 mg l -1 , the levels of Ca and P<br />

<strong>in</strong> zucch<strong>in</strong>i fruit were slightly lower than that of the control, while the level of Mg rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

unaffected and levels of both K and Si <strong>in</strong>creased slightly. Even <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> K and Si levels <strong>in</strong><br />

response to extra Si application were negligible.<br />

Time of flower<strong>in</strong>g and fruit sett<strong>in</strong>gs and the size of the fruit were not affected by Si supply <strong>in</strong><br />

the solution. In addition, visual estimations were that the colour and texture of Si-treated and<br />

untreated zucch<strong>in</strong>i fruit were the same, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that treatment with Si did not have major<br />

impact on the characteristics of the zucch<strong>in</strong>i fruit. Contrary to our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, a study by<br />

Bélanger et al. (1997) reported that application of Si at > 100 mg l -1 <strong>in</strong>creased the cucumber<br />

yield, but at the same time, it hardened the fruit of cucumber, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> poor fruit quality<br />

which limited farmers to us<strong>in</strong>g Si at low levels. Samuels et al. (1993) found that cucumber<br />

plants produced unusual, dull appear<strong>in</strong>g fruits, when they were grown <strong>in</strong> hydroponics supplied<br />

with Si. Therefore, the response of cucurbits to Si treatment may vary among species or even<br />

the cultivar level (Ago et al., 2008). Hence, no generalization can be made on each plant<br />

species and cultivar without proper test<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

136


Elemental analysis of the whole plant showed that application of 100-150 mg l -1 Si was<br />

optimal for z<strong>in</strong>nia. Application of Si at 150 mg l -1 provided effective control of PM and<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> accumulation of high levels of Si <strong>in</strong> all parts of the plant. Moreover, concentrations<br />

of Ca, P, K, and Mg <strong>in</strong> all parts of the plant were little affected at that level. For zucch<strong>in</strong>i,<br />

supply<strong>in</strong>g Si at 200 mg l -1 resulted <strong>in</strong> the highest level of Si accumulation <strong>in</strong> roots, although<br />

leaves could accumulate more with an extra supply of Si. However, the differences <strong>in</strong><br />

accumulated Si as a result of applications of 50-400 mg l -1 were small, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

translocation of Si from roots to leaves was not <strong>in</strong>creased significantly as a result of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the supply of Si. S<strong>in</strong>ce our ma<strong>in</strong> objective was to control PM, the impact of lower levels Si on<br />

growth and composition of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia were not <strong>in</strong>vestigated. We believe that when<br />

the risk of <strong>in</strong>fection by PM is m<strong>in</strong>imal, the use of Si at lower levels (i.e., < 50 mg l -1 ) can<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease the growth of both plants because accumulations of most of the elements studied<br />

seemed to be optimal. However, when the risk of PM is high, Si should be used at higher rates<br />

(100-150 mg l -1 ). This level could be altered, based on the need to balance the uptake and<br />

distribution of other elements, which ultimately determ<strong>in</strong>es the health of the plant. For<br />

example, K was part of the solution (i.e. KSi) and its level <strong>in</strong> the plant was <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the concentration of potassium silicate applied. However, this can result <strong>in</strong> reduced<br />

uptake of Ca, Mn, Fe and other elements by the plant (Ma and Takahashi, 1993). For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

uptake of Ca by rice plants was reduced when Si was added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution (Ma and<br />

Takahashi, 1993). With cucumber, reduced uptake of Ca as a response to Si supply resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased growth of the plant (Marschner et al. (1990). However, add<strong>in</strong>g Ca to the solution did<br />

not affect uptake and distribution of Si <strong>in</strong> rice (Ma and Takahashi, 1990).<br />

Previous research on the effects of Si on uptake and accumulation of P <strong>in</strong> various plants<br />

provided contradictory results (Ma and Takashi, 1990; Islam and Saha, 1969). This was<br />

because Si is possibly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the metabolic or physiological changes <strong>in</strong> the plants by<br />

promot<strong>in</strong>g or suppress<strong>in</strong>g uptake and transportation of selected elements, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

stress conditions (Liang, 1999). Islam and Saha (1969) discovered that the application of Si<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased levels of P, Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> rice. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, Ma and Takashi (1990)<br />

found that the concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the shoots of cucumber was slightly reduced with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased level of P <strong>in</strong> the same organ, although uptake of Si was not significantly affected by<br />

the presence of P <strong>in</strong> the nutrient solution. They concluded that Si could <strong>in</strong>crease availability of<br />

137


P when Si is deficient or reduce uptake of P when levels of Si are high, reflect<strong>in</strong>g that Si plays<br />

a major role <strong>in</strong> balanc<strong>in</strong>g P uptake. With<strong>in</strong> a small range, add<strong>in</strong>g low levels of Si to the<br />

nutrient solution improved accumulation of P <strong>in</strong> most parts of both plants studied here.<br />

Infections of z<strong>in</strong>nia and zucch<strong>in</strong>i with PM resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si and Ca <strong>in</strong><br />

their leaves. Similar observations have been reported for various plant species (Samuels et al.,<br />

1991b; Koga, 1994: Cherif et al., 1992a). Even <strong>in</strong> the same leaf, the concentration of Si<br />

around <strong>in</strong>fected areas was higher than disease-free areas. This agrees with previous<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation by Menzies et al. (1991) and Samuels et al. (1991b) who demonstrated that<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection of the plant with the pathogen results <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> the leaves.<br />

These authors observed high levels of Si at the <strong>in</strong>fection sites and around the hyphae of the<br />

pathogen. Our observations us<strong>in</strong>g EDX mapp<strong>in</strong>g gave extra <strong>in</strong>formation, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conclusively that Si was accumulated <strong>in</strong> the leaf and not <strong>in</strong> the pathogen. The conclusion was<br />

based on the observation that when the concentration of Si <strong>in</strong> the pathogen and the leaf tissue<br />

(<strong>in</strong>fected site) were compared us<strong>in</strong>g contrast mapp<strong>in</strong>g, Si levels were low <strong>in</strong> the pathogen, but<br />

were at high levels <strong>in</strong> leaf tissue adjacent to PM hyphae. Even though the total uptake of K<br />

and Mg by both plants was not affected by <strong>in</strong>fection, their accumulation on leaves was<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased by <strong>in</strong>fection. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that they may also have some roles <strong>in</strong> disease control.<br />

Regardless of <strong>in</strong>fection, the highest concentration of Si was observed at the base of trichomes,<br />

confirm<strong>in</strong>g observations of other researchers (Iwasaki and Matsumura, 1999; Samuels et al.,<br />

1991a, 1991b & 1993).<br />

Leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia <strong>in</strong>fected their respective pathogens accumulated more Ca and<br />

less P than leaves of un<strong>in</strong>fected plants. Similar observations were reported for other crops<br />

<strong>in</strong>fected with different pathogens (Goodenough and Maw, 2008; Kalamera and Heath, 1998).<br />

Reduced uptake of P by <strong>in</strong>fected plants may have been affected by the <strong>in</strong>creased uptake of Ca<br />

by the <strong>in</strong>fected plant. Zhang et al. (2006) showed that the uptake of P was reduced when<br />

plants were supplied with calcium silicate (CaSiO). It has been noted that under stress<br />

conditions, Si enhances absorption of Ca by the plant at the expenses of Fe and Mn (Islam and<br />

Saha, 1969; Liang, 1999). However, whether the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Ca content of <strong>in</strong>fected leaves is<br />

related to the expression of the resistance to PM or not is still not clear.<br />

138


7.4 REFERENCES<br />

Adatia, M.H., Besford, R.T. 1986. The effects of silicon on cucumber plants grown <strong>in</strong> recirculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nutrient solution. Annals of Botany, 58: 343-51.<br />

Ago, Y., Mitani, N. Yamaji, N. Iwasaki, K., Ma, J.F. 2008. Differential uptake of silicon <strong>in</strong> two<br />

cultivars of pumpk<strong>in</strong> (Abstract). 4th International Conference on <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>, Port,<br />

Edward, South Africa.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.G. 1997. Powdery mildews: Recent advances toward <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

control. In: G.J. Boland and L.D. Kuykendall (Eds) Plant-microbe Interactions and Biological<br />

Control. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, Pp. 89-109.<br />

Cherif, M., Assel<strong>in</strong>, A., Bélanger, R.R. 1994. Defense responses <strong>in</strong>duced by soluble silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber roots plants <strong>in</strong>fected by Pythium spp. Phytopathology, 84: 236-242.<br />

Cherif, M., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 1992a. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced resistance <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber plants aga<strong>in</strong>st Pythium ultimum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 41:<br />

411-425.<br />

Cherif, M., Menzies, J.G., Benhamou, N., Bélanger, R.R. 1992b. Studies of silicon distribution <strong>in</strong><br />

wounded and Pythium ultimum <strong>in</strong>fected cucumber plants. Physiological and Molecular Plant<br />

Pathology, 41: 371-385.<br />

Datnoff, L.E., Deren, C.W., Snyder, G.H. 1997. <strong>Silicon</strong> fertilization for disease management of rice <strong>in</strong><br />

Florida. Crop Protection, 16: 525-531.<br />

E<strong>in</strong>häuser, T.J. 1997. ICP-OES and SEM-EDX analysis of dust and powder produced by the laserprocess<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of a Cr-Ni-Steel alloy. Microchimica Acta 127: 265-268.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant biology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the United States of America, 91: 11-17.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1999. <strong>Silicon</strong>. Annual Reviews <strong>in</strong> Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50: 641-<br />

664.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 2001. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> plants: Facts vs. concepts. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>. L.E. Datnoff, G.H.<br />

Snyder, and G.H. Korndörfer (Eds.). Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam: pp 1-15.<br />

Fawe, A., Abou-Zaid, M., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. <strong>Silicon</strong>-mediated accumulation of<br />

flavonoid phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> cucumber. Phytopathology, 88: 396-401.<br />

Feng, X., Wu, S., Wharmby, A., Wittmeier, A. 1999. Microwave digestion of plant and gra<strong>in</strong> standard<br />

reference materials <strong>in</strong> nitric and hydrofluoric acids for multi-elemental determ<strong>in</strong>ation by<br />

<strong>in</strong>ductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry,<br />

14: 939-946.<br />

139


Ghanmi, D., McNally, D.J., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2004. Powdery mildew of<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana: a pathosystem for explor<strong>in</strong>g the role of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant–microbe<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 64:189-199.<br />

Goodenough, P.W., Maw, G.A. 2008. Effects of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici <strong>in</strong>fection on nutrient uptake<br />

by tomato plants. Annals of Applied Biology, 73: 339-347.<br />

Hodson, M.J., Sangster, A.G. 1988. Observations on the distribution of m<strong>in</strong>eral elements <strong>in</strong> the leaf of<br />

wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), with particular reference to silicon. Annals of Botany, 62: 463-<br />

471.<br />

Islam, A., Saha, R.C. 1969. Effects of silicon on the chemical composition of rice plants. Plant and<br />

Soil, 30: 446-458.<br />

Iwasaki, K., Matsumura, G. 1999. Effect of silicon on alleviation of manganese toxicity <strong>in</strong> pumpk<strong>in</strong><br />

(Cucurbita moschata Duch cv. Sh<strong>in</strong>tosa). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 45: 909-920.<br />

Kalamera, D.S., Heath, M.C. 1998. Changes <strong>in</strong> the cytoskeleton accompany<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

nuclear movements and the hypersensitive response <strong>in</strong> plant cells <strong>in</strong>vaded by rust fungi. The<br />

Plant Journal, 16: 191-200.<br />

Koga, H. 1994. Hypersensitive death, autofluorescence and ultrastructural changes <strong>in</strong> cells of leaf<br />

sheaths of susceptible and resistant near-isogenic l<strong>in</strong>es of rice (Pi-Zt) <strong>in</strong> relation to penetration<br />

and growth of Pyricularia oryzae. Canadian Journal of Botany, 72: 1463-77.<br />

Liang, Y. 1999. Effects of silicon on enzyme activity and sodium, potassium and calcium<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> barley under salt stress. Plant and Soil, 209: 217-224.<br />

Liang, Y., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. <strong>Silicon</strong> uptake and transport is an active process <strong>in</strong> Cucumis<br />

sativus. New Phytologist, 167: 797-804.<br />

Lieten, P., Horvath, J., Asard, H. 2002. Effect of silicon on alb<strong>in</strong>ism of strawberry. Acta Horticulturae,<br />

567: 361-364.<br />

Ma, J.F. 2004. Role of silicon <strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil<br />

Science and Plant Nutrition, 50: 11-18.<br />

Ma, J.F., Takahashi, E. 1990. Effect of silicon on the growth and phosphorus uptake of rice. Plant and<br />

Soil, 126: 115-119.<br />

Ma, J.F., Takahashi, E. 1993. Interaction between calcium and silicon <strong>in</strong> water-cultured rice plants.<br />

Plant and Soil, 148: 107-113.<br />

Ma, J.F., Takahashi, E. 2002. Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant <strong>Silicon</strong> Research <strong>in</strong> Japan Elsevier Science,<br />

Amsterdam.<br />

Ma, J.F., Yamaji, N. 2006. <strong>Silicon</strong> uptake and accumulation <strong>in</strong> higher plants. Trends <strong>in</strong> Plant Science,<br />

11: 392-397.<br />

140


Marguí, E., Queralt, I., Carvalho, M.L., Hidalgo, M. 2005. Comparison of EDXRF and ICP-OES after<br />

microwave digestion for element determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> plant specimens from an abandoned m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

area. Analytica Chimica Acta 549:197-204.<br />

Marschner, H., Oberle, H., Cakmak, I., Römheld, V. 1990. Growth enhancement by silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants depends on imbalance <strong>in</strong> phosphorus and z<strong>in</strong>c supply. Plant<br />

and Soil, 124: 211-219.<br />

Meyer, J.H., Keep<strong>in</strong>g, M.G. 2005. Impact of silicon <strong>in</strong> alleviat<strong>in</strong>g biotic stress <strong>in</strong> sugarcane <strong>in</strong> South<br />

Africa. Sugar Cane International, 23: 14-18.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Samuels, A.L. 1991. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of silicon on cytological<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions between Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea and Cucumis sativus. Physiological and<br />

Molecular Plant Pathology, 39: 403-414.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>s, D.W., Epste<strong>in</strong>, E., Zasoski, R.J., Aslam, M. 2006. Active silicon uptake by wheat. Plant and<br />

Soil, 280: 223-228.<br />

Ranganathan, S., Suvarchala, V., Rajesh, Y., Prasad, M.S., Padmakumari, A.P., Voleti, S.R. 2006.<br />

Effects of silicon sources on its deposition, chlorophyll content, and disease and pest resistance<br />

<strong>in</strong> rice. Biologia Plantarum, 50: 713-716.<br />

Raven, J.A. 2001. <strong>Silicon</strong> transport at the cell and tissue level. In: Datnoff, L.E, Snyder, G.H.,<br />

Korndörfer, G.H. (Eds.). <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>. Elsevier, the Netherlands, pp 41-55.<br />

Rodrigues, F.A., Jurick, W.M., Datnoff, L.E., Jones, J.B., Roll<strong>in</strong>s, J.A. 2005. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluences<br />

cytological and molecular events <strong>in</strong> compatible and <strong>in</strong>compatible rice-Magnaporthe grisea<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 66: 144-159.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991a. Mobility and deposition of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 485-492.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991b. Distribution of silicon <strong>in</strong> cucumber<br />

leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea). Canadian Journal<br />

of Botany, 69: 140-146.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1993. The effects of silicon supplementation<br />

on cucumber fruit: changes <strong>in</strong> surface characteristics. Annals of Botany, 72: 433-440.<br />

Takahashi, E. 1995. Uptake mode and physiological functions of silica. Science of the Rice Plant, 2:<br />

58-71.<br />

Tamai, K., Ma, J.F. 2003 Characterization of silicon uptake by rice roots. New Phytologist, 158: 4301-<br />

436.<br />

Zhang, Q., Fry, J., Lowe, K., Tisserat, N. 2006. Evaluation of calcium silicate for brown patch and<br />

dollar spot suppression on turf grasses. Crop Science, 46: 1635-1643.<br />

141


CHAPTER EIGHT<br />

EFFECTS OF SELECTED BIOCONTROL AGENTS AND SILICON ON<br />

POWDERY MILDEW OF ZINNIA PLANTS GROWN HYDROPONICALLY<br />

H.B. Tesfagiorgis a , M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g a and M.J. Morris b<br />

a<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa<br />

b Plant Health Products, P. O. Box 207, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham Road, South Africa<br />

Abstract<br />

Five selected biocontrol agents, and soluble silicon (Si) at various concentrations, were tested<br />

for their ability to control powdery mildew of hydroponically grown z<strong>in</strong>nia plants. Biocontrol<br />

treatments were applied before <strong>in</strong>fection and cont<strong>in</strong>ued weekly, while Si was supplied to<br />

plants cont<strong>in</strong>uously. Both BCAs and Si reduced the severity and AUDPC values of PM<br />

significantly. Application of BCAs resulted <strong>in</strong> reductions <strong>in</strong> severity and AUDPC values of<br />

PM by 38-68% and 30-65%, respectively. Both severity and AUDPC values of PM were<br />

reduced by 87-95% when plants were supplied with soluble Si (50-200 mg l -1 ). It is proposed<br />

that the provision of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous supply of Si and the ability of z<strong>in</strong>nia to accumulate high<br />

levels of Si <strong>in</strong> its leaves were the major reasons for the good response of z<strong>in</strong>nia plants to Si<br />

treatments aga<strong>in</strong>st PM. <strong>Silicon</strong> played a protective role before <strong>in</strong>fection and suppressed<br />

development of PM after <strong>in</strong>fection. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the tested BCAs and Si can be used as<br />

effective control options aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia grown hydroponically.<br />

142


8.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>nia (Z<strong>in</strong>nia elegans L) is a popular ornamental flower grown <strong>in</strong> many parts of the world.<br />

Production of attractive flowers, fast growth, a short production cycle and m<strong>in</strong>imal labor<br />

requirements makes z<strong>in</strong>nia a commercially important crop as a cut flower (P<strong>in</strong>to et al., 2005),<br />

as well as a popular bedd<strong>in</strong>g plant. However, its susceptibility to several diseases often<br />

reduces its value as an ornamental plant (L<strong>in</strong>derman and Ewart, 1990). Powdery mildew (PM),<br />

caused by Golov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum (DC.) VP Heluta is one of the common diseases of<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> plant losses and decreased ornamental values by weaken<strong>in</strong>g plant growth,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> poor flower<strong>in</strong>g (Boyle and Wick, 1996; Kamp, 1985).<br />

The use of fungicides to control PM of annual bedd<strong>in</strong>g plants is limited by their toxicity to the<br />

flower crop (Kamp, 1985) and other non-target organisms. Furthermore, development of<br />

fungicide resistance by several species of PM fungi as a response to <strong>in</strong>tensive use of<br />

fungicides has also been a major challenge (McGrath, 1996; McGrath, 2001; McGrath and<br />

Shishkoff, 2001; O'Hara et al., 2000; Wong and Wilcox, 2002). As an alternative approach to<br />

the control of PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia, Kamp (1958) successfully used a polymer-based anti-transpirant.<br />

Similarly, applications of biocontrol agents (BCAs) and soluble silicon (Si) to PM susceptible<br />

crops have produced promis<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g the disease caused by different PM<br />

species, under controlled environmental conditions (Dik et al., 1998; Guével et al., 2007;<br />

Liang et al., 2005; Menzies and Bélanger, 1996; Verhaar et al., 1996, 1997). However, <strong>in</strong> spite<br />

of the challenges that PM poses to growers of z<strong>in</strong>nia, no alternative control measures have<br />

been developed to date to supplement or replace fungicides.<br />

Based on prior research, the objectives of this study were to test the efficacy of five selected<br />

biocontrol agents, and Si applied at various concentrations, for control of PM and to assess<br />

whether a cont<strong>in</strong>uous supply of Si could improve its efficacy. Z<strong>in</strong>nia was selected as an<br />

ornamental test plant for this study under hydroponics condition because of its relatively small<br />

size and its susceptibility to PM.<br />

143


8.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

8.2.1 Preparation of plants<br />

Seeds of Z<strong>in</strong>nia (Z<strong>in</strong>nia elegans L., cv. Jakobrekop Sunbow), obta<strong>in</strong>ed from McDonald<br />

Seeds 1 , were planted <strong>in</strong> Speedl<strong>in</strong>g ® trays conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g composted p<strong>in</strong>e bark and transferred <strong>in</strong>to<br />

a greenhouse tunnel operat<strong>in</strong>g at 26-28 o C and an RH of 75-85%. Trays were irrigated with a<br />

balanced fertilizer [3:1:3 (38) from Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> 2 at 0.5 g l -1 ] + [Ca(NO 3 ) 2 at 0.5 g l -1 ]<br />

for 3 wk. Seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were transplanted <strong>in</strong>to pots (150 mm diameter) once they had produced 2-<br />

3 well developed leaves and atta<strong>in</strong>ed a height of approximately 50-70 mm. Thereafter, pots<br />

were transferred <strong>in</strong>to a greenhouse (mean temperature, 28 o C and RH of 60-70%). All pots<br />

were placed <strong>in</strong>to horizontal m<strong>in</strong>i troughs with the nutrient solution be<strong>in</strong>g supplied <strong>in</strong> a recirculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system (Figure 8.1).<br />

8.2.2 Design of the hydroponic system<br />

Horizontal m<strong>in</strong>i troughs, constructed from 1mm thick black plastic, were placed on a table.<br />

The troughs were arranged <strong>in</strong> alternat<strong>in</strong>g directions to provide enough space for the reservoirs<br />

(8l) to fit next to each other. Each reservoir conta<strong>in</strong>ed a Project Powerhead submersible pump<br />

(100w) fitted to supply l<strong>in</strong>es which carried the nutrient solution to the top end of the trough<br />

from where it flowed through the trough and back to the reservoir (Neumann, 2003). The<br />

pumps ran cont<strong>in</strong>uously and the level of nutrient solution <strong>in</strong> each reservoir was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g the nutrient solution as needed. Where Si was used as a treatment, its concentration <strong>in</strong><br />

the nutrient solution was set at 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg l -1 by add<strong>in</strong>g KSi . <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong>ly, the<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of z<strong>in</strong>nia, <strong>in</strong> pots, were placed <strong>in</strong>to the troughs with each row conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g four or five<br />

pots for the first and second trials, respectively.<br />

1 McDonald Seeds (Pty) Ltd, P. O. Box 238, Pietermaritzburg, 3200, South Africa<br />

2 Ocean <strong>Agriculture</strong> (Pty) Ltd., P. O. Box 742, Muldersdrift, 1747, South Africa.<br />

144


Figure 8.1. Horizontal m<strong>in</strong>i troughs and their accessories used to supply nutrient solution to the plants<br />

<strong>in</strong> a re-circulat<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

8.2.3 Preparation of biocontrol agents<br />

Microbial suspensions of three Serratia marcescens (Bizio) isolates (i.e., Isolates B15, Y15<br />

and Y41) and two fungi (Clonostachys rosea (L<strong>in</strong>k) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & Gams (syn.<br />

Gliocladium roseum) (Isolate EH) and Trichothecium roseum (Pers.) L<strong>in</strong>k (syn.<br />

Cephalothecium roseum) (Isolate H20)) were prepared as described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3. Biocontrol<br />

agents were applied to plants once a week at a concentrations of 10 8 and 10 6 spores ml -1 for<br />

bacterial and fungal BCAs, respectively. Treatments with BCAs were applied 2 d before<br />

plants were <strong>in</strong>oculated with PM, and repeated 4 d after the first symptoms of PM developed<br />

and cont<strong>in</strong>ued weekly. To enhance survival of BCAs on the phylloplane, spray<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

commenced dur<strong>in</strong>g the late afternoon us<strong>in</strong>g hand sprayers.<br />

8.2.4 Preparation of powdery mildew <strong>in</strong>oculum and <strong>in</strong>oculation technique<br />

Seedl<strong>in</strong>g of z<strong>in</strong>nia were prepared as described <strong>in</strong> the above and put <strong>in</strong>to ice cream conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

(2l) and kept <strong>in</strong> an open environment to allow natural <strong>in</strong>fection by plac<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> batches,<br />

placed at different positions <strong>in</strong> the Controlled Environmental Facility (CEF) of the university.<br />

Plants were watered manually by drench<strong>in</strong>g them with a complete nutrient solution. After the<br />

first symptoms of PM, <strong>in</strong>fected plants were kept <strong>in</strong> a separate glasshouse to enhance<br />

development of the disease and to avoid contam<strong>in</strong>ation between experiments. The <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />

145


was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>fect<strong>in</strong>g fresh plants through direct contact of <strong>in</strong>fected and un<strong>in</strong>fected<br />

leaves.<br />

Three <strong>in</strong>oculation techniques were tested: (1) conidia of PM were sprayed onto both sides of<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia leaves until run-off, us<strong>in</strong>g a hydraulic hand sprayer; (2) dust<strong>in</strong>g of dry conidia collected<br />

from <strong>in</strong>fected leaves onto disease-free plants; and (3) physical contact between <strong>in</strong>fected and<br />

disease free leaves. However, the spray technique of <strong>in</strong>oculation did not result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection of<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia. Therefore, the last two methods were comb<strong>in</strong>ed as the standard <strong>in</strong>oculation technique<br />

for z<strong>in</strong>nia. Infected leaves of the same age were collected from the source plants, and one<br />

<strong>in</strong>fected leaf was used to <strong>in</strong>fect one plant by dust<strong>in</strong>g the conidia us<strong>in</strong>g a brush and by gently<br />

rubb<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>fected leaf aga<strong>in</strong>st 3 leaves of the test plant. Inoculation was performed dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the late afternoon to enhance establishment of the disease.<br />

8.2.5 Disease assessment<br />

Percentage of leaf area covered by PM was assessed weekly before spray<strong>in</strong>g of BCAs for<br />

5 wk, and AUDPC was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g an AUDPC Program (Shaner and F<strong>in</strong>ney, 1977). The<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al disease level recorded at the end of the experiment was recorded as the f<strong>in</strong>al disease<br />

level.<br />

8.2.6 Statistical analysis<br />

The experiment was conducted twice, with each treatment hav<strong>in</strong>g four replications <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

trial, and five replications <strong>in</strong> the second trial. The arrangement was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by access to<br />

space <strong>in</strong> the hydroponics system. Because of their homog<strong>in</strong>uity, the results of these two trials<br />

were mixed together and ANOVA analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g GenStat (R) Statistical<br />

Analysis Software (GenStat, 2006). To reduce the coefficient of variation, data was<br />

transformed a us<strong>in</strong>g square root transformation. Means of treatments were compared us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Fisher’s Protected LSD at P < 0.05. Percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> disease severity and AUDPC<br />

values were calculated by compar<strong>in</strong>g each treatment aga<strong>in</strong>st the control.<br />

146


8.3 RESULTS<br />

Symptoms of PM started to appear on the leaves one week after <strong>in</strong>oculation and developed<br />

slowly. After 5 wk, disease level of the control plants reached > 45% <strong>in</strong> the first trial and 31%<br />

<strong>in</strong> the second trial.<br />

In both trials, the BCAs and Si had significant effects on the severity of PM and its AUDPC<br />

values. In the first trial, all BCAs reduced the severity of PM significantly, with reductions of<br />

35-84%. Isolates EH and H20 reduced the severity of PM by 83% and 60%, respectively.<br />

Similarly, treatments with the Isolates B15, Y15 and Y41 caused significant reductions <strong>in</strong><br />

disease severity of 35-76%. Among the three bacterial isolates tested aga<strong>in</strong>st the disease,<br />

Isolate Y41 performed best. In the second trial, only Isolates EH, H20 and Y41 reduced the<br />

severity of PM significantly. Treatments with these three isolates provided disease reductions<br />

of 41-47%. Although statistically not significant, Isolate B15 and Isolate Y41 also reduced the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al disease level by 30% and 34%, respectively. In both trials, application of BCAs reduced<br />

the AUDPC values significantly (P < 0.001). Among the BCAs tested, Isolate EH gave the<br />

best results <strong>in</strong> suppress<strong>in</strong>g the development of PM (Figure 8.2).<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g Si at concentrations of 50-200 mg l -1 <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution reduced the severity<br />

and AUDPC values of PM significantly. After one month of <strong>in</strong>fection, the f<strong>in</strong>al disease level<br />

recorded for plants treated with Si was reduced by 86-100% and 75-90%, <strong>in</strong> the first and<br />

second experiments, respectively. AUDPC values were also significantly reduced when plants<br />

were treated with Si (Figure 8.2). The performance of Si was better <strong>in</strong> the first trial, provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

disease control as much as 100% when Si was added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution at 150 mg l -1 .<br />

147


Table 8.13 Effects of selected biocontrol agents and silicon on the f<strong>in</strong>al disease level (FDL) and area<br />

under disease progress curve (AUDPC) of powdery mildew of z<strong>in</strong>nia, five weeks after <strong>in</strong>oculation with<br />

Golov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum<br />

Treatments FDL AUDPC<br />

Control 36.9 (5.92) e 358.2 (18.02) e<br />

BCAs<br />

<strong>Silicon</strong><br />

B15 22.8 (4.45) d 220.5 (13.86) cde<br />

EH 12.1 (3.00) bc 126.4 (9.74) bc<br />

H20 17.8 (4.07) cd 182.0 (13.06) cd<br />

Y15 22.6 (4.53) de 250.8 (15.18) de<br />

Y41 15.7 (3.47) cd 145.8 (11.00) cd<br />

50 mg l -1 4.3 (1.92) ab 43.2 (6.04) ab<br />

100 mg l -1 2.3 (1.29) a 21.4 (3.87) a<br />

150 mg l -1 4.1 (1.39) a 31.9 (3.93) a<br />

200 mg l -1 4.7 (1.82) ab 47.4 (5.69) ab<br />

Effects P-values P-values<br />

F < 0.001 < 0.001<br />

CV% 46.8 46.6<br />

MSE 2.222 21.885<br />

FLSD 1.398 4.389<br />

Means with<strong>in</strong> column followed by a common letter were not significantly different accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fisher’s<br />

protected least significant difference (P < 0.05).<br />

Values <strong>in</strong> brackets are means of data transformed us<strong>in</strong>g a square root transformation.<br />

148


A<br />

Si level<br />

(mg l -1 )<br />

Si<br />

BCA<br />

Isolates<br />

BCAs<br />

B<br />

Si level<br />

(mg l -1 )<br />

Si<br />

BCA<br />

Isolates<br />

BCAs<br />

Figure 8.2 Percentage reductions <strong>in</strong> the disease severity (A) and Area under disease progress curve<br />

(AUDPC) (B) of powdery mildew of z<strong>in</strong>nia after five weeks of treatment with five biocontrol agents<br />

soluble silicon, compared to a control <strong>in</strong>oculated with Golov<strong>in</strong>omyces cichoracearum.<br />

149


8.4 DISCUSSION<br />

Unlike other crops, where <strong>in</strong>oculation PM fungi can be performed by spray<strong>in</strong>g on a conidial<br />

suspension of the pathogen <strong>in</strong> water, <strong>in</strong>oculation of z<strong>in</strong>nia with conidial spray onto leaves was<br />

not effective. It has been reported that high leaf wetness has detrimental effects on the<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ation of conidia of PM fungi (Bushnell and Rowell, 1967; Qu<strong>in</strong>n and Powell, 1982;<br />

Sakurai and Hirata, 1959; Sivapalan, 1993). In this study, even though the time between<br />

harvest of conidia and spray<strong>in</strong>g was m<strong>in</strong>imized to less than 30 m<strong>in</strong> and a high concentration of<br />

conidia was used, the <strong>in</strong>oculation method did not produce consistent <strong>in</strong>fection, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

this pathogen was sensitive to water. Therefore, dust<strong>in</strong>g conidia by shak<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>fected leaf<br />

over the test plant, and physical contact between <strong>in</strong>fected and disease-free leaves were used as<br />

standard technique of <strong>in</strong>oculation. Although these techniques lacked <strong>in</strong>formation on the exact<br />

amount of <strong>in</strong>oculum used to cause a certa<strong>in</strong> level of <strong>in</strong>fection, both techniques consistently<br />

produced a level of <strong>in</strong>fection that developed to > 45% with<strong>in</strong> one month after <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />

From the hydroponic trials, it was demonstrated that all the tested BCAs and Si reduced the<br />

level of PM significantly. In both trials, the level of control obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Si treatments was<br />

better than that of BCAs. If z<strong>in</strong>nia plants absorb Si before <strong>in</strong>fection, then they become highly<br />

resistant to <strong>in</strong>fection by G. cichoracearum. Richmond and Sussman (2003) noted that plants<br />

treated with Si before <strong>in</strong>fection displayed an accelerated activation of SAR resistance of the<br />

plant, thereby <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g fungal cell death. In contrast, although some BCAs which can<br />

antagonize the pathogen with<strong>in</strong> one week after application (Sundheim and Krekl<strong>in</strong>g, 1982),<br />

most antagonists require an average of 10-14 d to establish themselves on the phylloplane and<br />

to start their antagonistic activities (Verhaar et al., 1997). Therefore, by the time the BCAs<br />

started their activities, the pathogen could have already covered a large part of the phylloplane,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol less effective. In previous chapters, fast development of the disease versus<br />

slow establishment of the BCAs has been shown to be one of the challenges <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM<br />

with BCAs. To overcome a similar problem, Verhaar et al. (1997) suggested that BCAs<br />

should be used as preventatively (i.e. applied approximately 1 wk before mildew <strong>in</strong>oculation)<br />

or as an early curative treatment (with<strong>in</strong> 2 d after PM <strong>in</strong>oculation).<br />

150


Both BCAs and Si gave some control of PM. Most isolates tested <strong>in</strong> this study showed<br />

promis<strong>in</strong>g performance by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the severity of PM and suppress<strong>in</strong>g its progress. Among<br />

the BCA isolates tested, Isolate EH performed best, provid<strong>in</strong>g disease control that was<br />

comparable to that provided by Si. In spite of fluctuations <strong>in</strong> disease levels between the two<br />

experiments, the relative efficacies of all isolates were almost constant and were less than Si<br />

treatments.<br />

Several researchers have reported that treatments with Si produced promis<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>in</strong><br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g PM of different crops (Bélanger et al., 1995; Guével et al., 2007; Menzies et al.,<br />

1991). However, most of these researchers <strong>in</strong>dicated that the level of control was usually<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete. In contrast to these reports, our results demonstrated the possibility of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

complete control of PM when z<strong>in</strong>nia plants were grown <strong>in</strong> hydroponics supplied with Si.<br />

Unlike hydroponics, where a plant is supplied with a nutrient solution cont<strong>in</strong>uously, <strong>in</strong> most<br />

glasshouses and field trials, Si is usually supplied to plants as a spray or drench, at limited<br />

frequencies per week. Samuels et al. (1991) observed a rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Si-<strong>in</strong>duced resistance<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st PM when cucumber plants grow<strong>in</strong>g with a Si conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g solution were transferred <strong>in</strong>to<br />

a Si-free solution. However, the same plant species supplied with Si cont<strong>in</strong>uously at a<br />

concentration of 100 mg l -1 or higher, showed a reduction <strong>in</strong> PM severity by as much as 98%<br />

(Menzies et al., 1991). Similarly, as much as 100% control was obta<strong>in</strong>ed when z<strong>in</strong>nia plants<br />

were cont<strong>in</strong>uously supplied with Si (50-150 mg l -1 ), lead<strong>in</strong>g to a conclusion that for maximum<br />

disease protection, a cont<strong>in</strong>uous supply of Si is needed. This, accord<strong>in</strong>g to He<strong>in</strong>e et al. (2006),<br />

is because Si-enhanced resistance of plants aga<strong>in</strong>st diseases is l<strong>in</strong>ked to the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of a<br />

high Si status <strong>in</strong> the plant. Another reason for the <strong>in</strong>consistency <strong>in</strong> efficacy of Si is the effect<br />

of the soil. Soil pH and nutritional balance can determ<strong>in</strong>e the availability of Si to the plant. For<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, soils that have large amounts of Fe, Al, and Mn can b<strong>in</strong>d Si and make it unavailable<br />

to the plant (M.D. La<strong>in</strong>g, 2008, pers. comm.).<br />

In this study, complete control of PM was obta<strong>in</strong>ed where plants did not show any symptom of<br />

the disease one week after artificial <strong>in</strong>oculation with the pathogen. Once symptoms of PM<br />

were observed on the leaves, it was not possible to cure the plant completely regardless of the<br />

concentration of Si added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that Si was more effective as<br />

151


protective treatment. Although Si did not provide a complete curative treatment, it kept PM<br />

levels low, probably by <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g resistance of the plants aga<strong>in</strong>st the disease (Bélanger et al.,<br />

2003; Fawe et al., 1998; Liang et al., 2005).<br />

The response of z<strong>in</strong>nia to Si treatment for the management of PM was promis<strong>in</strong>g. To date,<br />

there is no <strong>in</strong>formation on the uptake and accumulation of Si by z<strong>in</strong>nia and subsequent disease<br />

suppression. In Chapter 7, however, we showed that leaves of z<strong>in</strong>nia could accumulate Si to<br />

levels of 10% of dry matter. Although the mode of action by which Si provides its protective<br />

role aga<strong>in</strong>st plant pathogens rema<strong>in</strong>s a controversial issue (Fauteux et al., 2005; Ghanmi et al.,<br />

2004; Rodrigues et al., 2004 and 2005), reports by Ma and Yamaji (2006) <strong>in</strong>dicated that there<br />

is a positive relationship between the amount of Si accumulated <strong>in</strong> the plant and the level of<br />

disease resistance. Therefore, the high level of PM control observed on z<strong>in</strong>nia by Si treatment<br />

could be the result of high uptake and accumulation of the element by this plant species.<br />

The experiments were conducted as a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary test<strong>in</strong>g of both control options and they<br />

were not used together as part of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g the disease because there<br />

was a lack of space <strong>in</strong> the glasshouse. However, given the additive effects of BCAs and Si<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> our previous research, the promis<strong>in</strong>g results obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this study, suggest that coapplication<br />

of these two components should provide better control of PM, lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

growth and quality of z<strong>in</strong>nia plants.<br />

152


8.5 REFERENCES<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Benhamou, N. Menzies, J.G. 2003. Cytological evidence of an active role of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

wheat resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria gram<strong>in</strong>is f.sp. tritici). Phytopathology, 93:<br />

402-412.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: Its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-336.<br />

Boyle, T.H., Wick, R.I. 1996. Responses of Z<strong>in</strong>nia angustifolia x Z. violacea backcross hybrids to<br />

three pathogens. HortScience, 31:851-854.<br />

Bushnell, W.R, Rowell, J.B. 1967. Fluorochemical liquid as a carrier for spores of Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is<br />

and Pucc<strong>in</strong>ia gram<strong>in</strong>is. Plant Disease Report, 51: 447-448.<br />

Dik A.J., Verhaar M.A., Bélanger R.R. 1998. Comparison of three biological control agents aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

cucumber powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) <strong>in</strong> semi-commercial-scale glasshouse<br />

trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104: 413-423.<br />

Fauteux, F., Rémus-Borel, W., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2005. <strong>Silicon</strong> and plant disease resistance<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 249: 1-6.<br />

Fawe, A., Abou-Zaid M., Menzies, J.G., Jeblick, W., Bélanger, R.R. 1998. <strong>Silicon</strong>-mediated<br />

accumulation of flavonoid phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> cucumber. Phytopathology, 88: 396-401.<br />

GenStat. 2006 GenStat Statistical Analysis Software 9th ed. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Oxford, UK<br />

Ghanmi, D., McNally, D.J., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger R.R. 2004. Powdery mildew of<br />

Arabidopsis thaliana: a pathosystem for explor<strong>in</strong>g the role of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant-microbe<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 64: 189-199.<br />

Guével, M.H., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2007. Effect of root and foliar applications of soluble<br />

silicon on powdery mildew control and growth of wheat plants. European Journal of Plant<br />

Pathology, 119:429-436.<br />

Hajlaoui, M.R., Bélanger, R.R. 1991. Comparative effects of temperature and humidity on the activity<br />

of three potential antagonists of rose powdery mildew. European Journal of Plant Pathology,<br />

97: 203-208.<br />

Kamp, M. 1985. Control of Erysiphe cichoracearum on Z<strong>in</strong>nia elegans, with a polymer-based<br />

antitranspirant. HortScience, 20: 879-881.<br />

Liang, Y.C., Sun, W.C., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. Effects of foliar-and root-applied silicon on the<br />

enhancement of <strong>in</strong>duced resistance to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> Cucumis sativus. Plant Pathology<br />

54:678.<br />

153


L<strong>in</strong>derman, S.D., Ewart, LC. 1990. Interspecific hybridization <strong>in</strong> z<strong>in</strong>nia: morphology, cytology, pollen<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation, and powdery mildew resistance. Acta Horticulturae, 272: 41-46.<br />

Ma, J.F., Yamaji, N. 2006. <strong>Silicon</strong> uptake and accumulation <strong>in</strong> higher plants. Trends <strong>in</strong> Plant Science<br />

11: 392-397.<br />

McGrath, M. T., Shishkoff, N. 2001. Resistance to triadimefon and benomyl: dynamics and impact on<br />

manag<strong>in</strong>g cucurbit powdery mildew. Plant Disease, 85: 147-154.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 1996. Increased resistance to triadimefon and to benomyl <strong>in</strong> Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea<br />

populations follow<strong>in</strong>g fungicide usage over one season. Plant Disease, 80: 633-639.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 2001. Fungicide resistance <strong>in</strong> cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences and challenges.<br />

Plant Disease, 85: 236-245.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 1996. Recent advances <strong>in</strong> cultural management of diseases of<br />

greenhouse crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 18:186-193.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Helmer, T., Koch, C., Seywerd, F. 1991. Effects of soluble<br />

silicon on the parasitic fitness of Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea on Cucumis sativus. Phytopathology,<br />

81: 84-88.<br />

Neumann, B.J. 2003. The effects of Trichoderma (Eco-T®) on biotic and abiotic <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong><br />

hydroponic systems. (<strong>PhD</strong> thesis) University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South<br />

Africa.<br />

O'Hara, R.B., Nielsen, B.J., Ostergard, H. 2000. The effect of fungicide dose on the composition of<br />

laboratory populations of barley powdery mildew. Plant Pathology, 49: 558-566.<br />

P<strong>in</strong>to, A.C.R., Rodrigues, T.J.D., Barbosa, J.C. 2005. Benzyladen<strong>in</strong>e sprays and senescent flowers<br />

removal on postproduction performance of potted Z<strong>in</strong>nia ‘Profusion Cherry'. Acta<br />

Horticulturae, 683: 391-398.<br />

Qu<strong>in</strong>n J.A., Powell C.C. 1982. Effects of temperature, light, and relative humidity on powdery mildew<br />

of begonia. Phytopathology, 72: 480-484.<br />

Rémus-Borel, W., Menzies, J.G., Bélanger, R.R. 2005. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong>duces antifungal compounds <strong>in</strong><br />

powdery mildew-<strong>in</strong>fected wheat. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 66:108-115.<br />

Richmond, K., Sussman, M. 2003. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Current<br />

Op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Plant Biology, 6:268-272.<br />

Rodrigues, F.A., McNally, D.J., Datnoff, L.E., Jones, J.B., Labbé, C., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J.G.,<br />

Bélanger, R.R. 2004. <strong>Silicon</strong> enhances the accumulation of diterpenoid phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> rice: a<br />

biochemical mechanism for blast resistance. Phytopathology 94: 177-183.<br />

154


Rodrigues, F.A., Jurick, W.M., II, Datnoff, L.E., Jones, J.B., Roll<strong>in</strong>s, J.A. 2005. <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluences<br />

cytological and molecular events <strong>in</strong> compatible and <strong>in</strong>compatible rice-Magnaporthe grisea<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 66: 144-159<br />

Sakurai, H., Hirata, K. 1959. Some observations on the relation between the penetration hypha and<br />

haustorium of the barley powdery mildew and the host cell. V. Influence of water spray on the<br />

pathogen and the host tissue. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 4: 239–245.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991. Mobility and deposition of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 485-492.<br />

Shaner, G., F<strong>in</strong>ney, R.E., 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slowmildew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resistance <strong>in</strong> Knox wheat. Phytopathology, 67: 1051-1056.<br />

Sivapalan, A. 1993. Effects of water on germ<strong>in</strong>ation of powdery mildew conidia, Mycological<br />

Research, 97: 71-76.<br />

Sundheim, L., Krekl<strong>in</strong>g, T. 1982. Host-parasite relationships of the hyperparasite Ampelomyces<br />

quisqualis and its powdery mildew host Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea: scann<strong>in</strong>g electron<br />

microscopy. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, 104: 202-210.<br />

Urquhart, E.J., Menzies, J.G., Punja, Z.K. 1994. Growth and biological control activity of Tilletiopsis<br />

species aga<strong>in</strong>st powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) on greenhouse cucumber.<br />

Phytopathology, 84:341-351.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1996. Glasshouse experiments on biocontrol of cucumber<br />

powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by the mycoparasites Verticillium lecanii and<br />

Sporothrix rugulosa. Biological Control, 6: 353-360.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Ostergaard, K.K., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1997. Preventative and curative<br />

applications of Verticillium lecanii for biological control of cucumber powdery mildew.<br />

Biocontrol Science and Technology, 7: 543-552.<br />

Wong, F.P., Wilcox, W.F. 2002. Sensitivity to azoxystrob<strong>in</strong> among isolates of Unc<strong>in</strong>ula necator:<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e distribution and relationship to myclobutanil sensitivity. Plant Disease, 86: 394-404.<br />

155


CHAPTER NINE<br />

GENERAL OVERVIEW<br />

The impact of powdery mildew (PM) on crop production and the control strategies that have<br />

been used aga<strong>in</strong>st this disease has been widely covered <strong>in</strong> the literature (Bélanger et al., 1997;<br />

McGrath and Thomas, 1996; Yarwood, 1957 & 1978). Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, reports <strong>in</strong> development of<br />

fungicide resistance by a number of PM species, coupled with public concerns for<br />

environmental and health hazards, have made the use of fungicides less popular. To meet the<br />

need for safe and environmentally friendly control measures, biocontrol agents and soluble<br />

silicon have emerged as viable alternatives that can be used <strong>in</strong>dividually, or comb<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />

other control strategies for <strong>in</strong>tegrated disease management (Bélanger et al., 1997; McGrath,<br />

2001; McGrath et al., 1996).<br />

The use of biological control aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of several species has been well documented<br />

(Bélanger et al., 1997; Jarvis and Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, 1977; Sztejnberg et al., 1989; Verhaar et al., 1996<br />

& 1998). This has resulted <strong>in</strong> development of some promis<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol products on the<br />

market. However, their use has been limited due to their <strong>in</strong>consistency under variable<br />

environmental conditions. To improve the efficacy of biocontrol agents (BCAs), which has<br />

been associated with their specific requirements for specific environmental conditions, various<br />

techniques have been used. To a certa<strong>in</strong> extent, the lack of appropriate screen<strong>in</strong>g protocols,<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>in</strong>sufficient environmental experiments dur<strong>in</strong>g evaluation, and a lack of<br />

knowledge of the modes of action of the specific BCA, have all contributed to this problem.<br />

Similarly, promis<strong>in</strong>g progress has been made <strong>in</strong> the use of soluble silicon (Si) aga<strong>in</strong>st PM and<br />

other diseases (Bélanger et al., 1997; Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1994 & 1999; Ma and Takahashi, 2002). In<br />

some plants, <strong>in</strong>creased growth and yields have been reported as a result of enhanced resistance<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st biotic and abiotic stresses, especially when Si was applied to soils that were deficient<br />

<strong>in</strong> Si (Datnoff et al., 2001). The ability of Si to benefit plants without affect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

environment negatively has made it an “agronomically essential element” (Ma and Takahashi,<br />

2002) or quasi-essential (Epste<strong>in</strong>, 1999). In spite of this, due to the <strong>in</strong>complete and<br />

156


<strong>in</strong>consistent control it provides, the use of Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM and other pathogens has been limited.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> reasons for the low efficacy of Si are a lack of knowledge on the optimum<br />

application conditions (i.e., concentration, frequency and methods of application), mode of<br />

action <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g the disease and the relationship between Si and the plant, and other biotic<br />

and abiotic factors that are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the production system.<br />

The research presented <strong>in</strong> this thesis focused on the isolation and <strong>in</strong> vitro screen<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

antagonists, us<strong>in</strong>g a series of <strong>in</strong> vitro and glasshouses experiments, for the evaluation and<br />

improvement of the efficacy of BCAs and Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM under different environmental<br />

conditions. It was established that:<br />

• At the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary stages, 29 BCA isolates reduced severity of PM by 30-77%. Under<br />

glasshouses and field conditions, five isolates (i.e., Gliocladium roseum (Isolate EH).<br />

Trichothecium roseum (Isolate H20) and 3 isolates of Serratia marcescens (Isolates<br />

B15, Y15 and Y41)) reduced the severity of PM by 50-90%.<br />

• Break-Thru ® (BK) at lower concentrations (i.e., 0.25 ml l -1 ) improved the efficacy of<br />

spray applications of BCAs and Si by enhanc<strong>in</strong>g their deposition on the leaves and the<br />

pathogen, and by directly affect<strong>in</strong>g the pathogen. Break-Thru ® was compatible with<br />

the zucch<strong>in</strong>i and BCA isolates when used at < 0.40 ml l -1 . However, at higher rates, it<br />

was toxic to zucch<strong>in</strong>i and to the BCAs, especially Isolates EH and H20.<br />

• When Si was applied as a foliar treatment, it <strong>in</strong>hibited PM through direct contact with<br />

the pathogen. Efficacy of Si spray was improved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the spray frequency.<br />

Although no Si was absorbed directly through the leaf, part of the foliar treatment was<br />

absorbed by the plant roots as runoff and drift, and played a role <strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g host<br />

resistance of the plant aga<strong>in</strong>st PM.<br />

• The efficacy of Si was better when added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution than when it was<br />

drenched onto roots of plants or sprayed on as a foliar treatment. In all these<br />

application methods, <strong>in</strong>creased concentrations provided better disease control.<br />

Drench<strong>in</strong>g 250 ml (under greenhouse conditions) or 1 l (under field conditions) of Si<br />

at 100 mg l -1 per week provided significant control of PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. Spray<strong>in</strong>g<br />

750 mg l -1 of Si also gave significant reduction <strong>in</strong> the severity of PM. When added <strong>in</strong>to<br />

157


the nutrient solution, 50-150 mg l -1 of Si reduced the severity of PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia by 85-<br />

100%.<br />

• A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of BCAs + Si + BK provided better control of PM under both field and<br />

glasshouse conditions, and can be used for <strong>in</strong>tegrated management of PM.<br />

• Add<strong>in</strong>g KSi <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution <strong>in</strong>creased the levels of Si and K <strong>in</strong> zucch<strong>in</strong>i and<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia. It also enhanced the growth of zucch<strong>in</strong>i without affect<strong>in</strong>g morphological<br />

characteristics of the fruits. However, it did not cause obvious changes to the growth of<br />

z<strong>in</strong>nia plants and their flowers.<br />

• Infections of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia plants with PM resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased uptake of Si and<br />

Ca by these plants, while reduc<strong>in</strong>g their P uptake. However, it did not affect the uptake<br />

of K and Mg <strong>in</strong> these plants.<br />

The development of a proper isolation and <strong>in</strong> vitro screen<strong>in</strong>g protocol that provides rapid,<br />

repeatable and reliable results is an important <strong>in</strong>itial step <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g effective antagonists for<br />

biocontrol of PM. S<strong>in</strong>ce the performance of biocontrol isolates on agar has less predictive<br />

value than <strong>in</strong> vivo tests (Verhaar et al., 1998), the screen<strong>in</strong>g protocol adopted <strong>in</strong> this thesis<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved three components: the biocontrol agent (BCA), the pathogen and the plant itself. If<br />

one of these three components were to be miss<strong>in</strong>g, then the screen<strong>in</strong>g procedure would have<br />

been <strong>in</strong>complete. Isolates that showed consistent results aga<strong>in</strong>st PM of zucch<strong>in</strong>i (P. xanthii)<br />

under different growth conditions also controlled PM of z<strong>in</strong>nia caused by G. cichoracearum,<br />

confirm<strong>in</strong>g a previous hypothesis that if a BCA isolate can antagonize PM of one species of<br />

plant, then it can often be used aga<strong>in</strong>st PM species of different plants (Sztejnburg et al., 1989;<br />

Szentivanyi and Kiss, 2003). The process of screen<strong>in</strong>g and rat<strong>in</strong>g systems followed <strong>in</strong> this<br />

study can serve <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a more comprehensive protocol, especially where isolates are to<br />

be screened aga<strong>in</strong>st obligate pathogens, and their antifungal activity is not noticeable dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

vitro assays.<br />

Clonostachys rosea has been reported as mycoparasite of many fungal species (Kwasna et al.,<br />

1999) and could be used as BCA aga<strong>in</strong>st PM (Sutton and Peng, 1993) and other foliar (Cota et<br />

al., 2008; Morandi et al., 2008; Yu and Sutton, 1997) and root diseases (Tarant<strong>in</strong>o et al.,<br />

2007). Serratia marcescens has been identified as a growth promot<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacterium that<br />

158


produces several antibiotics and can <strong>in</strong>duce resistance of plants aga<strong>in</strong>st several diseases<br />

(Battagl<strong>in</strong>o et al., 1991; Jeun, 2004; Kobayashi et al., 1995; Maji et al., 2003; Ordentlich et<br />

al., 1988; Roberts et al., 2005; Strobel et al., 1999; Sujay et al., 2003; Wei et al., 1996).<br />

Similarly, a report by Iida et al (1996) identified Trichothecium roseum as produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

antifungal antibiotics and <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g host resistances <strong>in</strong> plants. In other research, it has provided<br />

promis<strong>in</strong>g results when tested aga<strong>in</strong>st PM and other diseases (Hijwegen and Buchenauer,<br />

1984; Huang et al., 2000; Vanneste et al., 2002).<br />

All the adjuvants tested (i.e., Break-Thru ® , Partner ® and Tween-80 ® ) improved spray<br />

efficiency of BCAs and Si by enhanc<strong>in</strong>g coverage of the spray and reduc<strong>in</strong>g the total volume.<br />

Both Break-Thru ® and Partner ® suppressed PM directly. However, Break-Thru ® was chosen<br />

for further studies because it was more compatible with our BCAs and the plant. Electron<br />

microscopy <strong>in</strong>vestigations showed that Break-Thru ® <strong>in</strong>creased the deposition of BCAs on the<br />

pathogen and on the leaves. It also <strong>in</strong>hibited germ<strong>in</strong>ation of conidia, and caused the collapse<br />

and dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of conidia and mycelia of the pathogen. The fact that it was biocompatible<br />

at lower dosages provides the opportunity to be used <strong>in</strong> the spray mix <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g PM with<br />

spray applications.<br />

Si was more effective aga<strong>in</strong>st PM when supplied to plants as a nutrient solution <strong>in</strong> a<br />

hydroponics system than when applied as drench or foliar spray. For best PM control, plants<br />

need an un<strong>in</strong>terrupted supply of Si, which was manageable under hydroponics. Regular<br />

drench<strong>in</strong>g of Si onto the roots of plants was also effective <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the severity of PM of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i under both glasshouse and field conditions. When Si is added to the soil as a<br />

fertilizer, it usually improves the resistance of plants aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, and other biotic and abiotic<br />

stresses of the plant, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased growth and yield of the plants. These benefits are<br />

noticeable when the plants are grown under sub-optimal conditions (Datnoff et al., 2001).<br />

However, if the aim is to control PM, then Si should be applied before <strong>in</strong>fection because once<br />

the plant is <strong>in</strong>fected, curative treatment with Si is less effective (Liang et al., 2005). In<br />

addition, cont<strong>in</strong>uity of supply of Si to plants is more important than the total volume or level<br />

of Si <strong>in</strong> the solution. Therefore, to improve the cont<strong>in</strong>uity of plant-available Si <strong>in</strong> the fields,<br />

the development of slow release formulations of Si, or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the application frequencies<br />

159


are recommended. As a foliar treatment, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the concentration and frequency of Si<br />

applications provided the best control of PM. This was partly due to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g availability of<br />

Si to plant roots via drift and runoff. Spray<strong>in</strong>g Si three times per week at lower levels of Si<br />

(i.e., 250mg l -1 ) provided the best results while reduc<strong>in</strong>g the total amount of Si that gave<br />

equivalent PM control when applied once per week. When KSi is used as a foliar treatment<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st PM, Si has been identified as the active <strong>in</strong>gredient of the solution (Menzies et al.,<br />

1992). Direct contact between Si and the pathogen, or the changes <strong>in</strong> osmotic characteristics<br />

of the leaf created by Si deposition, are one of the mechanisms of disease control (Liang et al.,<br />

2005). In addition, <strong>in</strong>creased deposition of Si on the leaf surface can prevent penetration of<br />

fungal hyphae <strong>in</strong>to the host (Bowen et al., 1992). However, there is no evidence that shows<br />

penetration of the leaf surface by Si directly. Therefore, any prim<strong>in</strong>g of resistance of the plant<br />

by foliar applications of Si can only be the result of Si that is absorbed by plant roots after the<br />

element is <strong>in</strong>tercepted by the plant roots as a result of runoff or drift.<br />

Although the use of BCAs and Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM has been studied <strong>in</strong>tensively, there are not many<br />

studies that <strong>in</strong>corporated both control options as part of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated control package.<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong>ations of BCAs and Si were more effective, and should result <strong>in</strong> a better PM control<br />

than when these two control measures are used separately. As expected, better control was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed under both glasshouse and field conditions, when BCAs were applied with Si. The<br />

additive effects were probably due to the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of different modes of action that affect<br />

the pathogen, as opposed to the fewer control mechanisms provided by the BCA or Si. Unlike<br />

most fungicides, Si has a broad spectrum of activities that affect economically important<br />

diseases (Datnoff et al., 2001). Therefore, the use of BCAs and Si for disease control should<br />

be developed and practiced <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tegrated disease management programmes.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> challenge <strong>in</strong> the use of BCAs and Si aga<strong>in</strong>st PM has been the speed of PM<br />

development. In this study, the use of Break-Thru ® at lower concentrations improved the<br />

performances of BCAs and Si spray by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the rate of PM development and contributed<br />

substantially towards an <strong>in</strong>tegrated programme under which BCAs and Si can actually control<br />

this disease. It might be possible to use comb<strong>in</strong>ation of BCAs + Si + Break-Thru ® aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

other foliar diseases of economic crops. Treatment with Si resulted <strong>in</strong> less <strong>in</strong>fection of the<br />

160


plant and the presence of Break-Thru ® weakened the pathogen, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the vulnerability of<br />

the pathogen to attacks by the antagonists. If the comb<strong>in</strong>ation fails, the addition of 1-2 sprays<br />

of effective, systemic fungicides may provide better control, lead<strong>in</strong>g to an <strong>in</strong>tegrated disease<br />

management programme that would m<strong>in</strong>imize the frequency of fungicide application, reduce<br />

the risk of fungicide resistance, and reduce environmental pollution, while provid<strong>in</strong>g a high<br />

level of PM control.<br />

In us<strong>in</strong>g Si, a lack of knowledge on optimum concentrations for optimal disease control and<br />

plant growth, without compromis<strong>in</strong>g quality has been the ma<strong>in</strong> challenge. Epste<strong>in</strong> (1994) and<br />

Feng (2004) have noted that disease resistance is l<strong>in</strong>ked with the amount of Si accumulated by<br />

the plant, which is species and cultivar dependant, and is l<strong>in</strong>ked to the level of physiologically<br />

available Si. Although high levels of Si provide effective PM control, at high concentrations,<br />

Si can reduce the quality of fruits of some crops (Bélanger et al., 1995 & 1997; Lieten et al.,<br />

2002). In this study, the use of Si at 100-150 mg l -1 as a soil drench, or <strong>in</strong> nutrient solutions,<br />

provided effective control of PM on zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia. Increas<strong>in</strong>g the level of Si <strong>in</strong> the<br />

nutrient solution resulted <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> roots and leaves of both plant<br />

species, without affect<strong>in</strong>g its distribution to other parts of these plants. The fact that growth of<br />

zucch<strong>in</strong>i and the uptake of most other elements <strong>in</strong> both plants were optimal when Si was added<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the nutrient solution at 50 mg l -1 showed that, where the likelihood of <strong>in</strong>fection by the PM<br />

fungi is low, then application of Si at lower levels (50 mg l -1 ) can improve growth of the<br />

plant, while m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the cost of Si applications. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce the experiment was<br />

conducted under optimal condition, these results need to be confirmed on different species of<br />

plants grow<strong>in</strong>g under different growth conditions.<br />

Electron microscopic observations on <strong>in</strong>creased accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> the base of trichomes<br />

and around the leaf areas <strong>in</strong>fected by PM confirmed previous reports by Menzies et al. (1991)<br />

and Samuels et al. (1991a & b). The role of Si <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected plant was to prim<strong>in</strong>g defense<br />

mechanisms of the plant (Cherif et al., 1992). Leaves of zucch<strong>in</strong>i and z<strong>in</strong>nia <strong>in</strong>fected by their<br />

respective pathogens accumulated more calcium and less phosphorus than leaves of un<strong>in</strong>fected<br />

plants. Similar observations were reported on other crops <strong>in</strong>fected with different pathogens<br />

(Goodenough and Maw, 2008; Kalamera and Heath, 1998). Cell wall strengthen<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

thickness are some of the functions of Ca (White and Broadley, 2003). However, whether the<br />

161


<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Ca content of <strong>in</strong>fected leaves is related to the expression of the resistance to<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection or not is still not clear.<br />

The way forward<br />

• This study presents some promis<strong>in</strong>g isolates that have the potential to be used aga<strong>in</strong>st PM<br />

and other foliar diseases. Some of them may also be used as growth promoters and <strong>in</strong><br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g the resistance status of the plant (Jeun et al., 2004; Kobayashi et al., 1995; Iida et<br />

al., 1996). However, before these BCAs are developed further for commercialization, a<br />

series of studies is needed to assess their efficacy aga<strong>in</strong>st other pathogens under various<br />

conditions. More <strong>in</strong>vestigations on the formulation, shelf life and cost-benefit analysis of<br />

these isolates are needed before they are released as bio-products. Toxicological studies<br />

will also be essential.<br />

• Most of the trials on Si were conducted under controlled growth conditions, where the<br />

plants were almost free of stresses except for the <strong>in</strong>fection with PM. We believe that effects<br />

of Si would have been more visible if the plants were grown under more stressful<br />

conditions.<br />

• Most available <strong>in</strong>formation on uptake, transportation and accumulation of Si <strong>in</strong> plants are<br />

based on studies conducted <strong>in</strong> monocots. It is not known whether the same pr<strong>in</strong>ciple applies<br />

to dicots or not. S<strong>in</strong>ce the form of Si <strong>in</strong>side the plant is more important than total, more<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations is recommend on dicots <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the mechanisms of uptake and<br />

levels of different forms of Si <strong>in</strong> different plants species.<br />

• In our study, the level of Si application did not cause obvious effects on the quality of the<br />

fruits of zucch<strong>in</strong>i. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce this effect may differ from species to species, it is<br />

important to assess this effect on other crops and determ<strong>in</strong>e the impacts of the fluctuation of<br />

selected nutrients <strong>in</strong> the fruit quality as <strong>in</strong>fluenced by Si application.<br />

• It is only recently that Si has been studied as an option for disease management. It is<br />

concluded that much research is still needed to fully understand the impact of this element<br />

on plant metabolic activities. Even <strong>in</strong> areas where much research has been conducted, e.g.,<br />

disease control mechanisms, there is still much to be learned. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce the effects of<br />

162


Si on plants seemed more complex than it was <strong>in</strong>itially imag<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong>ter-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

research is needed <strong>in</strong> order to exploit the full potential of Si for control of abiotic and biotic<br />

stress, and to prpmote plant growth.<br />

9.1 REFERENCES<br />

Battagl<strong>in</strong>o, R.A., Huergo, M., Pilosof, A.M.R., Bartholomai, G.B. 1991. Culture requirements for the<br />

production of protease by Aspergillus oryzae <strong>in</strong> solid state fermentation. Applied Microbiology<br />

and Biotechnology, 35: 292-296.<br />

Bélanger, R.B., Dik, A.J., Menzies, J.M. 1997. Powdery mildew: Recent advances toward <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

control. In: G.J. Boland and L.D. Kuykendall (Eds.). Plant-Microbe Interactions and Biological<br />

Control. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Pp. 89-109.<br />

Bélanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1995. Soluble silicon: Its role <strong>in</strong> crop and<br />

disease management of greenhouse crops. Plant Disease, 79: 329-336.<br />

Bowen, P., Menzies, J., Ehret, D., Samuels, L., Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Soluble silicon sprays <strong>in</strong>hibit<br />

powdery mildew development on grape leaves. Journal of the American Society for<br />

Horticultural Science, 117: 906-912.<br />

Cherif, M., Menzies, J.G., Benhamou, N., Bélanger, R.R. 1992. Studies of silicon distribution <strong>in</strong><br />

wounded and Pythium ultimum <strong>in</strong>fected cucumber plants. Physiological and Molecular Plant<br />

Pathology, 41: 371-385.<br />

Cota, L.V., Maffia, L.A., Mizubuti, E S.G., Macedo, P.E.F., Antunes, R.F. 2008. Biological control of<br />

strawberry gray mold by Clonostachys rosea under field conditions. Biological Control, 46:<br />

515-522.<br />

Datnoff, L.E., Kenneith, W.S., Fernando, J.C. 2001.The use of silicon for <strong>in</strong>tegrated disease<br />

management: reduc<strong>in</strong>g fungicide applications and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g host plant resistance. In: L.E.,<br />

Datnoff, G.H. Snyder, G.H. Korndörfer (Eds.). <strong>Silicon</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong>. Elsevier Science, The<br />

Netherlands. Pp. 171-184.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon <strong>in</strong> plant biology. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the United States of America, 91: 11-17.<br />

Epste<strong>in</strong>, E. 1999. <strong>Silicon</strong>. Annual Reviews <strong>in</strong> Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50: 641-<br />

664.<br />

Goodenough, P.W., Maw, G.A. 2008. Effects of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici <strong>in</strong>fection on nutrient uptake<br />

by tomato plants. Annals of Applied Biology, 73: 339-347.<br />

163


Hijwegen, T., Buchenauer, H. 1984. Isolation and identification of hyperparasitic fungi associated with<br />

Erysiphaceae. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 90: 79-83.<br />

Huang, H.C., Bremer, E., Hynes, R.K., Erickson, R.S. 2000. Foliar application of fungal biocontrol<br />

agents for the control of white mold of dry bean caused by Sclerot<strong>in</strong>ia sclerotiorum. Biological<br />

Control, 18: 270-276.<br />

Iida, A., Konishi, K., Kubo, H., Tomioka, K., Tokuda, H., Nish<strong>in</strong>o, H. 1996. Trichothec<strong>in</strong>ols A, B and<br />

C, potent anti-tumor promot<strong>in</strong>g sesquiterpenoids from the fungus Trichothecium roseum.<br />

Tetrahedron Letters, 37: 9219-9220.<br />

Jarvis, W.R., Sl<strong>in</strong>gsby, K. 1977. The control of powdery mildew of greenhouse cucumber by water<br />

sprays and Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Disease Reporter, 61: 728-730.<br />

Jeun, Y.C., Park, K.S., Kim, C.H., Fowler, W.D., Kloepper, J.W. 2004. Cytological observations of<br />

cucumber plants dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced resistance elicited by rhizobacteria. Biological Control, 29:<br />

34-42.<br />

Kalamera, D.S., Heath, M.C. 1998. Changes <strong>in</strong> the cytoskeleton accompany<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

nuclear movements and the hypersensitive response <strong>in</strong> plant cells <strong>in</strong>vaded by rust fungi. The<br />

Plant Journal, 16: 191-200.<br />

Kobayashi, D.Y., Guglielmoni, M., Clarke, B.B. 1995. Isolation of the chit<strong>in</strong>olytic bacteria<br />

Xanthomonas maltophilia and Serratia marcescens as biological control agents for summer<br />

patch disease of turfgrass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27: 1479-1487.<br />

Kwasna, H., Dawson, W., Bateman, G.L. 1999. Mycoparasitism of Coemansia species. Mycological<br />

Research, 103: 925-928.<br />

Liang, Y.C., Sun, W.C., Si, J., Romheld, V. 2005. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the<br />

enhancement of <strong>in</strong>duced resistance to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong> Cucumis sativus. Plant Pathology,<br />

54: 678-685.<br />

Lieten, P., Horvath, J., Asard, H. 2002. Effect of silicon on alb<strong>in</strong>ism of strawberry. Acta Horticulturae,<br />

567: 361-364.<br />

Ma, J.F., Takahashi, E. 2002. Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant <strong>Silicon</strong> Research <strong>in</strong> Japan. Elsevier Science,<br />

Amsterdam.<br />

Maji, M.D., Chattopadhyay, S., Kumar, P.M.P., Urs, S.R. 2003. Evaluation of mulberry phylloplane<br />

bacteria for biological control of powdery mildew of mulberry caused by Phyllact<strong>in</strong>ia corylea.<br />

Journal of Mycopathological Research, 41: 197-200.<br />

McGrath, M.T. 2001. Fungicide resistance <strong>in</strong> cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences and challenges.<br />

Plant Disease, 85: 236-245.<br />

164


McGrath, M.T., Staniszewska, H., Shishkoff, N., Casella, G. 1996. Fungicide sensitivity of<br />

Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea populations <strong>in</strong> the United States. Plant Disease, 80: 697-703.<br />

McGrath, M.T., Thomas, C.E., 1996. Powdery mildew. In: T.H. Zitter, D.I. Hopk<strong>in</strong>s, and C.E.<br />

Thomas. Compendium of Cucurbit Disease. APS Press, St. Paul, M<strong>in</strong>nesota, USA. Pp. 28-30.<br />

Menzies, J., Bowen, P., Ehret, D., Glass, A.D. M. 1992. Foliar applications of potassium silicate<br />

reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucch<strong>in</strong>i squash. Journal of<br />

the American Society for Horticultural Science, 117: 902-905.<br />

Menzies, J.G., Ehret, D.L., Glass, A.D.M., Helmer, T., Koch, C., Seywerd, F. 1991. Effects of soluble<br />

silicon on the parasitic fitness of Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea on Cucumis sativus. Phytopathology,<br />

81: 84-88.<br />

Morandi, M.A.B., Mattos, L.P.V., Santos, E.R., Bonugli, R.C. 2008. Influence of application time on<br />

the establishment, survival, and ability of Clonostachys rosea to suppress Botrytis c<strong>in</strong>erea<br />

sporulation on rose debris. Crop Protection, 27: 77-83.<br />

Ordentlich, A., Elad, Y., Chet, I. 1988. The role of chit<strong>in</strong>ase of Serratia marcescens <strong>in</strong> biocontrol of<br />

Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology, 78: 84-88.<br />

Roberts, D.P., Lohrke, S.M., Meyer, S.L.F., Buyer, J.S. Bowers, J.H., Baker, C.J., Li, W., de Souza,<br />

J.T., Lewis, J.A., Chung, S. 2005. Biocontrol agents applied <strong>in</strong>dividually and <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

for suppression of soilborne diseases of cucumber. Crop Protection, 24: 141-155.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991a. Mobility and deposition of silicon <strong>in</strong><br />

cucumber plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14: 485-492.<br />

Samuels, A.L., Glass, A.D.M., Ehret, D.L., Menzies, J.G. 1991b. Distribution of silicon <strong>in</strong> cucumber<br />

leaves dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection by powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea). Canadian<br />

Journal of Botany, 69: 140-146.<br />

Strobel, G., Li, J.Y., Sugawara, F., Kosh<strong>in</strong>o, H., Harper, J., Hess, W.M., 1999. Oocyd<strong>in</strong> A, a<br />

chlor<strong>in</strong>ated macrocyclic lactone with potent anti-oomycete activity from Serratia marcescens.<br />

Microbiology, 145: 3557-3564.<br />

Sujay, R., Mishra, S.K., Bhat, A.I., Sharma, B. 2003. Increase <strong>in</strong> cellular content of chit<strong>in</strong>ase as<br />

response to powdery mildew <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> pea: detection through enzyme l<strong>in</strong>ked immunosorbent<br />

assay (ELISA). Annals of Agricultural Research, 24: 129-132.<br />

Sutton, J.C., Peng, G. 1993. Manipulation and vector<strong>in</strong>g of biocontrol organisms to manage foliage and<br />

fruit diseases <strong>in</strong> cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems. Annual Reviews <strong>in</strong> Phytopathology, 31: 473-493.<br />

Szentivany, O., Kiss, L. 2003. Overw<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g of Ampelomyces mycoparasites on apple trees and other<br />

plants <strong>in</strong>fected with powdery mildew. Plant Pathology, 52: 737-746.<br />

165


Sztejnberg, A., Galper, S., Mazar, S., Lisker, N. 1989. Ampelomyces quisqualis for biological and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated control of powdery mildews <strong>in</strong> Israel. Journal of Phytopathology, 124: 285-295.<br />

Tarant<strong>in</strong>o, P., Caiazzo, R., Carella, A., Lahoz, E. 2007. Control of Rhizoctonia solani <strong>in</strong> a tobacco-float<br />

system us<strong>in</strong>g low rates of iprodione-and iprodione-resistant stra<strong>in</strong>s of Gliocladium roseum.<br />

Crop Protection, 26: 1298-1302.<br />

Vanneste, J.L., Hill, R.A., Kay, S.J., Farrell, R.L. Holland, P.T. 2002. Biological control of sapsta<strong>in</strong><br />

fungi with natural products and biological control agents: a review of the work carried out <strong>in</strong><br />

New Zealand. Mycological Research, 106: 228-232.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1996. Glasshouse experiments on biocontrol of cucumber<br />

powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fulig<strong>in</strong>ea) by the mycoparasites Verticillium lecanii and<br />

Sporothrix rugulosa. Biological Control, 6: 353-360.<br />

Verhaar, M.A., Hijwegen, T., Zadoks, J.C. 1998. Selection of Verticillium lecanii isolates with high<br />

potential for biocontrol of cucumber powdery mildew by means of components analysis at<br />

different humidity regimes. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8: 465-477.<br />

Wei, G., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun, S. 1996. Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased plant growth by plant growth-promot<strong>in</strong>g rhizobacteria under field conditions.<br />

Phytopathology, 86: 221-224.<br />

White, P.J., Broadley, M.R. 2003. Calcium <strong>in</strong> Plants. Annals of Botany 92:487-511.<br />

Yarwood, C.E. 1957. Powdery mildews. The Botanical Review, 23: 235-301.<br />

Yarwood, C.E. 1978. History and taxonomy of powdery mildews. In: D.M. Spencer (Ed.). The<br />

Powdery Mildews. Academic Press, London. Pp. 1-32.<br />

Yu, H., Sutton, J.C. 1997. Effectiveness of bumblebees and honeybees for deliver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>oculum of<br />

Gliocladium roseum to raspberry flowers to control Botrytis c<strong>in</strong>erea. Biological Control,<br />

10: 113-122.<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!