You are on page 1of 7

CONTRACT LAW

INTENTION TO CREATE
LEGAL RELATION
PROF MADYA DR REZIAN-NA
MUHAMMED KASSIM
FACULTY OF SPORT SCIENCE AND
RECREATION

*
INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATION

⮚ A valid contract requires an intention to create legal


relations. The court determines where there is such an
intention from the language used and the context in which it
is used. There are 2 presumptions have developed in the
determination of intention with respect to agreements:

1. Business / Commercial agreements


2. Social, domestic and family agreements

* 2
Cont…
BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL AGREEMENTS
⮚ Presumption: there is an agreement that the parties
intend legal consequences to follow unless the parties
specify otherwise.

WINN v BULL (1877)


• A written agreement for a lease of a house ‘subject to the
preparation and approval of a formal contract’.
• Held:There was no enforceable contract because no
further formal contract was entered into.

* 3
Cont…
SOCIAL, DOMESTIC AND FAMILY AGREEMENTS
✔ In social, domestic or family agreement, it is implied as a
matter of course that no legal relations are contemplated,
but such presumption may be rebuttable.
✔ Normally it does not constitute a legally binding agreement.
This is because parties have no intention to create legal
relation.
Balfour v Balfour [1919]
⮚ The defendant husband was a civil servant stationed in
Sri Lanka. When he was in England, he had promised his
wife that he will pay her a monthly allowance as
maintenance. The wife was unable to accompany the
husband because of her poor health.

*
Cont…
⮚ The defendant did not give the plaintiff the monthly
allowance. The plaintiff brought an action against the
defendant for breach of a contract.
⮚ The court held: it was not a legally enforceable agreement
because the parties did not intend that they should be
attended by legal consequences.
Pettitt v Pettitt [1970]
⮚ Lord Diplock said that : Although many agreements between
spouses are not intended to be legally enforceable,
performance of such agreements may give rise to legal
consequences in other fields of law.

*
Cont… The presumption is rebuttable in the case:

Merrit v Merrit [1970]


⮚ The husband left the matrimonial home which was in the joint
names of husband and wife and subject to a mortgage. The
husband and wife had a discussion in which the husband agreed
to pay the wife £40 a month out of which she should pay the
outstanding mortgage payments and when such payments had
been completed, he would transfer the property to her sole
ownership. The agreement was recorded in writing on a piece
of paper and signed by the husband. Upon completion of the
payment, the husband refused to transfer the house.
⮚ Held: the parties had intended to create legal relations and
accordingly ordered that the house be transferred to the wife.

*
*

You might also like