Next Article in Journal
Flood Forecasting Method and Application Based on Informer Model
Previous Article in Journal
Groundwater Hydrochemistry and Recharge Process Impacted by Human Activities in an Oasis–Desert in Central Asia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Time Series Analysis of Water Quality Factors Enhancing Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs): A Study Integrating In-Situ and Satellite Data, Vaal Dam, South Africa

1
School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, P.O. Box Wits, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
2
Faculty of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, University of Al-Fashir, Al Fashir P.O. Box 125, Sudan
3
Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, USA
4
School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, P.O. Box Wits, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(5), 764; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050764
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2024 / Accepted: 29 February 2024 / Published: 3 March 2024

Abstract

:
The Vaal Dam catchment, which is the source of potable water for Gauteng province, is characterized by diverse human activities, and the dam encounters significant nutrient input from multiple sources within its catchment. As a result, there has been a rise in Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) within the reservoir of the dam. In this study, we employed time series analysis on nutrient data to explore the relationship between HABs, using chlorophyll-a (Chl−a) as a proxy, and nutrient levels. Additionally, Chl−a data extracted from Landsat-8 satellite images was utilized to visualize the spatial distribution of HABs in the reservoir. Our findings revealed that HAB productivity in the Vaal Dam is influenced by the levels of total phosphorus (TP) and organic nitrogen (KJEL_N), which exhibited a positive correlation with chlorophyll-a (Chl−a) concentration. Long-term analysis of Chl−a in-situ data (1986–2022) collected at a specific point within the reservoir showed an average concentration of 11.25 μg/L. However, on certain stochastic dates, Chl−a concentration spiked to very high values, reaching a maximum of 452.8 μg/L, coinciding with elevated records of TP and KJEL_N concentrations on those dates, indicating their effect on productivity levels. The decadal time series and trend analysis demonstrated an increasing trend in Chl−a productivity over the studied period, rising from 4.75 μg/L in the first decade (1990–2000) to 10.51 μg/L in the second decade (2000–2010), and reaching 16.7 μg/L in the last decade (2010–2020). The rising averages of the decadal values were associated with increasing decadal averages of its driving factors, TP from 0.1043 to 0.1096 to 0.1119 mg/L for the three decades, respectively, and KJEL_N from 0.80 mg/L in the first decade to 1.14 mg/L in the last decade. Satellite data analysis during the last decade revealed that the spatial dynamics of HABs are influenced by the dam’s geometry and the levels of discharge from its two feeding rivers, with higher concentrations observed in meandering areas of the reservoir and within zones of restricted water circulation.

1. Introduction

Globally, freshwater resources have been put under increasing pressure due to the rapid increase in the world population and their improvement of living standards [1]. It is indicated that an estimation of more than 83% of land surfaces that are surrounding freshwater systems have been significantly influenced by the footprint of human beings as a response to anthropogenic activities [1,2]. Contaminants from ineffective waste management, pesticides and fertilizers from agricultural areas, pollution from urban, industrial, and domestic wastewater can often be released to ground and surface water [3], and even the landfills or slag heap disposals may release pollutants seeping into nearby water resources [4,5]. The inland freshwater bodies are more vulnerable to such problems of pollution and contamination [6] resulting in the decline of quality and availability. Among the loaded pollutants, some serve as nutrients for the enhancing growth of algae. Such nutrients can be loaded from point or non-point sources, point sources, for example, wastewater treatment plants can easily be recognized and given more attention [7,8]. Non-point sources including urban areas, cultivated lands, natural forests, and pastures are more difficult to recognize and attention should be given to them according to the amounts of nutrients they can potentially release. For example, it was found that the estimated loads of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediments from urban areas and cultivated land are 10 to 100 times greater than idle and forested lands in the Great Lakes catchments of USA and Canada [9].
Eutrophication is a serious freshwater problem caused by the excessive growth of harmful algal blooms (HABs). In recent years, the factors enhancing such blooms have become interesting research subjects. Many studies have been conducted in this field, and most of them were related to the HABs to the loading of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus into the water bodies [10,11].
In Africa, societies are highly dependent on their natural inland freshwater resources creating more pressure on them resulting in significant changes in their water quality [12]. South Africa has over 4000 freshwater storage dams, among which around 700 are public dams controlled and managed by the governments used for domestic, irrigation, and industrial water supply [13], they are underpinning the economic and social development of the country. Despite such a huge number of dams, South Africa is a water-stressed and scarce country facing critical challenges due to poor water management practices, inadequate infrastructure, and a relentless surge in water demands [14]. Owing to the fact that most South African dams are located downstream of metropolitan and urban areas, they have become more enriched with nutrients [4,15]. The climatic conditions of South Africa associated with nutrient loads resulted in extensive and widespread eutrophication and cyanobacterial blooms in the inland freshwater bodies [16,17]. This will continue to increase the cost of using these valuable resources. Nitrogen and phosphorus are considered the leading factors in accelerating the lakes’ and reservoirs’ eutrophication [18]. The Water Act of 1956, Section 21(1) (a) and the Department of Water Affairs in 1980 set exceptional standards of the phosphate concentration for effluent discharged to some mentioned rivers or their tributaries, it promulgated that the phosphate concentration should not be higher than 1 mg/L [14,19]. An investigation was conducted by CSIR and the Department of Water Affairs from 1985 to 1988 to predict the impact of the phosphorus standard (1 mg/L). Based on their findings, the eutrophication control aim was set to maintain the mean concentration of chlorophyll-a within receiving water bodies at the level that no conditions of severe nuisance would occur more than 20% of the time. To achieve this aim, it is required to keep the phosphorus concentration level in the reservoirs water less than 0.14 mg/L [20].
Vaal Dam is one of multiple water bodies affected by eutrophication and cyanobacterial blooms in South Africa. It was constructed by the Department of Irrigation of the national government and functionally completed in October 1936 at 20 km downstream of the confluence of the Vaal and Wilge rivers [21]. It is the second biggest dam by surface area in South Africa (about 320 Km2). The dam has undergone several rises to increase its storage capacity which ended up with a total capacity of approximately 2.603 × 106 m3 [21]. The dam catchment area is approximately 38,000 km2 holding various human activities including major agricultural activities (crop cultivation and cattle grazing), mining, and some industrial activities [22,23] as well as many formal and informal settlements. In many areas within the Vaal Dam catchment, mine dewatering and urban/industrial treated effluent discharges find their way to the streams causing serious water quality issues [22]. Such activities have direct or indirect effects on the dam water quality in terms of nutrient loading which enhances the growth of HABs. A study in 2013 stated that the Vaal Dam Reservoir was classified as a mesotrophic water body according to the South African Department of Water Affairs Classification System, the mean concentration of chlorophyll-a was 14.8 μg/L, the mean total phosphorus concentration was 0.077 mg/L, and the time percentage where chlorophyll-a exceeds 30 μg/L was found was 17% [24].
HABs have major effects on water quality and their aquatic system function; therefore, monitoring of their distribution in space and time is very important for water resources managers to address the issues related to it. Moreover, it is very important to address the question of which factors enhance and control the HABs in the Vaal Dam Reservoir. Historically, many studies were conducted to assess different methods to detect HABs and cyanobacteria in the Vaal Dam Reservoir, for example, an attempt was made to help the managers of the drinking water treatment facility with advanced prediction of Microcystis sp. concentration in the Vaal Dam water, by building a model using physical, chemical, and biological water quality records between 2000 and 2012. The model showed a promising result in estimating Microcystis sp. in 7 days in advance [24]. The composition of the phytoplankton in the reservoir was examined over the course of a year, it was found that Anabaena and Microcystis are the most abundant cyanobacteria that dominate the phytoplankton on the dam reservoir during summer time; during February and March, the study reviled that they are not necessary dominating throughout the year [25]. Few studies were conducted in the Vaal Dam using remote sensing data (Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel 2 MSI), the two sensors have relatively high spatial resolution and a capability to distinguish very small differences in the optics of the water column as a function of water quality parameters such as Chl−a. Sakuno, Y et al., (2018) have obtained a strong correlation between the satellite estimation using unified red-to-near-infrared two-band and three-band models, and the in-situ measurements (see ref. [26]). Another study tested the red-to-near-infrared (NIR-red) bands by means of stepwise logistic regression (SLR) to classify Chl−a concentrations using Landsat 8 data for 2014–2016, the SLR gave overall accuracy ranged between 65 to 80% (see ref. [27]). A comparison of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 was conducted in mapping water quality at Vaal Dam, Sentinel 2 generated better results than Landsat 8 for estimating both chlorophyll-a and turbidity with R2 = 0.86 comparing to 0.68 for Chl−a, and 0.59 and 0.50 for turbidity [26,27,28]. The latest remote sensing-based article published on the Vaal Dam was (Obaid et al., 2021) applied to high-resolution sensors that successfully used both the blue–green and red-infrared OC algorithms in estimating Chl−a concentrations [15,29].
Blue–green algorithms are typically utilized to estimate chlorophyll-a concentration in Case I waters, where water quality is predominantly influenced by phytoplankton [30,31]. However, in Case II waters, where the optical signature is influenced by various water quality constituents, employing blue–green models can result in inaccuracies when estimating chlorophyll-a concentration. The successful use of the blue–green OC algorithm in the Vaal Dam, a Case II water body, may be attributed to the strong signal of HABs arising from the high biomass concentration in the reservoir water column. While previous studies have focused on developing methods to detect HABs and cyanobacterial blooms in the reservoir, none have attempted to uncover the factors contributing to such blooms in terms of nutrient loading and environmental factors.
This study aims to explore the correlation between HABs, nutrients, and environmental factors during peak blooms over recent decades. Historical water quality records from the dam reservoir will be analyzed to investigate this relationship by comparing nutrient levels with measured chlorophyll-a (Chl−a) concentrations, thereby identifying which nutrients contribute to algal bloom enhancement. Additionally, the study seeks to assess the spatial distribution of HABs using Landsat-8 satellite images captured in late summer (April) between 2013 and 2023. This analysis will facilitate the identification of the frequently and most affected areas of the dam reservoir. Leveraging remote sensing techniques provides a synoptic view of HABs’ spatial and temporal distribution, enhancing our understanding of their dynamic variations. This approach has the potential to enable effective monitoring of HABs, utilizing high-resolution data for more precise studies.

2. The Study Area

The Vaal Dam holds water used to supply potable water to the Gauteng metropolitans and its surrounding areas. The Vaal Dam Catchment extends within Free State, Mpumalanga, and Gauteng provinces and drains by the Vaal and Wilge river systems, (Figure 1). The main rivers consist of many tributaries draining different areas in terms of land use land cover types and human activities.
The Waterval River contributes approximately 111 × 106 m3 of water annually to the Vaal River. It drains very active areas holding intense human activities such as agriculture, industry, mining, and urban and rural settlements, mainly in the upper reach of the Waterval River, these activities have been shown to be responsible for the deterioration of the water quality and ecological integrity of the river system [30]. Another active area with mining and industrial activities within the Vaal River site is the Grootdraai Dam catchment, it is found that the greatest area of concern was the region’s closeness to the downstream of the urban, industrial, mining, and cultivated lands cover [31]. These two active areas in terms of land use activities put the Vaal River under more concern about its water quality issues.
The Wilge River system drains areas dominated by agriculture and grasslands, it contributes a great deal of water to the dam from its catchment and from the Lesotho Highland Water Project [32]. The Tugela–Vaal Water Project also contributes a good portion of water to the Vaal Dam via the Wilge and Nuwejaarspruit Rivers [21].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. The Water Quality Data

Historical water quality was obtained from the Department of Water and Sanitation (http://www.dwa.gov.za/iwqs/wms/data/WMA08_reg_WMS_nobor.htm), accessed on 2 January 2023. The data contains chemical and physicochemical water quality parameters from the Vaal Dam Reservoir. Daily water quality data include Chl−a, Total Phosphorus (TP), Dissolved Oxygen (DO), KJEL Nitrogen (KJEL_N), Ammonia Nitrogen (NH4_N), Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen (NO3NO2_N), and water Temperature (Temp) have been downloaded. Some gaps of data missing data existed in some chosen parameters, the records were poor with a big gap noticed between 2000 and 2010 for all-targeted water quality parameters except Chl−a and TP. A good record was only found for the period between 2010 to 2019. Thus, the distribution, time series, and decadal trend plots as well as regressions between the variables were generated using the available data only, no gap-fill approach was applied. The continuous DO records are only available from 2010 to 2019.

3.2. The Satellite Data

Cloud-free Landsat-8 OLI, Level 1 data were downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Explorer website (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/), accessed on 1 March 2023. One image was acquired for each summer season in a year, and a total of eleven images were downloaded covering the period between 2013 and 2023 to understand the spatial dynamics of HABs in the reservoir, specifically, the images acquired in April if available otherwise any summer month. The images were processed using a level−2 generator (l2gen) of the NASA SeaDAS software version 8.3, which is the standard ocean color processing software of NASA. To perform the atmospheric correction, l2gen uses an iterative process to estimate the aerosol radiance, it uses the near-infrared and short-wave infrared to overcome the limitation of dark pixel assumption, and it has proven to give a better result in turbid waters [33]. Landsat 8 OLI bands 865 and 2201 were used in this study for atmospheric correction and then normalized water-leaving radiance (nLw) and remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) have been retrieved in l2gen. All necessary masks have been applied using SeaDAS v.8.3 standard masking to retrieve only the open water body images.

3.3. Data Analysis

Historical in-situ water quality data has been analyzed using statistical methods in R v4.3. The long-term average and the standard deviation (SD) for any single variable have been calculated from the whole data. The SD values have been corrected using a correction factor to obtain the known SD in textbooks. Multiplot types including frequency scatter plots, time series plots, and decadal trend plots have been generated. The variable data have been indexed and matched using the index and match function in an Excel sheet. Then, the above-mentioned plots have been generated. The erratic high values have been excluded from the frequency distribution plots to explore the most frequent values while all data have been included in long-term time series (1986 to 2022), decadal time series, and decadal trend plots. The analysis was performed to understand the changes in the studied parameters. The correlation between these variables has also been evaluated, scatter plots of Chl−a against temperature and the potential nutrients, and between the variables that are well-correlated with Chl−a were plotted to reveal the relationship between such variables. From the perusal of the graph, the extremely high values that show excessive HAB conditions were chosen for detailed analysis alongside their concurrent nutrient concentrations. Since the data were collected over only one point within this large dam reservoir, more understanding of the spatial distribution of HABs was conducted using satellite remote sensing data to explore the spatial change of productivity levels. A simple two-band ratio of blue–green based ocean color algorithm was applied [34] for Vaal Dam water modeling productivity. Level 2 Landsat-8 products obtained from level−2 generator (l2gen) of NASA SeaDAS v8.3 were used for chlorophyll-a retrieval. The ratio of (Rrs560/Rrs443) from our previous work [29] is used in this study, it was successfully used to retrieve Chl−a from Landsat-8 data in the Vaal Dam.

4. Results

Time Series of Targeted Parameters

Time series of the Chl−a, TP, DO, KJEL_N, NH4_N, NO3NO2_N, and temperature have been plotted from 1986 to 2022. The analysis of the data shows that the concentration levels for the targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam ranged from very low values to extremely high recorded values on some stochastic dates. Table 1 summarizes the availability of the data coverage periods and their minimum and maximum recorded values as well as their averages which are calculated from the whole available data. The averages tend to lower values which explains that the extremely high values do not always occur.
The frequency distribution plots (Figure 2) show that most of the Chl−a data are centered near the low-range values, below its average. A similar situation for HN4_N and TP which most of the values fall below 0.1 mg/L and 0.15 mg/L, respectively. Temperature and NO3NO2_N values are distributed stochastically with the most values falling below 20 °C and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. KJEL_N and DO data values have relatively followed the normal distribution and most of the data centered around their averages.
The time series of the temperature showed seasonal variations which have a strong influence on DO levels, the DO concentrations are decreasing during summer months when the temperature and Chl−a are relatively high (Figure 3 and Figure 4c). The Chl−a concentration time series recorded many peak values (Figure 3) on some erratic dates. The time series plots of the TP and KJEL_N also show some recorded high values corresponding to the same dates of Chl−a high values, reaching up to 1.15 mg/L and 18 mg/L for TP and KJEL_N, respectively, mainly during the period between 2015 and 2017 (Figure 4c) and between 2004 and 2008 for phosphorus where it jumped up to 0.75 mg/L (Figure 4b). DO, NO3NO2_N, and NH4_N did not show a clear correlation with the Chl−a time series. But in general, the time series of NO3NO2_N showed low values during the high levels of Chl−a concentrations, and it appears to show a periodic cycle (1.5-year) during the last decade (Figure 3 and Figure 4c).
Figure 4 shows the decadal time series for the targeted parameters. In the period between 1990 to 2000, there were very poor records (Figure 4a) which show relatively low values of chlorophyll-a concentrations except on specific dates. TP and KJEL_N show some high values between 1993 and 1995 but there are no correlated peaks with Chl−a during this period due to the poorness of the records and no matchup in their measuring dates. Between 2000 and 2010 only records for Chl−a and TP were available, some high values were recorded on specific dates (Figure 4b). The best records were found between 2010 and 2018 which covered all targeted parameters (Figure 4c), extremely high values were noticed for some of the targeted parameters during this decade. There are increasing decadal averages of Chl−a, TP, and KJEL_N, while there were decreasing decadal averages of NO3NO2_N and no significant change in the NH4_N decadal average (Table 2).
From the decadal trend analysis (Figure 5a–c), Chl−a shows a decreasing trend during the first decade from 1990 to 2000 with low trend average values ranging from ~5.5 to ~4 μg/L and it remains constant during the second decade from 2000 to 2010 with higher mean trend average value, then it showed an upward trend during the last decade from 2010 to 2020, which raised from ~7 to 30 μg/L. TP average trend levels showed the same pattern as Chl−a, it showed a downward trend from around 0.137 mg/L to around 0.075 mg/L during the first decade and showed a nearly constant trend during the second decade with a trend average value of ~0.11 mg/L before it started showing an upward trend during the last decade, where the trend average value increased from around 0.11 to 0.125 mg/L. KJEL_N and NH4_N followed the same pattern as Chl−a and TP, they showed a downward trend during the first decade from ~0.95 mg/L to ~0.65 mg/L and from around 0.053 mg/L to 0.025 mg/L, respectively, and they showed an upward trend during the last decade, KJEL_N from 0.75 to 1.75 mg/L and NH4_N from ~0.028 to 0.06 mg/L. DO showed a decreasing trend during the last decade which decreased from ~9 to ~7 mg/L. The NO3NO2_N concentration showed an upward average trend during the first decade from ~0.22 to ~0.26 mg/L while remaining nearly constant with an average trend value of around 0.225 mg/L in the last decade. The average trend of temperature shows a slight decrease from ~20 to ~17 °C from 1990 to 2000 and a nearly constant average trend value of ~18 °C from 2010 to 2020.
The regression analysis between the chosen variables showed positive correlations between Chl−a and TP; Chl−a and temperature; Chl−a and KJEL_N, also showed positive correlations between KJEL_N and TP, and KJEL_N and temperature (Figure 6) while s showing negative correlations between Chl−a and DO, Chl−a and NO3NO2_N and between KJEL_N and DO but no correlation between Chl−a and NH4_N (Figure 6).
The satellite-based time series analysis showed the spatial and temporal variability and the HABs dynamics across the dam. The satellite data were normalized to compare the variation between those mentioned on different dates. In general, the images showed high levels of Chl−a concentration which is linked to the summer blooms and the load of nutrients to the system with the summer storm runoff, for example, the image dated 7 February 2016, was captured 10 days after a very high record of Chl−a concentration at the measuring point (452 μg/L). Generally high productivities were seen near the Vaal and Wilge rivers discharge areas in most of the images, also high productivity levels were seen where the reservoir is shallow and meandering (Figure 7).

5. Discussion

The data have been explored to uncover the important water quality properties. The perusal of the graphs reveals some extremely high values as well as some trends, it also reveals the seasonality of temperature and dissolved oxygen. The distribution frequency plot of chlorophyll−a (Figure 2) after excluding the very high values, shows that most of the data is centered near its lower range, below 10 μg/L. This illustrates that most of the time, the chlorophyll−a concentration in this measurement point remains below its average value. Algal blooms are spatially and temporarily varying, it might happen that an excess bloom might occur at the location of the measuring point during the time of sampling. This might explain the extremely high values of Chl−a concentration. The distribution plots of TP, NH4_N, and KJEL_N after removing the very high values, also show that most of the data are centered relatively near their lower values in the reservoir water. Therefore, the extremely high to very high values probably indicate that some types of pollution ended up reaching the reservoir which apparently increases the capacity of the reservoir water to support high rates of biomass productivity during such high nutrient load times.
The productivity in the open water systems is a function of multi biophysical factors, such as light, temperature, nutrients, etc. In many aquatic systems, some limiting nutrients (mainly TP and N) are considered the main drivers of HABs [35,36]. However, the time series plot (Figure 3) showed that TP levels between 1990 and 2022 are relatively low except on some specific dates, a corresponding increase in Chl−a and KJEL_N concentrations at such specific dates were detected, which jumped to extremely high values. These are clearer when we look closely at the decadal time series plots in Figure 4b,c. Thus, this explains that the dam water HABs productivity is primarily driven by TP and KJEL_N when their concentrations suddenly jumped to high values. The water temperature time series in Figure 3 and Figure 4a,c shows no significant change, and its decadal trends show a slightly decreasing trend for the first decade (1990 to 2000) in Figure 5a while showing no increasing or decreasing trend during the last decade (2010–2020) in Figure 5c. The average temperatures for the first and last decades were 17.94 and 18.04 °C, respectively, which suggests a slight increase in the average water temperature between the first and last decades. This situation of increasing the decadal average of Chl−a during the study period while the temperature remains with no significant change suggests that the productivity in the Vaal Dam is not limited to the changes in the temperature during the study period, but its value ranges are ideal for algal growth.
Chl−a decadal trends (Figure 5a–c) showed a slight decrease in the first decade (1990 to 2000) and remained constant within the second decade (2000 to 2010) before it increased noticeably during the last decade (2010 to 2020). The average decadal concentrations were 4.75, 10.51, and 16.7 μg/L, respectively. Such an increasing trend of the Chl−a during the last decade alongside the increasing decadal average through the study period raises a significant warning to the situation of algal blooms in the dam. It will become a serious challenge facing the authorities to control this rising impact of HABs in the future. The significant increases in the Chl−a decadal average might be affected by the erratic extremely high values that occurred at individual dates during the second and third decades, for example, when excluding all Chl−a values above 50 μg/L, the decadal averages will decrease to 6.26 and 10.38 μg/L for the second and third decades, respectively. It still has high jumps on the decadal averages through the last three decades.
TP, KJEL_N, and NH4_N decadal trends followed the same trend behavior of the Chl−a in the first and last decades, where they were associated with general upward and downward trends of Chl−a. The average decadal concentrations of TP were 0.1043, 0.1096, and 0.1119 for the first, second, and third decades, respectively. These concentrations show that the TP concentrations were low except on the above-mentioned individual dates where they jump to high levels greater than the hypertrophic TP threshold level which is 0.25 mg/L [15]. For KJEL_N, the decadal average concentrations were 0.8033 and 1.1417 mg/L for the first and last decade, respectively, and NH4_N were 0.0397 and 0.0431 mg/L, respectively. However, the corresponding behavior of the Chl−a, TP, and KJEL_N decadal trends alongside the erratic high Chl−a values recorded at the same individual dates of very high TP and KJEL_N records, support that they are the driving factors of the algal blooms within the Vaal Dam.
On the other hand, the NO3NO2_N concentrations showed a negative trend compared to the Chl−a decadal trends during the first and last decade and DO also showed a negative trend during the last decade. The NO3NO2 decadal average concentrations were 0.2455 and 0.2248 mg/L, respectively, while the average concentration of DO was 7.928 mg/L. The trend of the DO is well understandable because dissolved oxygen is usually consumed during excessive algal blooms which have been known through the last few decades [37], but this situation might not be applicable to the behavior of NO3NO2_N trends. The analysis of the results suggests that it has no direct relation with the Chl−a trend, but a paper [38] focused on sources and forms of the most important nitrogen substrate for blooms in eutrophic Lake Erie suggested that the NO3 was the most important source of N except in late blooming stages where phytoplankton relays on recycled N derived from dissolved organic nitrogen. Their study further showed that the NO3ˉ depletion was related to the consumption by phytoplankton during its blooms showing a negative relationship. In this study, NO3NO2_N also showed a negative correlation with Chl−a, but the assumption of consumption by the HABs needs more detailed investigations. The regression between the targeted WQ parameters showed a strong correlation between Chl−a and TP, Chl−a and KJEL_N in great agreement with the trend analysis. It also showed a positive correlation between Chl−a and temperature while there was no correlation between Chl−a and NH4_N which explains that NH4_N is not a driving factor for HAB in the Vaal Dam. Like the decadal trend plots, the regression showed a negative correlation between the Chl−a, DO and NO3NO2_N.
The need for more effective monitoring of the temporal and spatial distribution of HABs in the Vaal Dam Reservoir has led to the use of satellite remote sensing techniques. The satellite data gives a synoptic view of the spatial distribution and the temporal frequency of HABs. Thus, it is an effective tool for the detection, mapping, and monitoring of the blooms. The spatial distribution of HABs in the reservoir has been analyzed using Chl−a concentrations derived from satellite data. Despite the presence of only one ground station for validation, the use of remote sensing data is justified based on the robustness of the employed algorithms. The accuracy of the retrieved data have been confirmed through rigorous evaluation of these algorithms. This assessment included correlating the in-situ data point with 16 distinct satellite images obtained across varying dates, seasons, and weather conditions. From each image, a singular value corresponding to the measuring point coordinates was extracted. The resulting R2 value indicates a reasonable fit, thereby affirming the reliability of the algorithms for chlorophyll retrieval in the Vaal Dam. Additionally, the observed accuracy of the retrieved data underscores the effectiveness of this approach, despite the limited number of in-situ data points utilized for evaluation. Notably, observations indicate temporal variations in Chl−a concentrations, including instances of elevated levels of Chl−a concentrations in 2015 and the following summers. Such high concentrations are strongly correlated with the in-situ measured values of Chl−a, TP, and KJEL_N during April and May 2015, and January 2016. High productivity was also noticed in images of 2019, 2021, 2022, and 2023. These high productivities may relate to the periods where TP and KJEL_N levels increase due to the increase in human activities such as the discharge of partially treated or untreated wastewater, or through runoff from urban and agricultural areas around the dam. For example, the media reported some waste found its way to the reservoir on 23 July 2015, a report mentioned that an uncontrolled sewage discharge overwhelmed the Deneysville town which is located on the Vaal Dam bank, just next to the dams wall (https://mg.co.za/article/2015-07-23-sewage-in-gautengs-drinking-water/), accessed 7 March 2023.
The satellite data showed high productivity in the Vaal Dam for the period from 2019 up to 2023 while there are no historical records available on the website during this time, which put some warnings of increasing nutrient loading to the dam reservoir recently. The geometry of the dam and the fluxes of the Vaal and Wilge rivers draining into it are directly linked to the pattern of HAB spatial dynamics, the shallow parts of the dam as well as the meandering areas where the velocity of the water decreases always exhibit relatively high blooms compared with the rest of the dam. Satellite monitoring is useful in detecting the frequency of the blooms. In this study, we processed one image each summer during the last decade, but there is a potential to monitor the spatial and temporal dynamic of the blooms every 16 days using Landsat−8 images only, or shorter intervals if using a harmony of Landsat-8 and Sentinel−2 a and b satellite data.

6. Conclusions

This study revealed that the Vaal Dam productivity is a function of TP and KJEL_N levels. The analyzed data between 1986 and 2018 showed a positive correlation of TP and KJEL_N with chlorophyll-a concentrations. They are the HABs drivers alongside the seasonal effect of surface water temperatures which enhances the productivity levels. When TP and KJEL_N levels are low, the Chl−a concentrations are usually below the threshold level of the eutrophic conditions of 7 μg/L. Chlorophyll-a retrieved from Landsat data showed the temporal and spatial dynamics of HABs over the past decade. Time series analysis of the data has shown the effect of sudden rises of the driving parameters on productivity levels, the productivity increases with an increased flux of TP and KJEL_N. The relatively high concentrations were observed where the reservoir is shallow and meandering and where restricted water circulation occurs due to the low level of mixing and near Vaal and Wilge rivers discharge points. According to the location of the in-situ measurement point, which is in the Vaal River stream near the dam wall, the measured Chl−a concentration might be much less than the concentrations on many other parts of the dam reservoir because the HABs can be washed out by high flow speed. Thus, one measuring point for this large dam is not enough to reveal the overall situation of the chlorophyll-a concentration on the dam, mainly when considering the spatial variations. Therefore, more water quality monitoring points are needed and to be well distributed among the reservoir for a better understanding of the spatial variations and to give valuable information to be used for satellite monitoring algorithm building and adjustments. However, we recognize the inherent limitations of relying on a solitary sample point. Therefore, to enhance the reliability and generalizability of our findings, we emphasize that this approach serves as an initial exploration to provide the general trend of the water quality. However, it also highlights the need for further investigation and data collection to strengthen the robustness of our findings. The results obtained from this time series analysis revealed a high level of anthropogenic impacts on the Vaal Dam which is being used to provide drinking water for Gauteng province, and for agricultural and industrial uses in the region. The periodic deterioration of the quality of the dam water over some stochastic dates was aggravated by the discharge of nutrient-rich, poor-quality effluents from the wastewater treatment works in the dam catchment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.O.; Data curation, A.A.O.; Formal analysis, A.A.O.; Investigation, A.A.O.; Methodology, A.A.O.; Resources, A.A.O.; Software, A.A.O.; Supervision, E.M.A., K.A.A. and T.A.A.; Validation, A.A.O., E.M.A., K.A.A. and T.A.A.; Visualization, A.A.O., E.M.A., K.A.A. and T.A.A.; Writing—original draft, A.A.O.; Writing—review and editing, A.A.O., E.M.A., K.A.A. and T.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are publicly accessible in (http://www.dwa.gov.za/iwqs/wms/data/WMA08_reg_WMS_nobor.htm, accessed on 2 February 2023).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to show their acknowledge and appreciation to the reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Makarigakis, A.K.; Jimenez-Cisneros, B.E. UNESCO’s contribution to face global water challenges. Water 2019, 11, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanderson, E.W.; Jaiteh, M.; Levy, M.A.; Redford, K.H.; Wannebo, A.V.; Woolmer, G. The human footprint and the last of the wild: The human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience 2002, 52, 891–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taheri Tizro, A.; Ghashghaie, M.; Georgiou, P.; Voudouris, K. Time series analysis of water quality parameters. J. Appl. Res. Water Wastewater 2014, 1, 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oberholster, P.J.; Ashton, P.J. State of the nation report: An overview of the current status of water quality and eutrophication in South African rivers and reservoirs. In Parliamentary Grant Deliverable; Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR): Pretoria, South Africa, 2008; p. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oberholster, P.; Botha, A.-M.; Cloete, T. Biological and chemical evaluation of sewage water pollution in the Rietvlei nature reserve wetland area, South Africa. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ho, L.T.; Goethals, P.L. Opportunities and challenges for the sustainability of lakes and reservoirs in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Water 2019, 11, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adu, J.T.; Kumarasamy, M.V. Assessing Non-Point Source Pollution Models: A Review. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Carey, R.O.; Migliaccio, K.W. Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: A review. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sonzogni, W.C.; Chesters, G.; Coote, D.; Jeffs, D.; Konrad, J.; Ostry, R.; Robinson, J. Pollution from land runoff. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaffin, J.D.; Bratton, J.F.; Verhamme, E.M.; Bair, H.B.; Beecher, A.A.; Binding, C.E.; Birbeck, J.A.; Bridgeman, T.B.; Chang, X.; Crossman, J. The Lake Erie HABs Grab: A binational collaboration to characterize the western basin cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms at an unprecedented high-resolution spatial scale. Harmful Algae 2021, 108, 102080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Glibert, P.M.; Maranger, R.; Sobota, D.J.; Bouwman, L. The Haber Bosch–harmful algal bloom (HB–HAB) link. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 105001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Robarts, R.D.; Zohary, T. Limnology and the future of African inland waters. Inland Waters 2018, 8, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hara, M.M.; Backeberg, G.R. An institutional approach for developing South African inland freshwater fisheries for improved food security and rural livelihoods. Water SA 2014, 40, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ewerts, H. Effectiveness of Purification Processes in Removing Algae from Vaal Dam Water at the Rand Water Zuikerbosch Treatment Plant in Vereeniging; North-West University: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ali, K.; Abiye, T.; Adam, E. Integrating In Situ and Current Generation Satellite Data for Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Harmful Algal Blooms in the Hartbeespoort Dam, Crocodile River Basin, South Africa. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matthews, M.W.; Bernard, S. Eutrophication and cyanobacteria in South Africa’s standing water bodies: A view from space. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2015, 111, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mudaly, L.; Van der Laan, M. Interactions between irrigated agriculture and surface water quality with a focus on phosphate and nitrate in the middle olifants catchment, South Africa. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beaulac, M.N.; Reckhow, K.H. An Examination of Land Use-Nutrient Export Relationships 1. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1982, 18, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Walmsley, R. A Review and Discussion Document: Perspectives on Eutrophication of Surface Waters: Policy or Research Needs in South Africa. 2002. Available online: https://www.wrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/KV-129-00.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  20. Van Ginkel, C. Eutrophication: Present reality and future challenges for South Africa. Water SA 2011, 37, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haarhoff, J.; Tempelhoff, J. Water supply to the Witwatersrand (Gauteng) 1924–2003. J. Contemp. Hist. 2007, 32, 95–114. [Google Scholar]
  22. Obaid, A.; Adam, E.; Ali, K.A. Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Vaal Dam Catchment, South Africa: A Study Based on Remote Sensing and Time Series Analysis. Geomatics 2023, 3, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du Plessis, A. Freshwater Challenges of South Africa and Its Upper Vaal River; Springer Cham: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Swanepoel, A.; Barnard, S.; Recknagel, F.; Cao, H. Evaluation of models generated via hybrid evolutionary algorithms for the prediction of Microcystis concentrations in the Vaal Dam, South Africa. Water SA 2016, 42, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chinyama, A.; Snyman, J.; Ochieng, G.M.; Nhapi, I. Occurrence of cyanobacteria genera in the Vaal Dam: Implications for potable water production. Water SA 2016, 42, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sakuno, Y.; Yajima, H.; Yoshioka, Y.; Sugahara, S.; Abd Elbasit, M.A.; Adam, E.; Chirima, J.G. Evaluation of unified algorithms for remote sensing of chlorophyll-a and turbidity in Lake Shinji and Lake Nakaumi of Japan and the Vaal Dam Reservoir of South Africa under eutrophic and ultra-turbid conditions. Water 2018, 10, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Malahlela, O.E.; Oliphant, T.; Tsoeleng, L.T.; Mhangara, P. Mapping chlorophyll-a concentrations in a cyanobacteria-and algae-impacted Vaal Dam using Landsat 8 OLI data. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2018, 114, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bande, P.; Adam, E.; Elbasit, M.; Adelabu, S. Comparing Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 in mapping water quality at Vaal dam. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain, 22–27 July 2018; pp. 9280–9283. [Google Scholar]
  29. Obaid, A.; Ali, K.; Abiye, T.; Adam, E. Assessing the utility of using current generation high-resolution satellites (Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8) to monitor large water supply dam in South Africa. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2021, 22, 100521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gyedu-Ababio, T.; Van Wyk, F. Effects of human activities on the waterval river, Vaal river catchment, South Africa. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2004, 29, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. du Plessis, A.; Harmse, T.; Ahmed, F. Predicting water quality associated with land cover change in the Grootdraai Dam catchment, South Africa. Water Int. 2015, 40, 647–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Matete, M.; Hassan, R. Integrated ecological economics accounting approach to evaluation of inter-basin water transfers: An application to the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ilori, C.O.; Pahlevan, N.; Knudby, A. Analyzing Performances of Different Atmospheric Correction Techniques for Landsat 8: Application for Coastal Remote Sensing. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. O’Reilly, J.E.; Werdell, P.J. Chlorophyll algorithms for ocean color sensors-OC4, OC5 & OC6. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 229, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Welch, E.B.; Cooke, G.D. Internal phosphorus loading in shallow lakes: Importance and control. Lake Reserv. Manag. 2005, 21, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gholizadeh, M.H.; Melesse, A.M.; Reddi, L. A comprehensive review on water quality parameters estimation using remote sensing techniques. Sensors 2016, 16, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Welch, E.B. Factors Initiating Phytoplankton Blooms and Resulting Effects on Dissolved Oxygen in Duwamish River Estuary, Seattle, Washington; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kharbush, J.J.; Robinson, R.S.; Carter, S.J. Patterns in sources and forms of nitrogen in a large eutrophic lake during a cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2023, 68, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The location map of the Vaal Dam.
Figure 1. The location map of the Vaal Dam.
Water 16 00764 g001
Figure 2. Frequency distribution plots of targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam: (a) Temperature; (b) Dissolved oxygen; (c) Chlorophyll-a; (d) Total phosphorus; (e) Organic nitrogen; (f) Ammonia; and (g) Nitrate and Nitrite. The extreme values falling outside whiskers of the boxplots represented by black dots.
Figure 2. Frequency distribution plots of targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam: (a) Temperature; (b) Dissolved oxygen; (c) Chlorophyll-a; (d) Total phosphorus; (e) Organic nitrogen; (f) Ammonia; and (g) Nitrate and Nitrite. The extreme values falling outside whiskers of the boxplots represented by black dots.
Water 16 00764 g002aWater 16 00764 g002b
Figure 3. Time series of the targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam.
Figure 3. Time series of the targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam.
Water 16 00764 g003
Figure 4. Decadal time series of the targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam (a) first decade 1990–2000, (b) second decade 2000–2010, and (c) third decade 2010–2020.
Figure 4. Decadal time series of the targeted water quality parameters in the Vaal Dam (a) first decade 1990–2000, (b) second decade 2000–2010, and (c) third decade 2010–2020.
Water 16 00764 g004aWater 16 00764 g004b
Figure 5. Decadal trends of Chl−a, TP, DO, NO3NO2_N, NH4_N, KJEL_N, and Temperature in the Vaal Dam. (ac) showing the decadal trends for the first, second, and third decades respectively.
Figure 5. Decadal trends of Chl−a, TP, DO, NO3NO2_N, NH4_N, KJEL_N, and Temperature in the Vaal Dam. (ac) showing the decadal trends for the first, second, and third decades respectively.
Water 16 00764 g005aWater 16 00764 g005b
Figure 6. Scatter plots between Chl−a and various water quality parameters; (a) Chl−a vs. TP; (b) Chl−a vs. KJEL_N; (c) Chl−a vs. temperature; (d) Chl−a vs. DO; (e) Chl−a vs. NO3NO2; and (f) Chl−a vs. NH4. The trend lines (red) showing the relationship between the two variables composing the scatter plot.
Figure 6. Scatter plots between Chl−a and various water quality parameters; (a) Chl−a vs. TP; (b) Chl−a vs. KJEL_N; (c) Chl−a vs. temperature; (d) Chl−a vs. DO; (e) Chl−a vs. NO3NO2; and (f) Chl−a vs. NH4. The trend lines (red) showing the relationship between the two variables composing the scatter plot.
Water 16 00764 g006
Figure 7. Productivity in the Vaal Dam between 2013 and 2023 from Landsat.
Figure 7. Productivity in the Vaal Dam between 2013 and 2023 from Landsat.
Water 16 00764 g007aWater 16 00764 g007b
Table 1. Summary of the availability periods and the characteristics of the targeted WQ parameters.
Table 1. Summary of the availability periods and the characteristics of the targeted WQ parameters.
ParameterData AvailabilityMinimum ValueMaximum ValueAverageStandard Deviation
Chl−a1986–20220.5 μg/L452.8 μg/L11.25 μg/L34.72
TP1986–20220.01 mg/L1.4 mg/L0.113 mg/L0.121
DO2010–20184.98 mg/L19.31 mg/L7.9 mg/L1.615
KJEL_N1986–20180.05 mg/L18.058 mg/L0.94 mg/L1.352
NH4_N1977–20180.02 mg/L0.28 mg/L0.046 mg/L0.029
NO3NO2_N1968–20180.02 mg/L0.921 mg/L0.27 mg/L0.201
Temperature1968–2018 18 °C4.160
Table 2. The decadal averages of the studded water quality parameters.
Table 2. The decadal averages of the studded water quality parameters.
Decades
WQ Parameter
1st Decade
(1990–2000)
2nd Decade
(2000–2010)
3rd Decade
(2010–2020)
Chl−a (μg/L)4.7510.5116.7
TP (mg/L)0.10430.10960.1119
KJEL_N (mg/L)0.8-1.14
NO3NO2_N (mg/L)0.246-0.225
NH4_N (mg/L)0.04-0.043
DO (mg/L)- -7.93
Temp. (°C)17.9-18
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Obaid, A.A.; Adam, E.M.; Ali, K.A.; Abiye, T.A. Time Series Analysis of Water Quality Factors Enhancing Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs): A Study Integrating In-Situ and Satellite Data, Vaal Dam, South Africa. Water 2024, 16, 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050764

AMA Style

Obaid AA, Adam EM, Ali KA, Abiye TA. Time Series Analysis of Water Quality Factors Enhancing Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs): A Study Integrating In-Situ and Satellite Data, Vaal Dam, South Africa. Water. 2024; 16(5):764. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Obaid, Altayeb A., Elhadi M. Adam, K. Adem Ali, and Tamiru A. Abiye. 2024. "Time Series Analysis of Water Quality Factors Enhancing Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs): A Study Integrating In-Situ and Satellite Data, Vaal Dam, South Africa" Water 16, no. 5: 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop