Next Article in Journal
Innate Immune Memory in Monocytes and Macrophages: The Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Atherosclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
eIF4A/PDCD4 Pathway, a Factor for Doxorubicin Chemoresistance in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 24
10.3390/cells11244071
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Biological Effect of Small Extracellular Vesicles on Colorectal Cancer Metastasis

by
Xiaoxing Wang
1,2,
Defa Huang
1,2,
Jiyang Wu
1,2,
Zhengzhe Li
1,2,
Xiaomei Yi
1,2 and
Tianyu Zhong
1,2,*
1
The First School of Clinical Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China
2
Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(24), 4071; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244071
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Metabolism)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignancy that seriously threatens human health, and metastasis from CRC is a major cause of death and poor prognosis for patients. Studying the potential mechanisms of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) in tumor development may provide new options for early and effective diagnosis and treatment of CRC metastasis. In this review, we systematically describe how sEVs mediate epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), reconfigure the tumor microenvironment (TME), modulate the immune system, and alter vascular permeability and angiogenesis to promote CRC metastasis. We also discuss the current difficulties in studying sEVs and propose new ideas.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract with a high incidence and mortality rate. Recent statistics show that approximately 9,300,000 new cases of CRC occur worldwide each year, and that it has the second highest mortality rate (9.4%) of all cancers [1]. Metastasis is the spread of cancer cells to surrounding or distant organs and is a sign of poor prognosis. During this process, the normal colorectal mucosal epithelium is transformed to hyperproliferative epithelial cells by multiple factors, leading to the development of CRC. When they lose their normal tissue structure, hyperproliferative intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) form adenomas which invade the underlying mucosa and surrounding tissues to become cancerous [2]. Metastasis is an inefficient process because most cancer cells do not acquire the necessary capacity to regenerate tumors at distant sites. To be able to metastasize, cancer cells must invade surrounding tissues, survive in circulation, colonize distant organs and eventually grow in other organs [3]. In addition to direct cell–cell contact, abnormally proliferating tumor cells promote tumor growth and development by releasing large amounts of substances that cause epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) of the intestinal epithelium and colonization of distant organs via the circulation [4]. EMT has been proved to play a key role in the metastasis cascade of epithelial carcinoma. The tumor microenvironment (TME) promotes cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by recruiting immunosuppressive cells, remodeling the extracellular matrix, and promoting angiogenesis [5]. In addition, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) promote cancer development, progression and metastasis through intercellular communication with cancer cells [6]. Increased vascular permeability and angiogenesis are the main bases for tumor growth and metastasis [7]. These factors interact and ultimately promote CRC metastasis. The five-year survival rate for regional CRC is approximately 72%; however, metastasis reduces the survival rate to 15% [8]. Metastasis is a key factor affecting CRC treatment and prognosis, and patients who develop metastasis have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis [9]. Exploring the mechanisms by which metastasis occurs in CRC may provide new treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are the major component of extracellular vesicles (EVs), which range in size from 30 to 150 nm. sEVs originate from endosomes and are formed by the fusion of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) with the plasma membrane. MVBs contain intraluminal vesicles that are released into the extracellular lumen when these MVBs fuse with the plasma membrane [10,11]. The biogenesis of EVs is regulated primarily through endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) or lipid ceramides [12]. The surface and interior of sEVs membranes are rich in proteins and consist mainly of nonspecific and specific proteins. Non-specific proteins include members of the four transmembrane protein family (CD9, CD63, CD81), membrane fusion and transport-related proteins such as Alix, TSG101, and cytoskeletal proteins such as microtubulin and troponin. These not only maintain the stability of the structure and function of sEVs, but also act as surface protein markers in the sorting and identification of sEVs [13,14]. The specific proteins are a class of sEV proteins involved in the physiologic and pathologic processes of the organism, and they play an important role in the development of specific diseases [15]. During sEV formation and secretion, lipids, proteins, nucleic acids, and other components are carried from the donor cell to the recipient cell [16]. sEVs can transport biomolecules from tissues to body fluids [17] and through body fluids to distant tissues and organs. These properties contribute to the role of sEVs in intercellular communication, where signaling molecules shuttle between nearby and remote cells, increasing the invasive capacity of tumor cells and promoting tumor metastasis. There is growing evidence that sEVs are critical factors mediating cancer metastasis [18,19]. Through sEVs, highly metastatic tumor cells can transfer biomolecules to less malignant cells, which then may begin to display enhanced migratory and metastatic behavior.
Several studies have shown that differential expression of sEV content is closely associated with CRC metastasis and plays an important role in the multi-step and multi-linked metastatic process [20,21,22]. Tumor-associated sEVs promote tumor cell metastasis and xenotropic colonization through various mechanisms such as influencing tumor cells to undergo EMT, suppressing tumor immunity, promoting generation of the pre-metastatic ecological niche, and increasing vascular leakage [23,24,25]. Other mechanisms are summarized in Figure 1. Compared with healthy individuals, sEVs are more abundantly expressed in the circulation, bodily fluids, and local tissues of cancer patients, providing an important biological basis for tumorigenesis and progression [26]. Therefore, this paper highlights evidence showing that sEVs affect CRC metastasis by mediating EMT, remodeling the TME, macrophage M2 polarization, and increasing vascular leakage and angiogenesis. We also summarize the potential mechanisms of sEVs in CRC development to provide new ideas for early and effective diagnosis and treatment options for CRC metastases.

2. Small Extracellular Vesicles Affect Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Remodeling the Tumor Microenvironment

CRC cells undergo a series of complex and highly regulated processes as they metastasize to surrounding and distant organs and tissues. The TME plays a crucial role in the process of tumor metastasis. The TME refers to the surrounding microenvironment where tumor cells exist, and includes surrounding blood vessels, immune cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, various signaling molecules, and the extracellular matrix (ECM) [27]. The fundamental role of TME is to interact dynamically with malignant tumor cells [28]. TME promotes tumor cell proliferation and metastasis by recruiting immunosuppressive cells, remodeling the ECM, and promoting angiogenesis [5]. sEVs are currently thought to regulate the TME by playing a key signaling mediator role (Table 1). Tumor cells secrete sEVs that act on various cells in the TME, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and local immune cells, to induce a pro-tumor phenotype in different cells. Then, the tumor-affected cells release sEVs, which in turn increase the motility and invasive potential of tumor cells, promote angiogenesis and the formation of pre-metastatic ecological sites, and facilitate drug resistance. Through these and other mechanisms, sEVs promote the tumor metastasis cascade [29].
It was found that sEVs derived from highly metastatic CRC cells enriched in miR-181a-5p-activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) by activating the IL6/STAT3 signaling pathway, acting directly on suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) and causing TME remodeling. Activated HSCs release C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20), which upregulates miR-181a-5p expression in CRC via the ERK/Elk-1 pathway. In addition, sEVs enable a positive feedback loop between CRC cells and HSCs, ultimately leading to CRC liver metastasis (CRLM) [30]. Exposure to sEVs from highly metastatic CRC cells was shown to increase the invasive and metastatic capacity of primary CRC cells, and both in vivo and in vitro experiments have demonstrated that sEVs derived from highly metastatic CRC cells mediated hypo-metastasis through metastases-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1). MALAT1 mediates fucosyltransferase 4 (FUT4)-related glycosylation in hypometastatic colorectal cancer cells and activates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, affecting the tumor microenvironment and allowing CRC to metastasize [31].
CRC cells originate from sEVs that highly express circPACRGL. CircPACRGL has been shown to enhance CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via the miR-142-3p/miR-506-3p-TGF-β1 axis. It also modulates N1-N2 neutrophil differentiation and regulates the differentiation of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) in the TME, allowing immunosuppression to occur and providing an important basis for CRC metastasis [32]. CRC cell-derived HSPC111-containing sEVs alter lipid metabolism by increasing the levels of acetyl coenzyme A in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), ultimately promoting pre-metastatic niche formation and CRLM. This demonstrates that CRC-derived sEVs are key mediators in establishing the pre-metastatic niche to promote CRC cell liver metastasis [33]. The CRC-derived sEVs deliver miR-221/222, which plays an important role in promoting the liver-specific metastasis of CRC by remodeling the hepatic microenvironment. sEVs secreted by CRC transport miR-221/222 to hepatic stromal cells and activate hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) by inhibiting serine peptidase inhibitor and Kunitz type 1 (SPINT1) expression. This induces the formation of a suitable metastatic and colonization environment for incoming metastatic tumor cells, thus contributing to CRC metastasis [34]. CRC cell-derived miR-146a-5p and miR-155-5p can be taken up by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) via sEVs and act through the JAK2-STAT3/NF-KB signaling pathway to suppress suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) and zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 2 protein (ZBTB2). This allows activated CAFs to further potentiate the invasive capability of CRC cells. Mechanistic studies revealed that levels of inflammation-related cytokines IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, transforming growth factor, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) increased significantly in CAFs transfected with miR-146a-5p and miR-155-5p. This triggered mesenchymal transformation and pre-metastatic conversion of CRC cells, ultimately causing CRC lung metastasis. These data were further confirmed in animal studies [35]. SEVs derived from CRC cells overexpressing cationic amino acid transporter 1 (CAT1) significantly enhanced the growth of vascular endothelial cells and tubular formation, promoted angiogenesis, and accelerated CRC metastasis by regulating cGMP metabolism and up-regulating arginine transport and downstream nitric oxide metabolism [36]. The formation of pre-metastatic ecotone is an important factor involved in tumor metastasis. It was shown that CRC cells release integrin beta-like 1 (ITGBL1)-rich sEVs into the circulation by stimulating tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3)-mediated nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathway activation in distant fibroblasts. The activated fibroblasts induced the formation of the pre-metastatic niche and promoted metastatic cancer growth by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g, IL-6 and IL-8) [37]. MicroRNA-21-5p (miR-21) is highly expressed in colorectal cancer-derived sEVs, polarizes hepatic macrophages to an interleukin 6 (IL-6) producing phenotype via toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), induces the formation of an inflammatory microenvironment, and promotes CRC liver-specific metastasis [38].
Hypoxic CRC cells secrete sEVs that promote the migration and invasion of normoxic CRC cells. These hypoxic CRC cell-derived sEVs were found to contain Wnt4, which affects hypoxic extracellular vesicle-mediated migration and invasion of normoxic CRC cells, enhances pro-metastatic behaviors, and further mediates CRC metastasis [39]. sEVs derived from CAF cell culture supernatants highly expressing circEIF3K mediate hypoxic CRC progression and metastasis via the circEIF3K/miR-214/PD-L1 axis [40]. To further demonstrate the effect of sEVs on CRC metastasis in the tumor microenvironment, Qu et al. conducted in vivo experiments and found that knockdown of circN4BP2L2 in CAF-derived sEVs inhibited subcutaneous tumorigenesis and liver metastasis in CRC nude mice [41].

3. Small Extracellular Vesicles Mediate Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition Affecting Colorectal Cancer Metastasis

Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a key role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. During EMT, epithelial tumor cells undergo marked morphological and phenotypic changes, including loss of tight junctions, cell polarity, and cytoskeletal reorganization, including a more aggressive phenotype [42]. In addition, tight junction proteins regulate para-cellular permeability and maintain cell polarity [43]. The absence of tight junction proteins can lead to the development of EMT and further promote cancer progression [44,45]. Evidence suggests that the expression of Claudin-2 in small extracellular vesicles of patient blood origin can be a relevant prognostic biomarker for predicting the development of replacement type liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer [46]. EMT is thought to be a prerequisite for causing initial tumor cells to become motile and aggressive, leading to metastasis and recurrence of many cancer types [47]. Many studies have demonstrated that during the progression of many types of cancer such as lung, bladder, and liver cancer, tumor-associated sEVs carry and release a variety of active components such as miRNAs, proteins, and circRNAs into the surrounding cells. This further promotes the metastasis of tumor cells by causing EMT of the recipient cells through various pathways [24,48,49]. In addition, sEVs affect the EMT of recipient cells and play an important role in CRC metastasis (Table 2).
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key stromal cells that play a dominant role in tumor progression. Researchers have co-cultured sEVs derived from CAFs with CRC cells. CRC cells internalized sEVs containing miR-92a-3p, leading to a significant increase in the level of miR-92a-3p in CRC cells. In addition, sEVs from CAFs with high miR-92a-3p expression activated the Wnt/βcatenin pathway in CRC cells, inhibiting mitochondrial apoptosis by directly inhibiting FBXW7 and MOAP1 expression and promoting EMT in CRC cells, thus further facilitating metastasis [50].
Another study showed that sEVs derived from metastatic SW620 CRC cells targeted RAS p21 protein activator 1 (RASA1) via miR-335-5p. Downregulation of RASA1 in CRC cells activated signaling downstream of RAS and induced EMT, further promoting CRC cell invasion and metastasis [51]. High levels of plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) in serum-derived sEVs from patients with distant CRC metastases, as well as treatment of CRC cells with sEVs expressing PVT1, increased intracellular expression of EGFR and VEGFA and promoted EMT [52]. Additionally, high expression of miR-106b-3p in serum-derived sEVs from CRC patients with distant metastases led to downregulation of deleted in liver cancer 1 (DLC-1) in tumor cells and ultimately inhibited CRC metastasis [53]. HCT-8 colorectal cancer cells actively secreted miR-210-containing sEVs to promote the expression of key EMT proteins (E-cadherin-negative and vimentin-positive). Additionally, miR-210-containing sEVs have been found to promote EMT, thereby promoting CRC metastasis [54].
Studies have shown that co-culture of LO2 hepatocytes and phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL-3) overexpressing CRC cells induced the re-expression of E-cadherin in CRC cells. The re-expression of E-cadherin is an important marker for the development of EMT in CRC. In addition, Src plays an important role in regulating EMT through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [55]. The above evidence suggests that hepatocytes can mediate the roles of E-cadherin and Src in the epithelial mesenchymal transition process of colorectal carcinogenesis, providing a new potential mechanism of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. To investigate the mechanism by which hepatocytes affect the development of liver metastasis in colorectal carcinoma, Xu et al. found that sEVs from hepatocytes inhibited Src expression and EGFR activation in CRC cells via miR-203a-3p and promoted E-cadherin re-expression, thereby inducing EMT. These related studies reveal a mechanism of liver metastasis in CRC cells and provide a comprehensive understanding of CRC liver metastasis [56].
High expression of integrin alpha6 (ITGA6) activated TGF-1 in CRC cells to promote CRC progression and metastasis. MiR-3940-5p in mesenchymal stem cell-derived sEVs promoted the progression and metastasis of CRC by downregulating ITGA6 in CRC cells. Reduced ITGA6 levels disrupted the TGF-β1 signaling pathway, inhibiting CRC cell invasion and EMT, and ultimately reducing tumor growth and metastatic capacity [57]. HCT116 cells were induced to undergo EMT following treatment with IL-6, and purified HCT116 cell supernatant-derived sEVs were found to overexpress miR-128-3p in the vesicles. MiR-128-3p overexpressed sEVs were subsequently transferred to normal HCT-116 target cells, which induced EMT via TGF-β/SMAD and JAK/STAT signaling and further promoted the development of distant CRC metastasis [58].

4. Small Extracellular Vesicles Promote Macrophages to Undergo M2 Polarization Affecting Colorectal Cancer Metastasis

Tumor-associated macrophages are derived from circulating peripheral blood monocytes, which are derived from the bone marrow. These monocytes are recruited into tumor tissues and undergo local differentiation in response to various cytokines, chemokines and growth factors produced by stromal and tumor cells in the TME, affecting tumor progression [59]. TAMs have two opposing phenotypes: M2 subtype macrophages exhibit pro-tumor activity and M1 subtype cells have anti-tumor activity. When CRC cells interact with M2 subtype TAMs, M2 TAMs can induce EMT in tumor cells by secreting IL-6, which promotes CRC metastasis. In addition, EMT-programmed CRC cells can activate the expression of different cytokines (e.g, CCL2 and IL-4) in cancer cells to enhance macrophage recruitment and promote M2 polarization [60,61]. sEVs secreted by tumor cells are taken up by macrophages and differentiated into tumor-associated macrophages of the M2 phenotype, which promotes tumor growth and immunosuppression [62]. Here, we summarize the relevant studies showing that sEVs promote CRC metastasis through M2 polarization of macrophages (Table 3).
Tumor-derived sEVs high in miR-934 can promote CRLM by regulating the interaction between CRC cells and TAMs. Studies have shown that tumor–TAM interactions in the metastatic microenvironment are mediated by tumor-derived sEVs and affect CRLM. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression and activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway induce M2 macrophage polarization. Polarized M2 macrophages can induce pre-metastatic niche formation and promote CRLM by secreting C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) [63]. CRC cell-derived sEVs translocate lncRNARPPH1 into macrophages and mediate their M2 polarization, thereby promoting CRC cell metastasis and proliferation [64]. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-overexpressing CRC cells deliver multiple miRNAs (miR-25-3p, miR-130b-3p and miR-425-5p) to macrophages via sEVs, causing M2 polarization of macrophages via the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. This promotes EMT and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), enhancing CRC metastasis [65]. In addition, one study found that lncRNA HLA-F-AS1 promoted profilin 1 (PFN1) expression in CRC-sEVs by suppressing miR-375, thereby polarizing macrophages toward the M2 phenotype and exacerbating CRC tumorigenesis and metastasis [66]. CRC-sEVs activated macrophage nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) signaling and promoted secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). NOD1-activated macrophages also promoted CRC cell metastasis [67]. Takano et al. found that sEVs carrying miR-203 from CRC cells were integrated into monocytes and promoted the expression of M2 markers. Studies have also demonstrated that miR-203 promoted the differentiation of monocytes to M2 TAMs. In a xenotransplantation mouse model, more liver metastases occurred in mice bearing CRC cells transfected with miR-203 compared to controls. Additionally, ex vivo experiments elucidated that sEVs of CRC cell origin promoted M2 polarization of macrophages via miR-203, laying the foundation for CRC liver metastasis [68]. Similarly, Wang et al. found that M2-type macrophage-derived sEVs transported miR-21-5p and miR-155-5p into CRC cells, allowing miRNA targeting to the BRG1 coding sequence, downregulating BRG1 expression and promoting CRC metastasis [69].
In addition to CRC cell-derived sEVs, CRC cells with EMT function can also promote CRC metastasis by causing M2 polarization in macrophages. It was found that EMT-CRC cell-derived extracellular vesicles highly expressing microRNA-106b-5p promoted M2 polarization of macrophages by directly inhibiting activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) γ/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway at the post-transcriptional level of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4). Activated M2 macrophages promoted EMT-mediated migration, invasion and metastasis of CRC cells in a positive feedback manner [70]. In addition, TP53 mutants (mutp53) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of most human cancers. Specific gain-of-function (GOF) mutp53 proteins do not exhibit the tumor suppressor activity of the wild-type proteins. Colon cancer cells carrying GOF mutp53 selectively shed miR-1246-rich sEVs and promote macrophage M2 polarization to promote colorectal cancer metastasis [71].

5. Small Extracellular Vesicles Increase Vascular Leakage and Angiogenesis to Promote Colorectal Cancer Metastasis

Tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis depend on angiogenesis for adequate oxygen and nutrient supply to the tumor cells. Moreover, disruption of vascular integrity and the consequent increase in vascular permeability allows EMT tumor cells to enter the vasculature and subsequently metastasize. sEVs secreted by cancer cells have been reported to be taken up by neighboring or distant receptor cells to promote tumor development and metastasis. They play an important role in tumor angiogenesis and vascular leakage [72,73,74]. Table 4 summarizes mechanistic studies showing that sEVs affect CRC metastasis by increasing vascular leakage and angiogenesis.
Angiopoietin-like protein 1 (ANGPTL1) protein levels were found to be significantly downregulated in sEVs from CRC tissues compared to paired normal tissues. sEVs with downregulated ANGPTL1 decreased matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) levels in Kupffer cells (KCs) by inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway, preventing hepatic vascular leakage and ultimately inhibiting the development of liver metastasis in CRC [75]. Zeng et al. found that CRC cell-derived sEVs carrying miR-25-3p targeted Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) to regulate the expression of VEGFR2, ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-5 in endothelial cells, thereby promoting vascular permeability and angiogenesis. In vivo assays demonstrated that miR-25-3p-containing sEVs significantly induced vascular leakage and enhanced CRC metastasis in mouse liver and lung tissues. Furthermore, the expression level of miR-25-3p in circulating sEVs was significantly higher in CRC patients with metastasis than in those without metastasis. This suggests that sEVs with high miR-25-3p expression can ultimately lead to distant CRC metastasis by increasing vascular permeability and promoting angiogenesis [76]. It has been reported that CRC-sEVs target suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in endothelial cells via miR-221-3 to regulate the STAT3/VEGFR-2 signaling axis. This leads to promotion of endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and formation of vascular-like structures, ultimately affecting CRC metastasis [77]. It was demonstrated that early growth response-1 (Egr-1) activation in endothelial cells is associated with the angiogenic activity of CRC cell-derived sEVs. Activation of Egr-1 by CRC cell-derived sEVs was shown to promote endothelial cell migration and induce angiogenesis via the ERK1/2 and JNK signaling pathways [78].
In addition, researchers found that sEVs secreted by EMT-CRC cells further disrupted endothelial cell junctions by transferring miR-27b-3p into vascular endothelial cells and attenuating vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-Cad) and p120-catenin (p120) expression in a post-transcriptional manner. This negatively affected cell integrity, increased vascular permeability and ultimately induced cancer metastasis [79]. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene plays a key role in the pathogenesis of CRC. Xie et al. found that sEVs from CRC cells with lncRNA-APC1 silencing promoted angiogenesis and CRC metastasis by activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in vascular endothelial cells [80].

6. Discussion

Because sEVs are formed by the fusion of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) with the plasma membrane, they serve as important carriers of intercellular information and participate in a variety of physiological activities of the body, playing a crucial role in pathological states. Most studies have focused on the role of sEVs in the development of cancer, diagnosis, drug delivery, and prognosis. During the development of malignant tumors, sEVs play a role in the regulation of the local microenvironment by carrying and transporting tumor cell content, tumor-associated fibroblasts, and tumor-associated immune cells, which are important to the regulation of tumor development in target cells. They release their content after binding to target cells, causing an intracellular cascade reaction. Cancer metastasis is a process involving the spread of cancer cells from primary lesions to distant organs and is a major cause of cancer lethality. Numerous studies have demonstrated that sEVs contribute to tumor metastasis by promoting EMT of tumor cells, inducing angiogenesis, promoting vascular leakage, establishing a pre-metastatic microenvironment, immunomodulation and forming a pre-metastatic ecological niche during cancer metastasis [81,82]. Being involved in every step of the tumor cell metastasis process, sEVs provide a new direction for the study of cancer metastasis and clinical translational research. sEVs play an important role in the development and progression of CRC, and many investigators have conducted exploratory studies on sEVs as important components of the TME in the context of early diagnosis and treatment of CRC. However, the specific mechanisms involved in tumor progression remain unclear [83,84]. Many questions regarding the mechanisms of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles in CRC metastasis remain. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of sEV use in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer is sub-optimal. Existing techniques for the isolation of small extracellular vesicles, such as ultracentrifugation and size exclusion, fail to achieve ideal purity and yield. In addition, characterization methods and storage stability are also important issues in the clinical application of sEVs [85,86]. Further, due to the heterogeneity of sEVs, specific tools for differentiating sEVs from different intracellular origins are under development. This is needed to properly assess the molecular mechanisms of biogenesis and secretion as well as the respective functions of EV subtypes [87].
Regarding the function of sEVs in promoting cancer metastasis through immunomodulation, previous researchers have mainly focused on cancer-derived sEVs that exert tumor–host immunosuppressive functions and promote tumor progression by binding to and altering the biological functions of surface receptors on natural killer cells, dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes, and mast cells [88,89,90]. Recently, studies have focused on the mechanisms through which sEVs induce differentiated macrophages to form M2-type tumor-associated macrophages, providing new evidence for immunotherapy in cancer [91].
We have summarized mechanistic studies showing how sEVs induce macrophages to undergo M2 polarization, and thus disrupt anti-tumor immunity and enable CRC to metastasize. We have also discussed sEV-induced inhibition of M2 polarization to reduce colorectal cancer metastasis. Therefore, sEVs are a promising new target that may be used to reduce colorectal cancer metastasis. This will be the focus of our future research.
In this review, we provide a detailed summary of how sEVs mediate the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, reconfigure the tumor microenvironment, modulate the immune system, and alter vascular permeability and angiogenesis to promote CRC metastasis. Importantly, these studies have identified several sEVs components such as microRNA, circRNA, lncRNA, and proteins highly associated with CRC metastasis. This work improves our understanding of the role of sEVs in the development of CRC and provides a basis for subsequent studies. Greater attention to the mechanisms of small extracellular vesicles in tumor progression and efforts in translational medicine research will provide a richer foundation for the clinical role of sEVs in the early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.
In conclusion, sEVs play an important role in CRC metastasis, and an in-depth exploration of the function of sEVs in metastasis will help identify early therapeutic approaches for CRC. Through summarizing the currently available studies, we have increased the understanding of how sEVs promote metastasis and organotropism. The translation of this knowledge is very useful for clinical cancer treatment. Future studies should focus on examining whether sEVs from metastatic CRC sites facilitate further metastatic tumor formation in other distant organs. Seeking answers to these questions will not only increase our understanding of sEVs in CRC biology but also provide important evidence for much-needed novel therapies for advanced CRC. Furthermore, increasing the number of studies focused on sEVs and CRC metastasis will facilitate the development of sEVs as a biomarker for metastatic CRC.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, X.W.; writing—review and editing, D.H., J.W., X.Y., Z.L. and T.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82260422), Key R&D Planning Project of Jiangxi Science and Technology Commission, China (No. 20203BBGL73126).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Terzić, J.; Grivennikov, S.; Karin, E.; Karin, M. Inflammation and colon cancer. Gastroenterology 2010, 128, 2101–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tauriello, D.V.; Calon, A.; Lonardo, E.; Batlle, E. Determinants of metastatic competency in colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2017, 11, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Weinberg, R.A. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer: Complexity and opportunities. Front. Med. 2018, 12, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kasprzak, A. The Role of Tumor Microenvironment Cells in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Cachexia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, M.; Su, Z.; Barnie, P.A. Crosstalk among colon cancer-derived exosomes, fibroblast-derived exosomes, and macrophage phenotypes in colon cancer metastasis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 81, 106298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yehya, A.H.S.; Asif, M.; Petersen, S.H.; Subramaniam, A.V.; Kono, K.; Majid, A.M.S.A.; Oon, C.E. Angiogenesis: Managing the Culprits behind Tumorigenesis and Metastasis. Medicina 2018, 54, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Xue, M.; Pan, X. ELTD1 promotes invasion and metastasis by activating MMP2 in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 3048–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reed, S.L.; Escayg, A. Extracellular vesicles in the treatment of neurological disorders. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 157, 105445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiao, Y.; Zhong, J.; Zhong, B.; Huang, J.; Jiang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Sun, J.; Dai, L.; Yang, C.; et al. Exosomes as potential sources of biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020, 476, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kenific, C.M.; Zhang, H.; Lyden, D. An exosome pathway without an ESCRT. Cell Res. 2020, 31, 105–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hou, R.; Li, Y.; Sui, Z.; Yuan, H.; Yang, K.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y. Advances in exosome isolation methods and their applications in proteomic analysis of biological samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 5351–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, X.; Deng, K. Research progress of exosomal proteomics in cancer diagnosis based on mass-spectrometic technique. Int. J. Lab. Med. 2021, 42, 2009–2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Qiu, G.; Zheng, G.; Ge, M.; Wang, J.; Huang, R.; Shu, Q.; Xu, J. Functional proteins of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Smollar, J.; Mao, W.; Wan, Y. The roles of small extracellular vesicles in lung cancer: Molecular pathology, mechanisms, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2021, 1876, 188539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Feng, M.; Ma, J.; Li, J.; Yang, X.; Fang, F.; Xia, Q.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Exosome-mediated secretion of LOXL4 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, J.; Ren, L.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Y.; Fu, W.; Yi, J.; Wang, J.; Du, G. The biology, function, and applications of exosomes in cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 2783–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seibold, T.; Waldenmaier, M.; Seufferlein, T.; Eiseler, T. Small Extracellular Vesicles and Metastasis-Blame the Messenger. Cancers 2021, 13, 4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Miguel Pérez, D.; Rodriguez Martinez, A.; Ortigosa Palomo, A.; Delgado Ureña, M.; Garcia Puche, J.L.; Robles Remacho, A.; Exposito Hernandez, J.; Lorente Acosta, J.A.; Ortega Sánchez, F.G.; Serrano, M.J. Extracellular vesicle-miRNAs as liquid biopsy biomarkers for disease identification and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, D.; Chen, C.; Cui, M.; Zhang, H. miR-140-3p inhibits colorectal cancer progression and its liver metastasis by targeting BCL9 and BCL2. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 3358–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, J.; Lu, Z.; Fu, W.; Lu, K.; Gu, X.; Xu, F.; Dai, J.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, J. Exosome-Derived ADAM17 Promotes Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 734351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.-Y.; Tao, Y.-W.; Gao, S.; Li, P.; Zheng, J.-M.; Zhang, S.-E.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Y. Cancer-associated fibroblasts contribute to oral cancer cells proliferation and metastasis via exosome-mediated paracrine miR-34a-5p. eBioMedicine 2018, 36, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Song, Q.; Yu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Han, J.; Li, K.; Zhuang, J.; Lv, Q.; Yang, X.; Yang, H. Bladder cancer-derived exosomal KRT6B promotes invasion and metastasis by inducing EMT and regulating the immune microenvironment. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 20, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Morrissey, S.M.; Zhang, F.; Ding, C.; Montoya-Durango, D.E.; Hu, X.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, F.; Fox, M.; Zhang, H.-G.; et al. Tumor-derived exosomes drive immunosuppressive macrophages in a pre-metastatic niche through glycolytic dominant metabolic reprogramming. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 2040–2058.e2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kalluri, R.; LeBleu, V.S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 2020, 367, eaau6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tan, H.-Y.; Wang, N.; Lam, W.; Guo, W.; Feng, Y.; Cheng, Y.-C. Targeting tumour microenvironment by tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Farazi, P.A.; DePinho, R.A. Hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis: From genes to environment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Forder, A.; Hsing, C.; Trejo Vazquez, J.; Garnis, C. Emerging Role of Extracellular Vesicles and Cellular Communication in Metastasis. Cells 2021, 10, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, S.; Mi, Y.; Zheng, B.; Wei, P.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Cai, S.; Li, X.; Li, D. Highly-metastatic colorectal cancer cell released miR-181a-5p-rich extracellular vesicles promote liver metastasis by activating hepatic stellate cells and remodelling the tumour microenvironment. J Extracell. Vesicles 2022, 11, e12186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, B.; Pan, S.; Liu, Q.; Shan, Y.; Li, S.; Qi, Y.; Huang, Y.; Jia, L. Exosomal MALAT1 sponges miR-26a/26b to promote the invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer via FUT4 enhanced fucosylation and PI3K/Akt pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shang, A.; Gu, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Sun, J.; Zeng, B.; Chen, C.; Chang, W.; Ping, Y.; Ji, P.; et al. Exosomal circPACRGL promotes progression of colorectal cancer via the miR-142-3p/miR-506-3p- TGF-β1 axis. Mol. Cancer. 2020, 19, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; He, T.C.; Han, J.H.; Zhang, R.; Lin, J.; Fan, J.; Lu, L.; Zhu, W.W.; et al. Cancer-derived exosomal HSPC111 promotes colorectal cancer liver metastasis by reprogramming lipid metabolism in cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tian, F.; Wang, P.; Lin, D.; Dai, J.; Liu, Q.; Guan, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Exosome-delivered miR-221/222 exacerbates tumor liver metastasis by targeting SPINT1 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2021, 112, 3744–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Si, M.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Cui, S.; Qu, X.; Yu, X. Exosomal miR-146a-5p and miR-155-5p promote CXCL12/CXCR7-induced metastasis of colorectal cancer by crosstalk with cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ikeda, A.; Nagayama, S.; Sumazaki, M.; Konishi, M.; Fujii, R.; Saichi, N.; Muraoka, S.; Saigusa, D.; Shimada, H.; Sakai, Y.; et al. Colorectal Cancer-Derived CAT1-Positive Extracellular Vesicles Alter Nitric Oxide Metabolism in Endothelial Cells and Promote Angiogenesis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2021, 19, 834–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ji, Q.; Zhou, L.; Sui, H.; Yang, L.; Wu, X.; Song, Q.; Jia, R.; Li, R.; Sun, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Primary tumors release ITGBL1-rich extracellular vesicles to promote distal metastatic tumor growth through fibroblast-niche formation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shao, Y.; Chen, T.; Zheng, X.; Yang, S.; Xu, K.; Chen, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, L.; Shen, Y.; Wang, T.; et al. Colorectal cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles establish an inflammatory premetastatic niche in liver metastasis. Carcinogenesis 2018, 39, 1368–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, Z.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Yang, F.; Feng, Y. Exosomes Derived from Hypoxic Colorectal Cancer Cells Transfer Wnt4 to Normoxic Cells to Elicit a Prometastatic Phenotype. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 2094–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, K.; Zhang, J.; Bao, C. Exosomal circEIF3K from cancer-associated fibroblast promotes colorectal cancer (CRC) progression via miR-214/PD-L1 axis. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, K.; Zhang, F.; Luo, B.; Qu, Z. CAFs-derived small extracellular vesicles circN4BP2L2 promotes proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer via miR-664b-3p/HMGB3 pathway. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2022, 23, 404–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tang, Q.; Chen, J.; Di, Z.; Yuan, W.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Z.; Han, S.; Liu, Y.; Ying, G.; Shu, X.; et al. TM4SF1 promotes EMT and cancer stemness via the Wnt/β-catenin/SOX2 pathway in colorectal cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bazzoni, G.; Dejana, E. Endothelial cell-to-cell junctions: Molecular organization and role in vascular homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 869–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kumar, B.; Ahmad, R.; Giannico, G.A.; Zent, R.; Talmon, G.A.; Harris, R.C.; Clark, P.E.; Lokeshwar, V.; Dhawan, P.; Singh, A.B. Claudin-2 inhibits renal clear cell carcinoma progression by inhibiting YAP-activation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ahmad, R.; Kumar, B.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Muller, D.; Lele, S.M.; Washington, M.K.; Batra, S.K.; Dhawan, P.; Singh, A.B. Loss of claudin-3 expression induces IL6/gp130/Stat3 signaling to promote colon cancer malignancy by hyperactivating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Oncogene 2017, 36, 6592–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tabaries, S.; Annis, M.G.; Lazaris, A.; Petrillo, S.K.; Huxham, J.; Abdellatif, A.; Palmieri, V.; Chabot, J.; Johnson, R.M.; Van Laere, S.; et al. Claudin-2 promotes colorectal cancer liver metastasis and is a biomarker of the replacement type growth pattern. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ombrato, L.; Nolan, E.; Kurelac, I.; Mavousian, A.; Bridgeman, V.L.; Heinze, I.; Chakravarty, P.; Horswell, S.; Gonzalez-Gualda, E.; Matacchione, G.; et al. Metastatic-niche labelling reveals parenchymal cells with stem features. Nature 2019, 572, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.; Sai, B.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Li, G.; Tang, J.; Xiang, J. Hypoxic BMSC-derived exosomal miRNAs promote metastasis of lung cancer cells via STAT3-induced EMT. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Liu, L.; Liao, R.; Wu, Z.; Du, C.; You, Y.; Que, K.; Duan, Y.; Yin, K.; Ye, W. Hepatic stellate cell exosome-derived circWDR25 promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via the miRNA-4474-3P-ALOX-15 and EMT axes. Biosci. Trends 2022, 16, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, J.L.; Wang, W.; Lan, X.L.; Zeng, Z.C.; Liang, Y.S.; Yan, Y.R.; Song, F.Y.; Wang, F.F.; Zhu, X.H.; Liao, W.J.; et al. CAFs secreted exosomes promote metastasis and chemotherapy resistance by enhancing cell stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sun, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, W.; Zhu, W.; Fang, D.; Luo, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, L. Exosome-transmitted miRNA-335-5p promotes colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis by facilitating EMT via targeting RASA1. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 24, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lai, S.W.; Chen, M.; Bamodu, O.A.; Hsieh, M.S.; Huang, T.Y.; Yeh, C.T.; Lee, W.H.; Cherng, Y.G. Exosomal lncRNA PVT1/VEGFA Axis Promotes Colon Cancer Metastasis and Stemness by Downregulation of Tumor Suppressor miR-152-3p. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 9959807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mannavola, F.; Pezzicoli, G.; Tucci, M. DLC-1 down-regulation via exosomal miR-106b-3p exchange promotes CRC metastasis by the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 955–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Bigagli, E.; Luceri, C.; Guasti, D.; Cinci, L. Exosomes secreted from human colon cancer cells influence the adhesion of neighboring metastatic cells: Role of microRNA-210. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2016, 17, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Vu, T.; Datta, P. Regulation of EMT in Colorectal Cancer: A Culprit in Metastasis. Cancers 2017, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Xu, H.; Lan, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Su, P.; Chu, Z.; Lai, W.; Chu, Z. The mechanisms of colorectal cancer cell mesenchymal-epithelial transition induced by hepatocyte exosome-derived miR-203a-3p. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, T.; Wan, Y.; Su, Z.; Li, J.; Han, M.; Zhou, C. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomal microRNA-3940-5p Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Targeting Integrin α6. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 66, 1916–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bai, J.; Zhang, X.; Shi, D.; Xiang, Z.; Wang, S.; Yang, C.; Liu, Q.; Huang, S.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. Exosomal miR-128-3p Promotes Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Colorectal Cancer Cells by Targeting FOXO4 via TGF-β/SMAD and JAK/STAT3 Signaling. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 568738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aras, S.; Zaidi, M. TAMeless traitors: Macrophages in cancer progression and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 1583–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wei, C.; Yang, C.; Wang, S.; Shi, D.; Zhang, C.; Lin, X.; Liu, Q.; Dou, R.; Xiong, B. Crosstalk between cancer cells and tumor associated macrophages is required for mesenchymal circulating tumor cell-mediated colorectal cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer. 2019, 18, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lin, X.; Wang, S.; Sun, M.; Zhang, C.; Wei, C.; Yang, C.; Dou, R.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, B.J. miR-195-5p/NOTCH2-mediated EMT modulates IL-4 secretion in colorectal cancer to affect M2-like TAM polarization. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pritchard, A.; Tousif, S.; Wang, Y.; Hough, K.; Khan, S.; Strenkowski, J.; Chacko, B.K.; Darley-Usmar, V.M.; Deshane, J.S. Lung Tumor Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote M2 Macrophage Polarization. Cells 2020, 9, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhao, S.; Mi, Y.; Guan, B.; Zheng, B.; Wei, P.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-934 induces macrophage M2 polarization to promote liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liang, Z.X.; Liu, H.; Wang, F.W.; Xiong, L.; Zhou, C.; Hu, T.; He, X.W.; Wu, X.J.; Xie, D.; Wu, X.R.; et al. LncRNA RPPH1 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by interacting with TUBB3 and by promoting exosomes-mediated macrophage M2 polarization. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Si, M.; Yang, J.; Sun, S.; Wu, H.; Cui, S.; Qu, X.; Yu, X. Exosome-encapsulated miRNAs contribute to CXCL12/CXCR4-induced liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by enhancing M2 polarization of macrophages. Cancer Lett. 2020, 474, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, W. LncRNA HLA-F-AS1 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by inducing PFN1 in colorectal cancer-derived extracellular vesicles and mediating macrophage polarization. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021, 28, 1269–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wei, X.; Ye, J.; Pei, Y.; Wang, C.; Yang, H.; Tian, J.; Si, G.; Ma, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, G. Extracellular vesicles from colorectal cancer cells promote metastasis via the NOD1 signalling pathway. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2022, 11, e12264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Takano, Y.; Masuda, T.; Iinuma, H.; Yamaguchi, R.; Sato, K.; Tobo, T.; Hirata, H.; Kuroda, Y.; Nambara, S.; Hayashi, N.; et al. Circulating exosomal microRNA-203 is associated with metastasis possibly via inducing tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 78598–78613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lan, J.; Sun, L.; Xu, F.; Liu, L.; Hu, F.; Song, D.; Hou, Z.; Wu, W.; Luo, X.; Wang, J.; et al. M2 Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Promote Cell Migration and Invasion in Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Yang, C.; Dou, R.; Wei, C.; Liu, K.; Shi, D.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Q.; Wang, S.; Xiong, B. Tumor-derived exosomal microRNA-106b-5p activates EMT-cancer cell and M2-subtype TAM interaction to facilitate CRC metastasis. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 2088–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cooks, T.; Pateras, I.S.; Jenkins, L.M.; Patel, K.M.; Robles, A.I.; Morris, J.; Forshew, T.; Appella, E.; Gorgoulis, V.G.; Harris, C.C. Mutant p53 cancers reprogram macrophages to tumor supporting macrophages via exosomal miR-1246. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. He, L.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, X. Ovarian cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-205 promotes metastasis by inducing angiogenesis. Theranostics 2019, 9, 8206–8220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, B.; Chen, J.; Shang, F.; Lian, M.; Shen, X.; Fang, J. Tumor-Derived Exosome FGD5-AS1 Promotes Angiogenesis, Vascular Permeability, and Metastasis in Thyroid Cancer by Targeting the miR-6838-5p/VAV2 Axis. J. Oncol. 2022, 2022, 4702855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wu, X.G.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, Y.M.; Yan, R.M.; Wei, W.F.; Chen, X.J.; Yi, H.Y.; Liang, L.J.; Fan, L.S.; Liang, L.; et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-221-3p promotes angiogenesis by targeting THBS2 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Angiogenesis 2019, 22, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jiang, K.; Chen, H.; Fang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhong, C.; Bu, T.; Dai, S.; Pan, X.; Fu, D.; Qian, Y.; et al. Exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuates colorectal cancer liver metastasis by regulating Kupffer cell secretion pattern and impeding MMP9 induced vascular leakiness. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zeng, Z.; Li, Y.; Pan, Y.; Lan, X.; Song, F.; Sun, J.; Zhou, K.; Liu, X.; Ren, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-25-3p promotes pre-metastatic niche formation by inducing vascular permeability and angiogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Dokhanchi, M.; Pakravan, K.; Zareian, S.; Hussen, B.M.; Farid, M.; Razmara, E.; Mossahebi-Mohammadi, M.; Cho, W.C.; Babashah, S. Colorectal cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles transfer miR-221-3p to promote endothelial cell angiogenesis via targeting suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. Life Sci. 2021, 285, 119937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yoon, Y.J.; Kim, D.K.; Yoon, C.M.; Park, J.; Kim, Y.K.; Roh, T.Y.; Gho, Y.S. Egr-1 activation by cancer-derived extracellular vesicles promotes endothelial cell migration via ERK1/2 and JNK signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Dou, R.; Liu, K.; Yang, C.; Zheng, J.; Shi, D.; Lin, X.; Wei, C.; Zhang, C.; Fang, Y.; Huang, S.; et al. EMT-cancer cells-derived exosomal miR-27b-3p promotes circulating tumour cells-mediated metastasis by modulating vascular permeability in colorectal cancer. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, F.-W.; Cao, C.-H.; Han, K.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Cai, M.-Y.; Xiang, Z.-C.; Zhang, J.-X.; Chen, J.-W.; Zhong, L.-P.; Huang, Y.; et al. APC-activated long noncoding RNA inhibits colorectal carcinoma pathogenesis through reduction of exosome production. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 727–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. SE, W. Extracellular Vesicles and Metastasis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2020, 10, a037275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mo, Z.; Cheong, J.; Xiang, L.; Le, M.T.N.; Grimson, A.; Zhang, D.X. Extracellular vesicle-associated organotropic metastasis. Cell Prolif. 2021, 54, e12948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wei, R.; Chen, L.; Qin, D.; Guo, Q.; Zhu, S.; Li, P.; Min, L.; Zhang, S. Liquid Biopsy of Extracellular Vesicle-Derived miR-193a-5p in Colorectal Cancer and Discovery of Its Tumor-Suppressor Functions. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, Q.; Liu, R.X.; Chan, K.W.; Hu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wei, L.; Tan, H.; Yang, X.; Liu, H. Exosomal transfer of p-STAT3 promotes acquired 5-FU resistance in colorectal cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, Y.; Bi, J.; Huang, J.; Tang, Y.; Du, S.; Li, P. Exosome: A Review of Its Classification, Isolation Techniques, Storage, Diagnostic and Targeted Therapy Applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 6917–6934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, J.; Jiao, Z.; Mo, J.; Huang, D.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yang, T.; Zhao, M.; Xie, F.; Hu, D.; et al. Comparison of the Variability of Small Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Human Liver Cancer Tissues and Cultured from the Tissue Explants Based on a Simple Enrichment Method. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2021, 18, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kowal, J.; Arras, G.; Colombo, M.; Jouve, M.; Morath, J.P.; Primdal-Bengtson, B.; Dingli, F.; Loew, D.; Tkach, M.; Théry, C. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E968–E977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Hosseini, R.; Sarvnaz, H.; Arabpour, M.; Ramshe, S.M.; Asef-Kabiri, L.; Yousefi, H.; Akbari, M.E.; Eskandari, N. Cancer exosomes and natural killer cells dysfunction: Biological roles, clinical significance and implications for immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vergani, E.; Daveri, E.; Vallacchi, V.; Bergamaschi, L.; Lalli, L.; Castelli, C.; Rodolfo, M.; Rivoltini, L.; Huber, V. Extracellular vesicles in anti-tumor immunity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 86, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yong, T.; Wei, Z.; Gan, L.; Yang, X. Extracellular-Vesicle-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Enhanced Antitumor Therapies through Modulating the Cancer-Immunity Cycle. Adv. Mater. 2022, e2201054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yang, Q.; Guo, N.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J.; Wei, Q.; Han, M. The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in tumor progression and relevant advance in targeted therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 2156–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 11 04071 g001 550
Figure 1. Tumor-associated sEVs promote tumor cell metastasis. Tumor-derived sEVs through promoting cellular epithelial–mesenchymal transformation (EMT), reshaping the tumor microenvironment (TME), immunosuppression, increase vascular leakage and angiogenesis to promote cancer metastasis.
Figure 1. Tumor-associated sEVs promote tumor cell metastasis. Tumor-derived sEVs through promoting cellular epithelial–mesenchymal transformation (EMT), reshaping the tumor microenvironment (TME), immunosuppression, increase vascular leakage and angiogenesis to promote cancer metastasis.
Cells 11 04071 g001
Table
Table 1. sEVs affect CRC metastasis by remodeling the TME.
Table 1. sEVs affect CRC metastasis by remodeling the TME.
Cancer Type sEVs CargosTissues and/or CellsMechanismFunctionRefs
Colorectal cancermiR-181a-5pHT29, SW480, RKO, SW620 and plasma from CRLMPromote liver metastasis by activating hepatic stellate cells and remodeling the tumor microenvironmentPromote metastasis[30]
Colorectal cancerMALAT1 LoVo, HCT-8, SW620, SW480 and CRC tissuesPromote the malignant behavior of CRC cells by sponging miR-26a/26b via regulating FUT4 and activating PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathwayPromote metastasis[31]
Colorectal cancercircPACRGL HCT116 and SW480Enhance CRC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, as well as differentiation of N1-N2 neutrophils via miR-142-3p/miR-506-3p-TGF-β1 axisPromote metastasis[32]
Colorectal cancerHSPC111 HCT116, SW620, HT29 and SW480 Facilitate pre-metastatic niche formation and CRLMPromote metastasis[33]
Colorectal cancermiR-221/222Tissues and SW480Induce the formation of a hospitable metastatic environment, providing an appropriate colonization environment for incoming metastatic tumor cellsPromote metastasis[34]
Colorectal cancermiR-146a-5p and miR-155-5pHCT116 and SW620 Promote CXCL12/CXCR7-induced metastasis of colorectal cancer by crosstalk with cancer-associated fibroblastsPromote metastasis[35]
Colorectal cancerCAT1HCT116 and tissuesEnhance vascular endothelial cell growth and tubule formation via up-regulation of arginine transport and downstream NO metabolic pathwayPromote metastasis[36]
Colorectal cancerITGBL1Tissues and NCM460, SW480 and SW620Promote metastatic cancer growth by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokinePromote metastasis[37]
Colorectal cancermicroRNA-21-5pSW480, SW620 and LoVoPromote liver metastasis by inducing an inflammatory premetastatic nichePromote metastasis[38]
Colorectal cancerWnt4HT29 and HCT116 Enhance pro-metastatic behaviorsPromote metastasis[39]
Colorectal cancercircEIF3KCAFPromote CRC progression via miR-214/PD-L1 axisPromote metastasis[40]
Colorectal cancercircN4BP2L2CAFPromote subcutaneous tumorigenesis and liver metastasis in CRC nude micePromote metastasis[41]
Abbreviations: CRLM liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, CRC colorectal cancer, CAF cancer-associated fibroblast, MALAT1 metastases-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1, FUT4 fucosyltransferase 4, CAT1 cationic amino acid transporter 1, CXCL12 C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12, ITGBL1 integrin beta-like 1.
Table
Table 2. sEVs related with colorectal cancer metastasis by EMT.
Table 2. sEVs related with colorectal cancer metastasis by EMT.
Cancer TypesEVs CargosTissues and/or CellsMechanismFunctionRefs
Colorectal cancermiR-92a-3pCAFs and serum from CRCActivate Wnt/β-catenin pathway contributing to cell stemness, EMT, metastasis and in CRCPromote metastasis[50]
Colorectal cancermiR-335-5pSW620Promotes CRC invasion and metastasis by facilitating EMT via targeting RASA1Promote metastasis[51]
Colorectal cancerPVT1Serum from metastatic CRCIncrease expression of metastatic markers such as VEGFA and EGFRPromote metastasis[52]
Colorectal cancermiR-106b-3pSerum from metastatic CRCDecrease the expression of DLC-1 and Inhibit the EMTInhibit metastasis[53]
Colorectal cancermiR-210HCT-8Promote the expression of key EMT proteinsPromote metastasis[54]
Colorectal cancermiR-203a-3pLO2 Induce MET in PRL-3 overexpressing CRC cellsPromote metastasis[56]
Colorectal cancermicroRNA-3940-5pMSCInhibit colorectal cancer metastasis by Targeting Integrin α6Inhibit metastasis[57]
Colorectal cancermiR-128-3pHCT116 cell culture fluid and serumInduce the activation of TGF-β/SMAD and JAK/STAT3 signaling in CRC cells and xenografted tumors, which led to EMTPromote metastasis[58]
Abbreviations: CAFs cancer-associated fibroblasts, CRC colorectal cancer, MSC mesenchymal stem cell, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, EMT epithelial mesenchymal transformation, PVT1 plasmacytoma variant translocation 1, PRL-3 regenerating liver-3.
Table
Table 3. sEVs promote macrophages to undergo M2 polarization affecting CRC metastasis.
Table 3. sEVs promote macrophages to undergo M2 polarization affecting CRC metastasis.
Cancer TypesEVs CargosTissues and/or CellsMechanismFunctionRefs
Colorectal cancermiR-934FHC, SW480, SW620, HCT-8, HT-29, CaCo2, LoVo and RKOInduce macrophage M2 polarization to promote liver metastasis of colorectal cancerPromote metastasis[63]
Colorectal cancerLncRNA RPPH1HCT8, SW620 and HT29Promote colorectal cancer metastasis by interacting with TUBB3 and by promoting exosome-mediated macrophage M2 polarizationPromote metastasis[64]
Colorectal cancermiR-25-3p, miR-130b-3p and miR-425-5pHCT116Contribute to CXCL12/CXCR4-induced liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by enhancing M2 polarization of macrophagesPromote metastasis[65]
Colorectal cancerLncRNA HLA-F-AS1DLD-1, HT-29, SW620, SW480,HCT116, and Caco-2Promote colorectal cancer metastasis by
inducing PFN1 in colorectal cancer-derived extracellular vesicles and mediating macrophage polarization		Promote metastasis[66]
Colorectal cancer-HT-29, HCT116 and plasma Promote metastasis via the NOD1 signaling pathwayPromote metastasis[67]
Colorectal cancermicroRNA-203Serum, tissues, CaR-1, RKO, Colo205, Colo320DM, DLD1, HCT116, Lovo, SW480 and SW620Promote metastasis possibly via inducing tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancerPromote metastasis[68]
Colorectal cancermiR-21-5p and miR-155-5pSW48, SW480, and CO-115Down-regulate BRG1 expression and promote CRC metastasisPromote metastasis[69]
Colorectal cancermicroRNA-106b-5pHCT116 and HT29Activate EMT-cancer cell and M2-subtype TAM interaction to facilitate CRC metastasisPromote metastasis[70]
Colorectal cancermiR-1246HT-29 and HCT116Promote macrophage M2 polarization to promote colorectal cancer metastasisPromote metastasis[71]
Abbreviations: CRC colorectal cancer, CXCL13 C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12, CXCR4 C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4, NOD1 nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 1.
Table
Table 4. sEVs increase vascular leakage and angiogenesis to promote CRC metastasis.
Table 4. sEVs increase vascular leakage and angiogenesis to promote CRC metastasis.
Cancer TypesEVs CargosTissues and/or CellsMechanismFunctionRefs
Colorectal cancerANGPTL1SW620 and tissuesAttenuate CRLM by regulating Kupffer cell secretion pattern and impeding MMP9-induced vascular leakinessInhibit metastasis[75]
Colorectal cancermiR-25-3p SW480, LS174T, SW620, LOVO, HCT116 and tissuesPromote pre-metastatic niche formation by inducing vascular permeability and angiogenesisPromote metastasis[76]
Colorectal cancermiR-221-3pHCT116 and Caco2Promote endothelial cell angiogenesis via targeting suppressor of cytokine
signaling 3		Promote metastasis[77]
Colorectal cancer-SW480 and HCT116Egr-1 activation by cancer-derived extracellular vesicles promotes endothelial cell migration via the ERK1/2 and JNK signaling pathwaysPromote metastasis[78]
Colorectal cancermiR-27b-3pLOVO, HCT-116, DLD-1, SW620 and SW480Promote circulating tumor cell-mediated metastasis by modulating vascular permeability in colorectal cancerPromote metastasis[79]
Colorectal cancerlncRNA-APC1HCT-116Enhance tumor angiogenesis by activating the MAPK pathway in endothelial cells. Promote metastasis[80]
Abbreviations: CRLM liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase, ANGPTL1 angiopoietin-like protein 1, MMP9 matrix metallopeptidase 9.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Huang, D.; Wu, J.; Li, Z.; Yi, X.; Zhong, T. The Biological Effect of Small Extracellular Vesicles on Colorectal Cancer Metastasis. Cells 2022, 11, 4071. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244071

AMA Style

Wang X, Huang D, Wu J, Li Z, Yi X, Zhong T. The Biological Effect of Small Extracellular Vesicles on Colorectal Cancer Metastasis. Cells. 2022; 11(24):4071. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaoxing, Defa Huang, Jiyang Wu, Zhengzhe Li, Xiaomei Yi, and Tianyu Zhong. 2022. "The Biological Effect of Small Extracellular Vesicles on Colorectal Cancer Metastasis" Cells 11, no. 24: 4071. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244071

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop