Get 40% Off
☕ Buy the dip? After losing 17%, Starbucks sees an estimated 20% upside. See the top Undervalued stocks!Unlock list

Fed's 2% CPI Target Too Low? 3-4% Inflation May Be the New Normal

Published 01/12/2024, 02:38 AM
Updated 02/22/2024, 09:00 AM

I’m changing the way I do the monthly CPI analysis. Doing it live for an audience was always stressful, especially with the inevitable data issues from time to time.

Of course, as an inflation investor/trader, I’ll still do it live; I just don’t have an audience.

The nice part about doing it live was that the monthly report had a very similar structure to it with the same charts all of the time, and that will change.

But it also means that I can lead with the important stuff sometimes, like this month.

So I’m going to start today’s discussion of the slightly above-consensus CPI report (+0.31% on core, vs expectations for +0.25%) by saying the quiet part out loud:Enduring Primary Rents Model vs CPI

Rents aren’t collapsing

They are decelerating, and they will continue to do so, but they are not going into deflation. Everyone today seems to be acting as if this is some huge shock, but it really isn’t.

The only reason to ever have thought there would be rental deflation in an environment of housing shortage was that some of the high-frequency rent indices.

These are not designed to be high-quality data; they’re data derived from a business that has been packaged as if it is high-quality data.

That suggested declines in rents and an influential article popularized the notion that you could get more information from the BLS by looking at less data.

But the cost side has never improved for landlords – in fact, it keeps getting worse – so it was hard to see how there would be a general decline in rents.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In some parts of the country, from which people are migrating away, e.g. perhaps inner cities, rents may fall.

But those people have to go somewhere. Big migration means the housing stock is now all in the wrong places, and rents go up when there’s a shortage faster than they fall when there’s a glut.

Anyway, both my costs-based rent model above and my old rent model below suggest the same destination for rents – middle of this year or just afterward, y/y rents should get to around 2-3%.

That’s a lot lower than the current run rate for rents, of +0.47% m/m for OER and +0.42% for Primary rents this month, but it’s also far above what the general expectation has been for this large part of the consumption basket.

Moreover, it appears that the longer-term pressures are for that part of inflation to scoop back higher, not lower.

Old Rent's Model

So, today’s rents number was a little surprising, but not that surprising. Some are attributing the miss today to ‘just rents,’ as if it’s okay for the largest part of the CPI to have a trajectory that’s confounding many forecasts, but it wasn’t just rents.

Median inflation was +0.42% m/m, keeping the y/y number above 5%. And three of the last four figures have been in that zone. The median should keep decelerating too, but it is not collapsing.

Median CPI

Now, I’ll note that Used Car prices were weird, again. They rose +0.49% m/m, when I (and most folks) had expected a decline.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

They’ve been a bit squirrelly for a while, with official inflation printing higher than the private surveys fairly persistently for 6-9 months.

On the other hand, airline fares have been persistently squirrelly lower compared to jet fuel, so these two things were ‘errors’ in the opposite direction.

This month, airfares also rose, by about 1% m/m – but that was right about where it should have been given the change in fuel prices and not a surprise.

CPI-Used Cars and Trucks

Now, the diffusion stuff is looking better and supports the idea that median inflation will continue to decelerate.

Diffusion Model

Such a deceleration has been and continues to be my forecast. I expect median inflation to settle in the high 3%s and low 4%s, and be hard to push much below that.

In the near term, meaning maybe by early H2 of this year, we could get some numbers a little below that as the rent deceleration continues.

But then the hook happens. It will be hard to get inflation below 3% for very long, especially if the Fed decides to stop shrinking its balance sheet and money supply growth recovers.

So the system is normalizing after COVID (and more relevantly, after the spastic and dramatic fiscal and monetary response to COVID). But normal is no longer sub-2%.

Core services ex-shelter (so-called “supercore”) abstracts both from the deceleration in housing and the sharp drop in core goods, and it is hooking higher (this is partly because Health Insurance had been artificially depressing it and that effect is waning).

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Core Services less Rent of Shelter

Supercore is unlikely to plunge either. Wages remain robust. The Atlanta Fed just released its Wage Growth Tracker, at 5.2% for the fourth month in a row.

The spread between median wages and median inflation, which had been stable around 1% for a long while, is heading back there (see chart).

So again, we’re looking at something around 4% for median inflation unless wages start to decelerate…and there’s as yet no sign of that.

Atlanta Fed Wages vs Median CPI

The bottom line is that while this number was only a little bit surprising, it was surprising for all the wrong reasons.

There is nothing in this figure that suggests the Fed can comfortably abandon a tight-money policy and think about easing soon, and I don’t expect them to do so.

Latest comments

Seems the writer don't even know the real meaning of inflation....
Government spends too much and tries to inflate the debt away while crushing the poor and middle class… thats the story here… its the new normal
you are probably correct with inflation not coming to 2 as projected by the fed, given still strong job market. This will complicate Fed's task in 2024.
Crazy to see a gallon of milk double in price in 5 years. 100% inflation on many items on the shelf.
food prices have been behind for years! the only reason the people haven't felt the crunch 15 and 20 years ago was because of government subsidies and tax breaks. Food is just now starting to reflect actual price of the goods...read Joel Salatin's book Folks this ain't normal to get a basic overview of the food issues in the US
Real Inflation is indeed way above 3-4% in the last 24 months. What's worse, is traders like you telling people that 3-4% should be the new normal. So to keep investors happy, you want all "normal" workers to have their savings evaporize twice as fast?  No, thank you.
Go to shops and compare prices from 2019 to 2024 !! Inflation will at 15%
Its nowhere close to 4%
Better not be. It will be a slow erosion of the American dream. Well what’s left of it.
You don’t do it live because you didn’t have a live audience to begin with. Stress and data error is an excuse. And the Fed already said a million times they are not moving from 2%. Useless article!
After every rate announcement all last year, when Powell was asked if the new normal inflation core rate had actually naturally reset above 2% and finds itself actually around 3- 3.25%,, he either refused to address it, or stated it was not part of current analysis to think that the natural rate of inflation had reset itself, and they weren't giving thought to it. The question was never answered. Core inflation is probably pushing with momentum, and a top rate probably should have been 5.75% in order to get close to the 2% target. It is absolutely why McCarthy is gone because what he agreed to puts us on a path well above those numbers. Freedom caucus members were demanding a budget consistent with the Pre-covid budget, and it was never given any negotiation time like they were crazy. Easy money politics won hands down.
Very informative. I believed, and still believe that the Fed screwed up, when after all the 0.5% increases, they lowered the next increase to 0.25%, I think that was June. Soon after, came the McCarthy stint, and I believe that was his personal preference for California. For the Country, he should have reached for more constraint, and opportunity is now lost. The Freedom caucus members who are viewed as radicals are correct in their assumptions, and a 50 trillion debt level will not be tackled without a shutdown. The election is only going to further cloud the task. You are correct. The Fed can not exit the tight money policy, and the hiccup is gonna be inflation is gonna steamroll us if we don't roll back to the budget levels prior to covid. Interest costs of this deficit size are not sustainable.
Maga trash and the house freedom cult are never right
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.