What do you think?
Rate this book
200 pages, Paperback
First published June 30, 1950
Then she went on in the same way: “At that rate, when you got back here and Miyo wasn’t here, it worked out perfectly, didn’t it?”
Her words were half thought, half spoken. She had difficulty distinguishing between soliloquy that kept insistently repeating itself in her mind and the soliloquy that she uttered.
In dreams, seedlings mature instantly into fruit-bearing trees, and small birds become winged horses. So in Etsuko’s trance, outlandish hopes waxed into shape of hopes capable of immediate realization.
What if I am the one Saburo has loved? I will have to be bold and try to find out. I must not even think that what I anticipate will not come true. If my hopes come true, I shall be happy. It’s that simple.
Thus Etsuko pondered. Hopes for whose fruition one does not fear, however, are hopes so much as, in the last analysis, a species of desperation.
“All right; but, then, who in the world do you love? Etsuko asked.
Like an author who thinks himself a genius because his books don’t sell, he felt that his not being asked to lecture anywhere was evidence that the world was not ready for his message.
The two sofas and eleven chairs in the drawing room, long untouched by human hand, were very much like girls worn out with waiting.
bu kitabın şöyle bir anısı var, balkonda okurken bıraktım orda, rüzgardan açılmış kitap, üç beş gün güneş altında kaldı sayfalar. sonra bir gün fırtına çıktı, kitap baştan aşağı ıslandı. başlık sayfası çok güzel gözüküyor.
„Abia când se dezbracă îți dai seama cât de fragilă e individualitatea oamenilor. Așa vezi că ar fi suficiente doar patru feluri de gândire: gândire de om gras, gândire de om slab, gândire de lungan și gândire de bondoc. Și fețele toate au doar doi ochi și câte un nas și-o gură. Nu e nimeni cu un singur ochi. Chiar și chipul cu cele mai particulare trăsături nu servește decât să simbolizeze diferența dintre el și altul.”
„Dragostea nu înseamnă decât un simbol care iubește alt simbol. Iubirea carnală înseamnă anonimitate care iubește anonimitatea. O împerechere unisexuată între haos și haos, impersonal și impersonal. Fără masculinitate sau feminitate.”
„Pentru el, termenul acesta făcea parte dintr-un vocabular îndepărtat, luxos, făcut pe comandă. Avea în el ceva care prisosea, ceva forțat și care nu era cu nimic grabnic. În relația zorită care îi lega pe el și pe Miyo, o relație nu neapărat menită să dureze o veșnicie, în care doi magneți se atrag doar pentru că au intrat unul în raza celuilalt, dar care încetează să se mai atragă imediat ce ies în afara ei, cuvântul iubire nu-și avea nicidecum locul.”
„Suferința îndelungată te prostește. Dar cei prostiți de suferință nu se mai îndoiesc de fericire atunci când au parte de ea.”
Η πρώτη μου επαφή με Μίσιμα.
Μου άρεσε η γραφή του; Ναι.
Μου άρεσε η ιστορία; Όχι.
Παρόλο που ήταν όμορφη η γραφή, η ροή της υπόθεσης προχωρούσε αργά. Το δε τέλος ήταν το κερασάκι στην τούρτα της απογοήτευσης.
Το βρήκα απότομο, χωρίς αιτιολογία, και παράλογο. Ένιωσα ότι ήταν ένα τρικ του συγγραφέα για να προκαλέσει έντονα συναισθήματα στον αναγνώστη.
Και μου προκάλεσε, όχι όμως εκείνα που είχε πρόθεση να προκαλέσει ο συγγραφέας.
Οι τελευταίες αυτές σελίδες του βιβλίου μοιάζουν όπως η τελευταία σεζόν του Game of Thrones και ειδικά τα τελευταία 2 επεισόδια. Η απότομη αλλαγή της Ντενέρις από Σωτήρα σε Παράφρονα έγινε σε πολύ σύντομο χρονικό διάστημα για να δικαιολογηθεί.
Μια σεζόν που δικαιολογημένα πήρε βαθμολογία 55% σε αντίθεση με τις προηγούμενες που πήραν όλες ανεξαιρέτως βαθμολογία 90%+.
Έτσι και εδώ η πράξη της διψασμένης για έρωτα Ετσούκο δείχνει ότι διψούσε για αποδοχή όχι έρωτα.
Και φυσικά δεν συνδέθηκα με κανένα από τους αχώνευτους χαρακτήρες του βιβλίου.
Εξαιρείται η όμορφη περιγραφή της πόλης της Οσάκα και της ζωής την τότε εποχή.
Και φυσικά θα συνεχίσω και με άλλο Μίσιμα στο μέλλον.
ΒΑΘΜΟΛΟΓΙΑ
Χαρακτήρες: 4/10
Γραφή: 8/10
Αναγνωσιμότητα: 7/10
Εμπειρία: 5/10
Ιστορία: 5/10
Σύνολο: 5.8--> 2.9 stars ★★★