Skip to main content

Commoning the Stage: The Complex Semantics of the Theatre Commons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Commons and Urban Dynamics

Abstract

The paper investigates the present role of theatre in society; in particular, it seeks to identify theatre as a peculiar, complex commons, with a precise spatial, relational and cultural syntax outlined in the first section with relevant examples. The stratification of meanings, archetypes and formats of such commons and the cultural value it has generated in different times and for different societies are described in the second section. Theatre is analysed through the commons analytical framework in the third section, identifying its characteristics of a semantic commons. The policy and strategic implications of the conceptualisation of theatre as a commons are expressed in the fourth section: in particular, its features of publicity and togetherness testify for its power to catalyse powerful instances such as the right to the city and the claim for the resurgence of the public sphere. Examples of policies and practices from the international context are provided that illustrate the emerging map of actions going towards such objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Folletto (2017).

  2. 2.

    Ricci (2018).

  3. 3.

    De Matteis (2018).

  4. 4.

    Francesco Reggiani was interviewed by the author on July 31, 2018.

  5. 5.

    During a workshop conducted in 2019 and 2020 by SITDA, the Italian Society of Architectural Technology, Tor Bella Monaca was chosen as the core topic; a series of unstructured interviews conducted throughout the workshop demonstrated the poor results of the regeneration interventions, and how the area is still perceived as largely abandoned and unsafe—regardless of the presence of the theatre.

  6. 6.

    For an introduction to Greek theatre and citizenship, see Barker (2008), Tragedy and citizenship: conflict, reconciliation and democracy from Haemon to Hegel, New York: State University of New York Press; Cartledge (1997).

  7. 7.

    The Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Miracle Play, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 6th February, 2019, https://www.britannica.com/art/miracle-play, Accessed 30th April, 2020.

    The Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Miracle Play, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 30th April, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/art/mystery-play, Accessed 30th April, 2020.

  8. 8.

    For a more detailed account see Craveri (2001).

  9. 9.

    The impact of theatrical practices and language on the formation of the modern political sphere is well documented by Sorba (2015).

  10. 10.

    Not much literature exists in academia regarding behavioural norms of exclusion in theatres; yet, more generally, more subtle and indirect forms of exclusion from the public space and the public sphere, which can relate to theatre as long as it is a publicly accessible space, can be found in Carmona (2010), Fraser, N. (1995), Culture, politics and the public sphere: towards a postmodern conception, in in Nicholson, L. & Seidman, S. (1995), Social postmodernism: beyond identity politics, 287–312, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  11. 11.

    Julia, 2019

  12. 12.

    Opéra Pagaï, https://www.operapagai.com/, accessed Sept. 7th, 2019.

  13. 13.

    The affinities between flash mobs and theatrical semantics testify the liveliness and the present relevance of theatrical dynamics; and yet, concerns arise over the “theatricalisation” of politics, which has turned from powerful instance of dissent into a harmless act of mimesis. See Ventura (2019).

  14. 14.

    Hughes (2017).

  15. 15.

    Specifically, the debate on the so called “deficit model”, which places an emphasis on artistic outcomes rather than on the democratisation and accessibility of the cultural modes of production and consumption. For an exhaustive account see Gross and Wilson (2018). For an account on the uses of the deficit model in the performing arts policy framework see Walmsley (2018).

  16. 16.

    The Mahogany Opera Group, Stretching the boundaries of what opera can be and who it is for, https://www.mahoganyopera.co.uk/about-us/, accessed Sept. 8th, 2019.

Bibliography

  • Arendt, H. (1996). The origins of totalitarianism. San Diego: Harvest Books–Harcourt (1st ed. 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (1st ed. 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, G. (2012). How motion pictures industrialised entertainment. The Journal of Economic History, 72(4), 1036–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, H. C. (1971). The Greek tragic theatre. London: Chatto&Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestra, C., & Malaguti, A. (2000). Organizzare Musica: Legislazione, produzione, distribuzione, gestione nel sistema italiano. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, J. W., & Bowen, G. (1966). Performing arts, the economic dilemma: a study of problems common to theatre, opera, music and dance. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianconi, L., & Pestelli, G., (Eds). (2003). The history of Italian Opera: Opera in theory and practice, image and myth, vol. 2: Systems. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchi, A. (2018). Culture as commons: Theoretical challenges and empirical evidence from occupied public spaces in Italy. Cultural Trends, 27(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (2012). The theatre ici, 40–46. In E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 40–46). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, Part One: Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartledge, P. (1997). “Deep plays”: Theatre as process in Greek civil life. In P. E. Easterling (Ed.), Cambridge companion to Greek theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craveri, B. (2001). La civiltà della conversazione (pp. 332–348). Milano: Adelphi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlhaus, C. (2002). Drammaturgia dell’opera italiana (trans. L. Bianconi). Milano: EDT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, J. (2018). Conceptualizing the commons: Moving beyond the goods-based definition by introducing the social practices of commoning as vital determinant. Ecological Economy, 143, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). Politics, culture and the modern sphere: Toward a postmodern conception. In L. Nicholson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Social postmodernism: Beyond identity politics (pp. 287–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., & Wilson, N. (2018). Cultural democracy: An ecological and capabilities approach. International journal of cultural policy, 26(3), 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, S. (2018). Towards cultural democracy: Promoting cultural capabilities for everyone. Cultural trends, 27(1), 52–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2004). Space as a key-word. Presented at Marx and philosophy, May 24th 2004. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A. (2003). Storia sociale dell’arte (Trans. by Bovero A). Torino: Einaudi (1st ed. 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 622–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1966). Dialettica dell’illuminismo (trans. by R. Solmi). Torino: Einaudi (1st ed. 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2017). Notes on a theatre commons: Common Wealth’s The Deal Versus the People (2015). Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 22(1), 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanouse, S. (2008). Performing haymarket. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 7, 1, 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, A. (Ed.). (1996). The value of culture. On the relationship between economics and arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L. (2012). What time is this place? Continuity, conflict, and the right to the city. In: E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 61–84). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2013) The politics of public space, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2009). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Economica (1st ed. 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, U. (2011). Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Bari: Edizioni Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnie, M. (2012). Performing like a city: London’s South Bank and the cultural politics of Urban Governance. In E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1937). What is a city? Architectural records, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Négrier, E. (2017). Performing arts and policies in France. Hal Archives Ouvertes. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01442237/document.

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Primavesi, P. (2012). Heterotopias of the public sphere: theatre and festivals around 1800. In E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 196–213). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggero, G. (2010). Five theses on the commons. Rethinking Marxism, 22, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselt, J. (2012). Changes through rapprochement. Spatial practices in contemporary performances (Trans. by M. Breslin & S.I. Jain). In E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 309–321). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F., & Trimarchi, M. (2019). Regulating the stage: Storms, wrecks and lifebelts in the Italian experience. Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 5(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, W., Bertacchini, E., Bravo, G., & Marrelli, M. (2011). Cultural commons and cultural communities. Paper presented at Sustaining Commons: Sustaining Our Future, the Thirteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Hyderabad, India, 10–14 September 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10535/7359.

  • Sassen, S. (2013). When the center no longer holds: Cities as frontier zones. Cities, 34, 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarte, L. (2012). Equality in theatre architecture: Voltaire’s private theatre. In E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 151–166). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorba, C. (2015). Il melodramma della nazione: politica e risentimenti nell’età del Rinascimento. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space. The city as Commons. Zed Books: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velde, F. R. (2015). The economic history of Opera. European Historical Economics Society. http://www.ehes.org/ehes2015/papers/Velde.pdf.

  • Ventura, R. A. (2019). La guerra di tutti. Populismo, terrore e crisi della società liberale. Roma: Minimum Fax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, B. (2018). A plea for audiences: from active spectatorship to enactive audiency. In L. Bonet & E. Négrier (Eds.), Breaking the Fourth Wall: Proactive audiences in the performing arts (pp. 196–209). Elverum: Kunnskapsverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wihstutz, B. (2012). Introduction. In E. Fischer-Lichte & B. Wihstutz (Eds.), Performance and the politics of space: Theatre and topology (pp. 15–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Sitography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Sabatini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sabatini, F. (2020). Commoning the Stage: The Complex Semantics of the Theatre Commons. In: Macrì, E., Morea, V., Trimarchi, M. (eds) Cultural Commons and Urban Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54418-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics