Abstract
Bacteria produce cellulose in the form of an extracellular matrix known for its ultrapure existence. Due to its distinctive features, such as high crystallinity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, excellent mechanical qualities, and high liquid-loading capacity, it has boosted significant advancements in biomedical, pharmaceutical, and healthcare. Bacterial cellulose (BC) has also been widely used as an antimicrobial packaging material/ ingredient in food due to its GRAS attribute. Komagataeibacter genus is a potential producer of BC and has been utilized by researchers and industries for cellulose production. The widely used synthetic culture medium yields cellulose with more prolonged incubation and high production costs. To overcome the drawbacks and to produce cellulose in an economical manner, waste of food, fruit/vegetable peel, starchy kitchen waste, agricultural waste, and other low-cost substrates have been widely exploited as an alternative nutritional source in the culture medium. Cell-free enzyme system for BC production is receiving a lot of attention due to its durability, reproducibility, and efficacy. Also, there has been a burst in the advancement in genetic intervention, genetic toolkit, metabolic engineering, and accessibility to whole genome sequences of BC-producing bacteria to regulate production. Furthermore, in the last few years, due to the increase in demand for BC with novel characteristics, researchers have also explored modern approaches, computational programming, genetic modifications, host recombinant expression, synthetic toolkits, and metabolic engineering for regulating and controlling BC production. This article aims to discuss inexpensive, affordable nutritional sources that can be readily employed for BC synthesis. Additionally, this article will list processes for gene regulation and recombination expression for accomplishing preferred alterations in the obtained cellulose as requisite for a distinct application and for adding new functionalities in the material.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelraof M, Hasanin MS, El Saied H (2019) Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 211:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.095
Abdelraof M, El Saied H, Hasanin MS (2022) Green Immobilization of Glucanobacter xylinum onto natural polymers to sustainable bacterial cellulose production. Waste and Biomass Valorization 13(4):2053–2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-021-01666-w
Abol-Fotouh D, Hassan MA, Shokry H, Roig A, Azab MS, Kashyout AEB (2020) Bacterial nanocellulose from agro-industrial wastes: low-cost and enhanced production by Komagataeibacter saccharivorans MD1. Sci Rep 10(1):3491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60315-9
Abral H, Pratama AB, Handayani D, Mahardika M, Aminah I, Sandrawati N, Sugiarti E, Muslimin AN, Sapuan SM, Ilyas RA (2021) Antimicrobial edible film prepared from bacterial cellulose nanofibers/starch/chitosan for a food packaging alternative. Int J Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6641284
Akintunde MO, Adebayo-Tayo BC, Ishola MM, Zamani A, Horváth IS (2022) Bacterial cellulose production from agricultural residues by two Komagataeibacter sp. Strains Bioengineered 13(4):10010–10025. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2062970
Akoğlu A, Çakır İ, Karahan AG, Lutfu M, Çakmakçi (2018) Effects of bacterial cellulose as a fat replacer on some properties of fat-reduced mayonnaise. Rom Biotechnol Lett 23(3):13674–13680
Albuquerque RM, Meira HM, Silva ID, Silva CJG, Almeida FCG, Amorim JD, Vinhas GM, Costa AFS, Sarubbo LA (2021) Production of a bacterial cellulose/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) blend activated with clove essential oil for food packaging. Polym Polym Compos 29(4):259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391120912098
Al-Janabi SS, Shawky H, El-Waseif AA, Farrag AA, Abdelghany TM, El-Ghwas DE (2022) Stable, efficient, and cost-effective system for the biosynthesis of recombinant bacterial cellulose in Escherichia coli DH5α platform. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 20(1):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-022-00384-7
Almeida T, Karamysheva A, Valente BFA, Silva JM, Braz M, Almeida A, Silvestre AJD, Vilela C, Freire CSR (2023) Biobased ternary films of thermoplastic starch, bacterial nanocellulose and gallic acid for active food packaging. Food Hydrocoll 144:108934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108934
Amorim LFA, Mouro C, Riool M, Gouveia IC (2022) Antimicrobial food packaging based on prodigiosin-incorporated double-layered bacterial cellulose and chitosan composites. Polymers 14(2):315
Amorim LFA, Li L, Gomes AP, Fangueiro R, Gouveia IC (2023) Sustainable bacterial cellulose production by low cost feedstock: evaluation of apple and tea by-products as alternative sources of nutrients. Cellulose 30(9):5589–5606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05238-0
Anand S, Mukherjee K, Padmanabhan P (2020) An insight to flux-balance analysis for biochemical networks. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 36(1):32–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2020.1847440
Andrade FK, Costa R, Domingues L, Soares R, Gama M (2010) Improving bacterial cellulose for blood vessel replacement: functionalization with a chimeric protein containing a cellulose-binding module and an adhesion peptide. Acta Biomater 6:4034–4041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.023
Anwar B, Bundjali B, Sunarya Y, Arcana IM (2021) Properties of bacterial cellulose and its nanocrystalline obtained from pineapple peel waste juice. Fibers and Polym 22(5):1228–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0765-8
Atta OM, Manan S, Ul-Islam MU, Ahmed AAQ, Ullah MW, Yang G (2021a) Silver decorated bacterial cellulose nanocomposites as antimicrobial food packaging materials. ES Food Agrofor. 6:12–26. https://doi.org/10.30919/esfaf590
Atta OM, Manan S, Ahmed AAQ, Awad MF, Ul-Islam M, Subhan F, Ullah MW, Yang G (2021b) Development and characterization of yeast-incorporated antimicrobial cellulose biofilms for edible food packaging application. Polymers 13(14):2310. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13142310
Atta OM, Manan S, Ul-Islam M, Ahmed AAQ, Ullah MW, Yang G (2022) Development and characterization of plant oil-incorporated carboxymethyl cellulose/bacterial cellulose/glycerol-based antimicrobial edible films for food packaging applications. Adv Compos Mater 5(2):973–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00408-9
Augimeri R, Strap JL (2015) The phytohormone ethylene enhances cellulose production, regulates CRP/FNRKx transcription and causes differential gene expression within the bacterial cellulose synthesis operon of Komagataeibacter (Gluconacetobacter) xylinus ATCC 53582. Front Microbiol 6:1459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01459
Azarniya A, Tamjid E, Eslahi N, Simchi A (2019) Modification of bacterial cellulose/keratin nanofibrous mats by a tragacanth gum-conjugated hydrogel for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 134:280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.023
Bandyopadhyay S, Saha N, Brodnjak UV, Sáha P (2019) Bacterial cellulose and guar gum based modified PVP-CMC hydrogel films: characterized for packaging fresh berries. Food Packag Shelf Life 22:100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100402
Barshan S, Rezazadeh-Bari M, Almasi H, Amiri S (2019) Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int J Biol Macromol 136:1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.192
Battad-Bernardo E, McCrindle SL, Couperwhite I, Neilan BA (2004) Insertion of an E. coli lacZ gene in Acetobacter xylinus for the production of cellulose in whey. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231(2):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1097(04)00007-2
Bella F, Widiyanti P, Aminatun A (2020) The effect of glycerol concentration on biocomposite bacterial cellulose-chitosan characterization as dura mater artificial. J Biomim Biomater Biomed 45:40–48. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.45.40
Betlej I, Rybak K, Nowacka M, Antczak A, Borysiak S, Krochmal-Marczak B, Lipska K, Boruszewski P (2022) Structural properties of bacterial cellulose film obtained on a substrate containing sweet potato waste. Crystals 12(9):1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12091191
Bozdağ G, Pinar O, Gündüz O, Kazan D (2023) Valorization of pea pod, celery root peel, and mixed-vegetable peel as a feedstock for biocellulose production from Komagataeibacter hansenii DSM 5602. Biomass Convers Biorefin 13(9):7875–7886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01643-2
Brandão PR, Crespo MTB, Nascimento FX (2022) Phylogenomic and comparative analyses support the reclassification of several Komagataeibacter species as novel members of the Novacetimonas gen. nov. and bring new insights into the evolution of cellulose synthase genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72(2):005252. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005252
Buldum G, Mantalaris A (2021) Systematic understanding of recent developments in bacterial cellulose biosynthesis at genetic, bioprocess and product levels. Int J Mol Sci 22(13):7192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137192
Buldum G, Bismarck A, Mantalaris A (2018) A Recombinant biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose in genetically modified Escherichia coli. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 41:265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1864-1
Buruaga-Ramiro C, Valenzuela SV, Valls C, Roncero MB, Pastor FIJ, Díaz P, Martinez J (2020) Development of an antimicrobial bioactive paper made from bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 158:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.234
Calderón-Toledo S, Horue M, Alvarez VA, Castro GR, Zavaleta AI (2022) Isolation and partial characterization of Komagataeibacter sp. SU12 and optimization of bacterial cellulose production using Mangifera indica extracts. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 97(6):l1482-1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6839
Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B (2009) The carbohydrate-active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D233–D238. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn663
Cao Y, Lu S, Yang Y (2018) Production of bacterial cellulose from byproduct of citrus juice processing (citrus pulp) by Gluconacetobacter hansenii. Cellulose 25(12):6977–6988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2056-0
Caro-Astorga J, Lee KY, Ellis T (2022) Increasing bacterial cellulose compression resilience with glycerol or PEG400 for robuster engineered living materials. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 4:100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2022.100245
Casarica A, Campeanu G, Moscovici M, Ghiorghita A, Manea V (2013) Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by Aceobacter xyilinum dsmz-2004 on poor quality horticultural substrates using the taguchi method for media optimization. part i. Cell Chem and Technol 47:61–68
Castro C, Zuluaga R, Putaux JL, Caro G, Mondragon I, Gañán P (2011) Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.072
Cavalcanti YF, Amorim JD, Medeiros AD, da Silva Jr CJ, Durval IJ, Costa AF, Sarubbo LA (2023) Microbial cellulose production with tomato (solanum Lycopersicum) residue for industrial applications. Chem Eng Trans 100:409–414. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET23100069
Chawla P, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124
Chen L, Zou M, Hong FF (2015) Evaluation of fungal laccase immobilized on natural nanostructured bacterial cellulose. Front Microbiol 6:1245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015
Chen F, Chang X, Xu H, Fu X, Ding S, Wang R (2023) Gellan gum-based functional films integrated with bacterial cellulose and nano-TiO2/CuO improve the shelf life of fresh-cut pepper. Food Packag Shelf Life 38:101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101103
Chien LJ, Chen HT, Yang PF, Lee CK (2006) Enhancement of cellulose pellicle production by constitutively expressing vitreoscilla hemoglobin in Acetobacter xylinum. Biotechnol Prog 22(6):1598–1603. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp060157g
Ciecholewska-Juśko D, Broda M, Żywicka A, Styburski D, Sobolewski P, Gorący K, Migdał P, Junka A, Fijałkowski K (2021) Potato juice, a starch industry waste, as a cost-effective medium for the biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Int J Mol Sci 22(19):10807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910807
Cielecka I, Szustak M, Kalinowska H, Gendaszewska-Darmach E, Ryngajłło M, Maniukiewicz W, Bielecki S (2019) Glycerol-plasticized bacterial nanocellulose-based composites with enhanced flexibility and liquid sorption capacity. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02501-1
Deng Y, Nagachar N, Xiao C, Tien M, Kao TH (2013) Identification and characterization of non-cellulose-producing mutants of Gluconacetobacter hansenii generated by Tn5 transposon mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 195:5072–5083. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00767-13
Dikshit PK, Kim BS (2020) Bacterial cellulose production from biodiesel–derived crude glycerol, magnetic functionalization, and its application as carrier for lipase immobilization. Int J Biol Macromol 153:902–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.047
Doğan N (2023) Native bacterial cellulose films based on kombucha pellicle as a potential active food packaging. J Food Sci Technol 60(11):2893–2904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-023-05808-x
Domeneguetti RR, Sakai VY, Perotti GF, Silva IC, Tercjak A, Barud HS, Pavan F, Constantino VRL, Ribeiro SJ (2023) Structural and morphological properties of in-situ biosynthesis of biocompatible bacterial cellulose/Laponite nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 234:106851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2023.106851
Dórame-Miranda RF, Gámez-Meza N, Medina-Juárez LÁ, Ezquerra-Brauer JM, Ovando-Martínez M, Lizardi-Mendoza J (2019) Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter entanii using pecan nutshell as carbon source and its chemical functionalization. Carbohydr Polym 207:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.067
dos Santos CA, dos Santos GR, Soeiro VS, dos Santos JR, Rebelo MDA, Chaud MV, Gerenutti M, Grotto D, Pandit R, Rai M, Jozala AF (2018) Bacterial nanocellulose membranes combined with nisin: a strategy to prevent microbial growth. Cellulose 25(11):6681–6689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2010-1
El-Sherbiny GM, Abou El-Nour SA, Askar AA, Mohammad NH, Hammad AA (2022) Solar radiation-induced synthesis of bacterial cellulose/silver nanoparticles (BC/AgNPs) composite using BC as reducing and capping agent. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 45(2):257–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02655-y
Fan X, Gao Y, He W, Hu H, Tian M, Wang K, Pan S (2016) Production of nano bacterial cellulose from beverage industrial waste of citrus peel and pomace using Komagataeibacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 151:1068–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.062
Fang J, Kawano S, Tajima K, Kondo T (2015) In vivo curdlan/cellulose bionanocomposite synthesis by genetically modified Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Biomacromol 16(10):3154–3160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01075
Fernandes IDAA, Pedro AC, Ribeiro VR, Bortolini DG, Ozaki MSC, Maciel GM, Haminiuk CWI (2020) Bacterial cellulose: From production optimization to new applications. Int J Biol Macromol 164:2598–2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.255
Fijałkowski K, Peitler D, Rakoczy R, Żywicka A (2015) Survival of probiotic lactic acid bacteria immobilized in different forms of bacterial cellulose in simulated gastric juices and bile salt solution. Lwt-Food Sci Technol 68:322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.038
Florea M, Hagemann H, Santosa G, Abbott J, Micklem CN, Spencer-Milnes X, De Arroyo GL, Paschou D, Lazenbatt C, Kong D, Chughtai H, Jensen K, Freemont PS, Kitney R, Reeve B, Ellis T (2016a) Engineering control of bacterial cellulose production using a genetic toolkit and a new cellulose-producing strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(24):E3431-3440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522985113
Florea M, Reeve B, Abbott J, Freemont PS, Ellis T (2016b) Genome sequence and plasmid transformation of the model high-yield bacterial cellulose producer Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 53582. Sci Rep 6:26365. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23635
Fonseca DFS, Vilela C, Pinto RJB, Bastos V, Oliveira H, Catarino J, Faísca P, Rosado C, Silvestre AJD, Freire CSR (2021) Bacterial nanocellulose-hyaluronic acid microneedle patches for skin applications: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111350
Ghozali M, Meliana Y, Chalid M (2021) Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum using liquid tapioca waste. Mater Today 44:2131–2134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.274
Gilbert C, Tang TC, Ott W, Dorr BA, Shaw WM, Sun GL, Lu TK, Ellis T (2021) Living materials with programmable functionalities grown from engineered microbial co-cultures. Nat Mater 20(5):691–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00857-5
Gomes FP, Silva NHCS, Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Duarte MF, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP, Freire CSR (2013) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy 55:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.004
Gorgieva S, Hribernik S (2019) Microstructured and degradable bacterial cellulose-gelatin composite membranes: mineralization aspects and biomedical relevance. Nanomaterials 9:303. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020303
Gorgieva S, Jančič U, Cepec E, Trček J (2023) Production efficiency and properties of bacterial cellulose membranes in a novel grape pomace hydrolysate by Komagataeibacter melomenusus AV436T and Komagataeibacter xylinus LMG 1518. Int J Biol Macromol 244:125368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125368
Guo Y, Zhang X, Hao W, Xie Y, Chen L, Li Z, Zhu B, Feng X (2018) Nano-bacterial cellulose/soy protein isolate complex gel as fat substitutes in ice cream model. Carbohydr Polym 198:620–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.078
Güzel M, Akpınar Ö (2019) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose from citrus peels. Waste and Biomass Valori 10(8):2165–2175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0241-x
Gwon H, Park K, Chung SC, Kim RH, Kang JK, Ji SM, Kim NJ, Lee S, Ku JH, Do EC, Park S, Kim M, Shim WY, Rhee HS, Kim JY, Kim J, Kim TY, Yamaguchi Y, Iwamuro R, Saito S, Kim G, Jung IS, Park H, Lee C, Lee S, Jeon WS, Jang WD, Kim HU, Lee SY, Im D, Doo SG, Lee SY, Lee HC, Park JH (2019) A safe and sustainable bacterial cellulose nanofiber separator for lithium rechargeable batteries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(39):19288–19293. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905527116
Ha JH, Shehzad O, Khan S, Lee SY, Park JW, Khan T, Park JK (2008) Production of bacterial cellulose by a static cultivation using the waste from beer culture broth. Korean J Chem Eng 25(4):812–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-008-0134-y
Haghighi H, Gullo M, La China S, Pfeifer F, Siesler HW, Licciardello F, Pulvirenti A (2021) Characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on gelatin/polyvinyl alcohol blend reinforced with bacterial cellulose nanowhiskers for food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll 113:106454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106454
Hasanin MS (2022) Cellulose-based biomaterials: chemistry and biomedical applications. Starch-Stärke 74(7–8):2200060. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202200060
Hasanin MS, Youssef AM (2022) Ecofriendly bioactive film doped CuO nanoparticles based biopolymers and reinforced by enzymatically modified nanocellulose fibers for active packaging applications. Food Packag Shelf Life 34:100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100979
Hasanin MS, Abdelraof M, Hashem AH, El Saied H (2023) Sustainable bacterial cellulose production by Achromobacter using mango peel waste. Microb Cell Fact 22(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3
Hernández-Arriaga AM, Del Cerro C, Urbina L, Eceiza A, Corcuera MA, Retegi A, Auxiliadora Prieto M (2019) Genome sequence and characterization of the bcs clusters for the production of nanocellulose from the low pH resistant strain Komagataeibacter medellinensis ID13488. Microb Biotechnol 12(4):620–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13376
Heydorn RL, Lammers D, Gottschling M, Dohnt K (2023) Effect of food industry by-products on bacterial cellulose production and its structural properties. Cellulose 30(7):4159–4179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05097-9
Hildayani GM, Fahrunisa N, Rachmadhani R, Rachmawati SA, Pratama RA, Saepudin E, Sufiandi S (2023) Hydrophobic properties of bacterial cellulose using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and SiO2 nano colloid as a raw material candidate. AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/50125545
Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S, Han SF, Yang G, Jönsson LJ (2012) Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: Enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 104:503–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.028
Huang LH, Liu QJ, Sun XW, Li XJ, Liu M, Jia SR, Xie YY, Zhong C (2020) Tailoring bacterial cellulose structure through CRISPR interference-mediated downregulation of galU in Komagataeibacter xylinus CGMCC 2955. Biotechnol Bioeng 117(7):2165–2176. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27351
Hur DH, Rhee HS, Lee JH, Shim WY, Kim TY, Lee SY, Park JH, Jeong KJ (2020a) Enhanced production of cellulose in Komagataeibacter xylinus by preventing insertion of IS element into cellulose synthesis gene. BioChem Eng J 156:107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107527
Hur DH, Choi WS, Kim TY, Lee SY, Park JH, Jeong J (2020b) Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose in Komagataeibacter xylinus via tuning of biosynthesis genes with synthetic RBS. J Microbiol Biotechnol 30(9):1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2006.06026
Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35(2):261–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004775229149
Ijmer J, Tran TLM, Nguyen TH (2014) Optimization of Corynebacterium glutamicum Immobilization on alginate and investigation into its storage conditions. IOSR J Comput Eng 4(7):33–38. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1304920.V1
Imai T, Sun SJ, Horikawa Y, Wada M, Sugiyama J (2014) Functional reconstitution of cellulose synthase in Escherichia coli. Biomacromol 15(11):4206–4213. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501217g
Inoue BS, Streit S, Dos Santos Schneider AL, Meier MM (2020) Bioactive bacterial cellulose membrane with prolonged release of chlorhexidine for dental medical application. Int J Biol Macromol 148:1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.036
Isopencu G, Deleanu I, Busuioc C, Oprea O, Surdu VA, Bacalum M, Stoica R, Stoica-Guzun A (2023) Bacterial cellulose-carboxymethylcellulose composite loaded with turmeric extract for antimicrobial wound dressing applications. Int J Mol Sci 24(2):1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021719
Jabbari F, Babaeipour V (2023) Bacterial cellulose as a potential biopolymer for wound care a review. Int J Polym Mater Polym B. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2023.2167080
Jacek P, Dourado F, Gama M, Bielecki S (2019a) Molecular aspects of bacterial nanocellulose biosynthesis Microb. Biotechnol 12:633–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13386
Jacek P, Ryngajłło M, Bielecki S (2019b) Structural changes of bacterial nanocellulose pellicles induced by genetic modification of Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:5339–5353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09846-4
Jacek P, Kubiak K, Ryngajłło M, Rytczak P, Paluch P, Bielecki S (2019c) Modification of bacterial nanocellulose properties through mutation of motility related genes in Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 53582. N Biotechnol 52:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2019.05.004
Jang WD, Kim TY, Kim HU, Shim WY, Ryu JY, Park JH, Lee SY (2019) Genomic and metabolic analysis of Komagataeibacter xylinus DSM 2325 producing bacterial cellulose nanofiber. Biotechnol Bioen 116(12):3372–3381. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27150
Jang EJ, Padhan B, Patel M, Pandey JK, Xu B, Patel R (2023) Antibacterial and biodegradable food packaging film from bacterial cellulose. Food Control 153:109902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109902
Jebela S, Almasi H (2016) Morphological, physical, antimicrobial and release properties of ZnO nanoparticles-loaded bacterial cellulose films. Carbohydr Polym 149:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.089
Jia Y, Zhu W, Zheng M, Huo M, Zhong C (2018) Bacterial cellulose/hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels with improved viscoelastic properties and good thermodynamic stability. Plast Rubber Compos 47:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2018.1447340
Jin HY, Lee T, Kim JR, Choi YE, Park C (2019) Improved production of bacterial cellulose from waste glycerol through investigation of inhibitory effects of crude glycerol-derived compounds by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Ind Eng Chem 75:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.017
Jipa IM, Stoica-Guzun A, Stroescu M (2012) Controlled release of sorbic acid from bacterial cellulose based mono and multilayer antimicrobial films. LWT 47(2):400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.01.039
Jozala AF, De Lencastre-Novaes LC, Lopes AM, De Carvalho Santos-Ebinuma V, Mazzola PG, Pessoa Jr A, Grotto D, Gerenutti M, Chaud MV (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(5):2063–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7243-4
Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Cathala B, Capron I (2011) New Pickering emulsions stabilized by bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 27(12):7471–7479. https://doi.org/10.1021/la200971f
Karahan AG, Kart A, Akoğlu A, Cakmakçı ML (2011) Physicochemical properties of low-fat soft cheese Turkish Beyaz made with bacterial cellulose as fat mimetic. Int J Dairy Technol 64(4):502–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00718.x
Keshk SMAS, Sameshima K (2005) Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr J Biotechnol 4:478–482. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2005.000-3087
Keshk S, Sameshima K (2006) The utilization of sugar cane molasses with/without the presence of lignosulfonate for the production of bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(2):291–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0265-6
Khan S, Islam M, Fatima A, Manan S, Khattak W, Ullah M, Yang G (2023) Potential of food and agro-industrial wastes for cost-effective bacterial cellulose production: an updated review of literature. ES Agrofor Syst 1(3):905. https://doi.org/10.30919/esfaf905
Kim Y, Ullah MW, Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Jang JH, Park JK (2019) Self-assembly of bio-cellulose nanofibrils through intermediate phase in a cell-free enzyme system. Biochem Eng J 142:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.11.017
Koo HM, Yim SW, Lee CS, Pyun YR, Kim YS (2000) Cloning, sequencing, and expression of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene from Acetobacter xylinum BRC5. Biosci Biotechnol Bioche 64(3):523–529. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.64.523
Kose R, Sunagawa N, Yoshida M, Tajima K (2013) One-step production of nanofibrillated bacterial cellulose (NFBC) from waste glycerol using Gluconacetobacter intermedius NEDO-01. Cellulose 20(6):2971–2979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0050-0
Kumar M, Kumar V, Saran S (2022) Efficient production of bacterial cellulose based composites using zein protein extracted from corn gluten meal. J Food Sci Technol 60(3):1026–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05443-y
Kuo CH, Teng HY, Lee CK (2015) Knock-out of glucose dehydrogenase gene in Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production enhancement. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 20(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-014-0316-x
Kuo CH, Huang CY, Shieh CJ, Wang HMD, Tseng CY (2019) Hydrolysis of orange peel with cellulase and pectinase to produce bacterial cellulose using Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Waste Biomass Valori 10(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0034-7
Kurosumi A, Sasaki C, Yamashita Y, Nakamura Y (2009) Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym 76(2):333–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.009
Lahiri D, Nag M, Dutta B, Dey A, Sarkar T, Pati S, Edinur HA, Abdul Kari Z, Mohd Noor NH, Ray RR (2021) Bacterial cellulose: production, characterization, and application as antimicrobial agent. Int J Mol Sci 22:12984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312984
Lee KY, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A (2014) More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol Biosci 14(1):10–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201300298
Lei C, Xie Y, Wu Y, Li Y, Li B, Pei Y, Liu S (2022) Properties and stability of water-in-water emulsions stabilized by microfibrillated bacterial cellulose. Food Hydrocoll 130:107698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107698
Li Z, Wang L, Hua J, Jia S, Zhang J, Liu H (2015) Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using Acetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr Polym 120:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.061
Li G, Wang L, Deng Y, Wei Q (2022) Research progress of the biosynthetic strains and pathways of bacterial cellulose. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 49(1):kuab071. https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuab071
Lin KW, Lin HY (2004) Quality characteristics of Chinese-style meatball containing bacterial cellulose (Nata). J Food Sci 69(3):SNQ107–SNQ111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb13378.x
Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, Li Z (2014) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol 151:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.052
Lin D, Liu Z, Shen R, Chen S, Yang X (2020) Bacterial cellulose in food industry: current research and future prospects. Int J Biol Macromol 158:1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.230
Lin X, Song Z, Jiang H, Hao Y, Hu X, Liu S, Li C (2022) Production of bacterial cellulose in the medium with yeasts pre-fermented coconut water or with addition of selected amino acids. Foods 11(22):3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223627
Liu M, Liu L, Jia S, Li S, Zou Y, Zhong C (2018a) Complete genome analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus CGMCC 2955 for elucidating bacterial cellulose biosynthesis and metabolic regulation. Sci Rep 8(1):6266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24559-w
Liu M, Li S, Xie Y, Jia S, Hou Y, Zou Y, Zhong C (2018b) Enhanced bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus via expression of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin and oxygen tension regulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(3):1155–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8680-z
Liu LP, Yang X, Zhao XJ, Zhang KY, Li WC, Xie YY, Jia SR, Zhong C (2020) A lambda red and FLP/FRT-mediated site-specific recombination system in Komagataeibacter xylinus and Its application to enhance the productivity of bacterial cellulose. ACS Synth Biol 9(11):3171–3180. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00450
Lotfy VF, Basta AH, Abdel-Monem MO, Abdel-Hamed GZ (2021) Utilization of bacteria in rotten Guava for production of bacterial cellulose from isolated and protein waste. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 2:100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100076
Lu T, Gao H, Liao B, Wu J, Zhang W, Huang J, Liu M, Huang J, Chang Z, Jin M, Yi Z, Jiang D (2020) Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on whole-genome analysis. Carbohydr Polym 232:115788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
Ma X, Yuan H, Wang H, Yu H (2021) Coproduction of bacterial cellulose and pear vinegar by fermentation of pear peel and pomace. Bioprocess Biosyst En 44(11):2231–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02599-3
Manan S, Ullah MW, Ul-Islam M, Shi Z, Gauthier M, Yang G (2022) Bacterial cellulose: molecular regulation of biosynthesis, supramolecular assembly, and tailored structural and functional properties. Prog Mater Sci 129:100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100972
Mangayil R, Rajala S, Pammo A, Sarlin E, Luo J, Santala V, Karp M, Tuukkanen S (2017) Engineering and characterization of bacterial nanocellulose films as low cost and flexible sensor material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(22):19048–19056. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04927
Mangayil R, Rissanen AJ, Pammo A, Guizelini D, Losoi P, Sarlin E, Tuukkanen S, Santala V (2021) Characterization of a novel bacterial cellulose producer for the production of eco-friendly piezoelectric-responsive films from a minimal medium containing waste carbon. Cellulose 28(2):671–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03551-6
Martins D, Estevinho B, Rocha F, Dourado F, Gama M (2020) A dry and fully dispersible bacterial cellulose formulation as a stabilizer for oil-in-water emulsions. Carbohydr Polym 230:115657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115657
Matsutani M, Ito K, Azuma Y, Ogino H, Shirai M, Yakushi T, Matsushita K (2015) Adaptive mutation related to cellulose producibility in Komagataeibacter medellinensis (Gluconacetobacter xylinus) NBRC 3288. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(17):7229–7240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6598-x
McManus John B, Deng Y, Nagachar N, Kao TH, Tien M (2016) AcsA–AcsB: the core of the cellulose synthase complex from Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC23769’. Enzyme and Microb Technol 82:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.08.015
McNamara JT, Morgan JL, Zimmer J (2015) A molecular description of cellulose biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem 84:895–921. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930
Mikkelsen D, Flanagan BM, Dykes GA, Gidley MJ (2009) Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. J Appl Microbiol 107(2):576–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x
Mira-Cuenca C, Meslier T, Roig-Sanchez S, Laromaine A, Roig A (2021) Patterning bacterial cellulose films with iron oxide nanoparticles and magnetic resonance imaging monitoring. ACS Appl Polym Mater 3(10):4959–4965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.1c00723
Molina-Ramírez C, Castro C, Zuluaga R, Gañán P (2018a) Physical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter medellinensis using food supply chain waste and agricultural by-products as alternative low-cost feedstocks. J Polym Environ 26(2):830–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-0993-6
Molina-Ramírez C, Enciso C, Torres-Taborda M, Zuluaga R, Gañán P, Rojas OJ, Castro C (2018b) Effects of alternative energy sources on bacterial cellulose characteristics produced by Komagataeibacter medellinensis. Int J Biol Macromol 117:735–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.195
Moradi M, Jacek P, Farhangfar A, Guimarães JT, Forough M (2021) The role of genetic manipulation and in situ modifications on production of bacterial nanocellulose: A review. Int J Biol Macromol 183:635–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.173
Nakai T, Sugano Y, Shoda M, Sakakibara H, Oiwa K, Tuzi S, Imai T, Sugiyama J, Takeuchi M, Yamauchi D, Mineyuki Y (2013) Formation of highly twisted ribbons in a carboxymethylcellulase gene-disrupted strain of a cellulose-producing bacterium. J Bacteriol 195:958–964. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01473-12
Ng CC, Shyu YT (2004) Development and production of cholesterol-lowering Monascus-nata complex. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20(9):875–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-0873-9
Nguyen VT, Gidley MJ, Dykes GA (2008) Potential of a nisin-containing bacterial cellulose film to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes on processed meats. Food Microbiol 25(3):471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.01.004
Nguyen HT, Ngwabebhoh FA, Saha N, Zandraa O, Saha T, Saha P (2022) Development of novel biocomposites based on the clean production of microbial cellulose from dairy waste (sour whey). J Appl Polym Sci 139(1):51433. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51433
Nowak A, Ossowicz-Rupniewska P, Rakoczy R, Konopacki M, Perużyńska M, Droździk M, Makuch E, Duchnik W, Kucharski Ł, Wenelska K, Klimowicz A (2021) Bacterial cellulose membrane containing Epilobium angustifolium L. Extract as a promising material for the topical delivery of antioxidants to the skin. Int J Mol Sci 22(12):6269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126269
Numata Y, Mazzarino L, Borsali R (2015) A slow-release system of bacterial cellulose gel and nanoparticles for hydrophobic active ingredients. Int J Pharm 486(1–2):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.068
Ogrizek L, Lamovšek J, Čuš F, Leskovšek M, Gorjanc M (2021) Properties of bacterial cellulose produced using white and red grape bagasse as a nutrient source. Processes 9(7):1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071088
Okiyama A, Motoki M, Yamanaka S (1992) Bacterial cellulose II. Processing of the gelatinous cellulose for food materials. Food Hydrocoll 6(5):479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(09)80033-7
Okiyama A, Motoki M, Yamanaka S (1993) Bacterial cellulose IV. Application to Processed Foods Food Hydrocoll 6(6):503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(09)80074-X
Omadjela O, Narahari A, Strumillo J, Mélida H, Mazur O, Bulone V, Zimmer J (2013) BcsA and BcsB form the catalytically active core of bacterial cellulose synthase sufficient for in vitro cellulose synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(44):17856–17861. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314063110
Osama S, Hussain AA, Roushdy MM, Shehabeldine AM, Hasanin MS (2022) Preliminary study for cellulolytic microorganism isolation from different resources, characterization and identification: green convert of microcrystalline cellulose to nanofibers. Egypt J Chem 65(131):1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2022.135890.5986
Pacheco G, Nogueira CR, Meneguin AB, Trovatti E, Silva MCC, Machado RTA, Ribeiro SJL, Da Silva Filho EC, Barud DS, H, (2017) Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by cashew tree residues as alternative carbon source. Ind Crops Prod 107:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.026
Padmanabhan SK, Lionetto F, Nisi R, Stoppa M, Licciulli A (2022) Sustainable production of stiff and crystalline bacterial cellulose from orange peel extract. Sustainability 14(4):2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042247
Perugini P, Bleve M, Redondi R, Cortinovis F, Colpani A (2020) In vivo evaluation of the effectiveness of biocellulose facial masks as active delivery systems to skin. J Cosmet Dermatol 19(3):725–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13051
Phan HN, Bui HM, Vu NK, Trinh HTK (2023) Fabrication of fabric-like bacterial cellulose/collagen membranes by applying textile padding method for wound dressing applications. Cellulose 30(4):2289–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-05003-9
Purwadaria T, Gunawan L, Gunawan A (2010) The production of nata colored by monascus purpureus J1 pigments as functional food. Microbiol Indones 4(1):2. https://doi.org/10.5454/mi.4.1.2
Qiao N, Fan X, Zhang X, Shi Y, Wang L, Yu D (2019) Soybean oil refinery effluent treatment and its utilization for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Food Hydrocoll 97:105185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105185
Qin X, Li B, Li L, Wang F, Jia S, Xie Y, Zhong C (2023) Cinnamon essential oil pickering emulsions: stabilization by bacterial cellulose nanofibrils and applications for active packaging films. Food Biosci 56:103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103258
Qiu Y, Qiu L, Cui J, Wei Q (2016) Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-vaccarin membranes for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C 59:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.016
Rahmadiawan D, Abral H, Ilham MK, Puspitasari P, Nabawi RA, Shi SC, Sugiarti E, Muslimin AN, Chandra D, Ilyas RA, Zainul R (2023a) Enhanced UV blocking, tensile and thermal properties of bendable TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose powder-based films immersed in PVA/Uncaria gambir/ZnO solution. J Mater Res Technol J 26:5566–5575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.267
Rahmadiawan D, Abral H, Kotodeli RA, Sugiarti E, Muslimin AN, Admi RI, Arafat A, Kim HJ, Sapuan SM, Kosasih EA (2023b) A novel highly conductive, transparent, and strong pure-cellulose film from TEMPO-Oxidized bacterial cellulose by increasing sonication power. Polymers 15(3):643. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030643
Raiszadeh-Jahromi Y, Rezazadeh-Bari M, Almasi H, Amiri S (2020) Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 in a low-cost medium using optimal combined design. J Food Sci Technol 57(7):2524–2533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04289-6
Rani MU, Rastogi NK, Appaiah KA (2011) Statistical optimization of medium composition for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk extract–an agro-industry waste. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21(7):739–745. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1012.12026
Rasouli Y, Moradi M, Tajik H, Molaei R (2021) Fabrication of anti-Listeria film based on bacterial cellulose and Lactobacillus sakei-derived bioactive metabolites; application in meat packaging. Food Biosci 42:101218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101218
Revin V, Liyaskina E, Nazarkina M, Bogatyreva A, Shchankin M (2018) Cost-effective production of bacterial cellulose using acidic food industry by-products. Braz J Microbiol 49:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.012
Rezazadeh M, Babaeipour V, Motamedian E (2020) Reconstruction, verification and in-silico analysis of a genome-scale metabolic model of bacterial cellulose producing Komagataeibacter xylinus. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 43(6):1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02299-4
Rollini M, Musatti A, Cavicchioli D, Bussini D, Farris S, Rovera C, Romano D, De Benedetti S, Barbiroli A (2020) From cheese whey permeate to Sakacin-A/bacterial cellulose nanocrystal conjugates for antimicrobial food packaging applications: a circular economy case study. Sci Rep 10(1):21358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78430-y
Römling U (2002) Molecular biology of cellulose production in bacteria. Res Microbiol 153(4):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-2508(02)01316-5
Römling U, Galperin MY (2015) Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions’. Trends Microbiol 23:545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005
Rovera C, Fiori F, Trabattoni S, Romano D, Farris S (2020) Enzymatic hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose for the production of nanocrystals for the food packaging industry. Nanomater 10(4):735
Sajadi E, Fatemi SS, Babaeipour V, Deldar AA, Yakhchali B, Anvar MS (2019) Increased cellulose production by heterologous expression of bcsA and B genes from Gluconacetobacter xylinus in E. coli Nissle 1917. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 12:2023–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-019-02197-4
Saleh AK, El-Gendi H, Ray JB, Taha TH (2021) A low-cost effective media from starch kitchen waste for bacterial cellulose production and its application as simultaneous absorbance for methylene blue dye removal. Biomass Convers Biorefin 3:12437–12449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01973-1
Salidkul N, Mongkolthanaruk W, Faungnawakij K, Pinitsoontorn S (2021) Hard magnetic membrane based on bacterial cellulose – Barium ferrite nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 264:118016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118016
Santoso SP, Lin SP, Wang TY, Ting Y, Hsieh CW, Yu RC, Angkawijaya AE, Soetaredjo FE, Hsu HY, Cheng KC (2021) Atmospheric cold plasma-assisted pineapple peel waste hydrolysate detoxification for the production of bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 175:526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.169
Sar T, Yesilcimen Akbas M (2022) Potential use of olive oil mill wastewater for bacterial cellulose production. Bioengineered 13(3):7659–7669. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2050492
Shafipour Yordshahi A, Moradi M, Tajik H, Molaei R (2020) Design and preparation of antimicrobial meat wrapping nanopaper with bacterial cellulose and postbiotics of lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 321:108561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108561
Sharifah Fathiyah SM, Shahril M, Junaidi Z (2021) Oil palm frond juice and coconut water as alternative fermentation substrate for bacterial cellulose production. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1092:012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1092/1/012055
Silva AGSF, Carvalho M, de Carvalho TB, Gama M, Poças F, Teixeira P (2023) Antimicrobial activity of in-situ bacterial nanocellulose-zinc oxide composites for food packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life 40:101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101201
Singh R, Mathur A, Goswami N, Mathur G (2016) Effect of carbon sources on physicochemical properties of bacterial cellulose produced from Gluconacetobacter xylinus MTCC 7795. E-Polymers 16(4):331–336. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2016-0047
Singh A, Walker KT, Ledesma-Amaro R, Ellis T (2020) Engineering bacterial cellulose by synthetic biology. Int J Mol Sci 21(23):9185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239185
Singhania RR, Patel AK, Tsai ML, Chen CW, Dong CD (2021) Genetic modification for enhancing bacterial cellulose production and its applications. Bioengineered 12(1):6793–6807. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1968989
Singhsa P, Narain R, Manuspiya H (2018) Physical structure variations of bacterial cellulose produced by different Komagataeibacter xylinus strains and carbon sources in static and agitated conditions. Cellulose 25(3):1571–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1699-1
Skiba EA, Budaeva VV, Ovchinnikova EV, Gladysheva EK, Kashcheyeva EI, Pavlov IN, Sakovich GV (2020) A technology for pilot production of bacterial cellulose from oat hulls. Chem Eng J 383:123128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123128
Soemphol W, Hongsachart P, Tanamool V (2018) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from agricultural by-product by Gluconacetobacter strains. Mater Today Proc 5(5):11159–11168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.036
Souza SS, Castro J, Porto LM (2018) Modeling the core metabolism of komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769 to evaluate nanocellulose biosynthesis. Braz J Chem Eng 35:869–886. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632
Souza EF, Furtado MR, Carvalho CWP, Freitas-Silva O, Gottschalk LMF (2020) Production and characterization of Gluconacetobacter xylinus bacterial cellulose using cashew apple juice and soybean molasses. Int J Biol Macromol 146:285–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180
Souza K, Trindade N, Amorim J, Nascimento H, Costa A, Henrique M, Caetano V, Sarubbo L, Vinhas G (2021) Kinetic study of a bacterial cellulose production by komagataeibacter rhaeticus using coffee grounds and sugarcane molasses. Mater Res 24:e20200454. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2020-0454
Sriplai N, Mangayil R, Pammo A, Santala V, Tuukkanen S, Pinitsoontorn S (2020) Enhancing piezoelectric properties of bacterial cellulose films by incorporation of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 231:115730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115730
Sunagawa N, Fujiwara T, Yoda T, Kawano S, Satoh Y, Yao M, Tajima K, Dairi T (2013) Cellulose complementing factor (Ccp) is a new member of the cellulose synthase complex (terminal complex) in Acetobacter xylinum. J Biosci Bioeng 115:607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.12.021
Sundaram MK, Nehru G, Tadi SRR, Katsuno N, Nishizu T, Sivaprakasam S (2023) Bacterial cellulose production by komagataeibacter hansenii utilizing agro-industrial residues and its application in coffee milk stabilization. Biomass Convers Biorefin 13(9):7971–7981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01867-2
Suvarna V, Nair A, Mallya R, Khan T, Omri A (2022) Antimicrobial nanomaterials for food packaging. Antibiotics 11(6):729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060729
Techasamran M, Charoensuk S, Than-ardna B, Sain M, Manuspiya H (2023) Fabrication of a colorimetric film based on bacterial cellulose/metal coordination framework composite for monitoring food spoilage gas. Int J Biol Macromol 253:127038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127038
Teh MY, Ooi KH, Teo SXD, Bin Mansoor ME, Lim WZS, Tan MH (2019) An expanded synthetic biology toolkit for gene expression control in Acetobacteraceae. ACS Synth Biol 8(4):708–723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.8b00168
Thiele I, Palsson B (2010) A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat Protoc 5(1):93–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.203
Tomé LC, Brandão L, Mendes A, Silvestre A, Neto C, Gandini A, Freire C, Marrucho I (2010) Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes with tailored surface and barrier properties. Cellulose 17:1203–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9457-z
Tseng YS, Patel AK, Chen CW, Dong CD, Singhania RR (2023) Improved production of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter europaeus employing fruit extract as carbon source. J Food Sci Technol 60(3):1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05451-y
Tsouko E, Kourmentza C, Ladakis D, Kopsahelis N, Mandala I, Papanikolaou S, Paloukis F, Alves V, Koutinas A (2015) Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int J Mol Sci 16(7):14832–14849
Tsouko E, Maina S, Ladakis D, Kookos IK, Koutinas A (2020) Integrated biorefinery development for the extraction of value-added components and bacterial cellulose production from orange peel waste streams. Renew Energy 160:944–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.108
Ul-Islam M, Ha JH, Khan T, Park JK (2013) Effects of glucuronic acid oligomers on the production, structure and properties of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.060
Ullah MW, Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Kim Y, Park JK (2015) Innovative production of bio-cellulose using a cell-free system derived from a single cell line. Carbohydr Polym 132:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.037
Ullah MW, Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Kim Y, Park JK (2016a) Structural and physico-mechanical characterization of bio-cellulose produced by a cell-free system. Carbohydr Polym 136:908–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.010
Ullah MW, Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Kim Y, Jang JH, Park JK (2016b) In situ synthesis of a bio-cellulose/titanium dioxide nanocomposite by using a cell-free system. RSC Adv 6(27):22424–22435. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA26704H
Ullah MW, Khattak WA, Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Park JK (2016c) Metabolic engineering of synthetic cell-free systems: strategies and applications. Biochem Eng J 105:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.10.023
Ullah MW, Ul Islam M, Khan S, Shah N, Park JK (2017) Recent advancements in bioreactions of cellular and cell-free systems: a study of bacterial cellulose as a model. Korean J Chem Eng 34(6):1591–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0121-2
Ullah MW, Manan S, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Khan KA, Liu J, Yang G, Sun J (2023a) Cell-free systems for biosynthesis: towards a sustainable and economical approach. Green Chem 25(13):4912–4940. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC00985H
Ullah MW, Subhan F, Manan S, Ul-Islam M, Alabbosh KF, Kamal T, Khan KA, Liu J, Yang G, Sun J (2023b) Impact of structural features of acetylated bacterial cellulose on cell-scaffold and scaffold-blood interactions in vitro. Cellulose 30(16):10373–10399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05518-9
Viana RM, Sá NMSM, Barros MO, Borges MDF, Azeredo HMC (2018) Nanofibrillated bacterial cellulose and pectin edible films added with fruit purees. Carbohydr Polym 196:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.017
Volova TG, Shumilova AA, Shidlovskiy IP, Nikolaeva ED, Sukovatiy AG, Vasiliev AD, Shishatskaya EI (2018) Antibacterial properties of films of cellulose composites with silver nanoparticles and antibiotics. Polym Test 65:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.10.023
Wan YZ, Hong L, Jia SR, Huan Y, Zhu Y, Wang YL, Jiang HJ (2006) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66(11):1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.027
Wang J, Tavakoli J, Tang Y (2019) Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods - A review. Carbohydr Polym 219:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.008
Wang Q, Zhong S, Zheng Z, Lei H, Li S, Yu W (2023) Bacterial cellulose based three-dimensional porous composites with remarkable amphiphobic monolith properties for passive daytime radiative cooling. Mater Lett 352:135220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2023.135220
Weihua Q, Hong R, Qianhui W (2022) Production of bacterial cellulose from enzymatic hydrolysate of kitchen waste by fermentation with kombucha. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02903-5
Wen Y, Liu J, Jiang L, Zhu Z, He S, He S, Shao W (2021) Development of intelligent/active food packaging film based on TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose containing thymol and anthocyanin-rich purple potato extract for shelf life extension of shrimp. Food Packag Shelf Life 29:100709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100709
Wu SC, Lia YK (2008) Application of bacterial cellulose pellets in enzyme immobilization. J Mol Catal B Enzym 54(3):103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.12.021
Wu X, Yao H, Cao L, Zheng Z, Chen X, Zhang M, Wei Z, Cheng J, Jiang S, Pan L, Li X (2017) Improving acetic acid production by over-expressing PQQ-ADH in Acetobacter pasteurianus. Front Microbiol 8:1713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01713
Wu M, Chen W, Hu J, Tian D, Shen F, Zeng Y, Yang G, Zhang Y, Deng S (2019) Valorizing kitchen waste through bacterial cellulose production towards a more sustainable biorefinery. Sci Total Environ 695:133898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133898
Xu Y, Liu X, Jiang Q, Yu D, Xu Y, Wang B, Xia W (2021) Development and properties of bacterial cellulose, curcumin, and chitosan composite biodegradable films for active packaging materials. Carbohydr Polym 260:117778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117778
Yang F, Cao Z, Li C, Chen L, Wu G, Zhou X, Hong FF (2023) A recombinant strain of Komagataeibacter xylinus ATCC 23770 for production of bacterial cellulose from mannose-rich resources. N Biotechnol 76:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.05.002
Yanti NA, Ahmad SW, Ramadhan LOAN, Jamili M, Walhidayah T, Mamangkey J (2021) Properties and application of edible modified bacterial cellulose film based sago liquid waste as food packaging. Polym 13(20):3570
Ye J, Zheng S, Zhang Z, Yang F, Ma K, Feng Y, Zheng J, Mao D, Yang X (2019) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 23767 using tobacco waste extract as culture medium. Bioresour Technol 274:518–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.028
Yim SM, Song JE, Kim HR (2017) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose fabrics by nitrogen sources of tea and carbon sources of sugar. Process Biochem 59:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.001
Yu Q, Yang L, Wang S, Zhang L, Sun D (2023) Citric acid cross-linked regenerated bacterial cellulose as biodegradable film for food packaging. Cellulose 30(16):10273–10284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05500-5
Zahan KA, Azizul NM, Mustapha M, Tong WY, Abdul Rahman MS, Sahuri IS (2020) Application of bacterial cellulose film as a biodegradable and antimicrobial packaging material. Mater Today 31:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.201
Zakaria JNM (2012) Optimization of bacterial cellulose production from pineapple waste: effect of temperature, pH and concentration. Ital Assoc Chem Engg. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2078094
Zaki ZAA, Francis F, Zaini NAM (2022) Bacterial cellulose production from oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) hydrolysate using Komagataeibacter xylinus strain. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02950-y
Zhai X, Lin D, Liu D, Yang X (2018) Emulsions stabilized by nanofibers from bacterial cellulose: new potential food-grade pickering emulsions. Int Food Res J 103:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.030
Zhai X, Lin D, Li W, Yang X (2020) Improved characterization of nanofibers from bacterial cellulose and its potential application in fresh-cut apples. Int J Biol Macromol 149:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.230
Zhang H, Xu X, Chen X, Yuan F, Sun B, Xu Y, Yang J, Sun D (2017) Complete genome sequence of the cellulose-producing strain Komagataeibacter nataicola RZS01. Sci Rep 7(1):4431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04589-6
Zhang X, Kang S, Adstedt K, Kim M, Xiong R, Yu J, Chen X, Zhao X, Ye C, Tsukruk VV (2022) Uniformly aligned flexible magnetic films from bacterial nanocelluloses for fast actuating optical materials. Nat Commun 13(1):5804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33615-z
Zhao J, Guo X, Yang J, Xie Y, Zheng Y (2023) In situ polymerization of methylene blue on bacterial cellulose for photodynamic/photoelectricity synergistic inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15(37):43591–43606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09449
Zhong C (2020) Industrial-scale production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Front Bioeng Biotechno 8:605374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.605374
Zhu H, Jia S, Yang H, Tang W, Jia Y, Tan Z (2010) Characterization of bacteriostatic sausage casing: a composite of bacterial cellulose embedded with ɛ-polylysine. Food Sci Biotechnol 19(6):1479–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0211-y
Zikmanis P, Kolesovs S, Ruklisha M, Semjonovs P (2021) Production of bacterial cellulose from glycerol: the current state and perspectives. Bioresour Bioprocess 8(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00468-1
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India. Parts of the Fig. 2 were drawn by using pictures from Servier Medical Art. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).”
Funding
This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial research- Indian Institute of integrative medicine (IIIM) with article submission number- (CSIR-IIIM/IPR/00597) and DBT-JRF fellowship (DBT/2018/IIIM/1020) to Manoj Kumar, grant by the Department of Biotechnology Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MK: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. VK: review, Validation and Visualization, SS: Conceptualization, review and editing, Writing—original draft and Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, M., Kumar, V. & Saran, S. Current research and advances in the molecular aspect of bacterial cellulose synthesis with special emphasis on the production of bacterial cellulose from waste and its food applications. Cellulose 31, 3323–3351 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05842-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05842-8