European Oral Research

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Original Research


DOI :10.17096/jiufd.30632   IUP :10.17096/jiufd.30632    Full Text (PDF)

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN

Fidan Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Ergül Ertürk

AbstractPurpose: This in vitro study compared the effect of five different techniques on the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain.

Materials and Methods: 100 feldspathic porcelain disk samples mounted in acrylic resin blocks were divided into five groups (n=20) according to type of surface treatment: I, hydrofluoric acid (HFA); II, Deglazed surface porcelain treated with Neodymium:yttrium- aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser; III, Deglazed porcelain surface treated with Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser; IV, Glazed porcelain surface treated with Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, V; Glazed porcelain surface treated with Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser. The surface roughness of porcelain was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer. For each porcelain sample, two readings were taken across the sample, before porcelain surface treatment (T1) and after porcelain surface treatment (T2). The roughness parameter analyzed was the average roughness (Ra). Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: Mean Ra values for each group were as follows: I, 12.64±073; II, 11.91±0.74; III, 11.76±0.59; IV, 3.82 ±0.65; V, 2.77±0.57. For all porcelain groups, the lowest Ra values were observed in Group V. The highest Ra values were observed for Group I, with a significant difference with the other groups. Kolmogorov–Smirnov showed significant differences among groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Surface treatment of porcelain with HFA resulted in significantly higher Ra than laser groups. Both Er:YAG laser or Nd:YAG laser on the deglaze porcelain surface can be recommended as viable treatment alternatives to acid etching.

Keywords: Porcelain roughness, hydrofluoric acid, Er-YAG laser;, Nd:YAG laser;, surface treatment
DOI :10.17096/jiufd.30632   IUP :10.17096/jiufd.30632    Full Text (PDF)

Farklı Yüzey Tedavi Tekniklerinin Feldspatik Porselenlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerindeki Etkileri

Fidan Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Ergül Ertürk

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmada, beş farklı tekniğin feldspatik porselenin yüzey pürüzlülüğüne etkisinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Akrilik rezin bloklara gömülen 100 feldspatik porselen disk işlem tipine göre beş gruba (n=20) ayrıldı. (I, Hidroflorik asit (HFA); II, Neodymium:yttrium- aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) lazer uygulanan deglaze porselen yüzey; III, Erbium:yttrium- aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lazer uygulanan deglaze porselen yüzey;IV, Nd:YAG lazer uygulanan glaze porselen yüzey; Er:YAG lazer uygulanan glaze porselen yüzey(. Porselen yüzeylerin pürüzlülüğü temassız optik profilometer ile ölçüldü. Her bir porselen örnek, porselen yüzey tedavisinden önce (T1) ve porselen yüzey tedavisinden sonra (T2) iki kez değerlendirildi. Pürüzlülük parametre analizi ortalama pürüzlülük olarak belirlendi (Ra). İstatiksel analiz Kolmogorov–Smirnov ve Wilcoxon işaretli sıralar testi kullanarak yapıldı.

Bulgular: Her bir grubun ortalama Ra değeri sırası ile :

I, 12.64±073; II, 11.91±0.74; III, 11.76±0.59; IV, 3.82 ±0.65; V, 2.77±0.57 olarak saptandı. Tüm porselen grupları içinde en düşük Ra Grup V de gözlendi. Diğer gruplarla istatiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık olmakla beraber birlikte en yüksek Ra, Grup I’de gözlendi. Kolmogorov–Smirnov testinde gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu saptandı (p<0.001).

Sonuç: HFA ile yapılan porselen yüzey tedavilerinde diğer lazer gruplardan istatiksel olarak daha yüksek Ra ile sonuçlandı. Deglaze porselen yüzeyinde hem Er:YAG hemde Nd:YAG lazer uygulaması asitleme tedavisine alternatif tedavi olarak tavsiye edilebilir.

Keywords: Porselen yüzeyi, hidroflorik asit, Er-YAG lazer, Nd:YAG lazer, yüzey işlemi

PDF View

References

  • Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC. Bonding of restorative resins to dentine: Status of dentine adhesives and impact on cavity design and filling techniques. Int Dent J 1988;38(2):97-104. google scholar
  • Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent 2004;32(2):91-99. google scholar
  • Ozcan M, Vallittu PK, Peltomaki T, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(2):220-227. google scholar
  • Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain--bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94(3):245-252. google scholar
  • Harari D, Shapira-Davis S, Gillis I, Roman I, Redlich M. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(5):551-554. google scholar
  • Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109(4):420-430. google scholar
  • Kim JT, Cho SA. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(2):101-106. google scholar
  • Li R, Ren Y, Han J. [Effects of pulsed nd:Yag laser irradiation on shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000;18(6):377-379. google scholar
  • de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent J 2007;18(4):314-319. google scholar
  • Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19(8):725-731. google scholar
  • Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(5):479-488. google scholar
  • Bottino MC, Ozcan M, Coelho PG, Valandro LF, Bressiani JC, Bressiani AH. Micro-morphological changes prior to adhesive bonding: High-alumina and glassy-matrix ceramics. Braz Oral Res 2008;22(2):158-163. google scholar
  • Kukiattrakoon B, Thammasitboon K. Optimal acidulated phosphate fluoride gel etching time for surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: On shear bond strength to resin composite. Eur J Dent 2012;6(1):63-69. google scholar
  • Walsh LJ, Abood D, Brockhurst PJ. Bonding of resin composite to carbon dioxide laser-modified human enamel. Dent Mater 1994;10(3):162-166. google scholar
  • da Silva Ferreira S, Hanashiro FS, de Souza-Zaroni WC, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influence of aluminum oxide sandblasting associated with nd:Yag or er:Yag lasers on shear bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic to resin cements. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28(4):471-475. google scholar
  • Kara HB, Dilber E, Koc O, Ozturk AN, Bulbul M. Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of ips empress 2 ceramic. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27(2):267-272. google scholar
  • Kara HB, Ozturk AN, Aykent F, Koc O, Ozturk B. The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond strength in low fusing ceramics. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26(5):599-604. google scholar
  • Poosti M, Jahanbin A, Mahdavi P, Mehrnoush S. Porcelain conditioning with ND:YAG and ER:YAG laser for bracket bonding in orthodontics. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27(2):321-324. google scholar
  • Yassaei S, Moradi F, Aghili H, Kamran MH. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with ER:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2013;14(1):e82-87. google scholar
  • Subasi MG, Inan O. Evaluation of the topographical surface changes and roughness of zirconia after different surface treatments. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27(4):735-742. google scholar
  • Gökçe B. Effects of Er: YAG laser irradiation on dental hard tissues and all-ceramic materials: SEM evaluation. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/scanning- electronmicroscopy/ effects-of-laser-irradiation-on-dental-hard-tissues- and-dental-materials- sem-evaluation-at 12 September, 2014. google scholar
  • Akova T, Yoldas O, Toroglu MS, Uysal H. Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128(5):630-637. google scholar
  • Usumez S, Orhan M, Usumez A. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er,Cr:YSGG hydrokinetic laser system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(6):649-656. google scholar
  • Barbosa VL, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O, Keith O. Direct bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107(2):159-164. google scholar
  • Barcelo Santana HF, Hernandez Medina R, Acosta Torres SL, Sanchez Herrera LM, Fernandez Pedrero AJ, Ortiz Gonzalez R. Evaluation of bond strength of metal brackets by a resin to ceramic surfaces. J Clin Dent 2006;17(1):5-9. google scholar
  • Eustaquio R, Garner LD, Moore BK. Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94(5):421-425. google scholar
  • Kocadereli I, Canay S, Akca K. Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119(6):617-620. google scholar
  • Sant'Anna EF, Monnerat ME, Chevitarese O, Stuani MB. Bonding brackets to porcelain--in vitro study. Braz Dent J 2002;13(3):191-196. google scholar
  • Goncalves PR, Moraes RR, Costa AR, Correr AB, Nouer PR, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effect of etching time and light source on the bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J 2011;22(3):245-248. google scholar
  • Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod 2009;31(4):402-406. google scholar
  • Al-Nawas B GK, Götz H, Heinrich G, Rippin TG, Stender TE, Duschner H, Wagner W. Validation of three-dimensional surface characterizing methods: scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scanning 2001;23(4):227-231. google scholar
  • Heurich E, Beyer M, Jandt KD, Reichert J, Herold V, Schnabelrauch M, Sigusch BW. Quantification of dental erosion--a comparison of stylus profilometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Dent Mater 2010;26(4):326-336. google scholar
  • Rodriguez JM, Bartlett DW. A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements of wear in a laboratory investigation. Dent Mater 2010;26(10):e221-225. google scholar
  • Passos VF, Melo MA, Vasconcellos AA, Rodrigues LK, Santiago SL. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microsc Res Tech 2013;76(2):178-183. google scholar
  • Brauchli LM, Baumgartner EM, Ball J, Wichelhaus A. Roughness of enamel surfaces after different bonding and debonding procedures. An in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72(1):61-67. google scholar
  • Fichtel T, Crha M, Langerova E, Biberauer G, Vla in M. Observations on the effects of scaling and polishing methods on enamel. J Vet Dent 2008;25(4):231-235. google scholar
  • Lee SY, Lai YL, Morgano SM. Effects of ultrasonic scaling and periodontal curettage on surface roughness of porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73(3):227-232. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, F., & Ertürk, E. (2016). THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN. European Oral Research, 50(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632


AMA

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu F, Ertürk E. THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN. European Oral Research. 2016;50(3):1-7. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632


ABNT

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, F.; Ertürk, E. THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 50, n. 3, p. 1-7, 2016.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Fidan, and Ergül Ertürk. 2016. “THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN.” European Oral Research 50, no. 3: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632


Chicago: Humanities Style

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Fidan, and Ergül Ertürk. “THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN.” European Oral Research 50, no. 3 (May. 2024): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632


Harvard: Australian Style

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, F & Ertürk, E 2016, 'THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN', European Oral Research, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1-7, viewed 8 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, F. and Ertürk, E. (2016) ‘THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN’, European Oral Research, 50(3), pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632 (8 May. 2024).


MLA

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Fidan, and Ergül Ertürk. “THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN.” European Oral Research, vol. 50, no. 3, 2016, pp. 1-7. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632


Vancouver

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu F, Ertürk E. THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN. European Oral Research [Internet]. 8 May. 2024 [cited 8 May. 2024];50(3):1-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632 doi: 10.17096/jiufd.30632


ISNAD

Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Fidan - Ertürk, Ergül. “THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN”. European Oral Research 50/3 (May. 2024): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.30632



TIMELINE


Submitted25.12.2015
Accepted06.04.2016
Published Online03.10.2016

SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.